by Aurelius Augustin, Bishop of Hippo

 Chapter 1 [I.]—Of the Nature of the Perseverance Here Discoursed of.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—Faith is the Beginning of a Christian Man. Martyrdom for Christ’s Sake is His Best Ending.

 Chapter 3.—God is Besought for It, Because It is His Gift.

 Chapter 4.—Three Leading Points of the Pelagian Doctrine.

 Chapter 5.—The Second Petition in the Lord’s Prayer.

 Chapter 6 [III.]—The Third Petition. How Heaven and Earth are Understood in the Lord’s Prayer.

 Chapter 7 [IV.]—The Fourth Petition.

 Chapter 8 [V.]—The Fifth Petition. It is an Error of the Pelagians that the Righteous are Free from Sin.

 Chapter 9.—When Perseverance is Granted to a Person, He Cannot But Persevere.

 Chapter 10 [VI.]—The Gift of Perseverance Can Be Obtained by Prayer.

 Chapter 11.—Effect of Prayer for Perseverance.

 Chapter 12.—Of His Own Will a Man Forsakes God, So that He is Deservedly Forsaken of Him.

 Chapter 13 [VII.]—Temptation the Condition of Man.

 Chapter 14.—It is God’s Grace Both that Man Comes to Him, and that Man Does Not Depart from Him.

 Chapter 15.—Why God Willed that He Should Be Asked for that Which He Might Give Without Prayer.

 Chapter 16 [VIII.]—Why is Not Grace Given According to Merit?

 Chapter 17.—The Difficulty of the Distinction Made in the Choice of One and the Rejection of Another.

 Chapter 18.—But Why Should One Be Punished More Than Another?

 Chapter 19.—Why Does God Mingle Those Who Will Persevere with Those Who Will Not?

 Chapter 20.—Ambrose on God’s Control Over Men’s Thoughts.

 Chapter 21 [IX.]—Instances of the Unsearchable Judgments of God.

 Chapter 22.—It is an Absurdity to Say that the Dead Will Be Judged for Sins Which They Would Have Committed If They Had Lived.

 Chapter 23.—Why for the People of Tyre and Sidon, Who Would Have Believed, the Miracles Were Not Done Which Were Done in Other Places Which Did Not Be

 Chapter 24 [X.]—It May Be Objected that The People of Tyre and Sidon Might, If They Had Heard, Have Believed, and Have Subsequently Lapsed from Their

 Chapter 25 [XI.]—God’s Ways, Both in Mercy and Judgment, Past Finding Out.

 Chapter 26.—The Manicheans Do Not Receive All the Books of the Old Testament, and of the New Only Those that They Choose.

 Chapter 27.—Reference to the “Retractations.”

 Chapter 28 [XII.]—God’s Goodness and Righteousness Shown in All.

 Chapter 29.—God’s True Grace Could Be Defended Even If There Were No Original Sin, as Pelagius Maintains.

 Chapter 30.—Augustin Claims the Right to Grow in Knowledge.

 Chapter 31.—Infants are Not Judged According to that Which They are Foreknown as Likely to Do If They Should Live.

 Chapter 32 [XIII.]—The Inscrutability of God’s Free Purposes.

 Chapter 33.—God Gives Both Initiatory and Persevering Grace According to His Own Will.

 Chapter 34 [XIV.]—The Doctrine of Predestination Not Opposed to the Advantage of Preaching.

 Chapter 35.—What Predestination is.

 Chapter 36.—The Preaching of the Gospel and the Preaching of Predestination the Two Parts of One Message.

 Chapter 37.—Ears to Hear are a Willingness to Obey.

 Chapter 38 [XV.]—Against the Preaching of Predestination the Same Objections May Be Alleged as Against Predestination.

 Chapter 39 [XVI]—Prayer and Exhortation.

 Chapter 40.—When the Truth Must Be Spoken, When Kept Back.

 Chapter 41.—Predestination Defined as Only God’s Disposing of Events in His Foreknowledge.

 [XVII.] Among these benefits there remains perseverance unto the end, which is daily asked for in vain from the Lord, if the Lord by His grace does no

 Chapter 42.—The Adversaries Cannot Deny Predestination to Those Gifts of Grace Which They Themselves Acknowledge, and Their Exhortations are Not Hinde

 Chapter 43.—Further Development of the Foregoing Argument.

 Chapter 44.—Exhortation to Wisdom, Though Wisdom is God’s Gift.

 Chapter 45.—Exhortation to Other Gifts of God in Like Manner.

 Chapter 46.—A Man Who Does Not Persevere Fails by His Own Fault.

 Chapter 47.—Predestination is Sometimes Signified Under the Name of Foreknowledge.

 [XVIII.] Consequently sometimes the same predestination is signified also under the name of foreknowledge as says the apostle, “God has not rejected

 Chapter 48 [XIX.]—Practice of Cyprian and Ambrose.

 Chapter 49.—Further References to Cyprian and Ambrose.

 Chapter 50.—Obedience Not Discouraged by Preaching God’s Gifts.

 Chapter 51 [XX.]—Predestination Must Be Preached.

 Chapter 52.—Previous Writings Anticipatively Refuted the Pelagian Heresy.

 Chapter 53.—Augustin’s “Confessions.”

 Chapter 54 [XXI.]—Beginning and End of Faith is of God.

 Chapter 55.—Testimony of His Previous Writings and Letters.

 Chapter 56.—God Gives Means as Well as End.

 Chapter 57 [XXII.]—How Predestination Must Be Preached So as Not to Give Offence.

 Chapter 58.—The Doctrine to Be Applied with Discrimination.

 Chapter 59.—Offence to Be Avoided.

 Chapter 60.—The Application to the Church in General.

 Chapter 61.—Use of the Third Person Rather Than the Second.

 Chapter 62.—Prayer to Be Inculcated, Nevertheless.

 Chapter 63 [XXIII.]—The Testimony of the Whole Church in Her Prayers.

 Chapter 64.—In What Sense the Holy Spirit Solicits for Us, Crying, Abba, Father.

 Chapter 65.—The Church’s Prayers Imply the Church’s Faith.

 Chapter 66 [XXIV.]—Recapitulation and Exhortation.

 Chapter 67.—The Most Eminent Instance of Predestination is Christ Jesus.

 Chapter 68.—Conclusion.

Chapter 30.—Augustin Claims the Right to Grow in Knowledge.

Therefore it is in vain that it is prescribed to me from that old book of mine, that I may not argue the case as I ought to argue it in respect of infants; and that thence I may not persuade my opponents by the light of a manifest truth, that God’s grace is not given according to men’s merits. For if, when I began my books concerning Free Will as a layman, and finished them as a presbyter, I still doubted of the condemnation of infants not born again, and of the deliverance of infants that were born again, no one, as I think, would be so unfair and envious as to hinder my progress, and judge that I must continue in that uncertainty. But it can more correctly be understood that it ought to be believed that I did not doubt in that matter, for the reason that they against whom my purpose was directed seemed to me in such wise to be rebutted, as that whether there was a punishment of original sin in infants, according to the truth, or whether there was not, as some mistaken people think, yet in no degree should such a confusion of the two natures be believed in, to wit, of good and evil, as the error of the Manicheans introduces. Be it therefore far from us so to forsake the case of infants as to say to ourselves that it is uncertain whether, being regenerated in Christ, if they die in infancy they pass into eternal salvation; but that, not being regenerated, they pass into the second death. Because that which is written, “By one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin, and so death passed upon all men,”61    Rom. v. 12. cannot be rightly understood in any other manner; nor from that eternal death which is most righteously repaid to sin does any deliver any one, small or great, save He who, for the sake of remitting our sins, both original and personal, died without any sin of His own, either original or personal. But why some rather than others? Again and again we say, and do not shrink from it, “O man, who art thou that repliest against God?”62    Rom. ix. 20. “His judgments are unsearchable, and His ways past finding out.”63    Rom. xi. 33. And let us add this, “Seek not out the things that are too high for thee, and search not the things that are above thy strength.”64    Ecclus. iii. 21.

30. Frustra itaque mihi de illius libri mei vetustate praescribitur, ne agam causam sicut debeo agere parvulorum, et inde gratiam Dei non secundum me rita hominum dari, perspicuae veritatis luce convincam. Si enim quando libros de Libero Arbitrio laicus coepi, presbyter explicavi , adhuc de damnatione infantium non renascentium et de renascentium liberatione dubitarem; nemo, ut opinor, esset tam injustus atque invidus, qui me proficere prohiberet, atque in hac dubitatione remanendum mihi esse judicaret. Cum vero rectius possit intelligi, non me propterea de hac re dubitasse credi oportere, quia contra quos mea dirigebatur intentio, sic mihi visi sunt refellendi, ut sive poena esset peccati originalis in parvulis, quod veritas habet; sive non esset, quod nonnulli errantes opinantur; nullo modo tamen quam Manichaeorum 1011 error inducit, duarum naturarum, boni scilicet et mali, permixtio crederetur: absit ut causam parvulorum sic relinquamus, ut esse nobis dicamus incertum, utrum in Christo regenerati, si moriantur parvuli, transeant in aeternam salutem; non regenerati autem transeant in mortem secundam: quoniam quod scriptum est, Per unum hominem peccatum intravit in mundum, et per peccatum mors; et ita in omnes homines pertransiit (Rom. V, 12,); aliter recte intelligi non potest: nec a morte perpetua, quae justissime est retributa peccato, liberat quemquam pusillorum atque magnorum, nisi ille qui propter remittenda et originalia et propria nostra peccata mortuus est sine ullo suo originali propriove peccato. Sed quare illos potius quam illos? Iterum atque iterum dicimus, nec nos piget, O homo, tu quis es qui respondeas Deo (Rom. IX, 20)? Inscrutabilia sunt judicia ejus, et investigabiles viae ejus (Id. XI, 33). Et hoc adjiciamus: Altiora te ne quaesieris, et fortiora te ne scrutatus fueris (Eccli. III, 22).