Theophilus to Autolycus.

 Book I. Chapter I.—Autolycus an Idolater and Scorner of Christians.

 Chapter II.—That the Eyes of the Soul Must Be Purged Ere God Can Be Seen.

 Chapter III.—Nature of God.

 Chapter IV.—Attributes of God.

 Chapter V.—The Invisible God Perceived Through His Works.

 Chapter VI.—God is Known by His Works.

 Chapter VII.—We Shall See God When We Put on Immortality.

 Chapter VIII.—Faith Required in All Matters.

 Chapter IX.—Immoralities of the Gods.

 Chapter X.—Absurdities of Idolatry.

 Chapter XI.—The King to Be Honoured, God to Be Worshipped.

 Chapter XII.—Meaning of the Name Christian.

 Chapter XIII.—The Resurrection Proved by Examples.

 Chapter XIV.—Theophilus an Example of Conversion.

 Book II. Chapter I.—Occasion of Writing This Book.

 Chapter II.—The Gods are Despised When They are Made But Become Valuable When Bought.

 Chapter III.—What Has Become of the Gods?

 Chapter IV.—Absurd Opinions of the Philosophers Concerning God.

 Chapter V.—Opinions of Homer and Hesiod Concerning the Gods.

 Chapter VI.—Hesiod on the Origin of the World.

 Chapter VII.—Fabulous Heathen Genealogies.

 Chapter VIII.— Opinions Concerning Providence.

 Chapter IX.—The Prophets Inspired by the Holy Ghost.

 Chapter X.—The World Created by God Through the Word.

 Chapter XI.—The Six Days’ Work Described.

 Chapter XII.—The Glory of the Six Days’ Work.

 Chapter XIII.—Remarks on the Creation of the World.

 Chapter XIV.—The World Compared to the Sea.

 Chapter XV.—Of the Fourth Day.

 Chapter XVI.—Of the Fifth Day.

 Chapter XVII.—Of the Sixth Day.

 Chapter XVIII.—The Creation of Man.

 Chapter XIX.—Man is Placed in Paradise.

 Chapter XX.—The Scriptural Account of Paradise.

 Chapter XXI.—Of the Fall of Man.

 Chapter XXII.—Why God is Said to Have Walked.

 Chapter XXIII.—The Truth of the Account in Genesis.

 Chapter XXIV.—The Beauty of Paradise.

 Chapter XXV.—God Was Justified in Forbidding Man to Eat of the Tree of Knowledge.

 Chapter XXVI.—God’s Goodness in Expelling Man from Paradise.

 Chapter XXVII.—The Nature of Man.

 Chapter XXVIII.—Why Eve Was Formed of Adam’s Rib.

 Chapter XXIX.—Cain’s Crime.

 Chapter XXX.—Cain’s Family and Their Inventions.

 Chapter XXXI.—The History After the Flood.

 Chapter XXXII.—How the Human Race Was Dispersed.

 Chapter XXXIII.—Profane History Gives No Account of These Matters.

 Chapter XXXIV.—The Prophets Enjoined Holiness of Life.

 Chapter XXXV.—Precepts from the Prophetic Books.

 Chapter XXXVI.—Prophecies of the Sibyl.

 Chapter XXXVII.—The Testimonies of the Poets.

 Chapter XXXVIII.—The Teachings of the Greek Poets and Philosophers Confirmatory of Those of the Hebrew Prophets.

 Theophilus to Autolycus. Chapter I.—Autolycus Not Yet Convinced.

 Chapter II.—Profane Authors Had No Means of Knowing the Truth.

 Chapter III.—Their Contradictions.

 Chapter IV.—How Autolycus Had Been Misled by False Accusations Against the Christians.

 Chapter V.—Philosophers Inculcate Cannibalism.

 Chapter VI.—Other Opinions of the Philosophers.

 Chapter VII.—Varying Doctrine Concerning the Gods.

 Chapter VIII.—Wickedness Attributed to the Gods by Heathen Writers.

 Chapter IX.—Christian Doctrine of God and His Law.

 Chapter X.—Of Humanity to Strangers.

 Chapter XI.—Of Repentance.

 Chapter XII.—Of Righteousness.

 Chapter XIII.—Of Chastity.

 Chapter XIV.—Of Loving Our Enemies.

 Chapter XV.—The Innocence of the Christians Defended.

 Chapter XVI.—Uncertain Conjectures of the Philosophers.

 Chapter XVII.—Accurate Information of the Christians.

 Chapter XVIII.—Errors of the Greeks About the Deluge.

 Chapter XIX.—Accurate Account of the Deluge.

 Chapter XX.—Antiquity of Moses.

 Chapter XXI.—Of Manetho’s Inaccuracy.

 Chapter XXII.—Antiquity of the Temple.

 Chapter XXIII.—Prophets More Ancient Than Greek Writers.

 Chapter XXIV.—Chronology from Adam.

 Chapter XXV.—From Saul to the Captivity.

 Chapter XXVI.—Contrast Between Hebrew and Greek Writings.

 Chapter XXVII.—Roman Chronology to the Death of M. Aurelius.

 Chapter XXVIII.—Leading Chronological Epochs.

 Chapter XXIX.—Antiquity of Christianity.

 Chapter XXX.—Why the Greeks Did Not Mention Our Histories.

Chapter XXIX.—Antiquity of Christianity.

These periods, then, and all the above-mentioned facts, being viewed collectively, one can see the antiquity of the prophetical writings and the divinity of our doctrine, that the doctrine is not recent, nor our tenets mythical and false, as some think; but very ancient and true. For Thallus mentioned Belus, king of the Assyrians, and Saturn, son of Titan, alleging that Belus with the Titans made war against Jupiter and the so-called gods in his alliance; and on this occasion he says that Gyges, being defeated, fled to Tartessus. At that time Gyges ruled over that country, which then was called Acte, but now is named Attica. And whence the other countries and cities derived their names, we think it unnecessary to recount, especially to you who are acquainted with history. That Moses, and not he only, but also most of the prophets who followed him, is proved to be older than all writers, and than Saturn and Belus and the Trojan war, is manifest. For according to the history of Thallus, Belus is found to be 322 years prior to the Trojan war. But we have shown above that Moses lived somewhere about 900 or 1000 years before the sack of Troy. And as Saturn and Belus flourished at the same time, most people do not know which is Saturn and which is Belus. Some worship Saturn, and call him Bel or Bal, especially the inhabitants of the eastern countries, for they do not know who either Saturn or Belus is. And among the Romans he is called Saturn, for neither do they know which of the two is more ancient—Saturn or Bel. So far as regards the commencement of the Olympiads, they say that the observance dates from Iphitus, but according to others from Linus, who is also called Ilius. The order which the whole number of years and Olympiads holds, we have shown above. I think I have now, according to my ability, accurately discoursed both of the godlessness of your practices,165    Another reading gives, “both of the antiquity of our religion.” and of the whole number of the epochs of history. For if even a chronological error has been committed by us, of, e.g., 50 or 100, or even 200 years, yet not of thousands and tens of thousands, as Plato and Apollonius and other mendacious authors have hitherto written. And perhaps our knowledge of the whole number of the years is not quite accurate, because the odd months and days are not set down in the sacred books.166    [Usher quotes this concession as to the ἀκριβεία or minute delicacy he could not attain. Ut supra, p. 119, note 1.] But so far as regards the periods we speak of, we are corroborated by Berosus,167    Berosus flourished in the reign of Alexander the Great. the Chaldæan philosopher, who made the Greeks acquainted with the Chaldæan literature, and uttered some things concerning the deluge, and many other points of history, in agreement with Moses; and with the prophets Jeremiah and Daniel also, he spoke in a measure of agreement. For he mentioned what happened to the Jews under the king of the Babylonians, whom he calls Abobassor, and who is called by the Hebrews Nebuchadnezzar. And he also spoke of the temple of Jerusalem; how it was desolated by the king of the Chaldæans, and that the foundations of the temple having been laid the second year of the reign of Cyrus, the temple was completed in the second year of the reign of Darius.

Τῶν οὖν χρόνων καὶ τῶν εἰρημένων ἁπάντων συνηρασμένων, ὁρᾶν ἔστιν τὴν ἀρχαιότητα τῶν προφητικῶν γραμμάτων καὶ τὴν θειότητα τοῦ παρ' ἡμῖν λόγου, ὅτι οὐ πρόσφατος ὁ λόγος, οὔτε μὴν τὰ καθ' ἡμᾶς, ὡς οἴονταί τινες, μυθώδη καὶ ψευδῆ ἐστιν, ἀλλὰ μὲν οὖν ἀρχαιότερα καὶ ἀληθέστερα. Καὶ γὰρ Βήλου τοῦ Ἀσσυρίων βασιλεύσαντος καὶ Κρόνου τοῦ Τιτᾶνος Θάλλος μέμνηται, φάσκων τὸν Βῆλον πεπολεμηκέναι σὺν τοῖς Τιτᾶσι πρὸς τὸν ∆ία καὶ τοὺς σὺν αὐτῷ θεοὺς λεγομένους, ἔνθα φησίν, “Καὶ Ὤγυγος ἡττηθεὶς ἔφυγεν εἰς Ταρτησσόν, τότε μὲν τῆς χώρας ἐκείνης Ἀκτῆς κληθείσης, νυνὶ δὲ Ἀττικῆς προσαγορευομένης, ἧς Ὤγυγος τότε ἦρξεν.” καὶ τὰς λοιπὰς δὲ χώρας καὶ πόλεις ἀφ' ὧν τὰς προσωνυμίας ἔσχον, οὐκ ἀναγκαῖον ἡγούμεθα καταλέγειν, μάλιστα πρὸς σὲ τὸν ἐπιστάμενον τὰς ἱστορίας. ὅτι μὲν οὖν ἀρχαιότερος ὁ Μωσῆς δείκνυται ἁπάντων συγγραφέων (οὐκ αὐτὸς δὲ μόνος ἀλλὰ καὶ οἱ πλείους μετ' αὐτὸν προφῆται γενόμενοι) καὶ Κρόνου καὶ Βήλου καὶ τοῦ Ἰλιακοῦ πολέμου, δῆλόν ἐστιν. κατὰ γὰρ τὴν Θάλλου ἱστορίαν ὁ Βῆλος προγενέστερος εὑρίσκεται τοῦ Ἰλιακοῦ πολέμου ἔτεσι τκβ. ὅτι δὲ πρός που ἔτεσι " ἢ καὶ α προάγει ὁ Μωσῆς τῆς τοῦ Ἰλίου ἁλώσεως, ἐν τοῖς ἐπάνω δεδηλώκαμεν. Τοῦ δὲ Κρόνου καὶ τοῦ Βήλου συνακμασάντων ὁμόσε, οἱ πλείους οὐκ ἐπίστανται τίς ἐστιν ὁ Κρόνος ἢ τίς ὁ Βῆλος. ἔνιοι μὲν σέβονται τὸν Κρόνον καὶ τοῦτον αὐτὸν ὀνομάζουσι Βὴλ καὶ Βάλ, μάλιστα οἱ οἰκοῦντες τὰ ἀνατολικὰ κλίματα, μὴ γινώσκοντες μήτε τίς ἐστιν ὁ Κρόνος μήτε τίς ἐστιν ὁ Βῆλος. παρὰ δὲ Ῥωμαίοις Σατοῦρνος ὀνομάζεται· οὐδὲ γὰρ αὐτοὶ γινώσκουσιν τίς ἐστιν αὐτῶν, πότερον ὁ Κρόνος ἢ ὁ Βῆλος. Ἡ μὲν οὖν ἀρχὴ τῶν ὀλυμπιάδων ἀπὸ Eἰφίτου, φασίν, ἔσχηκεν τὴν θρησκείαν, κατὰ δέ τινας ἀπὸ Aἵμονος, ὃς καὶ Ἠλεῖος ἐπεκλήθη. ὁ μὲν οὖν ἀριθμὸς τῶν ἐτῶν καὶ ὀλυμπιάδων ὡς ἔχει τὴν τάξιν, ἐν τοῖς ἐπάνω δεδηλώκαμεν. Τῆς μὲν οὖν ἀρχαιότητος τῶν παρ' ἡμῖν πραγμάτων καὶ τῶν χρόνων τὸν πάντα ἀριθμὸν κατὰ τὸ δύνατον οἶμαι τὰ νῦν ἀκριβῶς εἰρῆσθαι. εἰ γὰρ καὶ ἔλαθεν ἡμᾶς χρόνος, εἰ τύχοι εἰπεῖν ἔτη ν ἢ ρ ἢ καὶ ς, οὐ μέντοι μυριάδες ἢ χιλιάδες ἐτῶν, καθὼς προειρήκασιν Πλάτων καὶ Ἀπολλώνιος καὶ οἱ λοιποὶ ψευδῶς ἀναγράψαντες. ὅπερ ἡμεῖς τὸ ἀκριβὲς ἴσως ἀγνοοῦμεν, ἁπάντων τῶν ἐτῶν τὸν ἀριθμόν, διὰ τὸ μὴ ἀναγεγράφθαι ἐν ταῖς ἱεραῖς βίβλοις τοὺς ἐπιτρέχοντας μῆνας καὶ ἡμέρας. Ἔτι δὲ περὶ ὧν φαμεν χρόνων συνᾴδει καὶ Βήρωσος, ὁ παρὰ Χαλδαίοις φιλοσοφήσας καὶ μηνύσας Ἕλλησιν τὰ χαλδαϊκὰ γράμματα, ὃς ἀκολούθως τινὰ εἴρηκεν τῷ Μωσεῖ περί τε κατακλυσμοῦ καὶ ἑτέρων πολλῶν ἐξιστορῶν. ἔτι μὴν καὶ τοῖς προφήταις Ἰερεμίᾳ καὶ ∆ανιὴλ σύμφωνα ἐκ μέρους εἴρηκεν· τὰ γὰρ συμβάντα τοῖς Ἰουδαίοις ὑπὸ τοῦ βασιλέως Βαβυλωνίων, ὃν αὐτὸς ὀνομάζει Ναβοπαλάσσαρον, κέκληται δὲ παρὰ Ἑβραίοις Ναβουχοδόνοσορ. μέμνηται καὶ περὶ τοῦ ναοῦ ἐν Ἱεροσολύμοις ὡς ἠρημῶσθαι ὑπὸ τοῦ Χαλδαίων βασιλέως, καὶ ὅτι, Κύρου τὸ δεύτερον ἔτος βασιλεύσαντος τοῦ ναοῦ τῶν θεμελίων τεθέντων, ∆αρείου πάλιν βασιλεύσαντος τὸ δεύτερον ἔτος ὁ ναὸς ἐπετελέσθη.