Treatises of St. Athanasius

  Annotations on Theological Subjects in the foregoing Treatises, alphabetically arranged.

 Adam

 Alexander's Encyclical

 Angels

 Apostle

 The Arians

 Arian Tenets and Reasonings

 Asterius

 Athanasius

 The Vicarious Atonement

 Chameleons

 Cursus Publicus

 Definitions

 Deification

 Economical Language

 Ecumenical

 Eusebius

 The Father Almighty

 The Flesh

 Use of Force in Religion

 Freedom of Our Moral Nature

 Grace of God

 The Divine Hand

 Heresies

 Heretics

 Hieracas

 Hypocrisy, Hypocrites

 Idolatry of Arianism

 Ignorance Assumed Economically by Our Lord

 Image

 Imperial Titles and Honours

 The Incarnation

 The Divine Indwelling

 Marcellus

 The Blessed Mary

 Mediation

 Meletius

 Two Natures of Emmanuel

 The Nicene Tests of Orthodoxy

 Omnipresence of God

 Paul of Samosata

 Personal Acts and Offices of Our Lord

 Philosophy

 Priesthood of Christ

 Private Judgment on Scripture  (Vid. art. Rule of Faith .)

 The Rule of Faith

 Sabellius

 Sanctification

 Scripture Canon

 Authority of Scripture

 Scripture Passages

 Semi-Arians

 Son of God

 Spirit of God

 Theognostus

 Tradition

 The Holy Trinity in Unity

 Two Wills in Christ

 Wisdom

 The Word of God

 The [ Agenneton ], or Ingenerate

 The [ Aeigennes ]

 [ Aion ]

 [ Akratos ]

 [ Aletheia ]

 [ Alogia,Alogos ]

 [ Anthropos ]

 [ Antidosis ton idiomaton ]

 [ Apaugasma ]

 [ Aporrhoe ]

 [ Areiomanitai ]

 The [ Atreptos ]

 [ Boule, kata boulesin ]

 [ Gennema ]

 The [ Geneton,Genneton ]

 [ Demiourgos ]

 [ Diabolikos ]

 [ Eidos ]

 [ Ensarkos parousia ]

 The [ Exoukontion ]

 [ Epinoia ]

 [ Epispeiras ]

 [ Eusebeia ]

 [ Theandrike energeia ]

 [ Theomachos, Christomachos ]

 [ Theotes ] (vid. Trinity )

 [ Theotokos ]

 [ Katapetasma ]

 [ Kurios, Kurios ]

 [ Logos,  endiathetos kai prophorikos ]

 [ Mia physis ]  ( of our Lord's Godhead and of His Manhood ).

 [ Monarchia ]

 [ Monogenes ]

 The [ Homoion ]

 [ Homoousios ]

 [ Onomata ]

 [ Organon ]

 [ Orthos ]

 [ Ousia, on ]

 [ Peribole ]

 [ Pege ]

 [ Probole ]

 [ Prototokos ]  Primogenitus, First-born

 [ Rheustos ]

 [Sunkatabasis]

 [ Sumbebekos ]

 The [ Teleion ]

 [ Trias ]  

 [ Huiopator ]

 [ Christomachos ]

  Catholicism and Religious Thought Fairbairn

  Development of Religious Error

  Catholicism and Reason Barry

  Reason and Religion Fairbairn

  Further remarks

  On the Inspiration of Scripture

  Preface to Froude's Remains

  Hymni Ecclesiae

   Library of Fathers Preface, St. Cyril

  Library of Fathers Preface, St. Cyprian

  Library of Fathers Preface, St. Chrysostom

  Catena Aurea

  Memoir  of  Henry W. Wilberforce

 Notes of a Visit to the Russian Church  by the Late William Palmer, M.A.  Selected and Arranged by Cardinal Newman

 Library of Fathers Preface, St. Chrysostom

 Commentary on the Epistle to the Galatians  and  Homilies on the Epistle to the Ephesians  of  S. John Chrysostom,  Archbishop of Constantinople Translated,  with notes and indices

 [Parker and Rivington, 1840] Preface

 {vii} ST. CHRYSOSTOM'S Commentary on the Epistle to the Galatians is continuous, according to chapter and verse; instead of being arranged in Homilies with a Moral or Practical application at their close, as in his exposition of other Epistles. It was written at Antioch, as Montfaucon infers from a reference which the Author makes, upon ch. i. v. 16. (p. 20,) to other of his writings, which certainly were written about the same time in that city. vid. Hom. de Mutat. Nom. tom. iii. p. 98. ed. Ben. The year is uncertain, but seems not to have been earlier than A.D. 395.

 The Homilies on the Epistle to the Ephesians have been by some critics assigned to his Episcopate at Constantinople, in consequence of certain imperfections in their composition, which seemed to argue absence of the comparative leisure which he enjoyed at Antioch. There is a passage too in Homily xi. p. 231, 2, which certainly is very apposite to the Author's circumstances in the court of Eudoxia. Yet there are strong reasons for deciding that they too were delivered at Antioch. S. Babylas and S. Julian, both Saints of Antioch, are mentioned familiarly, the former in Homily ix. p. 205, the latter in Homily xxi. pp. 342, 3. Monastic establishments in mountains in the neighbourhood are spoken of in Homily vi. p. 165, and xiii. p. 248 [n. 1]; and those near Antioch are famous in St. Chrysostom's history. A schism too is alluded to in Homily xi. p. 230, as existing in the {viii} community he was addressing, and that not about a question of doctrine; circumstances which are accurately fulfilled in the contemporary history of Antioch, and which are more or less noticed in the Homilies on 1 Cor. which were certainly delivered at Antioch [n. 2]. Moreover, he makes mention of the prevalence of superstitions, Gentile and Jewish, among the people whom he was addressing, in Homily vi. fin., p. 166. Hom. xii. fin. p. 240. which is a frequent ground of complaint in his other writings against the Christians of Antioch; vid. in Gal. p. 15; in 1 Cor. Hom. xii. §. 13, 14; in Col. Hom. viii. fin.; contr. Jud. i. p. 386-8. Since Evagrius, the last Bishop of the Latin succession in the schism, died in A.D. 392, those Homilies must have been composed before that date.

 As to the Translations, the Editors have been favoured with the former by a friend who conceals his name; and with the latter, by the Rev. WILLIAM JOHN COPELAND, M.A. Fellow of Trinity College, Oxford.

 J. H. N.

 Notes

 1. Vid. also xxi. p. 338.  

 2. Vid. also Preface to Transl. of Homilies on 1 Cor. p. xiii.