The Ecclesiastical History of Theodoret.

 Book I

 The ECCLESIASTICAL HistorY of Theodoret.

 Chapter I.— Origin of the Arian Heresy.

 Chapter II.— List of the Principal Bishops

 Chapter III.— The Epistle of Alexander, Bishop of Alexandria to Alexander, Bishop of Constantinople .

 Chapter IV.— The Letter of Arius to Eusebius, Bishop of Nicomedia

 Chapter V.— The Letter of Eusebius, Bishop of Nicomedia, to Paulinus, Bishop of Tyre .

 Chapter VI.— General Council of Nicæa .

 Chapter VII.— Confutation of Arianism deduced from the Writings of Eustathius and Athanasius .

 Chapter VIII.— Facts relating to Meletius the Egyptian, from whom originated the Meletian Schism, which remains to this day.—Synodical Epistle respect

 Chapter IX.— The Epistle of the Emperor Constantine, concerning the matters transacted at the Council, addressed to those Bishops who were not present

 Chapter X.— The daily wants of the Church supplied by the Emperor, and an account of his other virtues .

 Chapter XI

 Chapter XII.— Confutation of the blasphemies of the Arians of our time, from the writings of Eusebius, Bishop of Cæsarea .

 Chapter XIII.— Extract from the Letter of Athanasius on the Death of Arius .

 Chapter XIV.— Letter written by the Emperor Constantine respecting the building of Churches .

 Chapter XV.— The Epistle of Constantine concerning the preparation of copies of the Holy Scriptures .

 Chapter XVI.— Letter from the Emperor to Macarius, Bishop of Jerusalem, concerning the building of the Holy Church .

 Chapter XVII.— Helena , Mother of the Emperor Constantine.—Her zeal in the Erection of the Holy Church .

 Chapter XVIII.— The Unlawful Translation of Eusebius, Bishop of Nicomedia .

 Chapter XIX.— Epistle of the Emperor Constantine against Eusebius and Theognis, addressed to the Nicomedians .

 Chapter XX.— The artful Machinations of Eusebius and his followers against the Holy Eustathius, Bishop of Antioch .

 Chapter XXI.— Bishops of Heretical opinions ordained in Antioch after the Banishment of St. Eustathius .

 Chapter XXII.— Conversion of the Indians .

 Chapter XXIII.— Conversion of the Iberians .

 Chapter XXIV.— Letter written by the Emperor Constantine to Sapor , the King of Persia, respecting the Christians .

 Chapter XXV.— An account of the plot formed against the Holy Athanasius .

 Chapter XXVI.— Another plot against Athanasius .

 Chapter XXVII.— Epistle of the Emperor Constantine to the Council of Tyre .

 Chapter XXVIII.— The Council of Tyre .

 Chapter XXIX.— Consecration of the Church of Jerusalem.—Banishment of St. Athanasius .

 Chapter XXX.— Will of the blessed Emperor Constantine .

 Chapter XXXI.— Apology for Constantine .

 Chapter XXXII.— The End of the Holy Emperor Constantine .

 Book II

 Book II.

 Chapter II.— Declension of the Emperor Constantius from the true Faith .

 Chapter III.— Second Exile of St. Athanasius.—Ordination and Death of Gregorius .

 Chapter IV.— Paulus, Bishop of Constantinople .

 Chapter V.— The Heresy of Macedonius .

 Chapter VI.— Council held at Sardica .

 Chapter VII.— Account of the Bishops Euphratas and Vincentius, and of the plot formed in Antioch against them .

 Chapter VIII.— Stephanus Deposed .

 Chapter IX.— The Second Return of Saint Athanasius .

 Chapter X.— Third exile and flight of Athanasius .

 Chapter XI.— The evil and daring deeds done by Georgius in Alexandria.

 Chapter XII.— Council of Milan .

 Chapter XIII.— Conference between Liberius, Pope of Rome, and the Emperor Constantius .

 Chapter XIV.— Concerning the Banishment and Return of the Holy Liberius .

 Chapter XV.— Council of Ariminum .

 Chapter XVI.— Concerning the Synod held at Nica in Thrace, and the Confession of Faith drawn up there .

 Chapter XVII.— Synodical Act of Damasus, Bishop of Rome, and of the Western Bishops, about the Council at Ariminum .

 Chapter XVIII.— The Letter of Athanasius, Bishop of Alexandria, concerning the same Council.

 Chapter XIX.— Concerning the cunning of Leontius, Bishop of Antioch, and the boldness of Flavianus and Diodorus .

 Chapter XX.— Concerning the innovations of Eudoxius, of Germanicia, and the zeal of Basilius .

 Chapter XXI.— Of the Second Council of Nicæa .

 Chapter XXII.— Of the Council held at Seleucia in Isauria .

 Chapter XXIII.— Of what befell the orthodox bishops at Constantinople .

 Chapter XXIV.— Synodical Epistle written against Aetius .

 Chapter XXV.— Of the causes which separated the Eunomians from the Arians .

 Chapter XXVI.— Of the siege of the city of Nisibis, and the apostolic conversation of Bishop Jacobus .

 Chapter XXVII.— Of the Council of Antioch and what was done there against the holy Meletius .

 Chapter XXVIII.— About Eusebius, Bishop of Samosata .

 Book III

 Book III.

 Chapter II.— Of the return of the bishops and the consecration of Paulinus .

 Chapter III.— Of the number and character of the deeds done by Pagans against the Christians when they got the power from Julian .

 Chapter IV.— Of the laws made by Julian against the Christians .

 Chapter V.— Of the fourth exile and flight of the holy Athanasius .

 Chapter VI.— Of Apollo and Daphne, and of the holy Babylas .

 Chapter VII.— Of Theodorus the Confessor .

 Chapter VIII.— Of the confiscation of the sacred treasures and taking away of the allowances .

 Chapter IX.— Of what befell Julianus, the Emperor’s Uncle, and Felix .

 Chapter X.— Of the Son of the Priest .

 Chapter XI.— Of the Holy Martyrs Juventinus and Maximinus .

 Chapter XII.— Of Valentinianus the great Emperor .

 Chapter XIII.— Of other confessors .

 Chapter XIV.— Of Artemius the Duke. Of Publia the Deaconess and her divine boldness .

 Chapter XV.— Of the Jews of their attempt at building, and of the heaven-sent plagues that befel them .

 Chapter XVI.— Of the expedition against the Persians .

 Chapter XVII.— Of the boldness of speech of the decurion of Berœa .

 Chapter XVIII.— Of the prediction of the pedagogue .

 Chapter XIX.— Of the Prophecy of St. Julianus the monk .

 Chapter XX.— Of the death of the Emperor Julian in Persia .

 Chapter XXI.— Of the sorcery at Carræ which was detected after his death. After he was slain the jugglery of his sorcery was detected. For Carræ is a

 Chapter XXII.— Of the heads discovered in the palace at Antioch and the public rejoicings there .

 Book IV

 Book IV.

 Chapter II.— Of the return of Athanasius .

 Chapter III.— Synodical letter to the Emperor Jovian concerning the Faith .

 Chapter IV.— Of the restoration of allowances to the churches and of the Emperor’s death.

 Chapter V.— Of the reign of Valentinianus, and how he associated Valens his brother with him.

 Chapter VI.— Of the election of Ambrosius, the Bishop of Milan .

 Chapter VII.— Letters of the Emperors Valentinianus and Valens, written to the diocese of Asia about the Homoüsion , on hearing that some men in Asia

 Chapter VIII.— Synodical Epistle of the Synod in Illyricum concerning the Faith .

 Chapter IX.— Of the heresy of the Audiani .

 Chapter X.— Of the heresy of the Messaliani .

 Chapter XI.— In what manner Valens fell into heresy .

 Chapter XII.— How Valens exiled the virtuous bishops .

 Chapter XIII.— Of Eusebius, bishop of Samosata, and others .

 Chapter XIV.— Of the holy Barses, and of the exile of the bishop of Edessa and his companions .

 Chapter XV.— Of the persecution which took place at Edessa, and of Eulogius and Protogenes, presbyters of Edessa .

 Chapter XVI.— Of the holy Basilius, Bishop of Cæsarea, and the measures taken against him by Valens and the prefect Modestus .

 Chapter XVII.— Of the death of the great Athanasius and the election of Petrus .

 Chapter XVIII.— On the overthrow of Petrus and the introduction of Lucius the Arian .

 Chapter XIX.— Narrative of events at Alexandria in the time of Lucius the Arian, taken from a letter of Petrus, Bishop of Alexandria .

 Chapter XX.— Of Mavia, Queen of the Saracens, and the ordination of Moses the monk.

 Chapter XXI

 Chapter XXII.— How Flavianus and Diodorus gathered the church of the orthodox in Antioch .

 Chapter XXIII.— Of the holy monk Aphraates .

 Chapter XXIV.— Of the holy monk Julianus .

 Chapter XXV.— Of what other monks were distinguished at this period .

 Chapter XXVI.— Of Didymus of Alexandria and Ephraim the Syrian .

 Chapter XXVII.— Of what bishops were at this time distinguished in Asia and Pontus.

 Chapter XXVIII.— Of the letter written by Valens to the great Valentinianus about the war, and how he replied .

 Chapter XXIX.— Of the piety of Count Terentius .

 Chapter XXX.— Of the bold utterance of Trajanus the general .

 Chapter XXXI.— Of Isaac the monk of Constantinople and Bretanio the Scythian Bishop.

 Chapter XXXII.— Of the expedition of Valens against the Goths and how he paid the penalty of his impiety .

 Chapter XXXIII.— How the Goths became tainted by the Arian error .

 Book V

 Book V.

 Chapter II.— Of the return of the bishops .

 Chapter III.— Of the dissension caused by Paulinus of the innovation by Apollinarius of Laodicea, and of the philosophy of Meletius .

 Chapter IV.— Of Eusebius Bishop of Samosata .

 Chapter V.— Of the campaign of Theodosius .

 Chapter VI.— Of the reign of Theodosius and of his dream .

 Chapter VII.— Of famous leaders of the Arian faction.

 Chapter VIII.— The council assembled at Constantinople .

 Chapter IX.— Synodical letter from the council at Constantinople .

 Chapter X.— Synodical letter of Damasus bishop of Rome against Apollinarius and Timotheus.

 Chapter XI.— A confession of the Catholic faith which Pope Damasus sent to Bishop Paulinus in Macedonia when he was at Thessalonica .

 Chapter XII.— Of the death of Gratianus and the sovereignty of Maximus

 Chapter XIII.— Of Justina, the wife of Valentinianus, and of her plot against Ambrosius.

 Chapter XIV.— Of the information given by Maximus the tyrant to Valentinianus .

 Chapter XV.— Of the Letter written by the Emperor Theodosius concerning the same .

 Chapter XVI.— Of Amphilochius, bishop of Iconium .

 Chapter XVII.— Of the massacre of Thessalonica the boldness of Bishop Ambrosius, and the piety of the Emperor .

 Chapter XVIII.— Of the Empress Placilla .

 Chapter XIX.— Of the sedition of Antioch .

 Chapter XX.— Of the destruction of the temples all over the Empire.

 Chapter XXI.— Of Marcellus, bishop of Apamea, and the idols’ temples destroyed by him.

 Chapter XXII.— Of Theophilus, bishop of Alexandria, and what happened at the demolition of the idols in that city .

 Chapter XXIII.— Of Flavianus bishop of Antioch and of the sedition which arose in the western Church on account of Paulinus .

 Chapter XXIV.— Of the tyranny of Eugenius and the victory won through faith by the Emperor Theodosius .

 Chapter XXV.— Of the death of the Emperor Theodosius .

 Chapter XXVI.— Of Honorius the emperor and Telemachus the monk .

 Chapter XXVII.— Of the piety of the emperor Arcadius and the ordination of John Chrysostom.

 Chapter XXVIII.— Of John’s boldness for God .

 Chapter XXIX.— Of the idol temples which were destroyed by John in Phœnicia .

 Chapter XXX.— Of the church of the Goths .

 Chapter XXXI.— Of his care for the Scythians and his zeal against the Marcionists

 Chapter XXXII.— Of the demand made by Gainas and of John Chrysostom’s reply .

 Chapter XXXIII.— Of the ambassage of Chrysostom to Gainas .

 Chapter XXXIV.— Of the events which happened on account of Chrysostom .

 Chapter XXXV.— Of Alexander, bishop of Antioch .

 Chapter XXXVI.— Of the removal of the remains of John and of the faith of Theodosius and his sisters .

 Chapter XXXVII.— Of Theodotus bishop of Antioch .

 Chapter XXXVIII.— Of the persecutions in Persia and of them that were martyred there.

 Chapter XXXIX.— Of Theodorus, bishop of Mopsuestia .

Chapter VIII.—Facts relating to Meletius the Egyptian, from whom originated the Meletian Schism, which remains to this day.—Synodical Epistle respecting him.

After Meletius129 Meletius (Μελέτιος), Bishop of Lycopolis, in Upper Egypt, was accused of apostasy. During the Patriarch Peter’s withdrawal under persecution he intruded into the see of Alexandria. He was deposed in 306. Probably Syrianus, who is described by Athanasius himself as sent to get him removed from Alexandria, but as denying that he had the written authority of Constantius. This was in Jan. a.d. 356. had been ordained bishop, which was not long before the Arian controversy, he was convicted of certain crimes by the most holy Peter, bishop of Alexandria, who also received the crown of martyrdom. After being deposed by Peter he did not acquiesce in his deposition, but filled the Thebaid and the adjacent part of Egypt with tumult and disturbance, and rebelled against the primacy of Alexandria. A letter was written by the council to the Church of Alexandria, stating what had been decreed against his revolutionary practices. It was as follows:—

Synodical Epistle.

“To the Church of Alexandria which, by the grace of God, is great and holy, and to the beloved brethren in Egypt, Libya, and Pentapolis, the bishops who have been convened to the great and holy council of Nicæa, send greeting in the Lord.

“The great and holy council of Nicæa having been convened by the grace of God, and by the most religious emperor, Constantine, who summoned us from different provinces and cities, we judge it requisite that a letter be sent from the whole Holy Synod to inform you also what questions have been mooted and debated, and what has been decreed and established.

“In the first place, the impious doctrines of Arius were investigated before our most religious emperor Constantine; and his impiety was unanimously anathematized, as well as the blasphemous language and views which he had propounded, alleging that the Son of God was out of what was not, that before He was begotten He was not, that there was a period in which He was not, and that He can, according to His own freewill, be capable either of virtue or of vice. The holy council anathematized all these assertions, and even refused so much as to listen to such impious and foolish opinions, and such blasphemous expressions. The final decision concerning him you already know, or will soon hear; but we will not mention it now, lest we should appear to trample upon a man who has already received the recompense due to his sins. Such influence has his impiety obtained as to involve Theonas, bishop of Marmarica, and Secundus, bishop of Ptolemais, in his ruin, and they have shared his punishment.

“But after Egypt had, by the grace of God, been delivered from these false and blasphemous opinions, and from persons who dared to raise discord and division among a hitherto peaceable people, there yet remained the question of the temerity of Meletius, and of those ordained by him. We now inform you, beloved brethren, of the decrees of the council on this subject. It was decided by the holy council, that Meletius should be treated with clemency, though, strictly speaking, he was not worthy of even the least concession. He was permitted to remain in his own city, but was divested of all power, whether of nomination or of ordination, neither was he to shew himself in any province or city for these purposes: but only to retain the bare name of his office. Those who had received ordination at his hands were to submit to a more religious re-ordination; and were to be admitted to communion on the terms of retaining their ministry, but of ranking in every diocese and church below those who had been ordained before them by Alexander, our much-honoured fellow-minister. Thus they would have no power of choosing or nominating others to the ministry, according to their pleasure, or indeed of doing anything with out the consent of the bishops of the Catholic and Apostolic Church, who are under Alexander. But they who, by the grace of God, and in answer to your prayers, have been detected in no schism, and have continued spotless in the Catholic and Apostolic Church, are to have the power of electing, and of nominating men worthy of the clerical office, and are permitted to do whatsoever is in accordance with law and the authority of the Church. If it should happen, that any of those now holding an office in the Church should die, then let these recently admitted be advanced to the honours of the deceased, provided only that they appear worthy, and that the people choose them, and that the election be confirmed and ratified by the catholic bishop of Alexandria. The same privilege has been conceded to all the others. With respect to Meletius, however, an exception has been made, both on account of his former insubordination, and of the rashness and impetuosity of his disposition; for if the least authority were accorded to him, he might abuse it by again exciting confusion. These are the chief points which relate to Egypt, and to the holy Church of Alexandria. Whatever other canons were made, or dogmas decreed, you will hear of them from Alexander, our most-honoured fellow-minister and brother, who will give you still more accurate information, because he himself directed, as well as participated in, every thing that took place.

“We also give you the good news that, according to your prayers, the celebration of the most holy paschal feast was unanimously rectified, so that our brethren of the East, who did not previously keep the festival at the same time as those of Rome, and as yourselves, and, indeed, all have done from the beginning, will henceforth celebrate it with you. Rejoice, then, in the success of our undertakings, and in the general peace and concord, and in the extirpation of every heresy, and receive with still greater honour and more fervent love, Alexander, our fellow-minister and your bishop, who imparted joy to us by his presence, and who, at a very advanced age, has undergone so much fatigue for the purpose of restoring peace among you. Pray for us all, that what has been rightly decreed may remain steadfast, through our Lord Jesus Christ, being done, as we trust, according to the good pleasure of God and the Father in the Holy Ghost, to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.”

Notwithstanding the endeavours of that divine assembly of bishops to apply this medicine to the Meletian disease, vestiges of his infatuation remain even to this day; for there are in some districts bodies of monks who refuse to follow sound doctrine, and observe certain vain points of discipline, agreeing with the infatuated views of the Jews and the Samaritans.