Theophilus to Autolycus.

 Book I. Chapter I.—Autolycus an Idolater and Scorner of Christians.

 Chapter II.—That the Eyes of the Soul Must Be Purged Ere God Can Be Seen.

 Chapter III.—Nature of God.

 Chapter IV.—Attributes of God.

 Chapter V.—The Invisible God Perceived Through His Works.

 Chapter VI.—God is Known by His Works.

 Chapter VII.—We Shall See God When We Put on Immortality.

 Chapter VIII.—Faith Required in All Matters.

 Chapter IX.—Immoralities of the Gods.

 Chapter X.—Absurdities of Idolatry.

 Chapter XI.—The King to Be Honoured, God to Be Worshipped.

 Chapter XII.—Meaning of the Name Christian.

 Chapter XIII.—The Resurrection Proved by Examples.

 Chapter XIV.—Theophilus an Example of Conversion.

 Book II. Chapter I.—Occasion of Writing This Book.

 Chapter II.—The Gods are Despised When They are Made But Become Valuable When Bought.

 Chapter III.—What Has Become of the Gods?

 Chapter IV.—Absurd Opinions of the Philosophers Concerning God.

 Chapter V.—Opinions of Homer and Hesiod Concerning the Gods.

 Chapter VI.—Hesiod on the Origin of the World.

 Chapter VII.—Fabulous Heathen Genealogies.

 Chapter VIII.— Opinions Concerning Providence.

 Chapter IX.—The Prophets Inspired by the Holy Ghost.

 Chapter X.—The World Created by God Through the Word.

 Chapter XI.—The Six Days’ Work Described.

 Chapter XII.—The Glory of the Six Days’ Work.

 Chapter XIII.—Remarks on the Creation of the World.

 Chapter XIV.—The World Compared to the Sea.

 Chapter XV.—Of the Fourth Day.

 Chapter XVI.—Of the Fifth Day.

 Chapter XVII.—Of the Sixth Day.

 Chapter XVIII.—The Creation of Man.

 Chapter XIX.—Man is Placed in Paradise.

 Chapter XX.—The Scriptural Account of Paradise.

 Chapter XXI.—Of the Fall of Man.

 Chapter XXII.—Why God is Said to Have Walked.

 Chapter XXIII.—The Truth of the Account in Genesis.

 Chapter XXIV.—The Beauty of Paradise.

 Chapter XXV.—God Was Justified in Forbidding Man to Eat of the Tree of Knowledge.

 Chapter XXVI.—God’s Goodness in Expelling Man from Paradise.

 Chapter XXVII.—The Nature of Man.

 Chapter XXVIII.—Why Eve Was Formed of Adam’s Rib.

 Chapter XXIX.—Cain’s Crime.

 Chapter XXX.—Cain’s Family and Their Inventions.

 Chapter XXXI.—The History After the Flood.

 Chapter XXXII.—How the Human Race Was Dispersed.

 Chapter XXXIII.—Profane History Gives No Account of These Matters.

 Chapter XXXIV.—The Prophets Enjoined Holiness of Life.

 Chapter XXXV.—Precepts from the Prophetic Books.

 Chapter XXXVI.—Prophecies of the Sibyl.

 Chapter XXXVII.—The Testimonies of the Poets.

 Chapter XXXVIII.—The Teachings of the Greek Poets and Philosophers Confirmatory of Those of the Hebrew Prophets.

 Theophilus to Autolycus. Chapter I.—Autolycus Not Yet Convinced.

 Chapter II.—Profane Authors Had No Means of Knowing the Truth.

 Chapter III.—Their Contradictions.

 Chapter IV.—How Autolycus Had Been Misled by False Accusations Against the Christians.

 Chapter V.—Philosophers Inculcate Cannibalism.

 Chapter VI.—Other Opinions of the Philosophers.

 Chapter VII.—Varying Doctrine Concerning the Gods.

 Chapter VIII.—Wickedness Attributed to the Gods by Heathen Writers.

 Chapter IX.—Christian Doctrine of God and His Law.

 Chapter X.—Of Humanity to Strangers.

 Chapter XI.—Of Repentance.

 Chapter XII.—Of Righteousness.

 Chapter XIII.—Of Chastity.

 Chapter XIV.—Of Loving Our Enemies.

 Chapter XV.—The Innocence of the Christians Defended.

 Chapter XVI.—Uncertain Conjectures of the Philosophers.

 Chapter XVII.—Accurate Information of the Christians.

 Chapter XVIII.—Errors of the Greeks About the Deluge.

 Chapter XIX.—Accurate Account of the Deluge.

 Chapter XX.—Antiquity of Moses.

 Chapter XXI.—Of Manetho’s Inaccuracy.

 Chapter XXII.—Antiquity of the Temple.

 Chapter XXIII.—Prophets More Ancient Than Greek Writers.

 Chapter XXIV.—Chronology from Adam.

 Chapter XXV.—From Saul to the Captivity.

 Chapter XXVI.—Contrast Between Hebrew and Greek Writings.

 Chapter XXVII.—Roman Chronology to the Death of M. Aurelius.

 Chapter XXVIII.—Leading Chronological Epochs.

 Chapter XXIX.—Antiquity of Christianity.

 Chapter XXX.—Why the Greeks Did Not Mention Our Histories.

Chapter VII.—Fabulous Heathen Genealogies.

Why need I recount the Greek fables,—of Pluto, king of darkness, of Neptune descending beneath the sea, and embracing Melanippe and begetting a cannibal son,—or the many tales your writers have woven into their tragedies concerning the sons of Jupiter, and whose pedigree they register because they were born men, and not gods? And the comic poet Aristophanes, in the play called “The Birds,” having taken upon him to handle the subject of the Creation, said that in the beginning the world was produced from an egg, saying:34    Aristoph., Av., 694. A wind-egg being one produced without impregnation, and coming to nothing.

“A windy egg was laid by black-winged night

At first.”

But Satyrus, also giving a history of the Alexandrine families, beginning from Philopator, who was also named Ptolemy, gives out that Bacchus was his progenitor; wherefore also Ptolemy was the founder of this35    The Dionysian family taking its name from Dionysus or Bacchus. family. Satyrus then speaks thus: That Dejanira was born of Bacchus and Althea, the daughter of Thestius; and from her and Hercules the son of Jupiter there sprang, as I suppose, Hyllus; and from him Cleodemus, and from him Aristomachus, and from him Temenus, and from him Ceisus, and from him Maron, and from him Thestrus, and from him Acous, and from him Aristomidas, and from him Caranus, and from him Cœnus, and from him Tyrimmas, and from him Perdiccas, and from him Philip, and from him Æropus, and from him Alcetas, and from him Amyntas, and from him Bocrus, and from him Meleager, and from him Arsinoë and from her and Lagus Ptolemy Soter, and from him and Arsinoe Ptolemy Euergetes, and from him and Berenicé, daughter of Maga, king of Cyrene, Ptolemy Philopator. Thus, then, stands the relationship of the Alexandrine kings to Bacchus. And therefore in the Dionysian tribe there are distinct families: the Althean from Althea, who was the wife of Dionysus and daughter of Thestius; the family of Dejanira also, from her who was the daughter of Dionysus and Althea, and wife of Hercules;—whence, too, the families have their names: the family of Ariadne, from Ariadne, daughter of Minos and wife of Dionysus, a dutiful daughter, who had intercourse with Dionysus in another form; the Thestian, from Thestius, the father of Althea; the Thoantian, from Thoas, son of Dionysus; the Staphylian, from Staphylus, son of Dionysus; the Euænian, from Eunous, son of Dionysus; the Maronian, from Maron, son of Ariadne and Dionysus;—for all these are sons of Dionysus. And, indeed, many other names were thus originated, and exist to this day; as the Heraclidæ from Hercules, and the Apollonidæ from Apollo, and the Poseidonii from Poseidon, and from Zeus the Dii and Diogenæ.

Τί δέ μοι λέγειν τοὺς κατὰ Ἕλληνας μύθους καὶ τὴν ἐν αὐτοῖς ματαιοπονίαν, Πλούτωνα μὲν σκότους βασιλεύοντα, καὶ Ποσειδῶνα ὑπὸ πόντων δύνοντα καὶ τῇ Μελανίππῃ περιπλεκόμενον καὶ υἱὸν ἀνθρωποβόρον γεννήσαντα, ἢ περὶ τῶν τοῦ ∆ιὸς παίδων ὁπόσα οἱ συγγραφεῖς ἐτραγῴδησαν; καὶ ὅτι οὗτοι ἄνθρωποι καὶ οὐ θεοὶ ἐγεννήθησαν, τὸ γένος αὐτῶν αὐτοὶ καταλέγουσιν. Ἀριστοφάνης δὲ ὁ κωμικὸς ἐν ταῖς ἐπιγραφομέναις Ὄρνισιν, ἐπιχειρήσας περὶ τῆς τοῦ κόσμου ποιήσεως, ἔφη ἐν πρώτοις ὠὸν γεγενῆσθαι τὴν σύστασιν τοῦ κόσμου, λέγων· Πρώτιστα τεκὼν μελανόπτερος ᾠόν. Ἀλλὰ καὶ Σάτυρος ἱστορῶν τοὺς δήμους Ἀλεξανδρέων, ἀρξάμενος ἀπὸ Φιλοπάτορος τοῦ καὶ Πτολεμαίου προσαγορευθέντος, τούτου μηνύει ∆ιόνυσον ἀρχηγέτην γεγονέναι· διὸ καὶ φυλὴν ὁ Πτολεμαῖος πρώτην κατέστησεν. λέγει οὖν ὁ Σάτυρος οὕτως· “∆ιονύσου καὶ Ἀλθαίας τῆς Θεστίου γεγενῆσθαι ∆ηϊάνειραν, τῆς δὲ καὶ Ἡρακλέους τοῦ ∆ιὸς Ὕλλον, τοῦ δὲ Κλεοδαῖον, τοῦ δὲ Ἀριστόμαχον, τοῦ δὲ Τήμενον, τοῦ δὲ Κεῖσον, τοῦ δὲ Μάρωνα, τοῦ δὲ Θέστιον, τοῦ δὲ Ἀκοόν, τοῦ δὲ Ἀριστοδαμίδαν, τοῦ δὲ Καρανόν, τοῦ δὲ Κοινόν, τοῦ δὲ Τυρίμμαν, τοῦ δὲ Περδίκκαν, τοῦ δὲ Φίλιππον, τοῦ δὲ Ἀέροπον, τοῦ δὲ Ἀλκέταν, τοῦ δὲ Ἀμύνταν, τοῦ δὲ Βόκρον, τοῦ δὲ Μελέαγρον, τοῦ δὲ Ἀρσινόην, τῆς δὲ καὶ Λάγου Πτολεμαῖον τὸν καὶ Σωτῆρα, τοῦ δὲ καὶ Βερενίκης Πτολεμαῖον τὸν Φιλάδελφον, τοῦ δὲ καὶ Ἀρσινόης Πτολεμαῖον τὸν Eὐεργέτην, τοῦ δὲ καὶ Βερενίκης τῆς Μάγα τοῦ ἐν Κυρήνῃ βασιλεύσαντος Πτολεμαῖον τὸν Φιλοπάτορα. ἡ μὲν οὖν πρὸς ∆ιόνυσον τοῖς ἐν Ἀλεξανδρείᾳ βασιλεύσασιν συγγένεια οὕτως περιέχει. ὅθεν καὶ ἐν τῇ ∆ιονυσίᾳ φυλῇ δῆμοί εἰσιν κατακεχωρισμένοι. Ἀλθηῒς ἀπὸ τῆς γενομένης γυναικὸς ∆ιονύσου, θυγατρὸς δὲ Θεστίου, Ἀλθαίας. ∆ηϊανειρὶς ἀπὸ τῆς θυγατρὸς ∆ιονύσου καὶ Ἀλθαίας, γυναικὸς δὲ Ἡρακλέους. ὅθεν καὶ τὰς προσωνυμίας ἔχουσιν οἱ κατ' αὐτοὺς δῆμοι· Ἀριαδνὶς ἀπὸ τῆς θυγατρὸς Μίνω, γυναικὸς δὲ ∆ιονύσου, παιδὸς πατροφίλης τῆς μιχθείσης ∆ιονύσῳ ἐν μορφῇ Πρύμνιδι , Θεστὶς ἀπὸ Θεστίου τοῦ Ἀλθαίας πατρός, Θοαντὶς ἀπὸ Θοαντὸς παιδὸς ∆ιονύσου, Σταφυλὶς ἀπὸ Σταφύλου υἱοῦ ∆ιονύσου, Eὐαινὶς ἀπὸ Eὐνόος υἱοῦ ∆ιονύσου, Μαρωνὶς ἀπὸ Μάρωνος υἱοῦ Ἀριάδνης καὶ ∆ιονύσου. οὗτοι γὰρ πάντες υἱοὶ ∆ιονύσου.” Ἀλλὰ καὶ ἑτέραι πολλαὶ ὀνομασίαι γεγόνασιν καί εἰσιν ἕως τοῦ δεῦρο, ἀπὸ Ἡρακλέους Ἡρακλεῖδαι καλούμενοι, καὶ ἀπὸ Ἀπόλλωνος Ἀπολλωνίδαι καὶ Ἀπολλώνιοι, καὶ ἀπὸ Ποσειδῶνος Ποσειδώνιοι, καὶ ἀπὸ ∆ιὸς ∆ῖοι καὶ ∆ιογέναι.