Contra Gentes. (Against the Heathen.)

 Part I

 §2. Evil no part of the essential nature of things. The original creation and constitution of man in grace and in the knowledge of God.

 §3. The decline of man from the above condition, owing to his absorption in material things.

 §4. The gradual abasement of the Soul from Truth to Falsehood by the abuse of her freedom of Choice.

 §5. Evil, then consists essentially in the choice of what is lower in preference to what is higher.

 §6. False views of the nature of evil: viz., that evil is something in the nature of things, and has substantive existence. (a) Heathen thinkers: (evi

 §7. Refutation of dualism from reason. Impossibility of two Gods. The truth as to evil is that which the Church teaches: that it originates, and resid

 §8. The origin of idolatry is similar. The soul, materialised by forgetting God, and engrossed in earthly things, makes them into gods. The race of me

 §9. The various developments of idolatry: worship of the heavenly bodies, the elements, natural objects, fabulous creatures, personified lusts, men li

 §10. Similar human origin of the Greek gods, by decree of Theseus. The process by which mortals became deified.

 §11. The deeds of heathen deities, and particularly of Zeus.

 §12. Other shameful actions ascribed to heathen deities. All prove that they are but men of former times, and not even good men.

 §13. The folly of image worship and its dishonour to art.

 §14. Image worship condemned by Scripture.

 §15. The details about the gods conveyed in the representations of them by poets and artists shew that they are without life, and that they are not go

 §16. Heathen arguments in palliation of the above: and (1) ‘the poets are responsible for these unedifying tales.’ But are the names and existence of

 §17. The truth probably is, that the scandalous tales are true, while the divine attributes ascribed to them are due to the flattery of the poets.

 §18. Heathen defence continued. (2) ‘The gods are worshipped for having invented the Arts of Life.’ But this is a human and natural, not a divine, ach

 §19. The inconsistency of image worship. Arguments in palliation. (1) The divine nature must be expressed in a visible sign. (2) The image a means of

 §20. But where does this supposed virtue of the image reside? in the material, or in the form, or in the maker’s skill? Untenability of all these view

 §21. The idea of communications through angels involves yet wilder inconsistency, nor does it, even if true, justify the worship of the image.

 §22. The image cannot represent the true form of God, else God would be corruptible.

 §23. The variety of idolatrous cults proves that they are false.

 §24. The so-called gods of one place are used as victims in another.

 §25. Human sacrifice. Its absurdity. Its prevalence. Its calamitous results.

 §26. The moral corruptions of Paganism all admittedly originated with the gods.

 §27. The refutation of popular Paganism being taken as conclusive, we come to the higher form of nature-worship. How Nature witnesses to God by the mu

 §28. But neither can the cosmic organism be God. For that would make God consist of dissimilar parts, and subject Him to possible dissolution.

 §29. The balance of powers in Nature shews that it is not God, either collectively, or in parts .

 Part II.

 §31. Proof of the existence of the rational soul. (1) Difference of man from the brutes. (2) Man’s power of objective thought. Thought is to sense as

 §32. (3) The body cannot originate such phenomena and in fact the action of the rational soul is seen in its over-ruling the instincts of the bodily

 §33. The soul immortal. Proved by (1) its being distinct from the body, (2) its being the source of motion, (3) its power to go beyond the body in ima

 §34. The soul, then, if only it get rid of the stains of sin is able to know God directly, its own rational nature imaging back the Word of God, after

 Part III.

 §36. This the more striking, if we consider the opposing forces out of which this order is produced .

 §37. The same subject continued .

 §38. The Unity of God shewn by the Harmony of the order of Nature .

 §39. Impossibility of a plurality of Gods .

 §40. The rationality and order of the Universe proves that it is the work of the Reason or Word of God .

 §41. The Presence of the Word in nature necessary, not only for its original Creation, but also for its permanence .

 §42. This function of the Word described at length .

 §43. Three similes to illustrate the Word’s relation to the Universe .

 §44. The similes applied to the whole Universe, seen and unseen .

 §45. Conclusion. Doctrine of Scripture on the subject of Part I .

 §46. Doctrine of Scripture on the subject of Part 3 .

 §47. Necessity of a return to the Word if our corrupt nature is to be restored .

§32. (3) The body cannot originate such phenomena; and in fact the action of the rational soul is seen in its over-ruling the instincts of the bodily organs.

We add a further point to complete our demonstration for the benefit of those48    Supra xxx. who shamelessly take refuge in denial of reason. How is it, that whereas the body is mortal by nature, man reasons on the things of immortality, and often, where virtue demands it, courts death? Or how, since the body lasts but for a time, does man imagine of things eternal, so as to despise what lies before him, and desire what is beyond? The body could not have spontaneously such thoughts about itself, nor could it think upon what is external to itself. For it is mortal and lasts but for a time. And it follows that that which thinks what is opposed to the body and against its nature must be distinct in kind. What then can this be, save a rational and immortal soul? For it introduces the echo of higher things, not outside, but within the body, as the musician does in his lyre. 2. Or how again, the eye being naturally constituted to see and the ear to hear, do they turn from some objects and choose others? For who is it that turns away the eye from seeing? Or who shuts off the ear from hearing, its natural function? Or who often hinders the palate, to which it is natural to taste things, from its natural impulse? Or who withholds the hand from its natural activity of touching something, or turns aside the sense of smell from its normal exercise49    Compare the somewhat analogous argument in Butler, Serm. ii.? Who is it that thus acts against the natural instincts of the body? Or how does the body, turned from its natural course, turn to the counsels of another and suffer itself to be guided at the beck of that other? Why, these things prove simply this, that the rational soul presides over the body. 3. For the body is not even constituted to drive itself, but it is carried at the will of another, just as a horse does not yoke himself, but is driven by his master. Hence laws for human beings to practise what is good and to abstain from evil-doing, while to the brutes evil remains unthought of and undiscerned, because they lie outside rationality and the process of understanding. I think then that the existence of a rational soul in man is proved by what we have said.

32 Καὶ τοῦτο δ' ἂν εἴη πρὸς ἀπόδειξιν ἀκριβῆ τοῖς ἔτι πρὸς ἀναίδειαν τῆς ἀλογίας τετραμμένοις· πῶς, τοῦ σώματος θνητοῦ κατὰ φύσιν ὄντος, λογίζεται ἄνθρωπος τὰ περὶ ἀθανασίας, καὶ πολλάκις ἑαυτῷ τὸν θάνατον ὑπὲρ ἀρετῆς προκαλεῖται; ἢ πῶς, προσκαίρου τοῦ σώματος ὄντος, τὰ αἰώνια φαντάζεται ἄνθρωπος, ὥστε τῶν μὲν ἐμποδὼν καταφρονεῖν, εἰς ἐκεῖνα δὲ τὸν πόθον ἔχειν; τὸ μὲν οὖν σῶμα οὐκ ἂν ἑαυτὸ περὶ ἑαυτοῦ τοιαῦτα λογίσηται, καὶ οὐκ ἂν τὰ ἔξωθεν ἑαυτοῦ λογίζοιτο· θνητὸν γὰρ καὶ πρόσκαιρόν ἐστιν· ἀνάγκη δὲ ἕτερον εἶναι τὸ τὰ ἐναντία καὶ παρὰ τὴν φύσιν τοῦ σώματος λογιζόμενον. τί οὖν ἂν εἴη τοῦτο πάλιν, ἢ ψυχὴ λογικὴ καὶ ἀθάνατος; καὶ γὰρ οὐκ ἔξωθεν, ἀλλ' ἔνδοθεν αὕτη τῷ σώματι, ὡς ὁ μουσικὸς τῇ λύρᾳ, ἐνηχεῖ τὰ κρείττονα. πῶς δὲ πάλιν κατὰ φύσιν ὢν ὁ ὀφθαλμὸς εἰς τὸ ὁρᾷν, καὶ ἡ ἀκοὴ εἰς τὸ ἀκούειν, τὰ μὲν ἀποστρέφονται, τὰ δὲ αἱροῦνται; τίς γὰρ ὁ τὸν ὀφθαλμὸν τοῦ ὁρᾷν ἀποστρέφων; ἢ τίς τὴν ἀκοὴν κατὰ φύσιν οὖσαν ἀκουστικὴν ἀπο κλείει τοῦ ἀκούειν; ἢ τίς τὴν γεῦσιν, κατὰ φύσιν οὖσαν γευστικήν, κωλύει πολλάκις τῆς φυσικῆς ὁρμῆς; τίς δὲ τὴν χεῖρα, κατὰ φύσιν οὖσαν εἰς τὸ ἐνεργεῖν, ἐπέχει τοῦ ψαύειν τινός; τίς δὲ τὴν ὄσφρησιν, καὶ αὐτὴν εἰς τὸ ὀδμᾶσθαι γενομένην, ἀποστρέφει τοῦ μὴ ἀντιλαμβάνεσθαι; τίς ὁ ταῦτα κατὰ τῶν φυσικῶν τοῦ σώματος ἐνεργῶν; ἢ πῶς τὸ σῶμα, τὴν φύσιν ἀποστραφέν, ἐπιστρέφεται πρὸς τὰς ἑτέρου συμβουλίας, καὶ πρὸς τὸ ἐκείνου νεῦμα ἡνιοχεῖται; ταῦτα γὰρ οὐδὲν ἕτερον ἢ ψυχὴν λογικὴν ἀποδείκνυσιν ἡγεμονεύουσαν τοῦ σώματος. οὐδὲ γὰρ ἑαυτὸ τὸ σῶμα πέφυκεν ἐλαύνειν, ἀλλ' ὑφ' ἑτέρου ἄγεται καὶ φέρεται, ὥσπερ οὐδὲ ἵππος ἑαυτὸν ὑποζεύγνυσιν, ἀλλ' ὑπὸ τοῦ κρατοῦντος ἐλαύνεται. διὰ τοῦτο γοῦν καὶ νόμοι μὲν ἀνθρώποις τὰ καλὰ μὲν πράττειν, τὴν δὲ κακίαν ἀποστρέφεσθαι· τοῖς δὲ ἀλόγοις ἀλόγιστα τὰ κακὰ καὶ ἄκριτα μένει, ἅτε δὴ τῆς λογικότητος καὶ τῆς κατὰ λόγον διανοίας ἐκτὸς τυγχάνουσιν. εἶναι μὲν οὖν ψυχὴν λογικὴν ἐν ἀνθρώποις ἐκ τῶν προειρημένων, νομίζω δεδεῖχθαι.