The Ecclesiastical History of Theodoret.

 Book I

 The ECCLESIASTICAL HistorY of Theodoret.

 Chapter I.— Origin of the Arian Heresy.

 Chapter II.— List of the Principal Bishops

 Chapter III.— The Epistle of Alexander, Bishop of Alexandria to Alexander, Bishop of Constantinople .

 Chapter IV.— The Letter of Arius to Eusebius, Bishop of Nicomedia

 Chapter V.— The Letter of Eusebius, Bishop of Nicomedia, to Paulinus, Bishop of Tyre .

 Chapter VI.— General Council of Nicæa .

 Chapter VII.— Confutation of Arianism deduced from the Writings of Eustathius and Athanasius .

 Chapter VIII.— Facts relating to Meletius the Egyptian, from whom originated the Meletian Schism, which remains to this day.—Synodical Epistle respect

 Chapter IX.— The Epistle of the Emperor Constantine, concerning the matters transacted at the Council, addressed to those Bishops who were not present

 Chapter X.— The daily wants of the Church supplied by the Emperor, and an account of his other virtues .

 Chapter XI

 Chapter XII.— Confutation of the blasphemies of the Arians of our time, from the writings of Eusebius, Bishop of Cæsarea .

 Chapter XIII.— Extract from the Letter of Athanasius on the Death of Arius .

 Chapter XIV.— Letter written by the Emperor Constantine respecting the building of Churches .

 Chapter XV.— The Epistle of Constantine concerning the preparation of copies of the Holy Scriptures .

 Chapter XVI.— Letter from the Emperor to Macarius, Bishop of Jerusalem, concerning the building of the Holy Church .

 Chapter XVII.— Helena , Mother of the Emperor Constantine.—Her zeal in the Erection of the Holy Church .

 Chapter XVIII.— The Unlawful Translation of Eusebius, Bishop of Nicomedia .

 Chapter XIX.— Epistle of the Emperor Constantine against Eusebius and Theognis, addressed to the Nicomedians .

 Chapter XX.— The artful Machinations of Eusebius and his followers against the Holy Eustathius, Bishop of Antioch .

 Chapter XXI.— Bishops of Heretical opinions ordained in Antioch after the Banishment of St. Eustathius .

 Chapter XXII.— Conversion of the Indians .

 Chapter XXIII.— Conversion of the Iberians .

 Chapter XXIV.— Letter written by the Emperor Constantine to Sapor , the King of Persia, respecting the Christians .

 Chapter XXV.— An account of the plot formed against the Holy Athanasius .

 Chapter XXVI.— Another plot against Athanasius .

 Chapter XXVII.— Epistle of the Emperor Constantine to the Council of Tyre .

 Chapter XXVIII.— The Council of Tyre .

 Chapter XXIX.— Consecration of the Church of Jerusalem.—Banishment of St. Athanasius .

 Chapter XXX.— Will of the blessed Emperor Constantine .

 Chapter XXXI.— Apology for Constantine .

 Chapter XXXII.— The End of the Holy Emperor Constantine .

 Book II

 Book II.

 Chapter II.— Declension of the Emperor Constantius from the true Faith .

 Chapter III.— Second Exile of St. Athanasius.—Ordination and Death of Gregorius .

 Chapter IV.— Paulus, Bishop of Constantinople .

 Chapter V.— The Heresy of Macedonius .

 Chapter VI.— Council held at Sardica .

 Chapter VII.— Account of the Bishops Euphratas and Vincentius, and of the plot formed in Antioch against them .

 Chapter VIII.— Stephanus Deposed .

 Chapter IX.— The Second Return of Saint Athanasius .

 Chapter X.— Third exile and flight of Athanasius .

 Chapter XI.— The evil and daring deeds done by Georgius in Alexandria.

 Chapter XII.— Council of Milan .

 Chapter XIII.— Conference between Liberius, Pope of Rome, and the Emperor Constantius .

 Chapter XIV.— Concerning the Banishment and Return of the Holy Liberius .

 Chapter XV.— Council of Ariminum .

 Chapter XVI.— Concerning the Synod held at Nica in Thrace, and the Confession of Faith drawn up there .

 Chapter XVII.— Synodical Act of Damasus, Bishop of Rome, and of the Western Bishops, about the Council at Ariminum .

 Chapter XVIII.— The Letter of Athanasius, Bishop of Alexandria, concerning the same Council.

 Chapter XIX.— Concerning the cunning of Leontius, Bishop of Antioch, and the boldness of Flavianus and Diodorus .

 Chapter XX.— Concerning the innovations of Eudoxius, of Germanicia, and the zeal of Basilius .

 Chapter XXI.— Of the Second Council of Nicæa .

 Chapter XXII.— Of the Council held at Seleucia in Isauria .

 Chapter XXIII.— Of what befell the orthodox bishops at Constantinople .

 Chapter XXIV.— Synodical Epistle written against Aetius .

 Chapter XXV.— Of the causes which separated the Eunomians from the Arians .

 Chapter XXVI.— Of the siege of the city of Nisibis, and the apostolic conversation of Bishop Jacobus .

 Chapter XXVII.— Of the Council of Antioch and what was done there against the holy Meletius .

 Chapter XXVIII.— About Eusebius, Bishop of Samosata .

 Book III

 Book III.

 Chapter II.— Of the return of the bishops and the consecration of Paulinus .

 Chapter III.— Of the number and character of the deeds done by Pagans against the Christians when they got the power from Julian .

 Chapter IV.— Of the laws made by Julian against the Christians .

 Chapter V.— Of the fourth exile and flight of the holy Athanasius .

 Chapter VI.— Of Apollo and Daphne, and of the holy Babylas .

 Chapter VII.— Of Theodorus the Confessor .

 Chapter VIII.— Of the confiscation of the sacred treasures and taking away of the allowances .

 Chapter IX.— Of what befell Julianus, the Emperor’s Uncle, and Felix .

 Chapter X.— Of the Son of the Priest .

 Chapter XI.— Of the Holy Martyrs Juventinus and Maximinus .

 Chapter XII.— Of Valentinianus the great Emperor .

 Chapter XIII.— Of other confessors .

 Chapter XIV.— Of Artemius the Duke. Of Publia the Deaconess and her divine boldness .

 Chapter XV.— Of the Jews of their attempt at building, and of the heaven-sent plagues that befel them .

 Chapter XVI.— Of the expedition against the Persians .

 Chapter XVII.— Of the boldness of speech of the decurion of Berœa .

 Chapter XVIII.— Of the prediction of the pedagogue .

 Chapter XIX.— Of the Prophecy of St. Julianus the monk .

 Chapter XX.— Of the death of the Emperor Julian in Persia .

 Chapter XXI.— Of the sorcery at Carræ which was detected after his death. After he was slain the jugglery of his sorcery was detected. For Carræ is a

 Chapter XXII.— Of the heads discovered in the palace at Antioch and the public rejoicings there .

 Book IV

 Book IV.

 Chapter II.— Of the return of Athanasius .

 Chapter III.— Synodical letter to the Emperor Jovian concerning the Faith .

 Chapter IV.— Of the restoration of allowances to the churches and of the Emperor’s death.

 Chapter V.— Of the reign of Valentinianus, and how he associated Valens his brother with him.

 Chapter VI.— Of the election of Ambrosius, the Bishop of Milan .

 Chapter VII.— Letters of the Emperors Valentinianus and Valens, written to the diocese of Asia about the Homoüsion , on hearing that some men in Asia

 Chapter VIII.— Synodical Epistle of the Synod in Illyricum concerning the Faith .

 Chapter IX.— Of the heresy of the Audiani .

 Chapter X.— Of the heresy of the Messaliani .

 Chapter XI.— In what manner Valens fell into heresy .

 Chapter XII.— How Valens exiled the virtuous bishops .

 Chapter XIII.— Of Eusebius, bishop of Samosata, and others .

 Chapter XIV.— Of the holy Barses, and of the exile of the bishop of Edessa and his companions .

 Chapter XV.— Of the persecution which took place at Edessa, and of Eulogius and Protogenes, presbyters of Edessa .

 Chapter XVI.— Of the holy Basilius, Bishop of Cæsarea, and the measures taken against him by Valens and the prefect Modestus .

 Chapter XVII.— Of the death of the great Athanasius and the election of Petrus .

 Chapter XVIII.— On the overthrow of Petrus and the introduction of Lucius the Arian .

 Chapter XIX.— Narrative of events at Alexandria in the time of Lucius the Arian, taken from a letter of Petrus, Bishop of Alexandria .

 Chapter XX.— Of Mavia, Queen of the Saracens, and the ordination of Moses the monk.

 Chapter XXI

 Chapter XXII.— How Flavianus and Diodorus gathered the church of the orthodox in Antioch .

 Chapter XXIII.— Of the holy monk Aphraates .

 Chapter XXIV.— Of the holy monk Julianus .

 Chapter XXV.— Of what other monks were distinguished at this period .

 Chapter XXVI.— Of Didymus of Alexandria and Ephraim the Syrian .

 Chapter XXVII.— Of what bishops were at this time distinguished in Asia and Pontus.

 Chapter XXVIII.— Of the letter written by Valens to the great Valentinianus about the war, and how he replied .

 Chapter XXIX.— Of the piety of Count Terentius .

 Chapter XXX.— Of the bold utterance of Trajanus the general .

 Chapter XXXI.— Of Isaac the monk of Constantinople and Bretanio the Scythian Bishop.

 Chapter XXXII.— Of the expedition of Valens against the Goths and how he paid the penalty of his impiety .

 Chapter XXXIII.— How the Goths became tainted by the Arian error .

 Book V

 Book V.

 Chapter II.— Of the return of the bishops .

 Chapter III.— Of the dissension caused by Paulinus of the innovation by Apollinarius of Laodicea, and of the philosophy of Meletius .

 Chapter IV.— Of Eusebius Bishop of Samosata .

 Chapter V.— Of the campaign of Theodosius .

 Chapter VI.— Of the reign of Theodosius and of his dream .

 Chapter VII.— Of famous leaders of the Arian faction.

 Chapter VIII.— The council assembled at Constantinople .

 Chapter IX.— Synodical letter from the council at Constantinople .

 Chapter X.— Synodical letter of Damasus bishop of Rome against Apollinarius and Timotheus.

 Chapter XI.— A confession of the Catholic faith which Pope Damasus sent to Bishop Paulinus in Macedonia when he was at Thessalonica .

 Chapter XII.— Of the death of Gratianus and the sovereignty of Maximus

 Chapter XIII.— Of Justina, the wife of Valentinianus, and of her plot against Ambrosius.

 Chapter XIV.— Of the information given by Maximus the tyrant to Valentinianus .

 Chapter XV.— Of the Letter written by the Emperor Theodosius concerning the same .

 Chapter XVI.— Of Amphilochius, bishop of Iconium .

 Chapter XVII.— Of the massacre of Thessalonica the boldness of Bishop Ambrosius, and the piety of the Emperor .

 Chapter XVIII.— Of the Empress Placilla .

 Chapter XIX.— Of the sedition of Antioch .

 Chapter XX.— Of the destruction of the temples all over the Empire.

 Chapter XXI.— Of Marcellus, bishop of Apamea, and the idols’ temples destroyed by him.

 Chapter XXII.— Of Theophilus, bishop of Alexandria, and what happened at the demolition of the idols in that city .

 Chapter XXIII.— Of Flavianus bishop of Antioch and of the sedition which arose in the western Church on account of Paulinus .

 Chapter XXIV.— Of the tyranny of Eugenius and the victory won through faith by the Emperor Theodosius .

 Chapter XXV.— Of the death of the Emperor Theodosius .

 Chapter XXVI.— Of Honorius the emperor and Telemachus the monk .

 Chapter XXVII.— Of the piety of the emperor Arcadius and the ordination of John Chrysostom.

 Chapter XXVIII.— Of John’s boldness for God .

 Chapter XXIX.— Of the idol temples which were destroyed by John in Phœnicia .

 Chapter XXX.— Of the church of the Goths .

 Chapter XXXI.— Of his care for the Scythians and his zeal against the Marcionists

 Chapter XXXII.— Of the demand made by Gainas and of John Chrysostom’s reply .

 Chapter XXXIII.— Of the ambassage of Chrysostom to Gainas .

 Chapter XXXIV.— Of the events which happened on account of Chrysostom .

 Chapter XXXV.— Of Alexander, bishop of Antioch .

 Chapter XXXVI.— Of the removal of the remains of John and of the faith of Theodosius and his sisters .

 Chapter XXXVII.— Of Theodotus bishop of Antioch .

 Chapter XXXVIII.— Of the persecutions in Persia and of them that were martyred there.

 Chapter XXXIX.— Of Theodorus, bishop of Mopsuestia .

Chapter III.—Synodical letter to the Emperor Jovian concerning the Faith.

To Jovianus Augustus most devout, most humane, victorious, Athanasius, and the rest of the bishops assembled, in the name of all the bishops from Egypt to Thebaid, and Libya. The intelligent preference and pursuit of holy things is becoming to a prince beloved of God. Thus may you keep your heart in truth in God’s hand and reign for many years in peace.435 Prov. viii. 22, lxx. Κύριος ἔκτισέ με ἀρχὴν ὁδῶν αὐτοῦ εἰς ἔργα αὐτοῦ Scarcely a prophecy, even if we read ἕξεις, “you shall keep;” a bare wish if we read ἔχοις, “may you keep.” Vide preceding note. In Athanasius we find ἕξεις. Valesius says “The latter part of this sentence is wanting in the common editions of Athanasius, and Baronius supposes it to have been added by some Arian, with the object of ridiculing Athanasius as a false prophet. As a fact the reign of Jovian was short. But I see nothing low, spurious or factitious. Athanasius is not in fault because Jovian did not live as long as he had wished.” Since your piety has recently expressed a wish to learn from us the faith of the Catholic Church, we have given thanks to the Lord and have determined before all to remind your reverence of the faith confessed by the fathers at Nicæa. This faith some have set at nought, and have devised many and various attacks on us, because of our refusal to submit to the Arian heresy. They have become founders of heresy and schism in the Catholic Church. The true and pious faith in our Lord Jesus Christ has been made plain to all as it is known and read from the Holy Scriptures. In this faith the martyred saints were perfected, and now departed are with the Lord. This faith was destined everywhere to stand unharmed, had not the wickedness of certain heretics dared to attempt its falsification; for Arius and his party endeavoured to corrupt it and to bring in impiety for its destruction, alleging the Son of God to be of the nonexistent, a creature, a Being made, and susceptible of change. By these means they deceived many, so that even men who seemed to be somewhat,436 At this point, according to Valesius, a quotation from the homily of Eustathius on the above text from Proverbs viii. 22, begins. On Eustathius, see notes on Chapters III. and XX. Gal. vi. 3 were led away by them. Then our holy Fathers took the initiative, met, as we said, at Nicæa, anathematized the Arian heresy, and subscribed the faith of the Catholic Church so as to cause the putting out of the flames of heresy by proclamation of the truth throughout the world. Thus this faith throughout the whole church was known and preached. But since some men who wished to start the Arian heresy afresh have had the hardihood to set at naught the faith confessed by the Fathers at Nicæa, and others are pretending to accept it, while in reality they deny it, distorting the meaning of the ὁμοούσιον and thus blaspheming the Holy Ghost, by alleging it to be a creature and a Being made through the Son’s means, we, perforce beholding the harm accruing from blasphemy of this kind to the people, have hastened to offer to your piety the faith confessed at Nicæa, that your reverence may know with what exactitude it is drawn up, and how great is the error of them whose teaching contradicts it. Know, O holiest Augustus, that this faith is the faith preached from everlasting, this is the faith that the Fathers assembled at Nicæa confessed. With this faith all the churches throughout the world are in agreement, in Spain, in Britain,437 Is. viii. 9, lxx. ἐὰν γὰρ πάλιν ἰσχύσητε πάλιν ἡττηθήσεσθε Christianity thus appears more or less constituted in Britain more than 200 years before the mission of Augustine. But by about 208 the fame of British Christianity had reached Tertullian in Africa. The date, that of the first mention of the Church in Britain, indicates a probable connexion of its foundation with the dispersion of the victims of the persecution of the Rhone cities. The phrase of Tertullian, “places beyond the reach of the Romans, but subdued to Christ,” points to a rapid spread into the remoter parts of the island. Vide Rev. C. Hole’s “Early Missions,” S. P. C. K. in Gaul, in all Italy and Campania, in Dalmatia and Mysia, in Macedonia, in all Hellas, in all the churches throughout Africa, Sardinia, Cyprus, Crete, Pamphylia and Isauria, and Lycia, those of all Egypt and Libya, of Pontus, Cappadocia and the neighbouring districts and all the churches of the East except a few who have embraced Arianism. Of all those above mentioned we know the sentiments after trial made. We have letters and we know, most pious Augustus, that though some few gainsay this faith they cannot prejudice438 ᾽Εξ οὐκ ὄντων πρόκριμα ποιεῖν the decision of the whole inhabited world.

After being long under the injurious influence of the Arian heresy they are the more contentiously withstanding true religion. For the information of your piety, though indeed you are already acquainted with it, we have taken pains to subjoin the faith confessed at Nicæa by these three hundred and eighteen bishops. It is as follows.

We believe in one God, Father Almighty, maker of all things visible and invisible; and in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, begotten of the Father, that is of the substance of the Father, God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God: begotten not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made both in Heaven and in earth. Who for us men and for our salvation came down from Heaven, was incarnate and was made man. He suffered and rose again the third day. He ascended into Heaven, and is coming to judge both quick and dead. And we believe in the Holy Ghost; the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church anathematizes those who say there was a time when the Son of God was not; that before He was begotten He was not; that He was made out of the non-existent, or that He is of a different essence or different substance, or a creature or subject to variation or change. In this faith, most religious Augustus, all must needs abide as divine and apostolic, nor must any strive to change it by persuasive reasoning and word battles, as from the beginning did the Arian maniacs in their contention that the Son of God is of the non-existent, and that there was a time when He was not, that He is created and made and subject to variation. Wherefore, as we stated, the council of Nicæa anathematized this heresy and confessed the faith of the truth. For they have not simply said that the Son is like the Father, that he may be believed not to be simply like God but very God of God. And they promulgated the term “Homoüsion” because it is peculiar to a real and true son of a true and natural father. Yet they did not separate the Holy Spirit from the Father and the Son, but rather glorified It together with the Father and the Son in the one faith of the Holy Trinity, because the Godhead of the Holy Trinity439 Κτίσμα καὶ ποίημα “Τρίας is either the number Three, or a triplet of similar objects, as in the phrase κασιγνήτων τριάς (Rost u. Palm’s Lexicon. s.v.) In this sense it is applied by Clement of Alexandria (Strom. IV. vii. 55) to the Triad of Christian graces, Faith, Hope, and Charity. As Gregory of Nazianzus says (Orat. xiii. p. 24) Τριὰς οὐ πραγμάτων ἀνίσων ἀπαρίθμησις, ἀλλ᾽ ἴσων καὶ ὁμοτίμων σύλληψις. The first instance of its application to the Three Persons in the one God is in Theophilus of Antioch (Ad Autol. ii. 15)” [†. c. 185] “Similarly the word Trinitas, in its proper force, means either the number Three or a triad. It is first applied to the mystery of the Three in One by Tertullian, who says that the Church ‘proprie et spiritualiter ipse est spiritus, in quo est Trinitas unius divinitatis, Pater, et Filius, et Spiritus Sanctus.’ De Pudicita 21.” [† c. 240] Archd. Cheetham. Dict. Christ. Biog. S.V. is one.