Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale686

but also the existing norms of canon law (particularly canons 1717-1719),2

despite their universal applicability and despite the Congregation's observa-

tion that the procedures established by the Code of Canon Law were to be

observed. The Cloyne Report states that the Diocese did not carry out proper

canonical investigations; in the five cases where an investigation was ordered

under canon 1717, the investigation was commenced but never completed

(1.49-1.50).

The Cloyne Report notes that prior to 2005 the Diocese of Cloyne did not

refer any case to the Holy See. Subsequently, on 1 December 2005, one case

was referred to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (21.40), which

gave its decision on 17 April 2007 (21.62). Following risk assessment of the

priests involved, four additional cases were referred to the Congregation for

the Doctrine of the Faith in 2009 (4.25).

The Framework Document

Some clarifications about the Framework Document should help to dispel a

number of common misconceptions.

When a number of high-profile cases of child sexual abuse perpetrated

by clerics came to light in Ireland during the 1990s, the Irish Bishops'

Conference established an Advisory Committee in 1994 to discuss how such

2 Can. 1717 § 1. Whenever an ordinary has knowledge, which at least seems true, of a

delict, he is carefully to inquire personally or through another suitable person about the facts,

circumstances, and imputability, unless such an inquiry seems entirely superfluous.

§ 2. Care must be taken so that the good name of anyone is not endangered from this

investigation.

§ 3. The person who conducts the investigation has the same powers and obligations as an

auditor in the process; the same person cannot act as a judge in the matter if a judicial process is

initiated later.

Can. 1718 § 1. When it seems that sufficient evidence has been collected, the ordinary is to

decide:

1. whether a process to inflict or declare a penalty can be initiated; 2. whether, attentive to

can. 1341, this is expedient; 3. whether a judicial process must be used or, unless the law forbids

it, whether the matter must proceed by way of extrajudicial decree.

§ 2. The ordinary is to revoke or change the decree mentioned in §1 whenever new evidence

indicates to him that another decision is necessary.

§ 3. In issuing the decrees mentioned in §§ 1 and 2, the ordinary is to hear two judges or other

experts of the law if he considers it prudent.

§ 4. Before he makes a decision according to the norm of §1 and in order to avoid useless

trials, the ordinary is to examine carefully whether it is expedient for him or the investigator,

with the consent of the parties, to resolve equitably the question of damages.

Can. 1719 The acts of the investigation, the decrees of the ordinary which initiated and

concluded the investigation, and everything which preceded the investigation are to be kept in

the secret archive of the curia if they are not necessary for the penal process.