Against Hermogenes.

 Chapter I.—The Opinions of Hermogenes, by the Prescriptive Rule of Antiquity Shown to Be Heretical. Not Derived from Christianity, But from Heathen Ph

 Chapter II.—Hermogenes, After a Perverse Induction from Mere Heretical Assumptions, Concludes that God Created All Things Out of Pre-Existing Matter.

 Chapter III.—An Argument of Hermogenes. The Answer:  While God is a Title Eternally Applicable to the Divine Being, Lord and Father are Only Relative

 Chapter IV.—Hermogenes Gives Divine Attributes to Matter, and So Makes Two Gods.

 Chapter V.—Hermogenes Coquets with His Own Argument, as If Rather Afraid of It. After Investing Matter with Divine Qualities, He Tries to Make It Some

 Chapter VI.—The Shifts to Which Hermogenes is Reduced, Who Deifies Matter, and Yet is Unwilling to Hold Him Equal with the Divine Creator.

 Chapter VII.—Hermogenes Held to His Theory in Order that Its Absurdity May Be Exposed on His Own Principles.

 Chapter VIII.—On His Own Principles, Hermogenes Makes Matter, on the Whole, Superior to God.

 Chapter IX.—Sundry Inevitable But Intolerable Conclusions from the Principles of Hermogenes.

 Chapter X.—To What Straits Hermogenes Absurdly Reduces the Divine Being. He Does Nothing Short of Making Him the Author of Evil.

 Chapter XI.—Hermogenes Makes Great Efforts to Remove Evil from God to Matter. How He Fails to Do This Consistently with His Own Argument.

 Chapter XII.—The Mode of Controversy Changed. The Premisses of Hermogenes Accepted, in Order to Show into What Confusion They Lead Him.

 Chapter XIII.—Another Ground of Hermogenes that Matter Has Some Good in It.  Its Absurdity.

 Chapter XIV.—Tertullian Pushes His Opponent into a Dilemma.

 Chapter XV.—The Truth, that God Made All Things from Nothing, Rescued from the Opponent’s Flounderings.

 Chapter XVI.—A Series of Dilemmas.  They Show that Hermogenes Cannot Escape from the Orthodox Conclusion.

 Chapter XVII.—The Truth of God’s Work in Creation. You Cannot Depart in the Least from It, Without Landing Yourself in an Absurdity.

 Chapter XVIII.—An Eulogy on the Wisdom and Word of God, by Which God Made All Things of Nothing.

 Chapter XIX.—An Appeal to the History of Creation. True Meaning of the Term Beginning, Which the Heretic Curiously Wrests to an Absurd Sense.

 Chapter XX.—Meaning of the Phrase—In the Beginning. Tertullian Connects It with the Wisdom of God, and Elicits from It the Truth that the Creation Was

 Chapter XXI.—A Retort of Heresy Answered. That Scripture Should in So Many Words Tell Us that the World Was Made of Nothing is Superfluous.

 Chapter XXII.—This Conclusion Confirmed by the Usage of Holy Scripture in Its History of the Creation.  Hermogenes in Danger of the Woe Pronounced Aga

 Chapter XXIII.—Hermogenes Pursued to Another Passage of Scripture. The Absurdity of His Interpretation Exposed.

 Chapter XXIV.—Earth Does Not Mean Matter as Hermogenes Would Have It.

 Chapter XXV.—The Assumption that There are Two Earths Mentioned in the History of the Creation, Refuted.

 Chapter XXVI.—The Method Observed in the History of the Creation, in Reply to the Perverse Interpretation of Hermogenes.

 Chapter XXVII.—Some Hair-Splitting Use of Words in Which His Opponent Had Indulged.

 Chapter XXVIII.—A Curious Inconsistency in Hermogenes Exposed.  CertainExpressions in The History of Creation Vindicated in The True Sense.

 Chapter XXIX.—The Gradual Development of Cosmical Order Out of Chaos in the Creation, Beautifully Stated.

 Chapter XXX.—Another Passage in the Sacred History of the Creation, Released from the Mishandling of Hermogenes.

 Chapter XXXI.—A Further Vindication of the Scripture Narrative of the Creation, Against a Futile View of Hermogenes.

 Chapter XXXII.—The Account of the Creation in Genesis a General One, Corroborated, However, by Many Other Passages of the Old Testament, Which Give Ac

 Chapter XXXIII.—Statement of the True Doctrine Concerning Matter. Its Relation to God’s Creation of the World.

 Chapter XXXIV.—A Presumption that All Things Were Created by God Out of Nothing Afforded by the Ultimate Reduction of All Things to Nothing.  Scriptur

 Chapter XXXV.—Contradictory Propositions Advanced by Hermogenes Respecting Matter and Its Qualities.

 Chapter XXXVI.—Other Absurd Theories Respecting Matter and Its Incidents Exposed in an Ironical Strain. Motion in Matter. Hermogenes’ Conceits Respect

 Chapter XXXVII.—Ironical Dilemmas Respecting Matter, and Sundry Moral Qualities Fancifully Attributed to It.

 Chapter XXXIII.—Other Speculations of Hermogenes, About Matter and Some of Its Adjuncts, Shown to Be Absurd. For Instance, Its Alleged Infinity.

 Chapter XXXIX.—These Latter Speculations Shown to Be Contradictory to the First Principles Respecting Matter, Formerly Laid Down by Hermogenes.

 Chapter XL.—Shapeless Matter an Incongruous Origin for God’s Beautiful Cosmos. Hermogenes Does Not Mend His Argument by Supposing that Only a Portion

 Chapter XLI.—Sundry Quotations from Hermogenes. Now Uncertain and Vague are His Speculations Respecting Motion in Matter, and the Material Qualities o

 Chapter XLII.—Further Exposure of Inconsistencies in the Opinions of Hermogenes Respecting the Divine Qualities of Matter.

 Chapter XLIII.—Other Discrepancies Exposed and Refuted Respecting the Evil in Matter Being Changed to Good.

 Chapter XLIV.—Curious Views Respecting God’s Method of Working with Matter Exposed. Discrepancies in the Heretic’s Opinion About God’s Local Relation

 Chapter XLV.—Conclusion. Contrast Between the Statements of Hermogenes and the Testimony of Holy Scripture Respecting the Creation. Creation Out of No

Chapter V.—Hermogenes Coquets with His Own Argument, as If Rather Afraid of It. After Investing Matter with Divine Qualities, He Tries to Make It Somehow Inferior to God.

But God is God, and Matter is Matter. As if a mere difference in their names prevented equality,50    Comparationi. when an identity of condition is claimed for them! Grant that their nature is different; assume, too, that their form is not identical,—what matters it so long as their absolute state have but one mode?51    Ratio. God is unborn; is not Matter also unborn? God ever exists; is not Matter, too, ever existent? Both are without beginning; both are without end; both are the authors of the universe—both He who created it, and the Matter of which He made it. For it is impossible that Matter should not be regarded as the author52    Auctrix. of all things, when the universe is composed of it. What answer will he give? Will he say that Matter is not then comparable with God as soon as53    Statim si. it has something belonging to God; since, by not having total (divinity), it cannot correspond to the whole extent of the comparison? But what more has he reserved for God, that he should not seem to have accorded to Matter the full amount of the Deity?54    Totum Dei. He says in reply, that even though this is the prerogative of Matter, both the authority and the substance of God must remain intact, by virtue of which He is regarded as the sole and prime Author, as well as the Lord of all things.  Truth, however, maintains the unity of God in such a way as to insist that whatever belongs to God Himself belongs to Him alone. For so will it belong to Himself if it belong to Him alone; and therefore it will be impossible that another god should be admitted, when it is permitted to no other being to possess anything of God. Well, then, you say, we ourselves at that rate possess nothing of God. But indeed we do, and shall continue to do—only it is from Him that we receive it, and not from ourselves. For we shall be even gods, if we, shall deserve to be among those of whom He declared, “I have said, Ye are gods,”55    Ps. lxxxii. 6. and, “God standeth in the congregation of the gods.”56    Ver. 1. But this comes of His own grace, not from any property in us, because it is He alone who can make gods. The property of Matter, however, he57    Hermogenes. makes to be that which it has in common with God. Otherwise, if it received from God the property which belongs to God,—I mean its attribute58    Ordinem: or course. of eternity—one might then even suppose that it both possesses an attribute in common with God, and yet at the same time is not God. But what inconsistency is it for him59    Quale autem est: “how comes it to pass that.” to allow that there is a conjoint possession of an attribute with God, and also to wish that what he does not refuse to Matter should be, after all, the exclusive privilege of God!

CAPUT V.

Sed Deus, Deus est; materia, materia est: quasi diversitas nominum comparationi resistat, si status idem vindicetur. Sit et natura diversa, sit et forma non eadem, dummodo ipsius status una sit ratio. Innatus Deus, an non et innata materia? semper Deus, annon semper et materia? Ambo sine initio, 0202A ambo sine fine, ambo etiam auctores universitatis, tam qui fecit, quam de qua fecit. Neque enim potest non et materia auctrix omnium deputari, de qua universitas consistit. Quomodo respondebit ? Non statim materiam comparari Deo, si quid Dei habeat, quia non totum habendo non concurrat in plenitudinem comparationis? Quid Deo reliquit amplius, ut non totum Dei, materiae dedisse videatur? Vel qua, inquit, et sic habente materia, salva sit Deo et auctoritas et substantia, qua solus et primus auctor est, et Dominus omnium censeatur. Veritas autem sic unum Deum exigit defendendo, ut solius sit quidquid ipsius est. Ita enim ipsius erit, si fuerit solius: et ex hoc alius deus non possit admitti, dum nemini licet habere de Deo aliquid. Ergo, inquis, nec nos 0202B habemus Dei aliquid. Imo habemus, et habebimus, sed ab ipso, non a nobis. Nam et dei crimus, si meruimus illi esse de quibus praedicavit: Ego dixi: Vos Dei estis; et, stetit Deus in ecclesia deorum (Ps. LXXXI, 1): sed ex gratia ipsius, non ex nostra proprietate, quia ipse est solus qui deos faciat. Materiae autem proprium facit quod cum Deo habet: aut si a Deo accepit, quod est Dei, ordinem dico aeternitatis, potest credi et habere illam cum Deo aliquid, et deum illam non esse. Quale est autem, cum confitetur ille aliquid cum Deo habere, et vult solius Dei esse quod materiam non negat habere?