S. Cyril, Archbishop Of Alexandria. Interpretation Or Comment On The Gospel According To John.

 The Lord will give utterance to them who evangelize with much power, declareth exceeding well the Psalmist. But I deem that they who ought to approach

 Chapters In Book I. Chapter 1. That Everlasting and before the ages is the Only-Begotten, on the words, In the beginning was the Word. And the Word wa

 Exegetic Commentary Gospel According To John Archbishop of Alexandria.

 Chapter I. That Everlasting and before the ages is the Only-Begotten.

 Chapter Ii. That the Son being Consubstantial with the Father is also God in His Own Person, even as also the Father.

 Chapter Iii. That the Son is both God by Nature and in no wise either inferior to or unlike the Father.

 Chapter Iv. Against those who dare to say that the conceived and Natural word in God the Father is one, and He that is called Son by the Divine Script

 Chapter V. That the Son is by Nature Creator with the Father, as being of His Essence, and not taken to Him as a minister.

 Chapter Vi. That the Son is by Nature Life and therefore not originate, but of the Essence of God the Father.

 Chapter Vii. That the Son is by Nature Light and therefore not originate, but of the Essence of God the Father, as Very Light from Very Light.

 Chapter Viii. That the Son of God alone is Very Light, the creature not at all, being participate of Light, as originate.

 Chapter Ix. That the soul of man does not exist prior to the body, nor is the embodiment as some say a consequence of former sins.

 Chapter X. That the Only-Begotten is Alone by Nature the Son from the Father, as being of Him and in Him.

 Chapters In Book Ii. Chapter 1. That the Holy Ghost is in the Son, not by participation, nor from without, but Essentially and by Nature : on the word

 Our Father Among The Saints Cyril Archbishop of Alexandria On The Gospel According To John. Book Ii.

 Chapter I. That the Holy Ghost is in the Son not by participation, not from without, but Essentially and by Nature.

 Chapter Ii. That the Son is not in the number of things originate, but above all, as God of God.

 Chapter Iii. That Christ is God and of God by Nature.

 Chapter Iv. That not by participation are the Properties of God the Father in the Son, but Essentially and by Nature.

 Chapter V. That the Son is not in the number of worshippers, in that He is Word and God, but rather is worshipped with the Father.

 Chapter Vi. That the Son is not inferior to the Father either in power or in operation for any work but is Equal in Might and Consubstantial with Him,

 Chapter Vii. That nought of God-befitting Dignities or Excellences is in the Son, by participation, or from without.

 Chapter Viii. That the Son being God and of God by Nature, and the Exact Image of Him Who begat Him, hath equal honour and glory with Him.

 Chapter Ix. That the Son is in nothing inferior to God the Father, but is of Equal Might in Operation unto all things as God of God.

 Chapters Treated More At Large In The Third Book. Chapter 1. A critical enquiry, why the blessed Baptist is called by Christ not only a lamp, but burn

 Our Father Among The Saints Cyril Archbishop of Alexandria On The Gospel According To John. Book Iii.

 Chapter Ii. That the Son is the Image of God the Father, wherein also is an exposure of the Jews as not understanding the words darkly uttered by Mose

 Chapter Iii. That Moses was indicating the Coming of the Saviour. From Deuteronomy, concerning Christ.

 Chapter Iv. That oftentimes the departures of Christ from Jerusalem signify the transferring of His grace to the Gentiles: wherein is also the discour

 Chapter V. That the Only-Begotten Son is the Impress of the Person of God the Father, and no other Impress either is, or is conceived of, save He.

 Chapter Vi. Of the manna, that it was a type of Christ's Presence and of the spiritual graces through Him.

 Chapters In The Fourth Book. 1.  That in nothing is the Son inferior to God the Father, because He is of Him by Nature, although He be said by some to

 Our Father Among The Saints Cyril Archbishop of Alexandria On The Gospel According To John. Book Iv.

 Chapter Ii. That the Holy Body of Christ is Lifegiving, wherein He speaks of His Own Body as of Bread.

 Chapter Iii. That the Son is not a Partaker of Life from any other, but rather Life by Nature, as being begotten of God the Father Who is Life by Natu

 Chapter Iv. That a type of Christ was the holy Tabernacle which led the people in the wilderness, and that the ark that was in it and the lamp and the

 Chapter V. On the feast of Tabernacles, that it signifies the restitution of the hope due to the Saints, and the resurrection from the dead on the wo

 Chapter Vi. A dissertation upon the rest of the Sabbath, manifoldly shewing of what it is significant.

 Chapter Vii. A dissertation upon the circumcision on the eighth day, manifoldly shewing of what it is significant.

 Chapters In Book V. 1.    That human affairs are not, according to the unlearned surmises of the Greeks, subject as of necessity to the Hours, but tha

 Our Father Among The Saints Cyril Archbishop of Alexandria Gospel According To John. Book V.

 Chapter I. That human affairs are not, according to the unlearned surmises of the Greeks, subject as of necessity to the Hours, but that of our own ch

 Chapter Ii. That after the Saviour's Cross at His rising again from the dead the Holy Ghost took up His abode in us permanently.

 Chapter Iii. That no work of Jewish might was the Suffering on the Cross, nor did Christ die from the tyranny of any, but Himself of His own will suff

 Chapter Iv. That the Son is by Nature God, wholly remote from likeness to the creature, as regards Essence.

 Chapter V. That not inferior in Might and Wisdom to God the Father is the Son, yea rather His very Wisdom and Might.

 Chapters In Book Vi. That not from sins of the soul prior to birth do bodily suffering's befal any, nor yet does God bring the sins of the fathers upo

 Our Father Among The Saints Cyril Archbishop of Alexandria On The Gospel According To John. Book Vi.

 Chapter I. That not from sins of the soul prior to birth do bodily sufferings befal any, nor yet does God bring the sins of their fathers upon any, pu

 The Fragments Which Are Extant Of Book Vii.

 The Fragments Which Are Extant Of Book Viii.

 Chapters In The Ninth Book. 1. That by reason of the identity of Their Nature, the Son is in the Father, and the Father again is in the Son. 

 Cyril Archbishop of Alexandria Comment On The Gospel According To John. Book Ix.

 Chapter I. That by reason of the identity of Their nature, the Son is in the Father, and the Father again is in the Son.

 Chapters In The Tenth Book. 1.  That in nothing is the Son inferior to God the Father, but rather equal to and like Him in nature on the words: If ye

 Our Father Among The Saints, Cyril, Archbishop of Alexandria On The Gospel According To John.  Book X.

 Chapter I. That in nothing is the Son inferior to God the Father, but rather equal to and like Him in nature.

 Chapter Ii. That the Son is Consubstantial with God the Father, and not of an alien or foreign nature, as some of the perverse assert.

 Chapters In The Eleventh Book.

 Our Father Among The Saints, Cyril, Archbishop of Alexandria, On The Gospel According To John. Book Xi.

 Chapter Ii. That His Spirit, that is, the Holy Spirit, is naturally in the Son and in His Substance, as He is also in the Substance of the Father.

 Chapter Iii. That no man should consider that the Son has any lack of God-befitting glory, though He be found to say, Father, glorify Thy Son.

 Chapter Iv. That it will in no way damage the glory of the Son, when He is said to have received aught from God the Father, since for this we can assi

 Chapter V. That the Son will not be excluded from being true God, even though He named God the Father the only true God.

 Chapter Vi. That the Son is not bare of God-befitting glory, even though He is found saying to the Father, And now glorify Me with the glory which I h

 Chapter Vii. That the fact that something is said to have been given to the Son from the Father does not rob Him of God-befitting dignity but He plai

 Chapter Viii. That nothing which is spoken of as belonging to the Father will be excluded from the kingdom of the Son, for Both alike rule over all.

 Chapter Ix. That the dignity of Godhead is inherent in the Son even though He is said to have received this from the Father, because of His humanity

 Chapter X. That Christ is not holy from participation in anything different from Himself and that the sanctification through the Spirit is not alien

 Chapter Xi. That the Son is naturally One with God His Father and that He is in the Father and the Father in Him, according to the essential bond and

 Chapter Xii. That the Son is by Nature One with God His Father, though He says that He received, as by way of grace, His being One with the Father.

 Chapter In The Twelfth Book.

 Our Father Among The Saints, Cyril, Archbishop of Alexandria, On The Gospel According To John. Book Xii.

 Chapter I. That the Son is by Nature God, even though we find Him calling the Father His God.

Chapter Viii. That the Son being God and of God by Nature, and the Exact Image of Him Who begat Him, hath equal honour and glory with Him.

23 That all should honour the Son even as they honour the Father: he that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father Which sent Him.

A cause and reason of the things already enumerated, is now evident, viz., that the Son ought to be honoured in Equality and likeness with the Father. For recapitulating a little, and carried back to a recollection of the preceding, you will view accurately the force of the passage. He said then that God was His Father, making Himself Equal with God; then again He began shewing that He was of Equal strength and skill, saying, For what things soever He doeth, these doeth also the Son likewise. That He is both Life and Life-giving by Nature, as is He too Who begat Him, He shewed plainly, adding, For as the Father raiseth up the dead and quickeneth them, so the Son too quick-eneth whom He will. But that He will be also Judge of all, the Father in all things co-approving and consenting, He declared, saying, For neither doth the Father judge any man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son. What then is the cause of these things? what induced the Only-Begotten to say all this? That all men (He saith) should honour the Son even as they honour the Father. For if He hath all things whatever the Father hath, as far as appertains to God-befitting Dignity, how is it not fitting that He to Whom nothing is lacking to Identity of essence should be crowned with equal honours with Him? What then do they say to this too who pervert all equity, as saith the Prophet Isaiah?  

"If (he says) by reason of its being said, That all men should honour the Son even as they honour the Father, ye suppose that one ought to magnify the Son with equal honours with the Father, ye know not that ye are stepping far away from the truth. For the word As does not altogether introduce equality of acts, in respect of those things it is affixed to, but often marks out a kind of likeness, just as (he says) the Saviour counsels, saying, Be ye therefore merciful as your Father also which is in Heaven is merciful. Shall we then be as merciful as the Father, on account of the as? And again Christ says to His Father of His disciples: Thou hast loved them, As Thou hast loved Me. But we will not grant that the disciples are loved just as the Son, on account of the as. Why then dost thou multiply words, and distort what is said into blasphemy, though it introduces no obligation on the hearers to honour the Son in equal measure with the Father?"

What then is our answer to these things? With bitter words do the fighters against God bay at us, but without are dogs, as Paul saith, without are evil workers, without the right faith are the concision. For we are sons of the truth and children of the light. Therefore we will glorify the Only-Begotten together with God the Father, not with any difference, but in equality of honour and glory, as God of God, and Light of Light, and Life of Life. And overmuch enquiry into what is to be received as faith, is not without hazard: nevertheless we must test the force of the As, lest our opponents be overwise in their own conceits. When therefore As is applied to things unlike in their nature, it does not wholly introduce absolute equality, but rather likeness and resemblance, as ye yourselves acknowledged above; but when it is applied to things in all respects like to one another, it shews equality in all things and similitude and whatever else is found to have the same force with these. Just as if I say, Bright is the sun in Heaven, bright too is silver which is of the earth, yet is the nature of the things mentioned diverse. Let any of the rich, of the earth, be supposed to say to his household servants, Let the silver shine as the sun. In this case we very justly say that earthly matter attains not to equal brightness with the sun, but to a certain likeness and resemblance, although the word As be used of it. But let Peter and John (suppose) of the holy disciples be brought forward, who both in respect of nature and of piety towards God, fail not of an accurate likeness one to another, let the As be applied, some one saying of them, as here, Let John be honoured by all, even as Peter, will the As here be powerless, so that equal honour ought not to be paid to both? But I do not suppose that any one will say such a thing: for he will see that there is nothing to prevent it.

According to this analogy of idea, when the As is applied to the Father and the Son, why should we shrink from crowning Both with equal honours? For He having considered before, as God, things to come, and having carefully viewed the envious opposition of thine unlearning hath brought in the As, not bare and bereft of the aid befitting it, but having strengthened it beforehand with convenient proofs, and shewn afore that He is God by Nature (for He made God His Father): having again fore-shewn that He is both God the Creator and of a truth Life, and having before introduced Himself, altogether glorying (so to say) in the Attributes of God the Father,----He afterwards seasonably subjoins That all men should honour the Son even as they honour the Father too. Then what objection still appears, what is there to hinder, that He, in Whom are Essentially the Properties and excellencies of the Father, should attain to an equal degree of honour? for we shall be found honouring the very Nature of God the Father, full well beaming forth in the Son. Wherefore He proceeds, He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which sent Him. For the charge of dishonouring the Son, and the force of blasphemy against Him, will mount up unto none other more truly than the Father Himself, Who put forth the Son as it were from the Fount of His Own Nature, even though He be seen throughout the whole Holy Scriptures as everlastingly with Him.

"Yea (saith the opponent) let the charge from dishonouring the Son go to whatsoever you please, or rather let it reach even unto God the Father Himself. For He will be angry, and that with reason, yet not wholly so, as though His Very Nature were insulted in the Son, according to our just now carefully finished argument, but since He is His Image and Impress, formed most excellently after His Divine and Ineffable Essence, He is with reason angry, and will wholly transfer the wrong to Himself. For it were indeed most absurd, that he who insulted the Divine Impresses, should not surely pay the penalty of his sin against the Archetype. Just as he who has in-suited the images of earthly kings, is punished as having indeed transgressed against the ruler himself. And in like manner shall we find it decreed by God in respect of ourselves also: for Whoso (saith He) sheddeth man's blood, for his blood shall he be poured forth: because in the Image of God He made man. Seest thou then hereby very clearly (saith he) that if the Image be wronged, and not altogether the Divine Nature, God the Father deems it right to be angry? In this way then let that which is said by Christ be conceived of and adapted, He that honoureth not the Son, neither doth he honour the Father."

Shall then the Only Begotten be classed with us as external to the Essence of the Father? how then will He yet be God by Nature, if He altogether slip out of the bounds of the Godhead, situate in some nature of his own and of other sort than that wherein the Father is? and we do wrong, it seems, in bringing into one count of Godhead, the order of the Holy Trinity. We ought, we ought at length to worship the Father as God, to impart some glory of Their Own to the Son and the Spirit, severing them as it were into different natures, and defining severally to Each the mode of His Existence. Yet do the Divine Scriptures declare unto us One God, classing with the Father the Son and the Spirit, so that through Their Essential and exact sameness the Holy Trinity is brought unto one count of Godhead. The Only-Begotten is not then alien from the Nature of Him who begat Him, but neither will He be a whit conceived of as Son in truth, if He beamed not forth from the Essence of the Father (for this and no other is the definition and mode of true son ship in all) but if there be no Son, God's being Father will be wholly taken away too. How then will Paul be true in saying of Him, Of Whom every family in Heaven and earth is named? For if He have not begotten of Himself in God-befitting manner the Son, how shall the beginning of Fatherhood be in Him, going through in imitation to those who are in Heaven and earth? But God is in truth Father: the Only-Begotten therefore is by Nature Son, and is of a surety within the bounds of the Divinity. For God will be begotten of God even as man (for example) of man, and the Nature of God the Father, Which transcends all things, will not err by bearing fruit not befitting It.

But since some blasphemously and foolishly say, that it is not the Nature of God the Father That is insulted in the Son, when He does not receive due honour from any, but that He is angry reasonably and rightly, at His Own Image being dishonoured in Him; we must ask them in what sense they would have the Son be and be called the Image of the Father. Yea rather let us forestalling their account, determine beforehand the Nature of the Image, according to legitimate reasoning: for so will the result of our enquiries be clear and more distinct. Therefore one and the first mode of image is that of sameness of nature in properties exactly alike, as Abel of Adam, or Isaac of Abraham: the second again is that consisting in likeness of impress, and accurate impression of form, as the King's delineation in wood, or made in any other way, most excellently and skilfully, as respects him. Another image again is taken in respect of habits and manners, and conversation and inclination to either good or bad, as for instance it may be said that the well-doer is like Paul, him that is not so like Cain (for the being equally good or bad, works likeness with either, and with reason confers it) Another form of image is, that of dignity and honour and glory and excellence, as when one for instance succeeds another in a command, and does all things with the authority which belongs to and becomes him. An image in another sense, is in respect of any either quality or quantity of a thing, and its outline and proportion: for we must speak briefly.

Let then the most critical investigators of the Divine Image teach us, whether they think one ought to attribute to the Only-Begotten the Essential and Natural Likeness, and thus say that the Only-Begotten Word proceeding from the Father is an Image of Him in the same sense as Abel is of Adam, who retained in himself the whole nature of his parent, and bore the count of human nature all-complete? or will they be vexed at this, compelled to confess the Son truly God of God by Nature, and turning aside according to their custom to fight against the truth, advance to the second kind of image, which is conceived to exist in mere form, impress and outline? But I suppose they will shrink from saying this. For no one, even if he be a very prater, will suppose that the Godhead can be estimated in respect of size, or circumscribed by outline, or meted by impress, or that the Unembodied will wholly undergo what belongs to bodies. Do they say then that He is conformed to Him in respect of manners and habits and will, and are they not ashamed to dress Him in this image? for how is He yet to be conceived of as God by Nature, Who has Likeness to Him in will only, but has another Being separately of Himself? For they will surely acknowledge that He subsists. Then what is there in Him more than in the creature? For shall we not believe that the angels themselves hasten to perform the Divine Will, who are by nature other than God? But what, when this is conceived of as belonging to us too? for does not the Only-Begotten teach us foolishly to jump at things above our nature, and to aim at impossibilities, saying, Be ye merciful, as your Father also which is in Heaven is merciful? For this were undoubtedly to say that we ought to gain the likeness of the Father by identity of will. And Paul too was an imitator of Christ, of the (as they babbling say) Image of the Father in will only. But they will shift their ground (I suppose) from these miserable conceptions, and as though thinking something greater and better, will surely say this, "The Only-Begotten is the Image of God the Father, in respect of identity of will, in respect of God-befitting Dignity and Glory and Power, in respect of Operation in creation and working miracles, in respect of reigning and ruling over all, in respect of judging and being worshipped by angels and men and in short by all creation. By all these He shewing us the Father in Himself, says that He is not of His Person, but is the Impress of His Person." Therefore as we said just now, the Son is none of these by nature, but is altogether separate from all of them according at least to your most foolish reasoning, and is neither Very God, nor Son, nor King, nor Lord, nor Creator, nor Mighty, nor in respect of His own "Will is He by Nature Good: but in boasts solely and only of what is God-befitting is He seen. And as is the application of tints to paintings on tablets, beautifying them by the variety to the eye, but having nothing true: so as to the Son too, the beauty of the Excellencies of God the Father decks Him around with bare names only, but is as it were applied from without like certain tints: yea rather the Divine Nature is outlined in Him, and appears in bare type.

Next, how will ye not be shewn to be fighting outright with all the holy Scriptures, that ye may with justice hear, Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, Ye are always resisting the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do Ye too, for when do they not call the Son Very God, or when do they bear Him forth from the Essence of His Father? which of them has dared to say that He is by Nature neither Creator nor King nor Almighty nor to be worshipped? For the Divine Psalmist says as to the Only-Begotten Himself, Thy Throne, O God, is for ever and ever: Thomas again the most wise disciple in like wise calls Him God alike and Lord. He is called Almighty and Creator by every voice of saint, and as having not according to you the Dignity from without, but as being by Nature what He is said to be, and therefore is He worshipped both by the holy Angels and by us, albeit the Divine Scripture says that we ought to worship none other, save the Lord God Alone.

If then they hold that the God-befitting Dignity in Him is acquired and given, and think that they ought to worship such an one, let them know that they are worshipping the creature rather than the Creator, and making out to themselves a new and fresh God, rather than acknowledging Him Who is really so by Nature. But if while they say that the Son is external to the Essence of God the Father, they yet acknowledge Him to be Son and Very God and King and Lord and Creator, and to have Essentially in Himself the Properties and Excellencies of the Father, let them see whither there is risk that the end of those who thus think will be. For nothing at all will be found of sure faith in the Divine Nature, since the nature of things originate also is now capable of being whatever It is conceived to be. For it has been proved according to the most feeble reasoning of our opponents, that the Only-Begotten not being of the Divine Nature, hath yet truly in Himself Its Excellencies. Who will not shudder at the mere hearing the blasphemy of the doctrines? For all things are now overturned, when the Nature That is above all things descendeth so as to be classed with things originate, and the creation itself contrary to reason springs up to the measure above it, and not designed for it.

Therefore let us swimming away from the absurdity of such doctrines, as from a ship sinking in the sea, hasten to the Truth, as to a secure and unruffled haven, and let us ackowledge the Son to be the Image of God the Father, not plaistered over so to say with perishable honours, nor adorned merely with God-befitting titles, but Essentially Exact according to the likeness of His Father, and unalterably being by Nature That which He That begat Him is conceived to be, to wit Very God of God in truth, Almighty, Creator, Glorified, Good, to be worshipped, and whatever may be added to the things enumerated as befitting God. For then shewing Him to be Like in all things to God the Father, we shall also shew Him true, in saying that if any will not honour the Son, neither doth he honour the Father Which hath sent Him: for as to this our enquiry and the test of the things just now investigated had its origin.

24 Verily verily I say unto you, he that heareth My Word and believeth on Him That sent Me, hath everlasting Life, and cometh not into condemnation, but is passed from death unto life.

Having now proved sufficiently by the foregoing, that the miserable Jews sin not against the Son only, by daring to find fault with the things which He says or does among them in His teaching, but do also ignorantly transgress against the Father Himself, and having as far as pertains to the force of what has been said, wrapped about their over-confidence with fear, and persuaded them to live more religiously in hope of things to come, He at length snares them to obedience. And not unskilfully again did He frame His speech to this end. For since He knew that the Jews were still diseased, and yet offended concerning Him, He again brings back their faith to the Person of God the Father, not as excluding Himself, but as honoured in the Father too by reason of Identity of Essence. For He affirms that they who believe shall not only be partakers of eternal life, but also shall escape the peril of the condemnation, being justified, that is: holding forth fear mixed with hope. For thus could He make His discourse more efficacious and more demonstrative to the hearers.  

25 Verily verily I say unto you, the hour is coming and now is when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God, and they that hear shall live.

Having said that believers shall pass from death to life, He introduces Himself as Performer of the promise, and Accomplisher of the whole thing, partly hinting to the Jews, that marvellous in truth is the Power shewn in the case of the paralytic, but that the Son will be revealed as a Worker of things yet more glorious, driving away from the bodies of men not only sickness and the infirmities of diseases, but also overthrowing death and the heavily-pressing corruption (for this was what was said a little before, The Father loveth the Son and sheweth Him all things that Himself doeth and greater works than these will He shew Him, that Ye may marvel; for the greater wonder is shewn in the raising of the dead), partly also preparing the way for that which would probably in no slight degree affright the hearers. For He plainly declares that He will raise the dead, and will bring the creature to judgment, that through the expectation of one day being brought before Him and giving account of everything, they might be found more backward in their daring to persecute Him, and might receive more zealously the word of teaching and guidance.

To these things then the aim of the chapter looks and tends: but we must now explain the words. The common account then is (as it seems) that the time will come, when the dead shall hear the Voice of Him That raiseth them: and they suppose that it is now too no less present, either as when Lazarus for instance is to hear the Voice of the Saviour, or as saying that the dead are those not yet called through faith unto eternal life, who will surely attain unto it, by having received the doctrine of the Saviour. And this method of considering it does indeed preserve a plausible appearance, but accuracy not at all. Wherefore ruminating again the force of the words, we will affix a more suitable sense, and thus open the reading:  

Verily verily I say unto you, the hour is coming and now is, when the dead shall hear the Voice of the Son of God; the hour again that is, when they that hear shall live. By the words then in the beginning, He means the time of the resurrection, wherein He teaches through the word of the Judge that they that sleep shall rise again to answer for their life in the world, that as I said before, devising the fear thence arising as a bridle, He might persuade them to live full excellently and wisely: by the closing words He shews that the due time of believing is now come, but also says that everlasting life will be the reward of obedience: all but declaring, Ye shall all come to judgement, sirs, that is at the time of the Resurrection, but if it seem bitter to you to be punished, and to undergo endless penalties at the hand of the offended Judge, suffer not the time of obedience to pass by, but laying hold of it while yet present, haste ye to attain to everlasting life.

26, 27  For as the Father hath life in Himself, so gave He to the Son too to have life in Himself, and gave Him authority to execute judgment also because He is the Son of Man.

Observe again the economy in these words, that thou mayest marvel at the form of expression and not, by falling into offence thereat from ignorance, bring upon thyself perdition. For the Only-Begotten, being Man in respect of the nature of His Body, and seen as one of us while yet upon the earth with flesh, manifoldly instructing the Jews in matters pertaining to salvation, clothed Himself with the glory of two God-befitting things. For He clearly affirmed, that He would both raise the dead, and set them at His Judgement-seat to be judged. But it was extremely likely that the hearers would be vexed at this, accusing Him with reason, because He said that God was His Father, making Himself equal with God. Having mingled therefore with God-befitting Authority and Splendour language befitting the human nature, He beguiles the weight of their wrath, saying more modestly and lowlily than was necessary, For as the Father hath life in Himself, so hath He given to the Son too to have life in Himself. Marvel not (saith He) if I, Who am now as you, and am seen as a Man, promise to raise the dead, and threaten to bring them to judgement: the Father hath given Me Power to quicken, He hath given Me to judge with authority. But when He had hereby healed the readily-slipping ear of the Jews, He bestows zealous care for the profit too of what follows, and immediately explaining why He says that He hath received it, He alleges that human nature hath nothing of itself, saying, Because He is the Son of Man.

For that the Only Begotten is also Life by Nature, and not a partaker of life from another, and so quickeneth as doth the Father, I think it superfluous to say now, since no small discourse was expended hereupon in the beginning of the book, upon the words, In Him was Life.

28, 29 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear His Voice and shall come forth; they that have done good unto the resurrection of life, and they that have done evil unto the resurrection of doom.

He signifies by these words the time of the resurrection of all, when, as the Divine Paul wrote to us, The Lord Himself shall descend from heaven with a summons, with the voice of the Archangel, with the trump of God, to judge the world in righteousness, and render to every man according to his works. He leads therefore by repetition of the same things the most unlearned understanding of the Jews, to be able clearly to understand, that He will be a Worker of greater deeds than those in which the paralytic was concerned, and that He will be revealed as a Judge of the world: and by profitably contrasting the healing of one sick person with the resurrection of the dead, He shews that greater and more noteworthy is the operation that undoes death and destroys the corruption of all, and reasonably and of necessity says, in respect of the lesser miracle, Marvel not at this. And let us not at all suppose that by these words He means to find fault with the glory of His own works, or to enjoin the hearers that they ought not to hold worthy of wonder, those things whereat one may reasonably wonder, but He wishes those who were astonished at that to know and believe that the subject of wonder as yet was small. For He raiseth by a word and God-befitting Operation not only the sick from little diseases, but those also who have been already submerged by death and overcome by invincible corruption. And hence introducing the greater, He says, The hour is coming in which all that are in their graves shall hear His Voice. For He who by a Word brought into being things that were not, how should He not be able to win back into being that which was already created? For thus each will be the effect of the same Operation, and the glorious production of one Authority. And profitably does He subjoin that they shall come forth of their graves, they that were holden of base deeds and that lived in wickedness to undergo endless punishment, the illustrious in virtue to receive the reward of their religiousness, eternal life: at once (as we said above) introducing Himself as the Dispenser of what belongs to each, in these words of His; and persuading them, either from fear of suffering dreadful punishments, to forego evil and to hasten to elect to live more soberly, or pricked with desire after some sort for eternal life, make more zealous and eager haste after good.  

ΚΕΦΑΛΗ Η. Ὅτι Θεὸς καὶ ἐκ Θεοῦ κατὰ φύσιν ὑπάρχων ὁ Υἱὸς, καὶ εἰκὼν τοῦ γεννήσαντος ἀκριβὴς, ἴσην ἔχει πρὸς αὐτὸν καὶ τιμὴν καὶ δόξαν.
« Ἵνα πάντες τιμῶσι τὸν Υἱὸν καθὼς τιμῶσι τὸν Πατέρα: ὁ μὴ τιμῶν τὸν Υἱὸν οὐ τιμᾷ τὸν Πατέρα τὸν πέμψαντα αὐτόν. » ΑΙΤΙΑ καὶ πρόφασις ἤδη τῶν προκατηριθμημένων ὁρᾶται, τὸ χρῆναι τιμᾶσθαι τὸν Υἱὸν ἐν ἰσότητί τε καὶ ὁμοιότητι τῇ πρὸς τὸν Πατέρα. βραχὺ δὲ ἀναλαβὼν, καὶ εἰς τὴν τῶν κατόπιν ἀνακομιζόμενος μνήμην, περιαθρήσῃ ἀκριβῶς τοῦ λόγου τὴν δύναμιν. οὐκοῦν ἴδιον μὲν ἔφασκε ” Πατέρα τὸν “Θεὸν ὑπάρχειν, ἴσον ἑαυτὸν ποιῶν τῷ Θεῷ:” εἶτα πάλιν ἰσοσθενῆ καὶ ὁμότεχνον ἀπεδείκνυε λέγων “Ἃ γὰρ ἂν ” ἐκεῖνος ποιῇ, ταῦτα καὶ ὁ Υἱὸς ὁμοίως ποιεῖ:“ ὅτι δὲ καὶ ζωὴ καὶ ζωοποιὸς κατὰ φύσιν ἐστὶν, ὥσπερ οὖν καὶ ὁ γεννήσας αὐτὸν, διεσάφει προστιθείς ” Ὥσπερ γὰρ ὁ Πατὴρ “ἐγείρει τοὺς νεκροὺς καὶ ζωοποιεῖ, οὕτω καὶ ὁ Υἱὸς οὓς ” θέλει ζωοποιεῖ.“ ἀλλ' ὡς ἔσοιτο καὶ πάντων κριτὴς, συνευδοκοῦντος ἐφ' ἅπασι καὶ συγκατανεύοντος τοῦ Πατρὸς, ἐξηγεῖτο λέγων ” Οὐδὲ γὰρ ὁ Πατὴρ κρίνει οὐδένα, ἀλλὰ “τὴν κρίσιν πᾶσαν δέδωκε τῷ Υἱῷ.” τίς οὖν ἡ τούτων αἰτία; τί δὲ ἄρα τὸ πεπεικὸς διὰ τοιούτων ἔρχεσθαι λόγων τὸν Μονογενῆ; Ἵνα πάντες φησὶ τιμῶσι τὸν Υἱὸν καθὼς τιμῶσι τὸν Πατέρα. εἰ γὰρ πάντα ἔστιν ὅσα καὶ ὁ Πατὴρ, ὅσον ἧκεν εἰς ἀξίωμα θεοπρεπὲς, πῶς οὐκ ἂν εἴη πρέπον ἰσοστάθμοις ἐκείνῳ στεφανοῦσθαι τιμαῖς, τὸν ᾧπερ οὐδὲν εἰς ταυτότητα τῆς οὐσίας ἐνδεῖ; τί οὖν ἄρα πάλιν καὶ πρὸς τοῦτό φασιν “οἱ πάντα τὰ ὀρθὰ διαστρέφοντες,” ὡς ὁ προφήτης φησὶν Ἡσαΐας; Εἰ διὰ τὸ λέγεσθαι, φησίν Ἵνα πάντες τιμῶσι τὸν Υἱὸν καθὼς τιμῶσι τὸν Πατέρα, νομίζετε χρῆναι τὸν Υἱὸν ἰσομέτροις τῷ Πατρὶ κατασεμνύνειν τιμαῖς, ἀγνοεῖτε τῆς ἀληθείας μακράν που βαδίζοντες. οὐ γὰρ πάντως τό Καθὼς ἰσότητα πραγμάτων εἰσφέρει, καθ' ὧν ἂν φαίνοιτο τεθὲν, ὁμοίωσιν δέ τινα χαρακτηρίζει πολλάκις, οἷον, φησὶν, ὁ Σωτήρ που συμβουλεύει λέγων “Γίνεσθε οἰκτίρμονες, καθὼς ” καὶ ὁ Πατὴρ ὑμῶν ὁ οὐράνιος οἰκτίρμων ἐστίν.“ ἆρ' οὖν ἐσόμεθα φιλοικτίρμονες οὕτως, ὡς ὁ Πατὴρ, διὰ τό Καθώς; καὶ πάλιν ὁ Χριστὸς λέγει πρὸς τὸν ἑαυτοῦ Πατέρα περὶ τῶν μαθητῶν ” Ἠγάπησας αὐτοὺς, καθὼς ἐμὲ ἠγάπησας.“ ἀλλ' οὐχ οὕτω δώσομεν ἠγαπῆσθαι τοὺς μαθητὰς, ὡς τὸν Υἱὸν πάλιν, διὰ τό Καθώς. τί οὖν εὑρεσιλογεῖς καὶ ἀποβιάζῃ τὴν λέξιν εἰς δυσφημίαν, οὐδεμίαν τοῖς ἀκροωμένοις ἀνάγκην εἰσφέρουσαν, εἰς τὸ χρῆναι τιμᾶν τὸν Υἱὸν ἐν ἴσῳ μέτρῳ τῷ φύσαντι; Τί οὖν πρὸς ταῦτα καὶ παρ' ἡμῶν; πικροῖς μὲν ἡμῶν καθυλακτοῦσι λόγοις οἱ θεομάχοι, ἀλλ' ” Ἔξω τοὺς κύνας,“ ὡς ὁ Παῦλός φησιν, ” ἔξω τοὺς κακοὺς ἐργάτας, ἔξω“ τῆς ὀρθῆς πίστεως ” τὴν κατατομήν.“ ἡμεῖς μὲν γάρ ἐσμεν ἀληθείας υἱοὶ, καὶ τέκνα φωτός: διάτοι τοῦτο τὸν Μονογενῆ τῷ Θεῷ καὶ Πατρὶ συνδοξάζομεν, οὐ κατά τινα διαφορὰν, ἀλλ' ἐν ἰσότητι τιμῆς τε καὶ δόξης, ὡς Θεὸν ἐκ Θεοῦ, καὶ φῶς ἐκ φωτὸς, καὶ ζωὴν ἐκ ζωῆς. καὶ περιεργάζεσθαι μὲν τὸ πίστει παραδεκτὸν, ὡς ἐπὶ πλεῖστον οὐκ ἀσφαλές: βασανιστέον δ' οὖν ὅμως καὶ τοῦ Καθὼς τὴν δύναμιν, ἵνα μὴ μέγα φρονῶσιν ἐφ' ἑαυτοῖς οἱ δι' ἐναντίας. οὐκοῦν ἐπὶ μὲν τῶν ἀνομοίων κατὰ τὴν φύσιν ὅτε τάττεται τό Καθὼς, οὐ πάντως ἀπαράλλακτον ἡμῖν εἰσφέρει τὴν ἰσότητα, ὁμοιότητα δὲ μᾶλλον καὶ εἰκονισμὸν, ὡς καὶ αὐτοὶ προλαβόντες ὡμολογήκατε. ἐπὶ δὲ τῶν ἀλλήλοις κατὰ πάντα προσεοικότων εἴπερ ὁρῷτο τεθὲν, καὶ ἰσότητα τὴν ἐν πᾶσι καὶ ὁμοιότητα δηλοῖ, καὶ εἴ τι τούτοις ἕτερον ἰσοδυναμοῦν εὑρίσκεται. οἷόν τι φημί: λαμπρὸς μὲν ὁ κατ' οὐρανόν ἐστιν ἥλιος, λαμπρὸς δὲ ὁμοίως καὶ ὁ γῆθεν ἄργυρος. ἀλλ' ἡ μὲν φύσις τῶν εἰρημένων διάφορος. νοείσθω δέ τις τυχὸν τῶν ἐπὶ γῆς πλουσίων τοῖς κατ' οἶκον οἰκέταις Λαμπέτω λέγων ὁ ἄργυρος, καθὼς καὶ ὁ ἥλιος: ἐν τούτῳ δὴ μάλα δικαίως οὐκ εἰς τὴν ἴσην ἀναβαίνειν λαμπρότητα τῷ ἡλίῳ τὴν ἐκ γῆς ὕλην φαμὲν, ἀλλ' εἰς ὁμοίωσίν τινα καὶ ἐμφέρειαν, καὶ εἰ φέροιτο κατ' αὐτοῦ τό Καθώς: Πέτρου δὲ καὶ Ἰωάννου τυχὸν τῶν ἁγίων μαθητῶν παρενεχθέντων εἰς μέσον, οἳ καὶ τῷ τῆς φύσεως λόγῳ, καὶ τῇ εἰς Θεὸν εὐσεβείᾳ τῆς πρὸς ἀλλήλους ἀκριβοῦς ὁμοιότητος οὐκ ἀπολιμπάνονται, τετάχθω τό Καθὼς, λέγοντός του περὶ αὐτῶν, ὡς ἐν ὑποκειμένῳ Τιμάσθω παρὰ πάντων Ἰωάννης, καθὼς καὶ ὁ Πέτρος: ἆρα τό Καθὼς ἀτονήσει πάλιν εἰς τὸ μὴ δεῖν ἐπ' ἀμφοῖν τὴν ἴσην ἄγεσθαι τιμήν; ἀλλ' οὐκ ἂν οἶμαί τις τὸ τοιοῦτον ἐρεῖ: θεωρήσει γὰρ δὴ τὸ κωλύον οὐδέν. Κατὰ ταύτην τοῦ νοήματος τὴν ἀναλογίαν, ὅταν ἐφ' Υἱοῦ καὶ Πατρὸς φέρηται τό Καθὼς, διὰ ποίαν αἰτίαν ἀποναρκήσομεν ἰσομέτροις ἄμφω καταστέφειν τιμαῖς; προανασκεψάμενος γὰρ ὡς Θεὸς τὰ ἐσόμενα, καὶ τὴν βάσκανον τῆς σῆς ἀμαθίας περιαθρήσας ἀντιλογίαν, οὐ γυμνὸν εὐθὺς, οὐδὲ τῆς αὐτῷ πρεπούσης ἔρημον ἐπικουρίας, τό Καθὼς εἰσενήνοχεν, ἀλλὰ ταῖς μὲν καθηκούσαις προοχυρώσας πληροφορίαις, προαποδείξας δὲ ὅτι καὶ Θεὸς ὑπάρχοι κατὰ φύσιν: ἴδιον γὰρ ἐποιεῖτο Πατέρα τὸν Θεόν: προκατασκευάσας δὲ πάλιν, ὅτι καὶ Θεὸς Δημιουργὸς καὶ ζωὴ κατ' ἀλήθειάν ἐστι, καὶ ὅλως, ἵν' οὕτως εἴπω, τοῖς τοῦ Θεοῦ καὶ Πατρὸς ἐπαγλαϊζόμενον ἰδιώμασι προεισενεγκὼν, εὐκαίρως ἐπάγει λοιπόν Ἵνα πάντες τιμῶσι τὸν Υἱὸν καθὼς τιμῶσι καὶ τὸν Πατέρα. εἶτα τί τὸ ἀντιστατοῦν ἀναφανεῖται λοιπὸν, τί δὲ τὸ κωλύον ἐστὶ τὸν, ᾧπερ οὐσιωδῶς ἐνυπάρχει τὰ τοῦ γεννήσαντος ἴδια καὶ ἐξαίρετα, πρὸς τὸ ἴσον τῆς τιμῆς ἀναβαίνειν μέτρον; αὐτὴν γὰρ ἤδη τιμῶντες τὴν τοῦ Θεοῦ καὶ Πατρὸς ἁλωσόμεθα φύσιν, καλῶς ἐν Υἱῷ διαλάμπουσαν: διὰ γὰρ τοῦτό φησιν ἐφεξῆς Ὁ μὴ τιμῶν τὸν Υἱὸν οὐ τιμᾷ τὸν Πατέρα τὸν πέμψαντα αὐτόν. ἀναβήσεται γὰρ οὐκ ἐφ' ἕτερόν τινα μᾶλλον τῆς εἰς Υἱὸν ἀτιμίας τὸ ἔγκλημα, καὶ τῆς δυσφημίας ἡ δύναμις, ἢ εἰς αὐτὸν ἀληθέστερον τὸν Πατέρα, καθάπερ ἀπὸ πηγῆς τῆς οἰκείας φύσεως ἀνέντα τὸν Υἱὸν, εἰ καὶ συνυπάρχων ἀϊδίως αὐτῷ διὰ πάσης ὁρᾶται τῆς ἁγίας γραφῆς. Ἀλλὰ ναὶ, φησὶν ὁ δι' ἐναντίας, ἡκέτω τῆς εἰς Υἱὸν ἀτιμίας τὸ ἔγκλημα πρὸς ὅπερ ἂν βούλοιο, μᾶλλον δὲ εἰς αὐτὸν ἀφικνείσθω τὸν Θεὸν καὶ Πατέρα. ἀγανακτήσει γὰρ δὴ καὶ μάλα εἰκότως, ἀλλ' οὐχὶ πάντως, ὡς τῆς αὐτοῦ φύσεως ὑβρισμένης ἐν Υἱῷ, κατὰ τὸν ἀρτίως ἡμῖν φιλοτεχνηθέντα λόγον, ἀλλ' ἐπείπερ ἐστὶν εἰκὼν αὐτοῦ καὶ χαρακτὴρ, ὡς πρὸς τὴν θείαν τε καὶ ἄῤῥητον αὐτοῦ φύσιν ἄριστα μεμορφωμένος, χαλεπαίνει μὲν εὐλόγως, ἀνοίσει δὲ πάντως εἰς ἑαυτὸν τὸ ἀδίκημα. καὶ γὰρ ἦν ὄντως τῶν ἀτοπωτάτων, τὸν τοῖς θείοις χαρακτῆρσιν ἐμπαροινήσαντα, μὴ οὐχὶ πάντως τῆς εἰς ἀρχέτυπον ἁμαρτίας ἀποτιννύναι δίκας. ὥσπερ οὖν ἀμέλει, καὶ ὁ ταῖς εἰκόσι τῶν ἐπὶ γῆς βασιλέων ἐμπαροινήσας, ὡς εἰς αὐτὸν ἤδη πεπλημμεληκὼς τὸν κρατοῦντα κολάζεται: ὡρισμένον δέ τι τοιοῦτον παρὰ Θεοῦ καὶ ἐφ' ἡμῶν αὐτῶν εὑρήσομεν ” Ὁ γὰρ ἐκχέων,“ φησὶν, ” αἷμα ἀνθρώπου ἀντὶ τοῦ αἵματος αὐτοῦ ἐκχυθή“σεται, ὅτι ἐν εἰκόνι Θεοῦ ἐποίησα τὸν ἄνθρωπον.” ὁρᾷς οὖν, φησὶν, ἤδη διὰ τούτου, καὶ μάλα σαφῶς, ὅτι τῆς εἰκόνος ἀδικουμένης, καὶ οὐχὶ πάντως τῆς θείας αὐτοῦ φύσεως, ἀγανακτεῖν οἴεται δεῖν ὁ Θεὸς καὶ Πατήρ; οὐκοῦν κατὰ τοῦτον νοείσθω τε καὶ ἐσχηματίσθω τὸν τρόπον τὸ εἰρημένον παρὰ Χριστοῦ Ὁ μὴ τιμῶν τὸν Υἱὸν οὐδὲ τὸν Πατέρα τιμᾷ. Ἆρ' οὖν ἔξω κείσεται μεθ' ἡμῶν τῆς τοῦ Πατρὸς οὐσίας ὁ Μονογενής; πῶς οὖν ἔτι κατὰ φύσιν Θεός ἐστιν, εἴπερ ὅλως ἐξώλισθε τῶν τῆς θεότητος ὅρων, ἐν ἰδίᾳ τινὶ φύσει καὶ ἑτεροίᾳ κείμενος, ἢ ἐν ᾗπέρ ἐστιν ὁ Πατήρ; ἀδικοῦμεν δὲ κατὰ τὸ εἰκὸς, εἰς ἕνα θεότητος ἀναβιβάζοντες λόγον, τῆς ἁγίας Τριάδος τὴν σύνταξιν. ἔδει γὰρ ἔδει λοιπὸν προσκυνεῖν μὲν ἡμᾶς ὡς Θεὸν τὸν Πατέρα, δόξαν δέ τινα πάλιν ἰδίαν ἀπονέμειν τῷ Υἱῷ καὶ τῷ Πνεύματι, ὡς εἰς διαφόρους κατασχίζοντας φύσεις, καὶ ἴδιον ἑκάστῳ τὸν τοῦ πῶς ἐστι διορίζοντας λόγον: ἀλλ' ἕνα Θεὸν ἡμῖν αἱ θεῖαι πρεσβεύουσι γραφαὶ, τὸν Υἱὸν τῷ Πατρὶ καὶ τὸ Πνεῦμα συντάττουσαι, ὡς διὰ τῆς οὐσιώδους καὶ ἀπαραλλάκτου ταυτότητος, εἰς ἕνα θεότητος ἀναφερομένης λόγον τῆς ἁγίας Τριάδος. οὐκ ἄρα ἐστὶ τῆς τοῦ γεννήσαντος φύσεως ἀλλότριος ὁ Μονογενὴς, ἀλλ' οὐδ' ἂν ὅλως Υἱὸς ὑπάρχων νοοῖτο κατὰ ἀλήθειαν, εἰ μὴ ἐκ τῆς τοῦ τεκόντος ἐξέλαμψεν οὐσίας: τοιοῦτος γὰρ, καὶ οὐχ ἕτερος ἐν πᾶσιν ὁ τῆς ἀληθοῦς υἱότητος ὅρος τε καὶ τρόπος: Υἱοῦ δὲ οὐκ ὄντος, συναναιρεθήσεται πάντως καὶ τὸ εἶναι Πατέρα τὸν Θεόν. πῶς οὖν ἀληθεύσει λέγων ὁ Παῦλος περὶ αὐτοῦ “Ἐξ οὗ πᾶσα πατριὰ ἔν τε οὐρανῷ καὶ ἐπὶ γῆς ” ὀνομάζεται;“ εἰ γὰρ μὴ γεγέννηκεν ἐξ ἑαυτοῦ θεοπρεπῶς τὸν Υἱὸν, πῶς ἐν αὐτῷ τῆς πατρότητος ἡ ἀρχὴ διήκουσα κατὰ μίμησιν ἐπί τε τοὺς ὄντας ἐν οὐρανῷ καὶ ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς; ἀλλ' ἔστι Πατὴρ κατ' ἀλήθειαν ὁ Θεός: Υἱὸς ἄρα κατὰ φύσιν ὁ Μονογενὴς, εἴσω τε πάντως ἐστὶ τῶν τῆς θεότητος ὅρων: Θεὸς γὰρ ἐκ Θεοῦ τεχθήσεται, καθάπερ οὖν ὁ ἄνθρωπος ἐξ ἀνθρώπου τυχὸν, καὶ οὐ διαψεύσεται τοῦ Θεοῦ καὶ Πατρὸς ἡ τὰ πάντα ὑπερκειμένη φύσις, τὸν αὐτῇ μὴ πρέποντα τεκοῦσα καρπόν. Ἐπειδὴ δὲ δυσσεβῶς τε καὶ ἀνοήτως φασὶν οὐ τὴν τοῦ Θεοῦ τε καὶ Πατρὸς ἐξυβρίζεσθαι φύσιν ἐν Υἱῷ, μὴ τῆς προσηκούσης ἀπολαύοντι δόξης πρός τινων, ὡς εἰκόνος δὲ μᾶλλον ἰδίας ἠτιμασμένης ἐν αὐτῷ χαλεπαίνειν, εἰκότως γε δὴ ποιοῦντα καὶ καλῶς: ἐρωτητέον αὐτοὺς, κατὰ τίνα τρόπον εἰκόνα βούλονται τοῦ Πατρὸς εἶναί τε καὶ λέγεσθαι τὸν Υἱόν. μᾶλλον δὲ αὐτοὶ τὸν παρ' ἐκείνων φθάσαντες λόγον προδιαστέλλωμεν τῆς εἰκόνος τὰ εἴδη, κατά γε τὸν ἐγχωροῦντα λόγον: οὕτω γὰρ ἂν γένοιτο σαφής τε καὶ λίαν εὐκρινεστέρα τῶν ζητουμένων ἡ εὕρεσις. οὐκοῦν μία μὲν ἤδη καὶ πρώτη τῆς κατὰ φύσιν ταυτότητος ἐν ἀπαραλλάκτοις τοῖς ἰδιώμασιν ἡ εἰκὼν, ὡς ἐξ Ἀδὰμ ὁ Ἄβελ, ἢ Ἰσαὰκ ἐξ Ἁβραάμ. δευτέρα δὲ πάλιν ἡ κατὰ μόνην τὴν τοῦ χαρακτῆρος ἐμφέρειαν, καὶ τὸ ἀκριβὲς τοῦ εἴδους ἐκτύπωμα, καθάπερ ἡ τοῦ βασιλέως ἐν ξύλῳ γραφὴ, ἢ καὶ καθ' ἕτερόν τινα πεποιημένη τρόπον, ὡς πρὸς αὐτὸν ἄριστά τε καὶ ἐντεχνέστατα. εἰκὼν δὲ ἑτέρα λαμβάνεται πάλιν πρὸς ἤθη καὶ τρόπους καὶ πολιτείαν καὶ θέλημα τὸ ἐπί τισιν ἀγαθοῖς ἢ φαύλοις, ὡς ἐοικέναι λέγεσθαι τυχὸν τὸν μὲν ἀγαθοεργοῦντα τῷ Παύλῳ, τὸν δὲ μὴ τοιοῦτον τῷ Κάϊν. τὸ γὰρ ἐν τοῖς ἴσοις ὁρᾶσθαι φαύλοις τε καὶ ἀγαθοῖς, τὴν ὁμοίωσιν ἑκάστῳ πραγματεύεται καὶ περιτίθησιν εἰκότως. εἶδος δέ πως εἰκόνος ἐστὶν ἕτερον, καὶ τὸ ἐν ἀξιώματι καὶ τιμῇ καὶ δόξῃ καὶ ὑπεροχῇ, ὥσπερ ἂν εἴ τις τυχὸν τήν τινος ἀρχὴν διαδέχοιτο, καὶ πάντα δρῴη μετ' ἐξουσίας, ἅπερ ἂν ἐκείνῳ προσήκοι τε καὶ πρέποι. εἰκὼν δὲ ἑτέρως, ἢ καθ' ἑτέραν τινὰ ποιότητα πράγματος ἢ ποσότητα, σχῆμά τε καὶ ἀναλογίαν: δεῖ γὰρ ἤδη συλλήβδην εἰπεῖν. Διδασκέτωσαν τοίνυν οἱ τῆς θείας εἰκόνος ἀκριβέστατοι ζητηταὶ, πότερόν ποτε τὴν οὐσιώδη καὶ φυσικὴν ἀπονέμειν ὁμοίωσιν οἴονται δεῖν τῷ Μονογενεῖ, καὶ οὕτως εἰκόνα φασὶν ὑπάρχειν τοῦ Πατρὸς τὸν Μονογενῆ τὸν ἐξ αὐτοῦ προελθόντα Λόγον, ὡσπερανεὶ καὶ τὸν Ἄβελ ἐξ Ἀδὰμ, ὅλην ἀποσώζοντα τοῦ τεκόντος τὴν φύσιν ἐν ἑαυτῷ, καὶ ὁλόκληρον τῆς ἀνθρωπότητος φοροῦντα τὸν λόγον; ἢ δυσχερανοῦσι μὲν ἐπὶ τούτῳ λίαν, ὡς Θεὸν ὄντως ἐκ Θεοῦ κατὰ φύσιν ὁμολογεῖν ἀναγκαζόμενοι τὸν Υἱὸν, ἐπὶ δὲ τὸ μάχεσθαι τῇ ἀληθείᾳ συνήθως ἐκνεύοντες, ἐπὶ τὸν δεύτερον τῆς εἰκόνος ἀναβαδιοῦνται τρόπον, ὃς ἐν μόνῃ νοεῖται μορφῇ καὶ χαρακτῆρι καὶ σχήματι. ἀλλ' οἶμαι μὲν τοῦτο λέγειν ἀποναρκήσειν αὐτούς. οὐ γὰρ πεποσῶσθαι τὸ θεῖον, ἢ καὶ σχήματι περιγραπτὸν, καὶ χαρακτῆρι μετρούμενον, ἢ καὶ ὅλως τὰ σωμάτων ὑπομένειν τὸ ἀσώματον, ὑπολήψεταί τις, οὐδ' εἰ σφόδρα φαίνοιτο ληρῶν. ἆρ' οὖν ὡς πρὸς ἤθη καὶ τρόπους καὶ θέλημα μεμορφῶσθαι λέγουσιν αὐτὸν, καὶ ταύτην αὐτῷ περιτιθέντες οὐκ αἰσχύνονται τὴν εἰκόνα; πῶς γὰρ ἔτι κατὰ φύσιν νοεῖται Θεὸς ὁ ἐν μόνῳ τῷ θέλειν τὴν πρὸς αὐτὸν ἔχων ὁμοίωσιν, ἕτερον δέ τι καθ' ἑαυτὸν ἰδίως ὑπάρχων; ὑφεστάναι γὰρ πάντως ὁμολογήσουσιν αὐτόν. εἶτα τί τὸ πλέον ἐν αὐτῷ παρὰ τὴν κτίσιν φανεῖται λοιπόν; ἢ γὰρ οὐχὶ καὶ ἀγγέλους πιστεύσομεν πρὸς τὸ θεῖον αὐτοὺς ἐπείγεσθαι διαπράττειν θέλημα, ἕτερόν τι παρὰ τὸν Θεὸν κατὰ φύσιν ὑπάρχοντας; τί δὲ ὅταν καὶ ἐφ' ἡμῶν νοῆται τὸ εἰρημένον; ἆρα γὰρ τοῖς ὑπὲρ φύσιν παραλόγως ἐπιπηδᾶν, καὶ τῶν ἀδυνάτων ἐφίεσθαι διδάσκει λέγων αὐτὸς ὁ Μονογενής ” Γίνεσθε οἰκτίρμονες, καθὼς καὶ ὁ Πατὴρ ὑμῶν ὁ “οὐράνιος οἰκτίρμων ἐστί;” τοῦτο γὰρ ἦν ἀνενδοιάστως εἰπεῖν, χρῆναι δὴ πάντως ἡμᾶς τὴν ἐν ταυτότητι θελημάτων ἀναλαμβάνειν εἰκόνα τοῦ Πατρός. μιμητὴς δὲ καὶ ὁ Παῦλος ἐγίνετο τοῦ Χριστοῦ, τῆς, ὡς ἐκεῖνοι ληροῦντές φασιν, ἐν θελήμασι μόνοις εἰκόνος τοῦ Πατρός. ἀλλὰ καὶ τούτων μὲν ἀπαναστήσονται κατὰ τὸ εἰκὸς τῶν ἀθλίων νοημάτων, ὥσπερ δέ τι μεῖζον ἐπινοοῦντες καὶ ἄμεινον, ἐκεῖνο δὴ πάντως ἐροῦσιν Εἰκών ἐστι τοῦ Θεοῦ καὶ Πατρὸς ὁ Μονογενὴς, ὅσον ἐν ταυτότητι θελημάτων, ὅσον ἐπὶ ἀξίωμα καὶ δόξαν καὶ δύναμιν τὴν θεοπρεπῆ, ὅσον εἰς ἐνέργειαν τὴν ἐπὶ τῷ κτίζειν καὶ θαυματουργεῖν, ὅσον εἰς τὸ βασιλεύειν καὶ πάντων κρατεῖν, ὅσον εἰς τὸ κρίνειν καὶ προσκυνεῖσθαι πρός τε ἀγγέλων καὶ ἀνθρώπων καὶ πάσης ἁπαξαπλῶς τῆς κτίσεως. διὰ τούτων ἁπάντων ἡμῖν ἐν ἑαυτῷ δεικνύων τὸν Πατέρα, οὐκ ἐκ τῆς ὑποστάσεώς φησιν, ἀλλὰ “χαρακτήρ ἐστι τῆς ” ὑποστάσεως αὐτοῦ.“ οὐκοῦν, ὅπερ ἔφημεν ἀρτίως, οὐδέν ἐστι τῶν εἰρημένων κατὰ φύσιν ὁ Υἱὸς, ἔξω δὲ πάντων ἀθρόως κείσεται, κατά γε τὸν παρ' ὑμῶν ἀνοητότατον λόγον, οὔτε δὲ Θεὸς ἀληθινὸς, οὔτε Υἱὸς, οὐ βασιλεὺς, οὐ Κύριος, οὐ δημιουργὸς, οὐ δυνατὸς, οὔτε μὴν ἐν θελήμασιν ἀγαθὸς κατὰ φύσιν ἰδίοις ἐστίν: ἐν δὲ γυμνοῖς καὶ μόνοις τοῖς θεοπρεπέσιν ὁρᾶται καυχήμασι. καὶ ὅπερ ἐστὶ ταῖς ἐν πίναξι γραφαῖς ἡ τῶν χρωμάτων ἐπιβολὴ, μόναις αὐταῖς ταῖς τῶν ὁρωμένων ποικιλίαις ἐξωραΐζουσα, φοροῦσα δὲ ἀληθὲς οὐδέν: τοῦτο καὶ ἐν Υἱῷ τῶν τοῦ Θεοῦ καὶ Πατρὸς ἀξιωμάτων τὸ κάλλος, ἐν μὲν ψιλοῖς καὶ μόνοις ὀνόμασι περιανθίζεται, ἔξωθεν δὲ ὥσπερ χρωμάτων τινῶν ἐπαλείφεται δίκην: σκιαγραφεῖται δὲ μᾶλλον ἡ θεία φύσις ἐν αὐτῷ, καὶ ὡς ἐν ψιλῷ φαίνεται τύπῳ. Εἶτα πῶς οὐκ ἄντικρυς ἁπάσαις φανήσεσθε ταῖς ἁγίαις πολεμοῦντες γραφαῖς, ἵνα δὴ καὶ δικαίως ἀκούσητε ” Σκλη“ροτράχηλοι καὶ ἀπερίτμητοι καρδίαις καὶ τοῖς ὠσὶν, ὑμεῖς ” ἀεὶ τῷ Πνεύματι τῷ Ἁγίῳ ἀντιπίπτετε, ὡς οἱ πατέρες “ὑμῶν καὶ ὑμεῖς.” πότε γὰρ οὐ Θεὸν ἀληθινὸν ὀνομάζουσι τὸν Υἱὸν, ἢ πότε τῆς τοῦ τεκόντος οὐσίας ἔξω φέρουσιν αὐτόν; τίς δὲ ὁ τολμήσας εἰπεῖν ὡς οὔτε φύσει δημιουργὸς οὔτε βασιλεὺς οὔτε παντοκράτωρ ἢ προσκυνητός ἐστιν; ὁ μὲν γὰρ θεσπέσιος μελῳδὸς, ὡς πρὸς αὐτόν που φησὶ τὸν Μονογενῆ “Ὁ θρόνος σου ὁ Θεὸς εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα τοῦ αἰῶνος.” Θωμᾶς δὲ πάλιν ὁμοίως ὁ νουνεχέστατος μαθητὴς, καὶ Θεὸν ὁμοῦ καὶ Κύριον ἀποκαλεῖ. παντοκράτωρ δὲ καὶ δημιουργὸς, διὰ πάσης ἁγίου καλεῖται φωνῆς, καὶ ὡς οὐκ ἐπακτὸν ἔχων καθ' ὑμᾶς τὸ ἀξίωμα, ἀλλ' ὡς τοῦτο κατὰ φύσιν ὑπάρχων, ὅπερ εἶναι λέγεται, διά τε τοῦτο προσκυνεῖται παρά τε τῶν ἁγίων ἀγγέλων καὶ πρὸς ἡμῶν, καίτοι μηδενὶ προσκυνεῖν ἑτέρῳ τῆς θείας λεγούσης χρῆναι γραφῆς, πλὴν μόνῳ Κυρίῳ τῷ Θεῷ. Εἰ μὲν οὖν ἐπίκτητον αὐτῷ καὶ δοτὸν ἐνυπάρχειν τὸ θεοπρεπὲς ἀξίωμα πεπιστεύκασιν, εἶτα τῷ τοιούτῳ προσκυνεῖν οἴονται δεῖν, ἴστωσαν παρὰ τὸν κτίστην τῇ κτίσει λατρεύοντες, πρόσφατόν τε καὶ νέον ἑαυτοῖς ζωγραφοῦντες θεὸν, ἤπερ ὄντως τὸν κατὰ φύσιν ἐπιγινώσκοντες. εἰ δὲ τῆς τοῦ Θεοῦ καὶ Πατρὸς οὐσίας ἔξω κεῖσθαι λέγοντες τὸν Υἱὸν, καὶ Υἱὸν αὐτὸν καὶ Θεὸν ὁμολογοῦσιν ὑπάρχειν ἀληθινὸν καὶ βασιλέα καὶ κύριον καὶ δημιουργὸν καὶ οὐσιωδῶς ἐν ἑαυτῷ τὰ τοῦ Πατρὸς ἔχειν ἴδια καὶ ἐξαίρετα: βλεπέτωσαν ὅποι ποτὲ πάλιν αὐτοῖς τὸ τῶν τῇδε δοκούντων ἀποκινδυνεύσει τέλος. οὐδὲν γὰρ ὅλως ἐν τῇ θείᾳ φύσει τὸ ἀξιόπιστον εὑρεθήσεται, δυναμένης ἤδη καὶ τῆς τῶν γενητῶν φύσεως ὑπάρχειν τοῦτο κατ' ἀλήθειαν, ὅπερ ἂν νοοῖτο καὶ αὐτή. ἀποδέδεικται γὰρ κατά γε τὸν παρὰ τοῖς δι' ἐναντίας ἀδρανέστατον λόγον, τῆς μὲν θείας φύσεως οὐχ ὑπάρχων ὁ Μονογενὴς, ἔχων δ' οὖν ὅμως ἀληθινῶς ἐν ἑαυτῷ τὰ ἐκείνης ἐξαίρετα. εἶτα τίς οὐκ ἀποφρίξει, καὶ μόνον ἀκούων τὴν τῶν δογμάτων δυσσέβειαν; πάντα γὰρ ἄνω τε καὶ κάτω στρέφεται λοιπὸν, τῆς μὲν τὰ πάντα ὑπερκειμένης φύσεως καταβαινούσης ἐπὶ τὸ συντάττεσθαι τοῖς γενητοῖς, αὐτῆς δὲ τῆς κτίσεως εἰς τὸ ὑπερέκεινα καὶ οὐχ ὡρισμένον αὐτῇ παραλόγως ἀναπηδώσης μέτρον. Οὐκοῦν, ὡς ὁλκάδος ἐν πελάγει βαπτιζομένης, τῆς τῶν τοιούτων δογμάτων ἀτοπίας ἀπονηχόμενοι, σπεύδωμεν ὡς ἐπ' ἀσφαλῆ καὶ ἀκύμονα λιμένα τὴν ἀλήθειαν, καὶ εἰκόνα τοῦ Θεοῦ τε καὶ Πατρὸς ὁμολογῶμεν τὸν Υἱὸν, οὐκ ἐπικήροις ὥσπερ τισὶ περιπεπλασμένον ἀξιώμασιν, οὐδὲ μόνοις τοῖς θεοπρεπέσι κατηγλαϊσμένον ὀνόμασιν, ἀλλ' οὐσιωδῶς πρὸς τὴν τοῦ τεκόντος ἐμφέρειαν ἀπηκριβώμενον, καὶ ἀπαραλλάκτως ὑπάρχοντα κατὰ φύσιν, ὅπερ ἂν νοοῖτο καὶ ὁ γεννήσας αὐτὸν, τουτέστι Θεὸν ἀληθινὸν ἐκ Θεοῦ κατὰ ἀλήθειαν, παντοκράτορα, δημιουργὸν, δεδοξασμένον, ἀγαθὸν, προσκυνητὸν, καὶ εἴ τι τοῖς εἰρημένοις ὡς Θεῷ πρέπον παρέζευκται. τότε γὰρ δὴ κατὰ πάντα προσεοικότα δεικνύοντες τῷ Θεῷ καὶ Πατρὶ, καὶ ἀληθεύοντα παραστήσομεν, ὡς εἰ μή τις βούλοιτο τιμᾶν τὸν Υἱὸν, οὐδὲ τὸν Πατέρα τιμᾷ τὸν ἀποστείλαντα αὐτόν: περὶ τούτου γὰρ ἡμῖν ἡ ζήτησις, καὶ ἡ τῶν ἀρτίως ἐξητασμένων κεκίνηται βάσανος.
« Ἀμὴν ἀμὴν λέγω ὑμῖν ὅτι ὁ τὸν λόγον μου ἀκούων καὶ πιστεύων τῷ πέμψαντί με ἔχει ζωὴν αἰώνιον: καὶ εἰς κρίσιν οὐκ ἔρχεται, ἀλλὰ μεταβέβηκεν ἐκ τοῦ θανάτου εἰς τὴν ζωήν. » Ἀποδείξας ἤδη διὰ τῶν προλαβόντων ἀρκούντως, ὡς οὐκ εἰς μόνον ἁμαρτάνουσι τὸν Υἱὸν οἱ τάλανες Ἰουδαῖοι, τολμῶντες ἐπιτιμᾶν οἷσπερ ἂν λέγῃ διδάσκων, ἢ καὶ ἐργάζηται παρ' αὐτοῖς, ἀλλὰ καὶ εἰς αὐτὸν ἀμαθαίνοντες πλημμελοῦσι τὸν Πατέρα, καὶ ὅσον ἧκεν εἰς τὴν τῶν εἰρημένων ἐνέργειαν, περιστείλας τῷ φόβῳ τὸ θράσος, καὶ ζῆν ἀναπείσας ἐπιεικέστερον τῇ τῶν ἐσομένων ἐλπίδι, λοιπὸν σαγηνεύει πρὸς εὐπείθειαν. οὐκ ἀτέχνως δὲ πάλιν τὸν ἐπὶ τούτοις ἐποιήσατο λόγον. ἐπειδὴ γὰρ οἶδεν ἔτι νοσοῦντας τοὺς Ἰουδαίους, σκανδαλιζομένους τε ἔτι περὶ αὐτοῦ, πάλιν ἀναφέρει τὴν πίστιν εἰς τὸ πρόσωπον τοῦ Θεοῦ καὶ Πατρὸς, οὐχ ὡς ἑαυτὸν ἔξω τιθεὶς, ἀλλ' ὡς διὰ τὴν ταυτότητα τῆς οὐσίας καὶ ἐν Πατρὶ τιμώμενος. τοὺς δέ γε πιστεύοντας, οὐ μετόχους ἔσεσθαι μόνον τῆς αἰωνίου ζωῆς, ἀλλὰ καὶ τὸν ἐκ τῆς κρίσεως διαφεύξεσθαι κίνδυνον, δικαιουμένους δηλονότι διισχυρίζεται, κεκερασμένον ἐλπίδι προτείνων τὸν φόβον. οὕτω γὰρ ἦν ἐνεργέστερόν πως καὶ δεικτικώτερον τοῖς ἀκροωμένοις ἀπεργάσασθαι τὸν λόγον.
« Ἀμὴν ἀμὴν λέγω ὑμῖν ὅτι ἔρχεται ὥρα καὶ νῦν ἐστιν ὅτε οἱ νεκροὶ ἀκούσωσι τῆς φωνῆς τοῦ Υἱοῦ τοῦ Θεοῦ καὶ οἱ ἀκούσαντες ζήσουσιν. » Ἐκ θανάτου πρὸς ζωὴν μεταβήσεσθαι τοὺς πιστεύοντας εἰπὼν, ἑαυτὸν εἰσφέρει τῆς ἐπαγγελίας ἐργάτην καὶ ὅλου τοῦ πράγματος ἀποτελεστὴν, ὁμοῦ μὲν ἐκεῖνο τοῖς Ἰουδαίοις ὑπαινιττόμενος, ὅτι θαυμαστὴ μὲν ὄντως ἐστὶν ἡ ἐπὶ τῷ παραλελυμένῳ δύναμις, ἀξιολογωτέρων δ' οὖν ὅμως ἀναδειχθήσεται δημιουργὸς ὁ Υἱὸς, οὐκ ἀῤῥώστημα μόνον, οὐδὲ τὰς ἐκ νόσου μαλακίας τῶν ἀνθρωπίνων ἐξελαύνων σωμάτων, ἀλλὰ καὶ αὐτὸν ἤδη τὸν θάνατον καὶ τὴν ἐπισκήψασαν ἀνατρέπων φθοράν: τοῦτο γὰρ ἦν τὸ καὶ μικρῷ πρότερον εἰρημένον “Ὁ Πατὴρ φιλεῖ τὸν Υἱὸν καὶ πάντα δείκνυσιν ” αὐτῷ ἃ αὐτὸς ποιεῖ, καὶ μείζονα τούτων δείξει αὐτῷ “ἔργα, ἵνα ὑμεῖς θαυμάζητε.” τὸ γὰρ ἐν τῷ θαυμάζεσθαι μεῖζον, ἐν τῇ τῶν νεκρῶν ἀναστάσει φαίνεται. ὁμοῦ δὲ πάλιν ἐκεῖνο κατασκευάζων, ὅπερ ἦν εἰκὸς οὐκ ἐν ὀλίγῳ μέτρῳ καταπτοήσειν τοὺς ἀκροωμένους: ὅτι γὰρ καὶ ἀναστήσει τοὺς νεκροὺς, καὶ πρὸς κρίσιν ἄξει τὸ ποίημα, διαγορεύει σαφῶς, ἵνα τῷ προσδοκᾶν αὐτῷ παραστήσεσθαί ποτε, καὶ τὸν ἐφ' ἑκάστοις ἀποδώσειν λόγον, ὀκνηρότεροι μέν πως εἰς τὴν ἐπὶ τὸ διώκειν αὐτὸν εὑρίσκοιντο τόλμαν, δέχοιντο δὲ προθυμότερον ἤδη τὸν τῆς διδασκαλίας τε καὶ ὑφηγήσεως λόγον. Εἰς ταῦτα μὲν οὖν ὁ τοῦ κεφαλαίου σκοπὸς ὁρᾶται καὶ συντείνεται: τὸ δὲ πρὸς λέξιν ἡμᾶς ἀναγκαῖον ἀπολευκάναι λοιπόν. ὁ μὲν οὖν κοινὸς, ὡς ἔοικεν, ἔχει λόγος, ὡς ἥξει ποτὲ καιρὸς καθ' ὃν ἀκούσονται τῆς τοῦ διανιστῶντος φωνῆς οἱ νεκροί: παρεῖναι δὲ καὶ νῦν οὐδὲν ἧττον ὑπολαμβάνουσιν αὐτὸν, ἢ ὡς Λαζάρου τυχὸν τῆς τοῦ Σωτῆρος ἀκουσομένου φωνῆς, ἢ καὶ νεκροὺς εἶναι λέγοντες τοὺς οὔπω διὰ τῆς πίστεως εἰς αἰώνιον ἀνακεκλημένους ζωὴν, οἳ δὴ καὶ πάντως εἰς αὐτὴν ἔμελλον ἀναβήσεσθαι, τὴν τοῦ Σωτῆρος διδασκαλίαν παραδεξάμενοι. καὶ σώζει μὲν ὄντως τῆς θεωρίας ὁ τρόπος τὸ ἐν πιθανότητι σχῆμα, τὸ δὲ ἀκριβὲς οὐ πάνυ: διὸ δὴ πάλιν τὴν τῶν λεγομένων ἀναμασώμενοι δύναμιν, τὸν πρεπωδέστερόν πως αὐτοῖς ἐφαρμόσομεν νοῦν, διαστελοῦμεν δὲ οὕτω τὸ ἀνάγνωσμα. Ἀμὴν ἀμὴν λέγω ὑμῖν ὅτι ἔρχεται ὥρα καὶ νῦν ἐστιν ὅτε οἱ νεκροὶ ἀκούσωσι τῆς φωνῆς τοῦ Υἱοῦ τοῦ Θεοῦ: ὥρα δηλονότι πάλιν ὅτε καὶ οἱ ἀκούσαντες ζήσουσι. διὰ μὲν οὖν τῶν ἐν ἀρχῇ, τὸν τῆς ἀναστάσεως ἡμῶν σημαίνει καιρὸν, καθ' ὃν εἰς ἀπολογίαν τῆς ἐν κόσμῳ ζωῆς ἀναστήσεσθαι τοὺς κεκοιμημένους διὰ τῆς τοῦ δικάζοντος ἐκδιδάσκει φωνῆς, ἵνα καθάπερ ἤδη προεῖπον, ὥσπερ τινὰ χαλινὸν τὸν ἐντεῦθεν αὐτοῖς ἐπινοήσας φόβον, καλῶς δὴ σφόδρα καὶ ἐπιστημόνως ἀναπείσῃ βιοῦν: διὰ δὲ τῶν ἐν ὑστέροις τὸν τοῦ χρῆναι πιστεύειν αὐτῷ ἐπιδεικνύει παρόντα καιρὸν, ἀλλὰ καὶ τῆς εὐπειθείας μισθὸν τὴν αἰώνιον ἔσεσθαί φησι ζωὴν, μονονουχὶ τοιοῦτόν τι δηλῶν Ἥξετε πάντες εἰς κρίσιν, ὦ οὗτοι, κατὰ τὸν τῆς ἀναστάσεως δηλονότι καιρὸν, ἀλλ' εἰ πικρὸν ὑμῖν εἶναι τὸ κολάζεσθαι δοκεῖ, καὶ ἀπεράντους λελυπημένῳ τῷ κρίνοντι τὰς δίκας ὑπέχειν, μὴ παρατρέχειν ἐᾶτε τὸν τῆς εὐπειθείας καιρὸν, ἀλλ' ἔτι παρόντος ἐπιδραττόμενοι, πρὸς τὴν αἰώνιον ἀναβαίνειν ἐπείγεσθε ζωήν.
« Ὥσπερ γὰρ ὁ Πατὴρ ἔχει ζωὴν ἐν ἑαυτῷ, οὕτως καὶ τῷ Υἱῷ ἔδωκε ζωὴν ἔχειν ἐν ἑαυτῷ: καὶ ἐξουσίαν ἔδωκεν αὐτῷ κρίσιν ποιεῖν, ὅτι υἱὸς ἀνθρώπου ἐστίν. » Ὅρα δή μοι πάλιν καὶ τὴν ἐν τούτοις οἰκονομίαν, ἵνα τοῦ λόγου θαυμάσῃς τὸ σχῆμα, καὶ μὴ τοῖς ἐξ ἀμαθίας περιπίπτων σκανδάλοις, αὐτὸς ἐπὶ σεαυτῷ καλέσῃς τὴν ἀπώλειαν. ἄνθρωπος ὑπάρχων, ὅσον εἰς τὴν φύσιν τοῦ σώματος, ὁ Μονογενὴς, καὶ ὡς εἷς ἐξ ἡμῶν ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς ἔτι μετὰ σαρκὸς ὁρώμενος, καὶ τοῖς Ἰουδαίοις πολυτρόπως τὰ πρὸς σωτηρίαν εἰσηγούμενος, δύο πραγμάτων θεοπρεπῶν ἑαυτῷ περιτέθεικε τὴν λαμπρότητα. ὅτι δὲ καὶ ἀναστήσει τοὺς νεκροὺς, καὶ κριθησομένους παραστήσει τῷ οἰκείῳ βήματι, διεβεβαιοῦτο σαφῶς: ἀλλ' ἦν καὶ σφόδρα εἰκὸς δυσχεραίνειν ἐπὶ τούτῳ τοὺς ἀκροωμένους, ἐγκαλοῦντας ἤδη καὶ διώκειν εὐλόγως αὐτὸν ὑποπτεύοντας, ὅτι “πατέρα ἴδιον ἔλεγε τὸν ” Θεὸν, ἴσον ἑαυτὸν ποιῶν τῷ Θεῷ.“ ἀνακεράσας τοίνυν ἐξουσίᾳ καὶ λαμπρότητι τῇ θεοπρεπεῖ τὸν ἁρμόζοντα τῇ ἀνθρωπότητι λόγον, ὑποκλέπτει τὸ βαρὺ τῆς ὀργῆς, ἐπιεικέστερόν πως καὶ ὑφειμένως, ἢ ᾗπερ ἐχρῆν, λέγων Ὥσπερ γὰρ ὁ Πατὴρ ἔχει ζωὴν ἐν ἑαυτῷ οὕτω καὶ τῷ Υἱῷ δέδωκε ζωὴν ἔχειν ἐν ἑαυτῷ. μὴ θαυμάζετε τούτῳ, φησὶν, εἰ καθ' ὑμᾶς νῦν ὑπάρχων, καὶ ὁρώμενος ἄνθρωπος, ἀναστήσειν ὑπισχνοῦμαι τοὺς νεκροὺς, καὶ εἰς κρίσιν ἄγειν ἀπειλῶ: δέδωκέ μοι τὸ δύνασθαι ζωογονεῖν ὁ Πατὴρ, δέδωκέ μοι τὸ κρίνειν ἐπ' ἐξουσίας. ἐπειδὴ δὲ διὰ τούτων τὴν εὐόλισθον τῶν Ἰουδαίων τεθεράπευκεν ἀκοὴν, φροντίδα ποιεῖται γοργὴν καὶ τῆς τῶν ἐφεξῆς ὠφελείας, καὶ τὴν αἰτίαν εὐθὺς τοῦ δεδέχθαι λέγειν ἑαυτὸν ἐξηγούμενος, τὴν οὐδὲν ἔχουσαν ἐξ ἑαυτῆς ἀνθρωπότητα προΐσχεται λέγων Ὅτι Υἱὸς ἀνθρώπου ἐστίν. Ὅτι γὰρ καὶ ζωὴ κατὰ φύσιν ἐστὶν ὁ Μονογενὴς, καὶ οὐ ζωῆς τῆς παρ' ἑτέρου μέτοχος, ζωογονεῖ τε οὕτως ὥσπερ καὶ ὁ Πατὴρ, περιττὸν οἶμαι λέγειν πρὸς τὸ παρὸν, ἐπείπερ ἡμῖν οὐ βραχὺς ἐν τούτῳ δεδαπάνηται λόγος ἐν ἀρχῇ τοῦ βιβλίου, προκειμένου ῥητοῦ Ὃ γέγονεν ἐν αὐτῷ ζωὴ ἦν.
« Μὴ θαυμάζετε τοῦτο: ὅτι ἔρχεται ὥρα ἐν ᾗ πάντες οἱ ἐν τοῖς μνημείοις ἀκούσωσι τῆς φωνῆς αὐτοῦ καὶ ἐξελεύσονται, οἱ τὰ ἀγαθὰ ποιήσαντες εἰς ἀνάστασιν ζωῆς, οἱ δὲ τὰ φαῦλα πράξαντες εἰς ἀνάστασιν κρίσεως. » Σημαίνει μὲν διὰ τούτων τῆς ἁπάντων ἀναστάσεως τὸν καιρὸν, ὅτε, καθάπερ ἡμῖν ὁ θεσπέσιος ἐπέστειλε Παῦλος ” Αὐτὸς ὁ Κύριος ἐν κελεύσματι, ἐν φωνῇ ἀρχαγγέλου, ἐν “σάλπιγγι Θεοῦ καταβήσεται ἀπ' οὐρανοῦ” κρῖναι “τὴν ” οἰκουμένην ἐν δικαιοσύνῃ,“ καὶ ἀποδώσειν ἑκάστῳ κατὰ τὰ ἔργα αὐτοῦ: χειραγωγεῖ δ' οὖν ὅμως διὰ τῆς τῶν αὐτῶν ἐπαναλήψεως τὴν ἀμαθεστάτην τῶν Ἰουδαίων διάνοιαν εἰς τὸ δύνασθαι συνιέναι σαφῶς, ὅτι καὶ μειζόνων ἔσται τερατουργὸς, ἢ ἐν οἷς ὁ παράλυτος ἦν, καὶ τῆς οἰκουμένης ἀναδειχθήσεται κριτής: ἀντιπαρατιθεὶς δὲ χρησίμως τῇ τῶν νεκρῶν ἀναστάσει τὴν ἐφ' ἑνὶ τῶν νοσούντων θεραπείαν, μείζονά τε καὶ ἀξιολογωτέραν ἐπιδεικνύει τὴν θανάτου λυτικὴν ἐνέργειαν, καὶ φθορᾶς τῆς ἁπάντων ἀναιρετικὴν, εἰκότως τε καὶ ἀναγκαίως ὡς ἐπ' ἐλάττονι τῷ παραδόξῳ φησί Μὴ θαυμάζετε τοῦτο. καὶ οὐ δήπου πάντως νομιοῦμεν αὐτὸν τῆς τῶν οἰκείων ἔργων λαμπρότητος διὰ τούτων κατηγορεῖν, ἢ καὶ τοῖς ἀκροωμένοις ἐπιτάττειν, μὴ χρῆναι θαύματος ἀξιοῦν τὰ ἐφ' οἷς ἂν εἰκότως θαυμάζοιεν, ἀλλ' εἰδέναι τε καὶ πιστεύειν βούλεται τοὺς ἐπ' ἐκείνῳ καταπεπληγμένους, ὅτι μικρὸν αὐτῷ τὸ μέχρι τούτου θαυμάζεσθαι. ἐγείρει γὰρ λόγῳ καὶ ἐνεργείᾳ θεοπρεπεῖ, οὐχ ὅπως ἐκ μικρῶν ἀῤῥωστημάτων τοὺς κάμνοντας, ἀλλὰ καὶ αὐτοὺς ἤδη τοὺς τῷ θανάτῳ βεβαπτισμένους, καὶ ἀκράτῳ νενικημένους φθορᾷ: καὶ διὰ τοῦτό φησι, τὸ μεῖζον εἰσφέρων Ὅτι ἔρχεται ὥρα ἐν ᾗ πάντες οἱ ἐν τοῖς μνημείοις ἀκούσωσι τῆς φωνῆς αὐτοῦ. ὁ γὰρ λόγῳ τὰ οὐκ ὄντα ποτὲ πρὸς τὸ εἶναι παρενεγκὼν, πῶς οὐκ ἂν ἰσχύσαι τὸ ἤδη πεποιημένον παλινδρομεῖν ἀναπεῖσαι πρὸς γένεσιν; εἶεν γὰρ ἂν οὕτω τῆς αὐτῆς ἐνεργείας ἑκάτερα, καὶ μιᾶς ἐξουσίας τὸ ἐπ' ἀμφοῖν ἀξιάγαστον ἀποτέλεσμα. ἐπιλέγει δὲ χρησίμως, ὅτι προελεύσονται τῶν μνημάτων οἱ μὲν ἐπ' αἰσχροῖς ἁλόντες καὶ πονηρίᾳ συμβιοτεύσαντες, τὴν ἀτελεύτητον ὑφέξοντες δίκην, οἱ δὲ διαπρεπεῖς ἐν ἀρεταῖς τῆς ἐπιεικείας μισθὸν ἀντικομιούμενοι τὴν αἰώνιον ζωήν: ὁμοῦ μὲν, καθάπερ ἤδη προείπομεν, ἑαυτὸν διανομέα τῶν ἑκάστῳ διαπρεπόντων καὶ διὰ τούτων εἰσφέρων, ὁμοῦ δὲ ἀναπείθων, ἢ τῷ φόβῳ τοῦ παθεῖν τὰ δεινὰ, παραιτεῖσθαι τὸ φαῦλον καὶ συνελαύνεσθαί πως εἰς τὸ βιοῦν ἐθέλειν ἤδη σωφρονέστερον, ἢ ἐφέσει νυττομένους τρόπον τινὰ τῇ περὶ τὴν αἰώνιον ζωὴν, συντονωτέραν ποιεῖσθαι σπουδάζειν τὴν ἐπ' ἀγαθοῖς προθυμίαν.