Theophilus to Autolycus.

 Book I. Chapter I.—Autolycus an Idolater and Scorner of Christians.

 Chapter II.—That the Eyes of the Soul Must Be Purged Ere God Can Be Seen.

 Chapter III.—Nature of God.

 Chapter IV.—Attributes of God.

 Chapter V.—The Invisible God Perceived Through His Works.

 Chapter VI.—God is Known by His Works.

 Chapter VII.—We Shall See God When We Put on Immortality.

 Chapter VIII.—Faith Required in All Matters.

 Chapter IX.—Immoralities of the Gods.

 Chapter X.—Absurdities of Idolatry.

 Chapter XI.—The King to Be Honoured, God to Be Worshipped.

 Chapter XII.—Meaning of the Name Christian.

 Chapter XIII.—The Resurrection Proved by Examples.

 Chapter XIV.—Theophilus an Example of Conversion.

 Book II. Chapter I.—Occasion of Writing This Book.

 Chapter II.—The Gods are Despised When They are Made But Become Valuable When Bought.

 Chapter III.—What Has Become of the Gods?

 Chapter IV.—Absurd Opinions of the Philosophers Concerning God.

 Chapter V.—Opinions of Homer and Hesiod Concerning the Gods.

 Chapter VI.—Hesiod on the Origin of the World.

 Chapter VII.—Fabulous Heathen Genealogies.

 Chapter VIII.— Opinions Concerning Providence.

 Chapter IX.—The Prophets Inspired by the Holy Ghost.

 Chapter X.—The World Created by God Through the Word.

 Chapter XI.—The Six Days’ Work Described.

 Chapter XII.—The Glory of the Six Days’ Work.

 Chapter XIII.—Remarks on the Creation of the World.

 Chapter XIV.—The World Compared to the Sea.

 Chapter XV.—Of the Fourth Day.

 Chapter XVI.—Of the Fifth Day.

 Chapter XVII.—Of the Sixth Day.

 Chapter XVIII.—The Creation of Man.

 Chapter XIX.—Man is Placed in Paradise.

 Chapter XX.—The Scriptural Account of Paradise.

 Chapter XXI.—Of the Fall of Man.

 Chapter XXII.—Why God is Said to Have Walked.

 Chapter XXIII.—The Truth of the Account in Genesis.

 Chapter XXIV.—The Beauty of Paradise.

 Chapter XXV.—God Was Justified in Forbidding Man to Eat of the Tree of Knowledge.

 Chapter XXVI.—God’s Goodness in Expelling Man from Paradise.

 Chapter XXVII.—The Nature of Man.

 Chapter XXVIII.—Why Eve Was Formed of Adam’s Rib.

 Chapter XXIX.—Cain’s Crime.

 Chapter XXX.—Cain’s Family and Their Inventions.

 Chapter XXXI.—The History After the Flood.

 Chapter XXXII.—How the Human Race Was Dispersed.

 Chapter XXXIII.—Profane History Gives No Account of These Matters.

 Chapter XXXIV.—The Prophets Enjoined Holiness of Life.

 Chapter XXXV.—Precepts from the Prophetic Books.

 Chapter XXXVI.—Prophecies of the Sibyl.

 Chapter XXXVII.—The Testimonies of the Poets.

 Chapter XXXVIII.—The Teachings of the Greek Poets and Philosophers Confirmatory of Those of the Hebrew Prophets.

 Theophilus to Autolycus. Chapter I.—Autolycus Not Yet Convinced.

 Chapter II.—Profane Authors Had No Means of Knowing the Truth.

 Chapter III.—Their Contradictions.

 Chapter IV.—How Autolycus Had Been Misled by False Accusations Against the Christians.

 Chapter V.—Philosophers Inculcate Cannibalism.

 Chapter VI.—Other Opinions of the Philosophers.

 Chapter VII.—Varying Doctrine Concerning the Gods.

 Chapter VIII.—Wickedness Attributed to the Gods by Heathen Writers.

 Chapter IX.—Christian Doctrine of God and His Law.

 Chapter X.—Of Humanity to Strangers.

 Chapter XI.—Of Repentance.

 Chapter XII.—Of Righteousness.

 Chapter XIII.—Of Chastity.

 Chapter XIV.—Of Loving Our Enemies.

 Chapter XV.—The Innocence of the Christians Defended.

 Chapter XVI.—Uncertain Conjectures of the Philosophers.

 Chapter XVII.—Accurate Information of the Christians.

 Chapter XVIII.—Errors of the Greeks About the Deluge.

 Chapter XIX.—Accurate Account of the Deluge.

 Chapter XX.—Antiquity of Moses.

 Chapter XXI.—Of Manetho’s Inaccuracy.

 Chapter XXII.—Antiquity of the Temple.

 Chapter XXIII.—Prophets More Ancient Than Greek Writers.

 Chapter XXIV.—Chronology from Adam.

 Chapter XXV.—From Saul to the Captivity.

 Chapter XXVI.—Contrast Between Hebrew and Greek Writings.

 Chapter XXVII.—Roman Chronology to the Death of M. Aurelius.

 Chapter XXVIII.—Leading Chronological Epochs.

 Chapter XXIX.—Antiquity of Christianity.

 Chapter XXX.—Why the Greeks Did Not Mention Our Histories.

Chapter VIII.— Opinions Concerning Providence.

And why should I recount further the vast array of such names and genealogies? So that all the authors and poets, and those called philosophers, are wholly deceived; and so, too, are they who give heed to them. For they plentifully composed fables and foolish stories about their gods, and did not exhibit them as gods, but as men, and men, too, of whom some were drunken, and others fornicators and murderers. But also concerning the origin of the world, they uttered contradictory and absurd opinions. First, some of them, as we before explained, maintained that the world is uncreated. And those that said it was uncreated and self-producing contradicted those who propounded that it was created. For by conjecture and human conception they spoke, and not knowing the truth. And others, again, said that there was a providence, and destroyed the positions of the former writers. Aratus, indeed, says:36    The following lines are partly from the translation of Hughes.

“From Jove begin my song; nor ever be

The name unuttered: all are full of thee;

The ways and haunts of men; the heavens and sea:

On thee our being hangs; in thee we move;

All are thy offspring and the seed of Jove.

Benevolent, he warns mankind to good,

Urges to toil and prompts the hope of food.

He tells where cattle best may graze, and where

The soil, deep-furrowed, yellow grain will bear.

What time the husbandman should plant or sow,

’Tis his to tell, ’tis his alone to know.”

Who, then, shall we believe: Aratus as here quoted, or Sophocles, when he says:37    Œdipus Rex, line 978.

“And foresight of the future there is none;

’Tis best to live at random, as one can”?

And Homer, again, does not agree with this, for he says38    Il., xx. 242. that virtue

“Waxes or wanes in men as Jove decrees.”

And Simonides says:—

“No man nor state has virtue save from God;

Counsel resides in God; and wretched man

Has in himself nought but his wretchedness.”

So, too, Euripides:—

“Apart from God, there’s nothing owned by men.”

And Menander:—

“Save God alone, there’s none for us provides.”

And Euripides again:—

“For when God wills to save, all things He’ll bend

To serve as instruments to work His end.”

And Thestius:—

“If God design to save you, safe you are,

Though sailing in mid-ocean on a mat.”39    This verse is by Plutarch hesitatingly attributed to Pindar. The expression, “Though you swim in a wicker basket,” was proverbial.

And saying numberless things of a like kind, they contradicted themselves. At least Sophocles, who in another place denied Providence, says:—

“No mortal can evade the stroke of God.”

Besides, they both introduced a multitude of gods, and yet spoke of a Unity; and against those who affirmed a Providence they maintained in opposition that there was no Providence. Wherefore Euripides says:—

“We labour much and spend our strength in vain,

For empty hope, not foresight, is our guide.”

And without meaning to do so, they acknowledge that they know not the truth; but being inspired by demons and puffed up by them, they spoke at their instance whatever they said. For indeed the poets,—Homer, to wit, and Hesiod, being, as they say, inspired by the Muses,—spoke from a deceptive fancy,40    Literally, “in fancy and error.” and not with a pure but an erring spirit. And this, indeed, clearly appears from the fact, that even to this day the possessed are sometimes exorcised in the name of the living and true God; and these spirits of error themselves confess that they are demons who also formerly inspired these writers. But sometimes some of them wakened up in soul, and, that they might be for a witness both to themselves and to all men, spoke things in harmony with the prophets regarding the monarchy of God, and the judgment and such like.

Καὶ τί μοι τὸ λοιπὸν τὸ πλῆθος τῶν τοιούτων ὀνομασιῶν καὶ γενεαλογιῶν καταλέγειν; ὥστε κατὰ πάντα τρόπον ἐμπαίζονται οἱ συγγραφεῖς πάντες καὶ ποιηταὶ καὶ φιλόσοφοι λεγόμενοι, ἔτι μὴν καὶ οἱ προσέχοντες αὐτοῖς. μύθους γὰρ μᾶλλον καὶ μωρίας συνέταξαν περὶ τῶν κατ' αὐτοὺς θεῶν· οὐ γὰρ ἀπέδειξαν αὐτοὺς θεοὺς ἀλλὰ ἀνθρώπους, οὓς μὲν μεθύσους, ἑτέρους δὲ πόρνους καὶ φονεῖς. Ἀλλὰ καὶ περὶ τῆς κοσμογονίας ἀσύμφωνα ἀλλήλοις καὶ φαῦλα ἐξεῖπον. πρῶτον μὲν ὅτι τινὲς ἀγένητον τὸν κόσμον ἀπεφήναντο, καθὼς καὶ ἔμπροσθεν ἐδηλώσαμεν, καὶ οἱ μὲν ἀγένητον αὐτὸν καὶ ἀΐδιον φύσιν φάσκοντες οὐκ ἀκόλουθα εἶπον τοῖς γενητὸν αὐτὸν δογματίσασιν. εἰκασμῷ γὰρ ταῦτα καὶ ἀνθρωπίνῃ ἐννοίᾳ ἐφθέγξαντο, καὶ οὐ κατὰ ἀλήθειαν. Ἕτεροι δ' αὖ εἶπον πρόνοιαν εἶναι, καὶ τὰ τούτων δόγματα ἀνέλυσαν. Ἄρατος μὲν οὖν φησιν· Ἐκ ∆ιὸς ἀρχώμεσθα, τὸν οὐδέποτ' ἄνδρες ἐῶμεν ἄρρητον. μεσταὶ δὲ ∆ιὸς πᾶσαι μὲν ἀγυιαί, πᾶσαι δ' ἀνθρώπων ἀγοραί, μεστὴ δὲ θάλασσα καὶ λιμένες· πάντη δὲ ∆ιὸς κεχρήμεθα πάντες. τοῦ γὰρ καὶ γένος ἐσμέν· ὁ δ' ἤπιος ἀνθρώποισιν δεξιὰ σημαίνει, λαοὺς δ' ἐπὶ ἔργον ἐγείρει μιμνήσκων βιότοιο· λέγει δ' ὅτε βῶλος ἀρίστη βουσί τε καὶ μακέλῃσι, λέγει δ' ὅτε δεξιαὶ ὧραι καὶ φυτὰ γυρῶσαι καὶ σπέρματα πάντα βαλέσθαι. τίνι οὖν πιστεύσωμεν, πότερον Ἀράτῳ ἢ Σοφοκλεῖ λέγοντι· Πρόνοια δ' ἐστὶν οὐδενός, εἰκῇ κράτιστον ζῆν ὅπως δύναιτό τις; Ὅμηρος δὲ πάλιν τούτῳ οὐ συνᾴδει. λέγει γάρ· Ζεὺς δ' ἀρετὴν ἄνδρεσσιν ὀφέλλει τε μινύθει τε. καὶ Σιμωνίδης· Oὔτις ἄνευ θεῶν ἀρετὰν λάβεν, οὐ πόλις, οὐ βρότος· θεὸς ὁ παμμῆτις, ἀπήμαντον δ' οὐδέν ἐστιν ἐν αὐτοῖς. ὁμοίως καὶ Eὐριπίδης· Oὐκ ἔστιν οὐδὲν χωρὶς ἀνθρώποις θεοῦ. καὶ Μένανδρος· Oὐκ ἄρα φροντίζει τις ἡμῶν ἢ μόνος θεός. καὶ πάλιν Eὐριπίδης· Σῶσαι γὰρ ὁπόταν τῷ θεῷ δοκῇ, πολλὰς προφάσεις δίδωσιν εἰς σωτηρίαν. καὶ Θέστιος· Θεοῦ θέλοντος σώζῃ, κἂν ἐπὶ ·ιπὸς πλέῃς. καὶ τὰ τοιαῦτα μυρία εἰπόντες ἀσύμφωνα ἑαυτοῖς ἐξεῖπον. ὁ γοῦν Σοφοκλῆς ἀπρονοησίαν εἴρων ἐν ἑτέρῳ λέγει· Θεοῦ δὲ πληγὴν οὐχ ὑπερπηδᾷ βροτός. Πλὴν καὶ πληθὺν εἰσήγαγον ἢ καὶ μοναρχίαν εἶπον, καὶ πρόνοιαν εἶναι τοῖς λέγουσιν ἀπρονοησίαν τἀναντία εἰρήκασιν. ὅθεν Eὐριπίδης ὁμολογεῖ λέγων· Σπουδάζομεν δὲ πολλ' ὑπ' ἐλπίδων, μάτην πόνους ἔχοντες, οὐδὲν εἰδότες. Καὶ μὴ θέλοντες ὁμολογοῦσιν τὸ ἀληθὲς μὴ ἐπίστασθαι· ὑπὸ δαιμόνων δὲ ἐμπνευσθέντες καὶ ὑπ' αὐτῶν φυσιωθέντες ἃ εἶπον δι' αὐτῶν εἶπον. ἤτοι γὰρ οἱ ποιηταί, Ὅμηρος δὴ καὶ Ἡσίοδος ὥς φασιν ὑπὸ Μουσῶν ἐμπνευσθέντες, φαντασίᾳ καὶ πλάνῃ ἐλάλησαν, καὶ οὐ καθαρῷ πνεύματι ἀλλὰ πλάνῳ. ἐκ τούτου δὲ σαφῶς δείκνυται, εἰ καὶ οἱ δαιμονῶντες ἐνίοτε καὶ μέχρι τοῦ δεῦρο ἐξορκίζονται κατὰ τοῦ ὀνόματος τοῦ ὄντως θεοῦ, καὶ ὁμολογεῖ αὐτὰ τὰ πλάνα πνεύματα εἶναι δαίμονες, οἱ καὶ τότε εἰς ἐκείνους ἐνεργήσαντες, πλὴν ἐνίοτέ τινες τῇ ψυχῇ ἐκνήψαντες ἐξ αὐτῶν εἶπον ἀκόλουθα τοῖς προφήταις, ὅπως εἰς μαρτύριον αὐτοῖς τε καὶ πᾶσιν ἀνθρώποις περί τε θεοῦ μοναρχίας καὶ κρίσεως καὶ τῶν λοιπῶν ὧν ἔφασαν.