Against Hermogenes.

 Chapter I.—The Opinions of Hermogenes, by the Prescriptive Rule of Antiquity Shown to Be Heretical. Not Derived from Christianity, But from Heathen Ph

 Chapter II.—Hermogenes, After a Perverse Induction from Mere Heretical Assumptions, Concludes that God Created All Things Out of Pre-Existing Matter.

 Chapter III.—An Argument of Hermogenes. The Answer:  While God is a Title Eternally Applicable to the Divine Being, Lord and Father are Only Relative

 Chapter IV.—Hermogenes Gives Divine Attributes to Matter, and So Makes Two Gods.

 Chapter V.—Hermogenes Coquets with His Own Argument, as If Rather Afraid of It. After Investing Matter with Divine Qualities, He Tries to Make It Some

 Chapter VI.—The Shifts to Which Hermogenes is Reduced, Who Deifies Matter, and Yet is Unwilling to Hold Him Equal with the Divine Creator.

 Chapter VII.—Hermogenes Held to His Theory in Order that Its Absurdity May Be Exposed on His Own Principles.

 Chapter VIII.—On His Own Principles, Hermogenes Makes Matter, on the Whole, Superior to God.

 Chapter IX.—Sundry Inevitable But Intolerable Conclusions from the Principles of Hermogenes.

 Chapter X.—To What Straits Hermogenes Absurdly Reduces the Divine Being. He Does Nothing Short of Making Him the Author of Evil.

 Chapter XI.—Hermogenes Makes Great Efforts to Remove Evil from God to Matter. How He Fails to Do This Consistently with His Own Argument.

 Chapter XII.—The Mode of Controversy Changed. The Premisses of Hermogenes Accepted, in Order to Show into What Confusion They Lead Him.

 Chapter XIII.—Another Ground of Hermogenes that Matter Has Some Good in It.  Its Absurdity.

 Chapter XIV.—Tertullian Pushes His Opponent into a Dilemma.

 Chapter XV.—The Truth, that God Made All Things from Nothing, Rescued from the Opponent’s Flounderings.

 Chapter XVI.—A Series of Dilemmas.  They Show that Hermogenes Cannot Escape from the Orthodox Conclusion.

 Chapter XVII.—The Truth of God’s Work in Creation. You Cannot Depart in the Least from It, Without Landing Yourself in an Absurdity.

 Chapter XVIII.—An Eulogy on the Wisdom and Word of God, by Which God Made All Things of Nothing.

 Chapter XIX.—An Appeal to the History of Creation. True Meaning of the Term Beginning, Which the Heretic Curiously Wrests to an Absurd Sense.

 Chapter XX.—Meaning of the Phrase—In the Beginning. Tertullian Connects It with the Wisdom of God, and Elicits from It the Truth that the Creation Was

 Chapter XXI.—A Retort of Heresy Answered. That Scripture Should in So Many Words Tell Us that the World Was Made of Nothing is Superfluous.

 Chapter XXII.—This Conclusion Confirmed by the Usage of Holy Scripture in Its History of the Creation.  Hermogenes in Danger of the Woe Pronounced Aga

 Chapter XXIII.—Hermogenes Pursued to Another Passage of Scripture. The Absurdity of His Interpretation Exposed.

 Chapter XXIV.—Earth Does Not Mean Matter as Hermogenes Would Have It.

 Chapter XXV.—The Assumption that There are Two Earths Mentioned in the History of the Creation, Refuted.

 Chapter XXVI.—The Method Observed in the History of the Creation, in Reply to the Perverse Interpretation of Hermogenes.

 Chapter XXVII.—Some Hair-Splitting Use of Words in Which His Opponent Had Indulged.

 Chapter XXVIII.—A Curious Inconsistency in Hermogenes Exposed.  CertainExpressions in The History of Creation Vindicated in The True Sense.

 Chapter XXIX.—The Gradual Development of Cosmical Order Out of Chaos in the Creation, Beautifully Stated.

 Chapter XXX.—Another Passage in the Sacred History of the Creation, Released from the Mishandling of Hermogenes.

 Chapter XXXI.—A Further Vindication of the Scripture Narrative of the Creation, Against a Futile View of Hermogenes.

 Chapter XXXII.—The Account of the Creation in Genesis a General One, Corroborated, However, by Many Other Passages of the Old Testament, Which Give Ac

 Chapter XXXIII.—Statement of the True Doctrine Concerning Matter. Its Relation to God’s Creation of the World.

 Chapter XXXIV.—A Presumption that All Things Were Created by God Out of Nothing Afforded by the Ultimate Reduction of All Things to Nothing.  Scriptur

 Chapter XXXV.—Contradictory Propositions Advanced by Hermogenes Respecting Matter and Its Qualities.

 Chapter XXXVI.—Other Absurd Theories Respecting Matter and Its Incidents Exposed in an Ironical Strain. Motion in Matter. Hermogenes’ Conceits Respect

 Chapter XXXVII.—Ironical Dilemmas Respecting Matter, and Sundry Moral Qualities Fancifully Attributed to It.

 Chapter XXXIII.—Other Speculations of Hermogenes, About Matter and Some of Its Adjuncts, Shown to Be Absurd. For Instance, Its Alleged Infinity.

 Chapter XXXIX.—These Latter Speculations Shown to Be Contradictory to the First Principles Respecting Matter, Formerly Laid Down by Hermogenes.

 Chapter XL.—Shapeless Matter an Incongruous Origin for God’s Beautiful Cosmos. Hermogenes Does Not Mend His Argument by Supposing that Only a Portion

 Chapter XLI.—Sundry Quotations from Hermogenes. Now Uncertain and Vague are His Speculations Respecting Motion in Matter, and the Material Qualities o

 Chapter XLII.—Further Exposure of Inconsistencies in the Opinions of Hermogenes Respecting the Divine Qualities of Matter.

 Chapter XLIII.—Other Discrepancies Exposed and Refuted Respecting the Evil in Matter Being Changed to Good.

 Chapter XLIV.—Curious Views Respecting God’s Method of Working with Matter Exposed. Discrepancies in the Heretic’s Opinion About God’s Local Relation

 Chapter XLV.—Conclusion. Contrast Between the Statements of Hermogenes and the Testimony of Holy Scripture Respecting the Creation. Creation Out of No

Chapter XXI.—A Retort of Heresy Answered. That Scripture Should in So Many Words Tell Us that the World Was Made of Nothing is Superfluous.

But, you will say to me, if you determine that all things were made of nothing, on the ground that it is not told us that anything was made out of pre-existent Matter, take care that it be not contended on the opposite side, that on the same ground all things were made out of Matter, because it is not likewise expressly said that anything was made out of nothing. Some arguments may, of course,206    Plane. be thus retorted easily enough; but it does not follow that they are on that account fairly admissible, where there is a diversity in the cause. For I maintain that, even if the Scripture has not expressly declared that all things were made out of nothing—just as it abstains (from saying that they were formed) out of Matter—there was no such pressing need for expressly indicating the creation of all things out of nothing, as there was of their creation out of Matter, if that had been their origin. Because, in the case of what is made out of nothing, the very fact of its not being indicated that it was made of any particular thing shows that it was made of nothing; and there is no danger of its being supposed that it was made of anything, when there is no indication at all of what it was made of.  In the case, however, of that which is made out of something, unless the very fact be plainly declared, that it was made out of something, there will be danger, until207    Dum ostenditur: which Oehler and Rigalt. construe as “donec ostendatur.” One reading has “dum non ostenditur,” “so long as it is not shown.” it is shown of what it was made, first of its appearing to be made of nothing, because it is not said of what it was made; and then, should it be of such a nature208    Ea conditione. as to have the appearance of having certainly been made of something, there will be a similar risk of its seeming to have been made of a far different material from the proper one, so long as there is an absence of statement of what it was made of. Then, if God had been unable to make all things of nothing, the Scripture could not possibly have added that He had made all things of nothing: (there could have been no room for such a statement,) but it must by all means have informed us that He had made all things out of Matter, since Matter must have been the source; because the one case was quite to be understood,209    In totum habebat intelligi. if it were not actually stated, whereas the other case would be left in doubt unless it were stated.

CAPUT XXI.

Ergo, inquis, si tu ideo praejudicas ex nihilo facta 0216B omnia, quia non sit manifeste relatum de materia praecedenti factum quid, vide ne diversa pars ideo contendat ex materia omnia facta, quia proinde non aperte significatum sit, ex nihilo quid factum. Plane retorqueri quaedam facile possunt: non statim et ex aequo admitti, ubi diversitas caussae est. Dico enim, etsi non aperte Scriptura pronuntiavit ex nihilo facta omnia, sicut nec ex materia, non tantam fuisse necessitatem aperte significandi de nihilo facta omnia, quanta esset, si ex materia facta fuissent. Quoniam quod fit ex nihilo, eo ipso dum non ostenditur ex aliquo factum, manifestatur ex nihilo factum: et non periclitatur ne ex aliquo factum existimetur, quando non demonstretur ex quo sit factum. Quod autem ex aliquo fit, nisi hoc ipsum aperte declaratur ex aliquo 0216C factum, dum illud ex quo factum sit non ostenditur , periclitabitur primo videri ex nihilo factum, quia non editur ex quo sit factum. Dehinc, etsi ea sit conditione, ut non possit videri non ex aliquo , proinde periclitabitur, ex alio longe factum videri, quam ex quo factum est, dum non proponitur unde 0217A sit factum. Ita, si ex nihilo Deus cuncta fecisse non potuit, etsi Scriptura non adjecisset illum ex nihilo fecisse (II Mach. VII, 28); ex materia eum fecisse omni modo debuit edixisse, si et ex materia fecisset, quia illud in totum habebat intelligi, etsi non significaretur: at istud in dubio, nisi significaretur.