S. Cyril, Archbishop Of Alexandria. Interpretation Or Comment On The Gospel According To John.

 The Lord will give utterance to them who evangelize with much power, declareth exceeding well the Psalmist. But I deem that they who ought to approach

 Chapters In Book I. Chapter 1. That Everlasting and before the ages is the Only-Begotten, on the words, In the beginning was the Word. And the Word wa

 Exegetic Commentary Gospel According To John Archbishop of Alexandria.

 Chapter I. That Everlasting and before the ages is the Only-Begotten.

 Chapter Ii. That the Son being Consubstantial with the Father is also God in His Own Person, even as also the Father.

 Chapter Iii. That the Son is both God by Nature and in no wise either inferior to or unlike the Father.

 Chapter Iv. Against those who dare to say that the conceived and Natural word in God the Father is one, and He that is called Son by the Divine Script

 Chapter V. That the Son is by Nature Creator with the Father, as being of His Essence, and not taken to Him as a minister.

 Chapter Vi. That the Son is by Nature Life and therefore not originate, but of the Essence of God the Father.

 Chapter Vii. That the Son is by Nature Light and therefore not originate, but of the Essence of God the Father, as Very Light from Very Light.

 Chapter Viii. That the Son of God alone is Very Light, the creature not at all, being participate of Light, as originate.

 Chapter Ix. That the soul of man does not exist prior to the body, nor is the embodiment as some say a consequence of former sins.

 Chapter X. That the Only-Begotten is Alone by Nature the Son from the Father, as being of Him and in Him.

 Chapters In Book Ii. Chapter 1. That the Holy Ghost is in the Son, not by participation, nor from without, but Essentially and by Nature : on the word

 Our Father Among The Saints Cyril Archbishop of Alexandria On The Gospel According To John. Book Ii.

 Chapter I. That the Holy Ghost is in the Son not by participation, not from without, but Essentially and by Nature.

 Chapter Ii. That the Son is not in the number of things originate, but above all, as God of God.

 Chapter Iii. That Christ is God and of God by Nature.

 Chapter Iv. That not by participation are the Properties of God the Father in the Son, but Essentially and by Nature.

 Chapter V. That the Son is not in the number of worshippers, in that He is Word and God, but rather is worshipped with the Father.

 Chapter Vi. That the Son is not inferior to the Father either in power or in operation for any work but is Equal in Might and Consubstantial with Him,

 Chapter Vii. That nought of God-befitting Dignities or Excellences is in the Son, by participation, or from without.

 Chapter Viii. That the Son being God and of God by Nature, and the Exact Image of Him Who begat Him, hath equal honour and glory with Him.

 Chapter Ix. That the Son is in nothing inferior to God the Father, but is of Equal Might in Operation unto all things as God of God.

 Chapters Treated More At Large In The Third Book. Chapter 1. A critical enquiry, why the blessed Baptist is called by Christ not only a lamp, but burn

 Our Father Among The Saints Cyril Archbishop of Alexandria On The Gospel According To John. Book Iii.

 Chapter Ii. That the Son is the Image of God the Father, wherein also is an exposure of the Jews as not understanding the words darkly uttered by Mose

 Chapter Iii. That Moses was indicating the Coming of the Saviour. From Deuteronomy, concerning Christ.

 Chapter Iv. That oftentimes the departures of Christ from Jerusalem signify the transferring of His grace to the Gentiles: wherein is also the discour

 Chapter V. That the Only-Begotten Son is the Impress of the Person of God the Father, and no other Impress either is, or is conceived of, save He.

 Chapter Vi. Of the manna, that it was a type of Christ's Presence and of the spiritual graces through Him.

 Chapters In The Fourth Book. 1.  That in nothing is the Son inferior to God the Father, because He is of Him by Nature, although He be said by some to

 Our Father Among The Saints Cyril Archbishop of Alexandria On The Gospel According To John. Book Iv.

 Chapter Ii. That the Holy Body of Christ is Lifegiving, wherein He speaks of His Own Body as of Bread.

 Chapter Iii. That the Son is not a Partaker of Life from any other, but rather Life by Nature, as being begotten of God the Father Who is Life by Natu

 Chapter Iv. That a type of Christ was the holy Tabernacle which led the people in the wilderness, and that the ark that was in it and the lamp and the

 Chapter V. On the feast of Tabernacles, that it signifies the restitution of the hope due to the Saints, and the resurrection from the dead on the wo

 Chapter Vi. A dissertation upon the rest of the Sabbath, manifoldly shewing of what it is significant.

 Chapter Vii. A dissertation upon the circumcision on the eighth day, manifoldly shewing of what it is significant.

 Chapters In Book V. 1.    That human affairs are not, according to the unlearned surmises of the Greeks, subject as of necessity to the Hours, but tha

 Our Father Among The Saints Cyril Archbishop of Alexandria Gospel According To John. Book V.

 Chapter I. That human affairs are not, according to the unlearned surmises of the Greeks, subject as of necessity to the Hours, but that of our own ch

 Chapter Ii. That after the Saviour's Cross at His rising again from the dead the Holy Ghost took up His abode in us permanently.

 Chapter Iii. That no work of Jewish might was the Suffering on the Cross, nor did Christ die from the tyranny of any, but Himself of His own will suff

 Chapter Iv. That the Son is by Nature God, wholly remote from likeness to the creature, as regards Essence.

 Chapter V. That not inferior in Might and Wisdom to God the Father is the Son, yea rather His very Wisdom and Might.

 Chapters In Book Vi. That not from sins of the soul prior to birth do bodily suffering's befal any, nor yet does God bring the sins of the fathers upo

 Our Father Among The Saints Cyril Archbishop of Alexandria On The Gospel According To John. Book Vi.

 Chapter I. That not from sins of the soul prior to birth do bodily sufferings befal any, nor yet does God bring the sins of their fathers upon any, pu

 The Fragments Which Are Extant Of Book Vii.

 The Fragments Which Are Extant Of Book Viii.

 Chapters In The Ninth Book. 1. That by reason of the identity of Their Nature, the Son is in the Father, and the Father again is in the Son. 

 Cyril Archbishop of Alexandria Comment On The Gospel According To John. Book Ix.

 Chapter I. That by reason of the identity of Their nature, the Son is in the Father, and the Father again is in the Son.

 Chapters In The Tenth Book. 1.  That in nothing is the Son inferior to God the Father, but rather equal to and like Him in nature on the words: If ye

 Our Father Among The Saints, Cyril, Archbishop of Alexandria On The Gospel According To John.  Book X.

 Chapter I. That in nothing is the Son inferior to God the Father, but rather equal to and like Him in nature.

 Chapter Ii. That the Son is Consubstantial with God the Father, and not of an alien or foreign nature, as some of the perverse assert.

 Chapters In The Eleventh Book.

 Our Father Among The Saints, Cyril, Archbishop of Alexandria, On The Gospel According To John. Book Xi.

 Chapter Ii. That His Spirit, that is, the Holy Spirit, is naturally in the Son and in His Substance, as He is also in the Substance of the Father.

 Chapter Iii. That no man should consider that the Son has any lack of God-befitting glory, though He be found to say, Father, glorify Thy Son.

 Chapter Iv. That it will in no way damage the glory of the Son, when He is said to have received aught from God the Father, since for this we can assi

 Chapter V. That the Son will not be excluded from being true God, even though He named God the Father the only true God.

 Chapter Vi. That the Son is not bare of God-befitting glory, even though He is found saying to the Father, And now glorify Me with the glory which I h

 Chapter Vii. That the fact that something is said to have been given to the Son from the Father does not rob Him of God-befitting dignity but He plai

 Chapter Viii. That nothing which is spoken of as belonging to the Father will be excluded from the kingdom of the Son, for Both alike rule over all.

 Chapter Ix. That the dignity of Godhead is inherent in the Son even though He is said to have received this from the Father, because of His humanity

 Chapter X. That Christ is not holy from participation in anything different from Himself and that the sanctification through the Spirit is not alien

 Chapter Xi. That the Son is naturally One with God His Father and that He is in the Father and the Father in Him, according to the essential bond and

 Chapter Xii. That the Son is by Nature One with God His Father, though He says that He received, as by way of grace, His being One with the Father.

 Chapter In The Twelfth Book.

 Our Father Among The Saints, Cyril, Archbishop of Alexandria, On The Gospel According To John. Book Xii.

 Chapter I. That the Son is by Nature God, even though we find Him calling the Father His God.

Chapter Vii. That nought of God-befitting Dignities or Excellences is in the Son, by participation, or from without.

22 For neither doth the Father judge any man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son.

He introduceth another God-befitting and marvellous thing, in many ways persuading them that He is God by Nature and Verily. For to what other would it befit to judge the world, save Him Alone Who is God over all. Whom too the Divine Scriptures call to this, saying in one place, Arise, O God, judge the earth, in another again, For God is the Judge, He putteth down one and setteth up another. But He says that judgment has been given Him by the Father, not as being without authority hereto, but economically as Man, teaching that all things are more suitably referred to the Divine Nature, whereto Himself too being not external, in that He is Word and God, hath inherently authority over all; but in that He is made Man, to whom it is said, What hast thou that thou didst not receive, He fittingly acknowledges that He received it.

To these things again one of our opponents will say, "Lo, the Son evidently declares that He hath received judgement of the Father; but He receives (it is plain) aa not having. How then will not He That gives with Authority be greater and of Superior Nature to Him Who must needs receive?"

What then do we say to these things? Our prearranged argument has been, I think, not unskilfully managed, introducing a consideration specially befitting the time, to wit of the Incarnation, and most accordant with the economy of the Flesh, when He was called a servant, when He humbled Himself, made in our likeness. But since it seemeth good to thee haughtily to despise the simpler doctrines, and to make more critical examination of them, come then, opposing thy objections, let us first say, Not altogether, nor of necessity, sir, doth he that is said to give anything, impart it to the recipient as though he had it not, nor yet is the giver always greater than the receiver. For what wilt thou do, when thou seest the holy Psalmist saying in the Spirit, Give glory to God? Shall we consider that God is in need of glory, or that we who are commanded to offer Him this, are on this account greater than the Creator? But not even thou wilt dare to say this, who shunnest not the fear of blasphemies. For full of glory is the Godhead, even though It receive it not from us. For He who receives as honour, what He hath of Own, will never bo thought inferior to those who offer Him glory as a gift. One may often see that he who has received anything is not inferior to the giver, and that the Father is not therefore of Superior Nature to His offspring, because He hath committed to Him all judgment.

Next we must consider this too. To judge or to give judgment, are rather operations and acts conceived as properties of essences than themselves truly essences. For we in giving judgment do something, being in ourselves what we are. But if we grant that judging or giving judgment is of the nature of an essence, how must we not needs grant, even against our wills, that some cannot exist at all, except as judges, and that their being wholly ceases together with the termination of the judgment? But so to think, is most absurd. Judgment then is an operation, and nothing else. What then hath the Father committed to the Son? No accession from His Own Nature, in committing all judgment to Him, but rather an operation in respect of them that are judged. How then will He herein be greater, or of Superior Nature, by having added anything which was not in the Son Who saith, All things that the Father hath are Mine?

How then He must be conceived of as giving, hear now.  

As God the Father, having the Power to create, createth all things through the Son, as through His own Power and Might: so having the Power too to judge, He will work this too through the Son, as His Own Righteousness. As though it were said that fire too yielded up burning to the operation that is of itself by nature, the fact taking this direction: so piously interpreting, Hath committed, shall we escape the snare of the devil. But if they persist in shamelessly asserting that glory is added to Him of the Father, through His being manifested Judge of the earth, let them teach us, how He is any longer to be considered Lord of glory, Who in the last times was crowned with the honours hereunto pertaining.  

ΚΕΦΑΛΗ Ζ. Ὅτι τῶν θεοπρεπῶν ἀξιωμάτων ἤτοι πλεονεκτημάτων οὐδὲν ὡς ἐκ μετοχῆς ἢ ἐπακτὸν ἐν Υἱῷ.
« Οὐδὲ γὰρ ὁ Πατὴρ κρίνει οὐδένα, ἀλλὰ τὴν κρίσιν πᾶσαν δέδωκε τῷ Υἱῷ. » ἝΤΕΡΟΝ εἰσφέρει πρᾶγμα θεοπρεπές τε καὶ ἐξαίσιον, διὰ πολλῶν ἀναπείθων ὅτι Θεός ἐστι κατὰ φύσιν καὶ ἀληθινῶς. τίνι γὰρ ἂν καὶ ἑτέρῳ πρέποι τὸ κρῖναι τὴν οἰκουμένην, εἰ μὴ μόνῳ τῷ ἐπὶ πάντας ὄντι Θεῷ, ὃν δὴ καὶ πρὸς τοῦτο καλοῦσιν αἱ θεῖαι λέγουσαι γραφαὶ, ποτὲ μὲν ” Ἀνάστα ὁ Θεὸς, κρῖνον τὴν γῆν:“ ποτὲ δὲ αὖ πάλιν ” Ὅτι ὁ Θεὸς κριτής ἐστι, τοῦτον ταπεινοῖ καὶ τοῦτον ὑψοῖ.“ δεδόσθαι γεμὴν τὴν κρίσιν ἑαυτῷ φησι παρὰ τοῦ Πατρὸς, οὐχ ὡς ἔξω τῆς ἐπὶ τούτῳ κείμενος ἐξουσίας, ἀλλ' ὡς ἄνθρωπος οἰκονομικῶς, πρεπωδέστερον ἀνακεῖσθαι τῇ θείᾳ φύσει τὰ πάντα διδάσκων, ἧς καὶ αὐτὸς εἴσω βεβηκὼς, ᾗ μέν ἐστι Λόγος καὶ Θεὸς, οἴκοθεν ἔχει τὴν ἐφ' ἅπασιν ἐξουσίαν: ᾗ δὲ γέγονεν ἄνθρωπος, πρὸς ὃν εἴρηταί που ” Τί “γὰρ ἔχεις ὃ οὐκ ἔλαβες,” δεδέχθαι πρεπόντως ὁμολογεῖ. Πρὸς δὴ ταῦτα πάλιν ἐρεῖ τις τυχὸν τῶν δι' ἐναντίας Ἰδοὺ διαῤῥήδην ὁ Υἱὸς τὴν κρίσιν δεδέχθαι φησὶ παρὰ τοῦ Πατρός. λαμβάνει δὲ ὡς οὐκ ἔχων δηλαδή. πῶς οὖν οὐκ ἂν εἴη μείζων καὶ μεγαλοφυέστερος ὁ διδοὺς μετ' ἐξουσίας, τοῦ δεομένου λαβεῖν; Τί δὴ οὖν ἄρα πρὸς τοῦτό φαμεν; ὁ μὲν λόγος ἡμῖν ὁ προτεταγμένος οὐκ ἀκόμψως, ὡς οἶμαι, διήρτισται, θεωρίαν εἰσφέρων τὴν τῷ καιρῷ μάλιστα πρέπουσαν τῆς ἐνανθρωπήσεως δηλαδὴ, καὶ οἰκονομίᾳ τῇ μετὰ σαρκὸς ἁρμοδιωτάτην, ὅτε δοῦλος ἐχρημάτισεν, ὅτε τεταπείνωκεν ἑαυτὸν, ἐν ὁμοιώματι τῷ ἡμετέρῳ γενόμενος: ἐπειδὴ δέ σοι δοκεῖ τῶν μὲν ἁπλουστέρων κατασοβαρεύεσθαι δογμάτων, περιεργοτέραν δὲ μᾶλλον ποιεῖσθαι τὴν ζήτησιν, ἄγε δὴ πάλιν τοῖς σοῖς ἐναντίως ἰόντες προβλήμασι, πρῶτον μὲν ἐκεῖνο λέγωμεν Οὐχὶ πάντως, οὐδὲ ἀναγκαίως, ὦ οὗτος, ὁ δοῦναί τι λεγόμενος, ὡς οὐκ ἔχοντι τῷ δεχομένῳ προσνέμει, ἀλλ' οὐδὲ μείζων ἀεὶ τοῦ λαμβάνοντος ὁ διδούς. ἐπεὶ τί ποιήσεις, ὅταν ἴδῃς ἐν πνεύματι τὸν ἱερὸν λέγοντα ψαλμῳδόν “Δότε δόξαν τῷ Θεῷ;” δόξης ἆρα καθεστάναι τὸν Θεὸν ἐπιδεᾶ λογιούμεθα, ἢ καὶ μείζους τοῦ κτίσαντος διὰ τοῦτο πάντως ἡμεῖς, οἱ ταύτην αὐτῷ προσάγειν ἐπιταττόμενοι; ἀλλ' οὐδ' ἂν αὐτὸς ἀποτολμήσῃς εἰπεῖν, ὁ τὸν ἐπὶ ταῖς δυσφημίαις ὄκνον οὐ παραιτούμενος: πλῆρες γὰρ δόξης τὸ θεῖον, κἂν μὴ δέχηται παρ' ἡμῶν: ὃ δὲ οἴκοθεν ἔχει λαμβάνων ἐν τάξει τιμῆς, οὐκ ἂν ἐλάττων νοοῖτό ποτε, τῶν οἵπερ αὐτῷ τὴν δόξαν ὡς δῶρον προσάγουσιν. ἔστι τοίνυν πολλάκις ὁρᾶν τὸν εἰληφότα τι τοῦ δεδωκότος οὐκ αἰσχίονα, καὶ οὐ διὰ τοῦτο μεγαλοφυέστερος ὁ Πατὴρ τοῦ ἰδίου γεννήματος, ἐπεὶ πᾶσαν αὐτῷ δέδωκε τὴν κρίσιν. Εἶτα πρὸς τούτῳ κἀκεῖνο περισκεπτέον: τὸ κρίνειν, ἤτοι δικάζειν, ἐνέργειαι μᾶλλόν εἰσι καὶ πράγματα τῶν περὶ τὰς οὐσίας νοουμένων, ἢ αὐτὸ κατ' ἀλήθειαν οὐσίαι: ἐνεργοῦμεν γάρ τι δικάζοντες, ἰδιαζόντως ὑπάρχοντες ὅπερ ἐσμέν. εἰ δὲ τὸ κρίνειν, ἤτοι δικάζειν, οὐσίας εἶναι δώσομεν, πῶς οὐκ ἀνάγκη καὶ οὐχ ἑκόντας ὁμολογεῖν, μηδὲ ὑπάρχειν ὅλως δύνασθαι τῶν ὄντων τινὰς, εἰ μὴ φαίνοιντο κριταὶ, συγκαταλήγειν τε πάντως αὐτοῖς τῷ τέλει τῆς κρίσεως τὴν οὐσίαν; ἀλλ' ἔστι τὸ οὕτως νοεῖν τῶν ἀτοπωτάτων: ἐνέργειά τις τοιγαροῦν τὸ κρίνειν ἐστὶ, καὶ ἕτερον οὐδέν. τί οὖν ἄρα δέδωκεν ὁ Πατὴρ τῷ Υἱῷ; πλεονέκτημα μὲν ὡς ἐξ ἰδίας φύσεως οὐδὲν, ἔν γε τῷ τὴν κρίσιν ἐπιτρέψαι πᾶσαν αὐτῷ, ἐνέργειαν δὲ μᾶλλον τὴν κατὰ τῶν κρινομένων. πῶς οὖν ἔσται κατὰ τοῦτο μείζων, ἢ μεγαλοφυέστερος, τι προστεθεικὼς, ὅπερ οὐκ ἦν ἐν Υἱῷ τῷ λέγοντι “Πάντα ὅσα ἔχει ” ὁ Πατὴρ ἐμά ἐστι;“ Πῶς οὖν ἄρα τὸ δοῦναι νοητέον, ἄκουε λοιπόν. ὥσπερ ἔχων τὸ δύνασθαι δημιουργεῖν ὁ Θεὸς καὶ Πατὴρ, δι' Υἱοῦ τὰ πάντα δημιουργεῖ, ὡς διὰ δυνάμεως καὶ ἰσχύος ἰδίας: οὕτως ἔχων καὶ τὸ δύνασθαι κρίνειν, ἐνεργήσει καὶ αὐτὸ δι' Υἱοῦ, ὡς διὰ δικαιοσύνης ἰδίας. ὥσπερ ἂν εἰ λέγοιτο καὶ τὸ πῦρ τῇ ἐξ ἑαυτοῦ κατὰ φύσιν ἐνεργείᾳ τὸ καῦσαί τι παραχωρεῖν, ταύτην ἔχοντος τοῦ πράγματος τὴν ὁδόν: οὕτω τό Δέδωκεν εὐσεβῶς ἑρμηνεύοντες, τὴν τοῦ διαβόλου παγίδα διαφευξόμεθα. εἰ δὲ ἐπιμένουσιν ἀναιδῶς προστεθεῖσθαι δόξαν αὐτῷ παρὰ τοῦ Πατρὸς διαβεβαιούμενοι, διὰ τοῦ κριτὴν ἀναφαίνεσθαι τῆς γῆς, διδασκόντων ἡμᾶς, πῶς ἂν ἔτι νοοῖτο τῆς δόξης Κύριος, ὁ καὶ ἐν ἐσχάτοις καιροῖς ταῖς ἐπὶ τούτῳ τιμαῖς στεφανούμενος.