Contra Gentes. (Against the Heathen.)

 Part I

 §2. Evil no part of the essential nature of things. The original creation and constitution of man in grace and in the knowledge of God.

 §3. The decline of man from the above condition, owing to his absorption in material things.

 §4. The gradual abasement of the Soul from Truth to Falsehood by the abuse of her freedom of Choice.

 §5. Evil, then consists essentially in the choice of what is lower in preference to what is higher.

 §6. False views of the nature of evil: viz., that evil is something in the nature of things, and has substantive existence. (a) Heathen thinkers: (evi

 §7. Refutation of dualism from reason. Impossibility of two Gods. The truth as to evil is that which the Church teaches: that it originates, and resid

 §8. The origin of idolatry is similar. The soul, materialised by forgetting God, and engrossed in earthly things, makes them into gods. The race of me

 §9. The various developments of idolatry: worship of the heavenly bodies, the elements, natural objects, fabulous creatures, personified lusts, men li

 §10. Similar human origin of the Greek gods, by decree of Theseus. The process by which mortals became deified.

 §11. The deeds of heathen deities, and particularly of Zeus.

 §12. Other shameful actions ascribed to heathen deities. All prove that they are but men of former times, and not even good men.

 §13. The folly of image worship and its dishonour to art.

 §14. Image worship condemned by Scripture.

 §15. The details about the gods conveyed in the representations of them by poets and artists shew that they are without life, and that they are not go

 §16. Heathen arguments in palliation of the above: and (1) ‘the poets are responsible for these unedifying tales.’ But are the names and existence of

 §17. The truth probably is, that the scandalous tales are true, while the divine attributes ascribed to them are due to the flattery of the poets.

 §18. Heathen defence continued. (2) ‘The gods are worshipped for having invented the Arts of Life.’ But this is a human and natural, not a divine, ach

 §19. The inconsistency of image worship. Arguments in palliation. (1) The divine nature must be expressed in a visible sign. (2) The image a means of

 §20. But where does this supposed virtue of the image reside? in the material, or in the form, or in the maker’s skill? Untenability of all these view

 §21. The idea of communications through angels involves yet wilder inconsistency, nor does it, even if true, justify the worship of the image.

 §22. The image cannot represent the true form of God, else God would be corruptible.

 §23. The variety of idolatrous cults proves that they are false.

 §24. The so-called gods of one place are used as victims in another.

 §25. Human sacrifice. Its absurdity. Its prevalence. Its calamitous results.

 §26. The moral corruptions of Paganism all admittedly originated with the gods.

 §27. The refutation of popular Paganism being taken as conclusive, we come to the higher form of nature-worship. How Nature witnesses to God by the mu

 §28. But neither can the cosmic organism be God. For that would make God consist of dissimilar parts, and subject Him to possible dissolution.

 §29. The balance of powers in Nature shews that it is not God, either collectively, or in parts .

 Part II.

 §31. Proof of the existence of the rational soul. (1) Difference of man from the brutes. (2) Man’s power of objective thought. Thought is to sense as

 §32. (3) The body cannot originate such phenomena and in fact the action of the rational soul is seen in its over-ruling the instincts of the bodily

 §33. The soul immortal. Proved by (1) its being distinct from the body, (2) its being the source of motion, (3) its power to go beyond the body in ima

 §34. The soul, then, if only it get rid of the stains of sin is able to know God directly, its own rational nature imaging back the Word of God, after

 Part III.

 §36. This the more striking, if we consider the opposing forces out of which this order is produced .

 §37. The same subject continued .

 §38. The Unity of God shewn by the Harmony of the order of Nature .

 §39. Impossibility of a plurality of Gods .

 §40. The rationality and order of the Universe proves that it is the work of the Reason or Word of God .

 §41. The Presence of the Word in nature necessary, not only for its original Creation, but also for its permanence .

 §42. This function of the Word described at length .

 §43. Three similes to illustrate the Word’s relation to the Universe .

 §44. The similes applied to the whole Universe, seen and unseen .

 §45. Conclusion. Doctrine of Scripture on the subject of Part I .

 §46. Doctrine of Scripture on the subject of Part 3 .

 §47. Necessity of a return to the Word if our corrupt nature is to be restored .

Part II.

§30. The soul of man, being intellectual, can know God of itself, if it be true to its own nature.

The tenets we have been speaking of have been proved to be nothing more than a false guide for life; but the way of truth will aim at reaching the real and true God. But for its knowledge and accurate comprehension, there is need of none other save of ourselves. Neither as God Himself is above all, is the road to Him afar off or outside ourselves, but it is in us and it is possible to find it from ourselves, in the first instance, as Moses also taught, when he said45    See Orig. c. Cels. vii. 42 sqq. de Princ. I. 1.    Deut. xxx. 14.: “The word” of faith “is within thy heart.” Which very thing the Saviour declared and confirmed, when He said: “The kingdom of God is within you46    Restored in Christ, see §34.    Luc. xvii. 12..” 2. For having in ourselves faith, and the kingdom of God, we shall be able quickly to see and perceive the King of the Universe, the saving Word of the Father. And let not the Greeks, who worship idols, make excuses, nor let any one else simply deceive himself, professing to have no such road and therefore finding a pretext for his godlessness. 3. For we all have set foot upon it, and have it, even if not all are willing to travel by it, but rather to swerve from it and go wrong, because of the pleasures of life which attract them from without. And if one were to ask, what road is this? I say that it is the soul of each one of us, and the intelligence which resides there. For by it alone can God be contemplated and perceived. 4. Unless, as they have denied God, the impious men will repudiate having a soul; which indeed is more plausible than the rest of what they say, for it is unlike men possessed of an intellect to deny God, its Maker and Artificer. It is necessary then, for the sake of the simple, to shew briefly that each one of mankind has a soul, and that soul rational; especially as certain of the sectaries deny this also, thinking that man is nothing more than the visible form of the body. This point once proved, they will be furnished in their own persons with a clearer proof against the idols.

30 Τὰ μὲν προειρημένα οὐδὲν ἕτερον ἢ πλάνη τῷ βίῳ διηλέγχθη· ἡ δὲ τῆς ἀληθείας ὁδὸς πρὸς τὸν ὄντως ὄντα Θεὸν ἕξει τὸν σκοπόν. πρὸς δὲ τὴν ταύτης γνῶσιν καὶ ἀπλανῆ κατάληψιν οὐκ ἄλλων ἐστὶν ἡμῖν χρεία, ἀλλ' ἡμῶν αὐτῶν· οὐδ', ὥσπερ ἐστὶν αὐτὸς ὁ Θεὸς ὑπεράνω πάντων, οὕτω καὶ ἡ πρὸς τοῦτον ὁδὸς πόρρωθεν ἢ ἔξωθεν ἡμῶν ἐστιν· ἀλλ' ἐν ἡμῖν ἐστι, καὶ ἀφ' ἡμῶν εὑρεῖν τὴν ἀρχὴν δυνατόν, καθὼς καὶ Μωϋσῆς ἐδίδασκε λέγων· Τὸ ῥῆμα τῆς πίστεως ἐντὸς τῆς καρδίας σοῦ ἐστιν. ὅπερ καὶ ὁ Σωτὴρ σημαίνων καὶ βεβαιῶν ἔλεγεν· Ἡ βασιλεία τοῦ Θεοῦ ἐντὸς ὑμῶν ἐστιν. ἔνδον γὰρ ἐν ἑαυτοῖς ἔχοντες τὴν πίστιν καὶ τὴν βασιλείαν τοῦ Θεοῦ, δυνάμεθα ταχέως θεωρῆσαι καὶ νοῆσαι τὸν τοῦ παντὸς βασιλέα, τοῦ Πατρὸς σωτήριον Λόγον. καὶ μὴ προφασι ζέσθωσαν Ἕλληνες οἱ τοῖς εἰδώλοις θρησκεύοντες· μηδὲ ἄλλος τις ἁπλῶς ἑαυτὸν ἀπατάτω, ὡς τὴν τοιαύτην ὁδὸν οὐκ ἔχων, καὶ διὰ τοῦτο τῆς ἀθεότητος ἑαυτοῦ πρόφασιν εὑρίσκων. πάντες γὰρ εἰς αὐτὴν ἐπιβεβήκαμεν καὶ ἔχομεν, εἰ καὶ μὴ πάντες αὐτὴν ὁδεύειν, ἀλλὰ παροδεύειν ἐκβαίνοντες θέλουσι διὰ τὰς ἔξωθεν αὐτοὺς ἑλκούσας ἡδονὰς τοῦ βίου. καὶ εἴ τις ἂν ἔροιτο, τίς ἂν εἴη αὕτη· φημὶ δὴ τὴν ἑκάστου ψυχὴν εἶναι, καὶ τὸν ἐν αὐτῇ νοῦν. δι' αὐτοῦ γὰρ μόνου δύναται Θεὸς θεωρεῖσθαι καὶ νοεῖσθαι· ἐκτὸς εἰ μή, ὥσπερ τὸν Θεὸν ἠρνήσαντο, οὕτω καὶ ψυχὴν ἔχειν παραιτήσονται οἱ ἀσεβεῖς, εἰκότως τοῦτο πρὸ τῶν ἄλλων λέγοντες. οὐ γὰρ ἐχόντων ἔστι νοῦν ἀρνεῖσθαι τὸν τούτου ποιητὴν καὶ δημιουργὸν Θεόν. ὅτι μὲν οὖν ψυχὴν ἕκαστος ἀνθρώπων ἔχει καὶ ταύτην λογικήν, καὶ τοῦτο ἀναγκαῖόν ἐστι δεῖξαι δι' ὀλίγων διὰ τοὺς ἀκεραίους, ἐπεὶ μάλιστά τινες ἀπὸ τῶν αἱρέσεων ἀρνοῦνται καὶ τοῦτο, οἰόμενοι μηδὲν πλέον εἶναι τὸν ἄνθρωπον, ἢ τὸ φαινόμενον εἶδος τοῦ σώματος· ἵνα ταύτης δειχθεί σης, φανερώτερον δι' ἑαυτῶν τὸν κατὰ τῶν εἰδώλων ἔλεγχον ἔχειν δυνηθῶσι.