The Festal Letters, and their Index.

 B.—The Festal Letters, and Their Index,

 Index.

 Festal Letters.

 I. Festal Letters.

 Letter II.— For 330. Easter-day xxiv Pharmuthi xiii Kal. Mai Æra Dioclet. 46 Coss. Gallicianus, Valerius Symmachus Præfect, Magninianus Indict. i

 Letter III.— For 331. Easter-day xvi Pharmuthi iii Id. April Æra Dioclet. 47 Coss. Annius Bassus, Ablabius Præfect, Florentius Indict. iv.

 Letter IV.— For 332. Easter-day vii Pharmuthi , iv Non. Apr. Æra Dioclet. 48 Coss. Fabius Pacatianus, Mæcilius Hilarianus Præfect, Hyginus Indict

 Letter V.— For 333. Easter-day , Coss. Dalmatius and Zenophilus Præfect, Paternus vi Indict. xvii Kal. Maii, xx Pharmuthi xv Moon vii Gods Æra

 Letter VI.— For 334. Easter-day, xii Pharmuthi, vii Id. April xvii Moon Æra Dioclet. 50 Coss. Optatus Patricius, Anicius Paulinus Præfect, Philagr

 Letter VII.— For 335. Easter-day iv Pharmuthi, iii Kal. April xx Moon Ær. Dioclet. 51 Coss. Julius Constantius, the brother of Augustus, Rufinus Al

 Letter X.— For 338. Coss. Ursus and Polemius Præf. the same Theodorus, of Heliopolis, and of the Catholics . After him, for the second year, Philagri

 Letter XI.— For 339. Coss. Constantius Augustus II, Constans I Præfect, Philagrius the Cappadocian, for the second time Indict. xii Easter-day xvii

 *XII.— (Probably for 340 a.d.) To the Beloved Brother, and our fellow Minister Serapion .

 Letter XIII.— (For 341.) Coss. Marcellinus, Probinus Præf. Longinus Indict. xiv Easter-day, xiii Kal. Maii, xxiv Pharmuthi Æra Dioclet. 57.

 Letter XIV.— (For 342.) Coss. Augustus Constantius III, Constans II, Præf. the same Longinus Indict. xv Easter-day iii Id. Apr., xvi Pharmuthi Æra

 Letter XVII.— (For 345.) Coss. Amantius, Albinus Præf. Nestorius of Gaza Indict. iii Easter-day, vii Id. Apr., xii Pharmuthi Moon 19 Æra Dioclet.

 Letter XVIII.— (For 346.) Coss. Augustus Constantius IV, Constans III Præf. the same Nestorius Indict. iv Easter-day iii Kal. Apr., iv Pharmuthi M

 Letter XIX.— (For 347.) Coss. Rufinus, Eusebius Præf. the same Nestorius Indict. v Easter-day, Prid. Id. Apr., Pharmuthi xvii Æra Dioclet. 63 Moo

 Letter XX.— (For 348.) Coss. Philippus, Salia Præfect the same Nestorius Indict. vi Easter-day iii Non. Apr., viii Pharmuthi Æra Dioclet. 64 Moon

 From Letter XXII .— (For 350.)

 From Letter XXIV .— (For 352.)

 From Letter XXVII.— (For 355.) From the twenty-seventh Festal Letter of Athanasius, Bishop of Alexandria and Confessor of which the commencement is,

 From Letter XXVIII .— (For 356.)

 Another Fragment.

 From Letter XXIX . — (For 357.) From the twenty-ninth Letter, of which the beginning is, ‘Sufficient for this present time is that which we have alrea

 Another Fragment .

 Another Fragment .

 From Letter XXXIX.— (For 367.) Of the particular books and their number, which are accepted by the Church. From the thirty-ninth Letter of Holy Athana

 From Letter XL .— (For 368.)

 From Letter XLII.— (For 370.)

 From Letter XLIII.— (For 371.)

 From Letter XLIV.— (For 372.) And again, from the forty-fourth Letter, of which the commencement is, ‘All that our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ did i

 From Letter XLV.— (For 373.)

 Personal Letters.

 II. Personal Letters.

 Letter XLVII.— To the Church of Alexandria on the same occasion.

 Letter XLVIII.— Letter to Amun . Written before 354 a.d.

 Letter XLIX.— Letter to Dracontius . Written a.d. 354 or 355.

 Letter L.— First Letter to Lucifer .

 Letter LI.— Second Letter to Lucifer.

 Letter LII.— First Letter to Monks . (Written 358–360).

 Letter LIII.— Second Letter to Monks.

 Letter LIV.— To Serapion, concerning the death of Arius.

 Letter LV.— Letter to Rufinianus.

 Letter LVI.— To the Emperor Jovian.

 Letter LVII.— First Letter to Orsisius .

 Letter LVIII.— Second Letter to Orsisius .

 Letter LIX.— To Epictetus.

 Letter LX.— To Adelphius , Bishop and Confessor: against the Arians.

 Letter LXI.— Letter to Maximus. (Written about 371 a.d.)

 Letter LXII.— To John and Antiochus .

 Letter LXIII.— Letter to the Presbyter Palladius .

 Letter LXIV.— To Diodorus (fragment).

 Memorandum.— On other Letters ascribed to Athanasius.

Letter XLVIII.—Letter to Amun772 See Migne xxvi. 1169, sqq.; Prolegg. ch. ii, §7. Amun, probably the Nitrian monk (supr. p. 212, and D.C.B. i. 102 init.). At any rate, Athanasius addresses his correspondent as ‘elder’ and ‘father,’ which accords well with the language of Vit. Ant. ubi supr. The letter states clearly Athanasius’ opinion as to the relative value of the celibate and married state. It also shews the healthy good sense of the great bishop in dealing with the morbid scrupulosity which even at that early date had begun to characterise certain circles in the Monastic world.. Written before 354 a.d.

All things made by God are beautiful and pure, for the Word of God has made nothing useless or impure. For ‘we are a sweet savour of Christ in them that are being saved773 2 Cor. ii. 15.,’ as the Apostle says. But since the devil’s darts are varied and subtle, and he contrives to trouble those who are of simpler mind, and tries to hinder the ordinary exercises of the brethren, scattering secretly among them thoughts of uncleanness and defilement; come let us briefly dispel the error of the evil one by the grace of the Saviour, and confirm the mind of the simple. For ‘to the pure all things are pure,’ but both the conscience and all that belongs to the unclean are defiled774 Tit. i. 15.. I marvel also at the craft of the devil, in that, although he is corruption and mischief itself, he suggests thoughts under the show of purity; but with the result of a snare rather than a test. For with the object, as I said before, of distracting ascetics from their customary and salutary meditation, and of appearing to overcome them, he stirs some such buzzing thoughts as are of no profit in life, vain questions and frivolities which one ought to put aside. For tell me, beloved and most pious friend, what sin or uncleanness there is in any natural secretion,—as though a man were minded to make a culpable matter of the cleanings of the nose or the sputa from the mouth? And we may add also the secretions of the belly, such as are a physical necessity of animal life. Moreover if we believe man to be, as the divine Scriptures say, a work of God’s hands, how could any defiled work proceed from a pure Power? and if, according to the divine Acts of the Apostles775 Acts xvii. 28., ‘we are God’s offspring,’ we have nothing unclean in ourselves. For then only do we incur defilement, when we commit sin, that foulest of things. But when any bodily excretion takes place independently of will, then we experience this, like other things, by a necessity of nature. But since those whose only pleasure is to gainsay what is said aright, or rather what is made by God, pervert even a saying in the Gospels, alleging that ‘not that which goeth in defileth a man, but that which goeth out776 Matt. xv. 11.,’ we are obliged to make plain this unreasonableness,—for I cannot call it a question—of theirs. For firstly, like unstable persons, they wrest the Scriptures777 2 Pet. iii. 16. to their own ignorance. Now the sense of the divine oracle is as follows. Certain persons, like these of today, were in doubt about meats. The Lord Himself, to dispel their ignorance, or it may be to unveil their deceitfulness, lays down that, not what goes in defiles the man, but what goes out. Then he adds exactly whence they go out, namely from the heart. For there, as he knows, are the evil treasures of profane thoughts and other sins. But the Apostle teaches the same thing more concisely, saying, ‘But meat shall not bring us before God778 1 Cor. viii. 8..’ Moreover, one might reasonably say no natural secretion will bring us before him for punishment. But possibly medical men (to put these people to shame even at the hands of outsiders) will support us on this point, telling us that there are certain necessary passages accorded to the animal body, to provide for the dismissal of the superfluity of what is secreted in our several parts; for example, for the superfluity of the head, the hair and the watery discharges from the head, and the purgings of the belly, and that superfluity again of the seminative channels. What sin then is there in God’s name, elder most beloved of God, if the Master who made the body willed and made these parts to have such passages? But since we must grapple with the objections of evil persons, as they may say, ‘If the organs have been severally fashioned by the Creator, then there is no sin in their genuine use,’ let us stop them by asking this question: What do you mean by use? That lawful use which God permitted when He said, ‘Increase and multiply, and replenish the earth779 Gen. i. 28.,’ and which the Apostle approves in the words, ‘Marriage is honourable and the bed undefiled780 Heb. xiii. 4.,’ or that use which is public, yet carried on stealthily and in adulterous fashion? For in other matters also which go to make up life, we shall find differences according to circumstances. For example, it is not right to kill, yet in war it is lawful and praiseworthy to destroy the enemy; accordingly not only are they who have distinguished themselves in the field held worthy of great honours, but monuments are put up proclaiming their achievements. So that the same act is at one time and under some circumstances unlawful, while under others, and at the right time, it is lawful and permissible. The same reasoning applies to the relation of the sexes. He is blessed who, being freely yoked in his youth, naturally begets children. But if he uses nature licentiously, the punishment of which the Apostle781 Heb. xiii. 4. writes shall await whoremongers and adulterers.

For there are two ways in life, as touching these matters. The one the more moderate and ordinary, I mean marriage; the other angelic and unsurpassed, namely virginity. Now if a man choose the way of the world, namely marriage, he is not indeed to blame; yet he will not receive such great gifts as the other. For he will receive, since he too brings forth fruit, namely thirtyfold782 See Mark iv. 20, &c.. But if a man embrace the holy and unearthly way, even though, as compared with the former, it be rugged and hard to accomplish, yet it has the more wonderful gifts: for it grows the perfect fruit, namely an hundredfold. So then their unclean and evil objections had their proper solution long since given in the divine Scriptures. Strengthen then, father, the flocks783 This is a clear reference to the Monastic Societies which had now long existed in the Nitrian desert. under you, exhorting them from the Apostolic writings, guiding them from the Evangelical, counselling them from the Psalms, and saying, ‘quicken me according to Thy Word784 Ps. cxix. 107.;’ but by ‘Thy Word,’ is meant that we should serve Him with a pure heart. For knowing this, the Prophet says, as if interpreting himself, ‘Make me a clean heart, O God785 Ps. li. 10.,’ lest filthy thoughts trouble me. David again, ‘And stablish me with Thy free spirit786 Ib. 12,’ that even if ever thoughts disturb me, a certain strong power from Thee may stablish me, acting as a support. Giving then this and the like advice, say with regard to those who are slow to obey the truth, ‘I will teach Thy ways unto the wicked,’ and, confident in the Lord that you will persuade them to desist from such wickedness, sing ‘and sinners shall be converted unto Thee787 Ib. li. 13..’ And be it granted, that they who raise malicious questions may cease from such vain labour, and that they who doubt in their simplicity may be strengthened with a ‘free spirit;’ while as many of you as surely know the truth, hold it unbroken and unshaken in Christ Jesus our Lord, with whom be to the Father glory and might, together with the Holy Spirit, for ever and ever. Amen.