Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale632
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale634
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale636
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale638
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale640
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale642
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale644
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale646
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale648
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale650
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale652
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale654
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale656
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale658
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale660
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale662
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale664
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale666
werden und nicht zu viele einseitige Polemiken hervorzurufen. Ich würde
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale670
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale672
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale674
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale676
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale678
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale680
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale682
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale684
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale686
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale688
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale690
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale692
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale694
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale696
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale698
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale700
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale702
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale704
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale706
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale708
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale710
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale712
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale714
Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 693
having to consult the Holy See, every Bishop, is free to apply the penal
measures of canon law to offending priests, and has never been impeded
under canon law from reporting cases of abuse to the civil authorities.
The question of cooperation with the civil authorities was clarified by the
then Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy, Cardinal Darı́o Castrillón
Hoyos, in his meeting with the Irish Bishops at Rosses Point, County Sligo
(Ireland), on 12 November 1998, when he unequivocally stated: "I also wish
to say with great clarity that the Church, especially through its Pastors
(Bishops), should not in any way put an obstacle in the legitimate path of civil
justice, when such is initiated by those who have such rights, while at the same
time, she should move forward with her own canonical procedures, in truth,
justice and charity towards all." In this way, the Cardinal drew attention to
the fact that canon law and civil law, while being two distinct systems, with
distinct areas of application and competence, are not in competition and can
operate in parallel. This basic principle has been repeated on several occa-
sions in the Holy See's subsequent interventions on this matter, including the
Pope's Letter to the Catholics of Ireland (No. 11) and the Circular Letter issued
by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith on 3 May 2011, which,
in addition, explicitly addresses the question of reporting requirements
(see below).
It should be noted that, at the time, not only the Church in Ireland but
also the State was engaged in efforts to improve its response to the problem
of child sexual abuse. In 1996, apart from cases relating to misprision of
felony, the reporting of incidents of child sexual abuse to either the relevant
health board or the Irish police was not mandatory. Furthermore, misprision
of felony was removed from the Irish Statute Book by the Criminal Justice
Act of 1997.
The Holy See is aware that public consultations about placing a legal
obligation on designated professionals to report known or suspected abuse
to the authorities took place in Ireland in 1996 following the publication of
the document Putting Children First at the request of the then Minister
of State at the Departments of Health, Education and Justice, Mr Austin
Currie. At that time, while some Church-related bodies, such as the above-
mentioned Advisory Committee, were broadly favourable to the introduction
of mandatory reporting, other Church-related bodies and professional groups
in civil society, including representatives of the medical, social service, edu-
cational and legal areas, expressed reservations or in some cases were opposed