The Treatise of Athenagoras

 Chapter I.—Defence of the Truth Should Precede Discussions Regarding It.

 Chapter II.—A Resurrection is Not Impossible.

 Chapter III.—He Who Could Create, Can Also Raise Up the Dead.

 Chapter IV.—Objection from the Fact that Some Human Bodies Have Become Part of Others.

 Chapter V.—Reference to the Processes of Digestion and Nutrition.

 Chapter VI.—Everything that is Useless or Hurtful is Rejected.

 Chapter VII.—The Resurrection-Body Different from the Present.

 Chapter VIII.—Human Flesh Not the Proper or Natural Food of Men.

 Chapter IX.—Absurdity of Arguing from Man’s Impotency.

 Chapter X.—It Cannot Be Shown that God Does Not Will a Resurrection.

 Chapter XI.—Recapitulation.

 Chapter XII.—Argument for the Resurrection From the Purpose Contemplated in Man’s Creation.

 Chapter XIII.—Continuation of the Argument.

 Chapter XIV.—The Resurrection Does Not Rest Solely on the Fact of a Future Judgment.

 Chapter XV.—Argument for the Resurrection from the Nature of Man.

 Chapter XVI—Analogy of Death and Sleep, and Consequent Argument for the Resurrection.

 Chapter XVII.—The Series of Changes We Can Now Trace in Man Renders a Resurrection Probable.

 Chapter XVIII.—Judgment Must Have Reference Both to Soul and Body: There Will Therefore Be a Resurrection.

 Chapter XIX.—Man Would Be More Unfavourably Situated Than the Beasts If There Were No Resurrection.

 Chapter XX.—Man Must Be Possessed Both of a Body and Soul Hereafter, that the Judgment Passed Upon Him May Be Just.

 Chapter XXI.—Continuation of the Argument.

 Chapter XXII.—Continuation of the Argument.

 Chapter XXIII.—Continuation of the Argument.

 Chapter XXIV.—Argument for the Resurrection from the Chief End of Man.

 Chapter XXV.—Argument Continued and Concluded.

Chapter XI.—Recapitulation.

If, then, by means of that which is by nature first and that which follows from it, each of the points investigated has been proved, it is very evident that the resurrection of dissolved bodies is a work which the Creator can perform, and can will, and such as is worthy of Him: for by these considerations the falsehood of the contrary opinion has been shown, and the absurdity of the position taken by disbelievers. For why should I speak of their correspondence each with each, and of their connection with one another? If indeed we ought to use the word connection, as though they were separated by some difference of nature; and not rather say, that what God can do He can also will, and that what God can will it is perfectly possible for Him to do, and that it is accordant with the dignity of Him who wills it. That to discourse concerning the truth is one thing, and to discourse in defence of it is another, has been sufficiently explained in the remarks already made, as also in what respects they differ from each other, and when and in dealing with whom they are severally useful; but perhaps there is no reason why, with a view to the general certainty, and because of the connection of what has been said with what remains, we should not make a fresh beginning from these same points and those which are allied to them. To the one kind of argument it naturally pertains to hold the foremost place, to the other to attend upon the first, and clear the way, and to remove whatever is obstructive or hostile. The discourse concerning the truth, as being necessary to all men for certainty and safety, holds the first place, whether in nature, or order, or usefulness: in nature, as furnishing the knowledge of the subject; in order, as being in those things and along with those things which it informs us of; in usefulness, as being a guarantee of certainty and safety to those who become acquainted with it. The discourse in defence of the truth is inferior in nature and force, for the refutation of falsehood is less important than the establishment of truth; and second in order, for it employs its strength against those who hold false opinions, and false opinions are an aftergrowth from another sowing and from degeneration. But, notwithstanding all this, it is often placed first, and sometimes is found more useful, because it removes and clears away beforehand the disbelief which disquiets some minds, and the doubt or false opinion of such as have but recently come over. And yet each of them is referrible to the same end, for the refutation of falsehood and the establishment of truth both have piety for their object: not, indeed, that they are absolutely one and the same, but the one is necessary, as I have said, to all who believe, and to those who are concerned about the truth and their own salvation; but the other proves to be more useful on some occasions, and to some persons, and in dealing with some. Thus much by way of recapitulation, to recall what has been already said. We must now pass on to what we proposed, and show the truth of the doctrine concerning the resurrection, both from the cause itself, according to which, and on account of which, the first man and his posterity were created, although they were not brought into existence in the same manner, and from the common nature of all men as men; and further, from the judgment of their Maker upon them according to the time each has lived, and according to the rules by which each has regulated his behaviour,—a judgment which no one can doubt will be just.

Eἰ δὲ διὰ τῶν κατὰ φύσιν πρώτων καὶ τῶν τούτοις ἑπομένων δέδεικται τῶν ἐξητασμένων ἕκαστον, εὔδηλον ὅτι καὶ δυνατὸν καὶ βουλητὸν καὶ ἄξιον τοῦ δημιουργήσαντος ἔργον ἡ τῶν διαλυθέντων σωμάτων ἀνάστασις· διὰ γὰρ τούτων ἐδείχθη ψεῦδος τὸ τούτοις ἀντικείμενον καὶ τὸ τῶν ἀπιστούντων παράλογον. τί γὰρ δεῖ λέγειν περὶ τῆς ἑκάστου τούτων πρὸς ἕκαστον ἀντιστροφῆς καὶ τῆς πρὸς ἄλληλα συναφείας, εἴ γε δεῖ καὶ συνάφειαν εἰπεῖν ὡς ἑτερότητί τινι κεχωρισμένων, οὐχὶ δὲ καὶ τὸ δυνατὸν λέγειν βουλητὸν καὶ τὸ τῷ θεῷ βουλητὸν πάντως εἶναι δυνατὸν καὶ κατὰ τὴν τοῦ βουληθέντος ἀξίαν; Καὶ ὅτι μὲν ἕτερος ὁ περὶ τῆς ἀληθείας λόγος, ἕτερος δὲ ὁ ὑπὲρ τῆς ἀληθείας, εἴρηται διὰ τῶν προλαβόντων μετρίως οἷς τε διενήνοχεν ἑκάτερος καὶ πότε καὶ πρὸς τίνας ἔχει τὸ χρήσιμον· κωλύει δὲ ἴσως οὐδὲν τῆς τε κοινῆς ἀσφαλείας ἕνεκεν καὶ τῆς τῶν εἰρημένων πρὸς τὰ λειπόμενα συναφείας ἀπ' αὐτῶν τούτων καὶ τῶν τούτοις προσηκόντων πάλιν ποιήσασθαι τὴν ἀρχήν. προσῆκεν δὲ τῷ μὲν τὸ πρωτεύειν κατὰ φύσιν, τῷ δὲ τὸ δορυφορεῖν τὸν πρῶτον ὁδοποιεῖν τε καὶ προανείργειν πᾶν ὁπόσον ἐμποδὼν καὶ πρόσαντες. ὁ μὲν γὰρ περὶ τῆς ἀληθείας λόγος ἀναγκαῖος ὢν πᾶσιν ἀνθρώποις πρὸς ἀσφάλειαν καὶ σωτηρίαν πρωτοστατεῖ καὶ τῇ φύσει καὶ τῇ τάξει καὶ τῇ χρείᾳ· τῇ φύσει μὲν, ὡς τὴν τῶν πραγμάτων γνῶσιν παρεχόμενος, τῇ τάξει δὲ, ὡς ἐν τούτοις καὶ ἅμα τούτοις ὑπάρχων ὧν γίνεται μηνυτής, τῇ χρείᾳ δὲ, ὡς τῆς ἀσφαλείας καὶ τῆς σωτηρίας τοῖς γινώσκουσι γινόμενος πρόξενος. ὁ δ' ὑπὲρ τῆς ἀληθείας φύσει τε καὶ δυνάμει καταδεέστερος, ἔλαττον γὰρ τὸ τὸ ψεῦδος ἐλέγχειν τοῦ τὴν ἀλήθειαν κρατύνειν· καὶ τάξει δεύτερος, κατὰ γὰρ τῶν ψευδοδοξούντων ἔχει τὴν ἰσχύν· ψευδοδοξίᾳ δὲ ἐξ ἐπισπορᾶς ἐπεφύη καὶ παραφθορᾶς· ἀλλὰ δὴ καὶ τούτων οὕτως ἐχόντων προτάττεται πολλάκις καὶ γίνεταί ποτε χρειωδέστερος ὡς ἀναιρῶν καὶ προδιακαθαίρων τὴν ἐνοχλοῦσάν τισιν ἀπιστίαν καὶ τοῖς ἄρτι προσιοῦσι τὴν ἀμφιβολίαν ἢ ψευδοδοξίαν. καὶ πρὸς ἓν μὲν ἑκάτερος ἀναφέρεται τέλος· εἰς γὰρ τὴν εὐσέβειαν ἔχει τὴν ἀναφορὰν ὅ τε τὸ ψεῦδος ἐλέγχων καὶ ὁ τὴν ἀλήθειαν κρατύνων· οὐ μὴν καὶ καθάπαξ ἕν εἰσιν, ἀλλ' ὁ μὲν ἀναγκαῖος, ὡς ἔφην, πᾶσι τοῖς πιστεύουσι καὶ τοῖς τῆς ἀληθείας καὶ τῆς ἰδίας σωτηρίας φροντίζουσιν, ὁ δὲ ἔστιν ὅτε καί τισιν καὶ πρός τινας γίνεται χρειωδέστερος. καὶ ταῦτα μὲν ἡμῖν κεφαλαιωδῶς προειρήσθω πρὸς ὑπόμνησιν τῶν ἤδη λεχθέντων· ἰτέον δὲ ἐπὶ τὸ προκείμενον, καὶ δεικτέον ἀληθῆ τὸν περὶ τῆς ἀναστάσεως λόγον ἀπό τε τῆς αἰτίας αὐτῆς, καθ' ἣν καὶ δι' ἣν ὁ πρῶτος γέγονεν ἄνθρωπος οἵ τε μετ' ἐκεῖνον, εἰ καὶ μὴ κατὰ τὸν ὅμοιον γεγόνασι τρόπον, ἀπό τε τῆς κοινῆς πάντων ἀνθρώπων ὡς ἀνθρώπων φύσεως, ἔτι δὲ ἀπὸ τῆς τοῦ ποιήσαντος ἐπὶ τούτοις κρίσεως, καθ' ὅσον ἕκαστος ἔζησε χρόνον καὶ καθ' οὓς ἐπολιτεύσατο νόμους, ἣν οὐκ ἄν τις ἀμφισβητήσειεν εἶναι δικαίαν.