The Epistles of Cyprian.

 The Epistles of Cyprian.

 From the Roman Clergy to the Carthaginian Clergy, About the Retirement of the Blessed Cyprian.

 Epistle III.

 To the Presbyters and Deacons.

 Epistle V.

 Epistle VI.

 To the Clergy, Concerning Prayer to God.

 To the Martyrs and Confessors.

 Epistle IX.

 To the Martyrs and Confessors Who Sought that Peace Should Be Granted to the Lapsed.

 Epistle XI.

 Epistle XII.

 To the Clergy, Concerning Those Who are in Haste to Receive Peace. a.d. 250.

 Epistle XIV.

 To Moyses and Maximus, and the Rest of the Confessors.

 The Confessors to Cyprian.

 To the Presbyters and Deacons About the Foregoing and the Following Letters.

 Epistle XVIII.

 Cyprian Replies to Caldonius.

 Epistle XX.

 Lucian Replies to Celerinus.

 To the Clergy Abiding at Rome, Concerning Many of the Confessors, and Concerning the Forwardness of Lucian and the Modesty of Celerinus the Confessor.

 To the Clergy, on the Letters Sent to Rome, and About the Appointment of Saturus as Reader, and Optatus as Sub-Deacon. a.d. 250.

 To Moyses and Maximus and the Rest of the Confessors.

 Moyses, Maximus, Nicostratus, and the Other Confessors Answer the Foregoing Letter. a.d. 250.

 Cyprian to the Lapsed.

 To the Presbyters and Deacons.

 To the Presbyters and Deacons Abiding at Rome.

 The Presbyters and Deacons Abiding at Rome, to Cyprian.

 The Roman Clergy to Cyprian.

 To the Carthaginian Clergy, About the Letters Sent to Rome, and Received Thence.

 To the Clergy and People, About the Ordination of Aurelius as a Reader.

 To the Clergy and People, About the Ordination of Celerinus as Reader.

 To the Same, About the Ordination of Numidicus as Presbyter.

 To the Clergy, Concerning the Care of the Poor and Strangers.

 To the Clergy, Bidding Them Show Every Kindness to the Confessors in Prison.

 To Caldonius, Herculanus, and Others, About the Excommunication of Felicissimus.

 The Letter of Caldonius, Herculanus, and Others, on the Excommunication of Felicissimus with His People.

 To the People, Concerning Five Schismatic Presbyters of the Faction of Felicissimus.

 Argument .—The Messengers Sent by Novatian to Intimate His Ordination to the Church of Carthage are Rejected by Cyprian.

 To Cornelius, About Cyprian’s Approval of His Ordination, and Concerning Felicissimus.

 To the Same, on His Having Sent Letters to the Confessors Whom Novatian Had Seduced.

 To the Roman Confessors, that They Should Return to Unity.

 To Cornelius, Concerning Polycarp the Adrumetine.

 Cornelius to Cyprian, on the Return of the Confessors to Unity.

 Cyprian’s Answer to Cornelius, Congratulating Him on the Return of the Confessors from Schism.

 Cornelius to Cyprian, Concerning the Faction of Novatian with His Party.

 Cyprian’s Answer to Cornelius, Concerning the Crimes of Novatus.

 Maximus and the Other Confessors to Cyprian, About Their Return from Schism.

 From Cyprian to the Confessors, Congratulating Them on Their Return from Schism.

 To Antonianus About Cornelius and Novatian.

 To Fortunatus and His Other Colleagues, Concerning Those Who Had Been Overcome by Tortures.

 To Cornelius, Concerning Granting Peace to the Lapsed.

 To Cornelius, Concerning Fortunatus and Felicissimus, or Against the Heretics.

 To the People of Thibaris, Exhorting to Martyrdom.

 To Cornelius in Exile, Concerning His Confession.

 Argument .—Cyprian, with His Colleagues, Congratulates Lucius on His Return from Exile, Reminding Him that Martyrdom Deferred Does Not Make the Glory

 To Fidus, on the Baptism of Infants.

 To the Numidian Bishops, on the Redemption of Their Brethren from Captivity Among the Barbarians.

 To Euchratius, About an Actor.

 To Pomponius, Concerning Some Virgins.

 Cæcilius, on the Sacrament of the Cup of the Lord.

 To Epictetus and to the Congregation of Assuræ, Concerning Fortunatianus, Formerly Their Bishop.

 To Rogatianus, Concerning the Deacon Who Contended Against the Bishop.

 To the Clergy and People Abiding at Furni, About Victor, Who Had Made the Presbyter Faustinus a Guardian.

 To Father Stephanus, Concerning Marcianus of Arles, Who Had Joined Himself to Novatian.

 To the Clergy and People Abiding in Spain, Concerning Basilides and Martial.

 To Florentius Pupianus, on Calumniators.

 To Januarius and Other Numidian Bishops, on Baptizing Heretics.

 To Quintus, Concerning the Baptism of Heretics.

 To Stephen, Concerning a Council.

 To Jubaianus, Concerning the Baptism of Heretics.

 To Pompey, Against the Epistle of Stephen About the Baptism of Heretics.

 Firmilian, Bishop of Cæsarea in Cappadocia, to Cyprian, Against the Letter of Stephen.  a.d. 256.

 To Magnus, on Baptizing the Novatians, and Those Who Obtain Grace on a Sick-Bed.

 Argument .—He Extols with Wonderful Commendations the Martyrs in the Mines, Opposing, in a Beautiful Antithesis, to the Tortures of Each, the Consolat

 The Reply of Nemesianus, Dativus, Felix, and Victor, to Cyprian.

 The Reply to the Same of Lucius and the Rest of the Martyrs.

 The Answer of Felix, Jader, Polianus, and the Rest of the Martyrs, to Cyprian.

 Cyprian to Sergius, Rogatianus, and the Other Confessors in Prison.

 To Successus on the Tidings Brought from Rome, Telling of the Persecution.

 To the Clergy and People Concerning His Retirement, a Little Before His Martyrdom.

 Not translated

 Not translated

 Not translated

Epistle LXVII.640    Oxford ed.: Ep. lxvii. a.d. 257.

To the Clergy and People Abiding in Spain, Concerning Basilides and Martial.

Argument.—Basilides and Martial, Bishops, Having Lapsed and Become Contaminated by the Certificates of Idolatry, Cyprian with His Fellow-Bishops Praises the Clergy and People of Spain that They Had Substituted in Their Place by a Legitimate Election, Sabinus and Felix; Especially As, According to the Decision of Cornelius and His Colleagues, Lapsed Bishops Might Indeed Be Received to Repentance, But Were Prohibited from the Priestly Honour. Moreover, He Alludes by the Way to Certain Matters About the Ancient Rite of Episcopal Election. The Context Indicates that This Was Written During the Episcopate of Stephen.

1. Cyprian, Cæcilius, Primus, Polycarp, Nicomedes, Lucilianus, Successus, Sedatus, Fortunatus, Januarius, Secundinus, Pomponius, Honoratus, Victor, Aurelius, Sattius, Petrus, another Januarius, Saturninus, another Aurelius, Venantius, Quietus, Rogatianus, Tenax, Felix, Faustinus, Quintus, another Saturninus, Lucius, Vincentius, Libosus, Geminius, Marcellus, Iambus, Adelphius, Victoricus, and Paulus, to Felix the presbyter, and to the peoples abiding at Legio641    Leon. and Asturica,642    Astorga. also to Lælius the deacon, and the people abiding at Emerita,643    Merida. brethren in the Lord, greeting. When we had come together, dearly beloved brethren, we read your letters, which according to the integrity of your faith and your fear of God you wrote to us by Felix and Sabinus our fellow-bishops, signifying that Basilides and Martial, being stained with the certificates of idolatry, and bound with the consciousness of wicked crimes, ought not to hold the episcopate and administer the priesthood of God; and you desired an answer to be written to you again concerning these things, and your solicitude, no less just than needful, to be relieved either by the comfort or by the help of our judgment. Nevertheless to this your desire not so much our counsels as the divine precepts reply, in which it is long since bidden by the voice of Heaven and prescribed by the law of God, who and what sort of persons ought to serve the altar and to celebrate the divine sacrifices. For in Exodus God speaks to Moses, and warns him, saying, “Let the priests which come near to the Lord God sanctify themselves, lest the Lord forsake them.”644    Ex. xix. 22. And again: “And when they come near to the altar of the Holy One to minister they shall not bring sin upon them, lest they die.”645    Ex. xxviii. 43. Also in Leviticus the Lord commands and says, “Whosoever hath any spot or blemish upon him, shall not approach to offer gifts to God.”646    Lev. xxi. 17.

2. Since these things are announced and are made plain to us, it is necessary that our obedience should wait upon the divine precepts; nor in matters of this kind can human indulgence accept any man’s person, or yield anything to any one, when the divine prescription has interfered, and establishes a law. For we ought not to be forgetful what the Lord spoke to the Jews by Isaiah the prophet, rebuking, and indignant that they had despised the divine precepts and followed human doctrines. “This people,” he says, honoureth me with their lips, but their heart is widely removed from me; but in vain do they worship me, teaching the doctrines and commandments of men.”647    Isa. xxix. 13. This also the Lord repeats in the Gospel, and says, “Ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may establish your own tradition.”648    Mark vii. 13. Having which things before our eyes, and solicitously and religiously considering them, we ought in the ordinations of priests to choose none but unstained and upright ministers,649    “Antistites.” who, holily and worthily offering sacrifices to God, may be heard in the prayers which they make for the safety of the Lord’s people, since it is written, “God heareth not a sinner; but if any man be a worshipper of God, and doeth His will, him He heareth.”650    John ix. 31. On which account it is fitting, that with full diligence and sincere investigation those should be chosen for God’s priesthood whom it is manifest God will hear.

3. Nor let the people flatter themselves that they can be free from the contagion of sin, while communicating with a priest who is a sinner, and yielding their consent to the unjust and unlawful episcopacy of their overseer, when the divine reproof by Hosea the prophet threatens, and says, “Their sacrifices shall be as the bread of mourning; all that eat thereof shall be polluted;”651    Hos. ix. 4. teaching manifestly and showing that all are absolutely bound to the sin who have been contaminated by the sacrifice of a profane and unrighteous priest. Which, moreover, we find to be manifested also in Numbers, when Korah, and Dathan, and Abiram claimed for themselves the power of sacrificing in opposition to Aaron the priest. There also the Lord commanded by Moses that the people should be separated from them, lest, being associated with the wicked, themselves also should be bound closely in the same wickedness. “Separate yourselves,” said He, “from the tents of these wicked and hardened men, and touch not those things which belong to them, lest ye perish together in their sins.”652    Num. xvi. 26. On which account a people obedient to the Lord’s precepts, and fearing God, ought to separate themselves from a sinful prelate, and not to associate themselves with the sacrifices of a sacrilegious priest, especially since they themselves have the power either of choosing worthy priests, or of rejecting unworthy ones.

4. Which very thing, too, we observe to come from divine authority, that the priest should be chosen in the presence of the people under the eyes of all, and should be approved worthy and suitable by public judgment and testimony; as in the book of Numbers the Lord commanded Moses, saying, “Take Aaron thy brother, and Eleazar his son, and place them in the mount, in the presence of all the assembly, and strip Aaron of his garments, and put them upon Eleazar his son; and let Aaron die there, and be added to his people.”653    Num. xx. 25, 26. God commands a priest to be appointed in the presence of all the assembly; that is, He instructs and shows that the ordination of priests ought not to be solemnized except with the knowledge of the people standing near, that in the presence of the people either the crimes of the wicked may be disclosed, or the merits of the good may be declared, and the ordination, which shall have been examined by the suffrage and judgment of all, may be just and legitimate.654    [See sec. 5, infra.] And this is subsequently observed, according to divine instruction, in the Acts of the Apostles, when Peter speaks to the people of ordaining an apostle in the place of Judas. “Peter,” it says, “stood up in the midst of the disciples, and the multitude were in one place.”655    Acts i. 15. From some authorities, Baluzius here interpolates, “the number of men was about a hundred and twenty.” But this, says a modern editor, smacks of “emendation.” Neither do we observe that this was regarded by the apostles only in the ordinations of bishops and priests, but also in those of deacons, of which matter itself also it is written in their Acts: “And they twelve called together,” it says, “the whole congregation of the disciples, and said to them;”656    Acts iv. 2. which was done so diligently and carefully, with the calling together of the whole of the people, surely for this reason, that no unworthy person might creep into the ministry of the altar, or to the office of a priest. For that unworthy persons are sometimes ordained, not according to the will of God, but according to human presumption, and that those things which do not come of a legitimate and righteous ordination are displeasing to God, God Himself manifests by Hosea the prophet, saying, “They have set up for themselves a king, but not by me.”657    Hos. viii. 4.

5. For which reason you must diligently observe and keep the practice delivered from divine tradition and apostolic observance, which is also maintained among us, and almost throughout all the provinces;658    [See Ep. xl. p. 319, supra.] that for the proper celebration of ordinations all the neighbouring bishops of the same province should assemble with that people for which a prelate is ordained. And the bishop should be chosen in the presence of the people, who have most fully known the life of each one, and have looked into the doings of each one as respects his habitual conduct. And this also, we see, was done by you in the ordination of our colleague Sabinus; so that, by the suffrage of the whole brotherhood,659    Elucidation XIV.] and by the sentence of the bishops who had assembled in their presence, and who had written letters to you concerning him, the episcopate was conferred upon him, and hands were imposed on him in the place of Basilides. Neither can it rescind an ordination rightly perfected, that Basilides, after the detection of his crimes, and the baring of his conscience even by his own confession, went to Rome and deceived Stephen our colleague, placed at a distance, and ignorant of what had been done, and of the truth, to canvass that he might be replaced unjustly in the episcopate from which he had been righteously deposed.660    [“Our colleague Stephen,” placed at a distance, ignorant of facts and truth, and, in short, incompetent to meddle with the African province in its own business: such was Cyprian’s idea of the limits to which even this apostolic See was restricted.] The result of this is, that the sins of Basilides are not so much abolished as enhanced, inasmuch as to his former sins he has also added the crime of deceit and circumvention. For he is not so much to be blamed who has been through heedlessness surprised by fraud, as he is to be execrated who has fraudulently taken him by surprise. But if Basilides could deceive men, he cannot deceive God, since it is written, “God is not mocked.”661    Gal. vi. 7. But neither can deceit advantage Martialis, in such a way as that he who also is involved in great crimes should hold his bishopric, since the apostle also warns, and says, “A bishop must be blameless, as the steward of God.”662    Tit. i. 7.

6. Wherefore, since as ye have written, dearly beloved brethren, and as Felix and Sabinus our colleagues affirm, and as another Felix of Cæsar Augusta,663    Saragossa. a maintainer of the faith and a defender of the truth, signifies in his letter, Basilides and Martialis have been contaminated by the abominable certificate of idolatry; and Basilides, moreover, besides the stain of the certificate, when he was prostrate in sickness, blasphemed against God, and confessed that he blasphemed; and because of the wound to his own conscience, voluntarily laying down his episcopate, turned himself to repentance, entreating God, and considering himself sufficiently happy if it might be permitted him to communicate even as a layman: Martialis also, besides the long frequenting of the disgraceful and filthy banquets of the Gentiles in their college, and placing his sons in the same college, after the manner of foreign nations, among profane sepulchres, and burying them together with strangers, has also affirmed, by acts which are publicly taken before a ducenarian procurator,664    A collector of taxes, so called from the amount of his salary. that he had yielded himself to idolatry, and had denied Christ; and as there are many other and grave crimes in which Basilides and Martialis are held to be implicated; such persons attempt to claim for themselves the episcopate in vain; since it is evident that men of that kind may neither rule over the Church of Christ, nor ought to offer sacrifices to God, especially since Cornelius also, our colleague, a peaceable and righteous priest, and moreover honoured by the condescension of the Lord with martyrdom, has long ago decreed with us,665    [Elucidation XV.] and with all the bishops appointed throughout the whole world, that men of this sort might indeed be admitted to repentance, but were prohibited from the ordination of the clergy, and from the priestly honour.

7. Nor let it disturb you, dearest brethren, if with some, in these last times, either an uncertain faith is wavering, or a fear of God without religion is vacillating, or a peaceable concord does not continue. These things have been foretold as about to happen in the end of the world; and it was predicted by the voice of the Lord, and by the testimony of the apostles, that now that the world is failing, and the Antichrist is drawing near, everything good shall fail, but evil and adverse things shall prosper.666    [Surely a significant warning to our own times.]

8. Yet although, in these last times, evangelic rigour has not so failed in the Church of God, nor the strength of Christian virtue or faith so languished, that there is not left a portion of the priests which in no respect gives way under these ruins of things and wrecks of faith; but, bold and stedfast, they maintain the honour of the divine majesty and the priestly dignity, with full observance of fear. We remember and keep in view that, although others succumbed and yielded, Mattathias boldly vindicated God’s law; that Elias, when the Jews gave way and departed from the divine religion, stood and nobly contended; that Daniel, deterred neither by the loneliness of a foreign country nor by the harassment of continual persecution, frequently and gloriously suffered martyrdoms; also that the three youths, subdued neither by their tender years667    Some read, “by the furnaces;” some “by arms.” nor by threats, stood up faithfully against the Babylonian fires, and conquered the victor king even in their very captivity itself. Let the number either of prevaricators or of traitors see to it, who have now begun to rise in the Church against the Church, and to corrupt as well the faith as the truth. Among very many there still remains a sincere mind and a substantial religion, and a spirit devoted to nothing but the Lord and its God.668    [A noteworthy testimony to the Decian period, when to be a Christian, indeed, was to be a confessor or martyr. Soc., H. E., bk. iv. c. 28.] Nor does the perfidy of others press down the Christian faith into ruin, but rather stimulates and exalts it to glory, according to what the blessed Apostle Paul exhorts, and says: “For what if some of these have fallen from their faith: hath their unbelief made the faith of God of none effect? God forbid. For God is true, but every man a liar.”669    Rom. iii. 3, 4. But if every man is a liar, and God only true, what else ought we, the servants, and especially the priests, of God, to do, than forsake human errors and lies, and continue in the truth of God, keeping the Lord’s precepts?

9. Wherefore, although there have been found some among our colleagues, dearest brethren, who think that the godly discipline may be neglected, and who rashly hold communion with Basilides and Martialis, such a thing as this ought not to trouble our faith, since the Holy Spirit threatens such in the Psalms, saying, “But thou hatest instruction, and castedst my words behind thee: when thou sawest a thief, thou consentedst unto him, and hast been partaker with adulterers.”670    Ps. l. 17, 18. He shows that they become sharers and partakers of other men’s sins who are associated with the delinquents.  And besides, Paul the apostle writes, and says the same thing: “Whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, injurious, proud, boasters of themselves, inventors of evil things, who, although they knew the judgment of God, did not understand that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only they which commit those things, but they also which consent unto those who do these things.”671    Rom. i. 30–32. Since they, says he, who do such things are worthy of death, he makes manifest and proves that not only they are worthy of death, and come into punishment who do evil things, but also those who consent unto those who do such things—who, while they are mingled in unlawful communion with the evil and sinners, and the unrepenting, are polluted by the contact of the guilty, and, being joined in the fault, are thus not separated in its penalty.  For which reason we not only approve, but applaud, dearly beloved brethren, the religious solicitude of your integrity and faith, and exhort you as much as we can by our letters, not to mingle in sacrilegious communion with profane and polluted priests, but maintain the sound and sincere constancy of your faith with religious fear. I bid you, dearest brethren, ever heartily farewell.

EPISTOLA LXVIII. (Erasm., I, 4. Pamel., Rigalt., Baluz., LXVIII. Paris., LXVII. Oxon., Lips., LXVII. Routh. Rell. Scr., III, p. 77 et 122.)AD CLERUM ET PLEBES IN HISPANIA CONSISTENTES, DE BASILIDE ET MARTIALE.

0400A

ARGUMENTUM.---Cum Basilides et Martialis, episcopi, lapsi essent et libellis idololatriae contaminati, laudat Cyprianus cum coepiscopis clerum et plebem Hispaniarum, quod in locum eorum Sabinum et Felicem legitima electione substituissent; praesertim cum, juxta Cornelii statutum, episcopi lapsi ad poenitentiam quidem agendam admitti possent, sed a sacerdotali honore prohiberentur, obiter etiam quaedam attingens de veteri electionis episcoporum ritu. Sub 0400BStephano autem scriptam esse, contextus indicat.