A Treatise on the Soul.

 Having discussed with Hermogenes the single point of the origin of the soul, so far as his assumption led me, that the soul consisted rather in an ada

 Chapter II.—The Christian Has Sure and Simple Knowledge Concerning the Subject Before Us.

 Chapter III.—The Soul’s Origin Defined Out of the Simple Words of Scripture.

 Chapter IV.—In Opposition to Plato, the Soul Was Created and Originated at Birth.

 Chapter V.—Probable View of the Stoics, that the Soul Has a Corporeal Nature.

 Chapter VI.—The Arguments of the Platonists for the Soul’s Incorporeality, Opposed, Perhaps Frivolously.

 Chapter VII.—The Soul’s Corporeality Demonstrated Out of the Gospels.

 Chapter VIII.—Other Platonist Arguments Considered.

 Chapter IX.—Particulars of the Alleged Communication to a Montanist Sister.

 Chapter X.—The Simple Nature of the Soul is Asserted with Plato. The Identity of Spirit and Soul.

 Chapter XI.—Spirit—A Term Expressive of an Operation of the Soul, Not of Its Nature.  To Be Carefully Distinguished from the Spirit of God.

 Chapter XII.—Difference Between the Mind and the Soul, and the Relation Between Them.

 Chapter XIII.—The Soul’s Supremacy.

 Chapter XIV.—The Soul Variously Divided by the Philosophers This Division is Not a Material Dissection.

 Chapter XV.—The Soul’s Vitality and Intelligence. Its Character and Seat in Man.

 Chapter XVI.—The Soul’s Parts. Elements of the Rational Soul.

 Chapter XVII.—The Fidelity of the Senses, Impugned by Plato, Vindicated by Christ Himself.

 Chapter XVIII.—Plato Suggested Certain Errors to the Gnostics.  Functions of the Soul.

 Chapter XIX.—The Intellect Coeval with the Soul in the Human Being. An Example from Aristotle Converted into Evidence Favourable to These Views.

 Chapter XX.—The Soul, as to Its Nature Uniform, But Its Faculties Variously Developed. Varieties Only Accidental.

 Chapter XXI.—As Free-Will Actuates an Individual So May His Character Change.

 Chapter XXII.—Recapitulation. Definition of the Soul.

 Chapter XXIII.—The Opinions of Sundry Heretics Which Originate Ultimately with Plato.

 Chapter XXIV.—Plato’s Inconsistency. He Supposes the Soul Self-Existent, Yet Capable of Forgetting What Passed in a Previous State.

 Chapter XXV.—Tertullian Refutes, Physiologically, the Notion that the Soul is Introduced After Birth.

 Chapter XXVI.—Scripture Alone Offers Clear Knowledge on the Questions We Have Been Controverting.

 Chapter XXVII.—Soul and Body Conceived, Formed and Perfected in Element Simultaneously.

 Chapter XXVIII.—The Pythagorean Doctrine of Transmigration Sketched and Censured.

 Chapter XXIX.—The Pythagorean Doctrine Refuted by Its Own First Principle, that Living Men are Formed from the Dead.

 Chapter XXX.—Further Refutation of the Pythagorean Theory.  The State of Contemporary Civilisation.

 Chapter XXXI.—Further Exposure of Transmigration, Its Inextricable Embarrassment.

 Chapter XXXII.—Empedocles Increased the Absurdity of Pythagoras by Developing the Posthumous Change of Men into Various Animals.

 Chapter XXXIII.—The Judicial Retribution of These Migrations Refuted with Raillery.

 Chapter XXXIV.—These Vagaries Stimulated Some Profane Corruptions of Christianity. The Profanity of Simon Magus Condemned.

 Chapter XXXV.—The Opinions of Carpocrates, Another Offset from the Pythagorean Dogmas, Stated and Confuted.

 Chapter XXXVI.—The Main Points of Our Author’s Subject. On the Sexes of the Human Race.

 Chapter XXXVII.—On the Formation and State of the Embryo. Its Relation with the Subject of This Treatise.

 Chapter XXXVIII.—On the Growth of the Soul. Its Maturity Coincident with the Maturity of the Flesh in Man.

 Chapter XXXIX.—The Evil Spirit Has Marred the Purity of the Soul from the Very Birth.

 Chapter XL.—The Body of Man Only Ancillary to the Soul in the Commission of Evil.

 Chapter XLI.—Notwithstanding the Depravity of Man’s Soul by Original Sin, There is Yet Left a Basis Whereon Divine Grace Can Work for Its Recovery by

 Chapter XLII.—Sleep, the Mirror of Death, as Introductory to the Consideration of Death.

 Chapter XLIII.—Sleep a Natural Function as Shown by Other Considerations, and by the Testimony of Scripture.

 Chapter XLIV.—The Story of Hermotimus, and the Sleeplessness of the Emperor Nero. No Separation of the Soul from the Body Until Death.

 Chapter XLV.—Dreams, an Incidental Effect of the Soul’s Activity.  Ecstasy.

 Chapter XLVI.—Diversity of Dreams and Visions. Epicurus Thought Lightly of Them, Though Generally Most Highly Valued. Instances of Dreams.

 Chapter XLVII.—Dreams Variously Classified. Some are God-Sent, as the Dreams of Nebuchadnezzar Others Simply Products of Nature.

 Chapter XLVIII.—Causes and Circumstances of Dreams. What Best Contributes to Efficient Dreaming.

 Chapter XLIX.—No Soul Naturally Exempt from Dreams.

 Chapter L.—The Absurd Opinion of Epicurus and the Profane Conceits of the Heretic Menander on Death, Even Enoch and Elijah Reserved for Death.

 Chapter LI.—Death Entirely Separates the Soul from the Body.

 Chapter LII.—All Kinds of Death a Violence to Nature, Arising from Sin.—Sin an Intrusion Upon Nature as God Created It.

 Chapter LIII.—The Entire Soul Being Indivisible Remains to the Last Act of Vitality Never Partially or Fractionally Withdrawn from the Body.

 Chapter LIV.—Whither Does the Soul Retire When It Quits the Body?  Opinions of Philosophers All More or Less Absurd. The Hades of Plato.

 Chapter LV.—The Christian Idea of the Position of Hades The Blessedness of Paradise Immediately After Death. The Privilege of the Martyrs.

 Chapter LVI.—Refutation of the Homeric View of the Soul’s Detention from Hades Owing to the Body’s Being Unburied. That Souls Prematurely Separated fr

 Chapter LVII.—Magic and Sorcery Only Apparent in Their Effects.  God Alone Can Raise the Dead.

 Chapter LVIII.—Conclusion. Points Postponed. All Souls are Kept in Hades Until the Resurrection, Anticipating Their Ultimate Misery or Bliss.

Chapter LVII.—Magic and Sorcery Only Apparent in Their Effects.  God Alone Can Raise the Dead.

It is either a very fine thing to be detained in these infernal regions with the Aori, or souls which were prematurely hurried away; or else a very bad thing indeed to be there associated with the Biaeothanati, who suffered violent deaths. I may be permitted to use the actual words and terms with which magic rings again, that inventor of all these odd opinions—with its Ostanes, and Typhon, and Dardanus, and Damigeron, and Nectabis, and Berenice. There is a well-known popular bit of writing,329    Litteratura. which undertakes to summon up from the abode of Hades the souls which have actually slept out their full age, and had passed away by an honourable death, and had even been buried with full rites and proper ceremony. What after this shall we say about magic? Say, to be sure, what almost everybody says of it—that it is an imposture.  But it is not we Christians only whose notice this system of imposture does not escape. We, it is true, have discovered these spirits of evil, not, to be sure, by a complicity with them, but by a certain knowledge which is hostile to them; nor is it by any procedure which is attractive to them, but by a power which subjugates them that we handle (their wretched system)—that manifold pest of the mind of man, that artificer of all error, that destroyer of our salvation and our soul at one swoop.330    Oehler takes these descriptive clauses as meant of Satan, instead of being synonymes of magic, as the context seems to require. In this way, even by magic, which is indeed only a second idolatry, wherein they pretend that after death they become demons, just as they were supposed in the first and literal idolatry to become gods (and why not? since the gods are but dead things), the before-mentioned Aori Biaeothanati are actually invoked,—and not unfairly,331    Æque. if one grounds his faith on this principle, that it is clearly credible for those souls to be beyond all others addicted to violence and wrong, which with violence and wrong have been hurried away by a cruel and premature death and which would have a keen appetite for reprisals.  Under cover, however, of these souls, demons operate, especially such as used to dwell in them when they were in life, and who had driven them, in fact, to the fate which had at last carried them off.  For, as we have already suggested,332    Above, in ch. xxxix. p. 219. there is hardly a human being who is unattended by a demon; and it is well known to many, that premature and violent deaths, which men ascribe to accidents, are in fact brought about by demons.  This imposture of the evil spirit lying concealed in the persons of the dead, we are able, if I mistake not, to prove by actual facts, when in cases of exorcism (the evil spirit) affirms himself sometimes to be one of the relatives333    Aliquem ex parentibus. of the person possessed by him, sometimes a gladiator or a bestiarius,334    One who fought with wild beasts in the public games, only without the weapons allowed to the gladiator. and sometimes even a god; always making it one of his chief cares to extinguish the very truth which we are proclaiming, that men may not readily believe that all souls remove to Hades, and that they may overthrow faith in the resurrection and the judgment. And yet for all that, the demon, after trying to circumvent the bystanders, is vanquished by the pressure of divine grace, and sorely against his will confesses all the truth. So also in that other kind of magic, which is supposed to bring up from Hades the souls now resting there, and to exhibit them to public view, there is no other expedient of imposture ever resorted to which operates more powerfully. Of course, why a phantom becomes visible, is because a body is also attached to it; and it is no difficult matter to delude the external vision of a man whose mental eye it is so easy to blind. The serpents which emerged from the magicians’ rods, certainly appeared to Pharaoh and to the Egyptians as bodily substances. It is true that the verity of Moses swallowed up their lying deceit.335    Ex. vii. 12. Many attempts were also wrought against the apostles by the sorcerers Simon and Elymas,336    Acts viii. 9; xiii. 8. but the blindness which struck (them) was no enchanter’s trick. What novelty is there in the effort of an unclean spirit to counterfeit the truth?  At this very time, even, the heretical dupes of this same Simon (Magus) are so much elated by the extravagant pretensions of their art, that they undertake to bring up from Hades the souls of the prophets themselves. And I suppose that they can do so under cover of a lying wonder. For, indeed, it was no less than this that was anciently permitted to the Pythonic (or ventriloquistic) spirit337    See above in ch. xxviii. p. 209, supra.—even to represent the soul of Samuel, when Saul consulted the dead, after (losing the living) God.338    1 Sam. xxviii. 6–16. God forbid, however, that we should suppose that the soul of any saint, much less of a prophet, can be dragged out of (its resting-place in Hades) by a demon. We know that “Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light”339    2 Cor. xi. 14.—much more into a man of light—and that at last he will “show himself to be even God,”340    2 Thess. ii. 4. and will exhibit “great signs and wonders, insomuch that, if it were possible, he shall deceive the very elect.”341    Matt. xxiv. 24. He hardly342    Si forte. hesitated on the before-mentioned occasion to affirm himself to be a prophet of God, and especially to Saul, in whom he was then actually dwelling. You must not imagine that he who produced the phantom was one, and he who consulted it was another; but that it was one and the same spirit, both in the sorceress and in the apostate (king), which easily pretended an apparition of that which it had already prepared them to believe as real—(even the spirit) through whose evil influence Saul’s heart was fixed where his treasure was, and where certainly God was not. Therefore it came about, that he saw him through whose aid he believed that he was going to see, because he believed him through whose help he saw. But we are met with the objection, that in visions of the night dead persons are not unfrequently seen, and that for a set purpose.343    Non frustra. For instance, the Nasamones consult private oracles by frequent and lengthened visits to the sepulchres of their relatives, as one may find in Heraclides, or Nymphodorus, or Herodotus;344    In iv. 172. and the Celts, for the same purpose, stay away all night at the tombs of their brave chieftains, as Nicander affirms.  Well, we admit apparitions of dead persons in dreams to be not more really true than those of living persons; but we apply the same estimate to all alike—to the dead and to the living, and indeed to all the phenomena which are seen. Now things are not true because they appear to be so, but because they are fully proved to be so. The truth of dreams is declared from the realization, not the aspect. Moreover, the fact that Hades is not in any case opened for (the escape of) any soul, has been firmly established by the Lord in the person of Abraham, in His representation of the poor man at rest and the rich man in torment.345    Luke xvi. 26. [Compare note 15, p. 231. supra.] No one, (he said,) could possibly be despatched from those abodes to report to us how matters went in the nether regions,—a purpose which, (if any could be,) might have been allowable on such an occasion, to persuade a belief in Moses and the prophets. The power of God has, no doubt, sometimes recalled men’s souls to their bodies, as a proof of His own transcendent rights; but there must never be, because of this fact, any agreement supposed to be possible between the divine faith and the arrogant pretensions of sorcerers, and the imposture of dreams, and the licence of poets. But yet in all cases of a true resurrection, when the power of God recalls souls to their bodies, either by the agency of prophets, or of Christ, or of apostles, a complete presumption is afforded us, by the solid, palpable, and ascertained reality (of the revived body), that its true form must be such as to compel one’s belief of the fraudulence of every incorporeal apparition of dead persons.

CAPUT LVII.

Aut optimum est hic retineri, secundum aoros; aut pessimum, secundum biaeothanatos, ut ipsis jam vocabulis utar, quibus auctrix opinionum istarum magia sonat, Hostanes et Typhon, et Dardanus, et Damigeron, et Nectabis, et Berenice. Publica jam literatura est , quae animas etiam justa aetate sopitas, etiam proba morte disjunctas, etiam prompta humatione dispunctas, evocaturam se 0747C ab inferum incolatu pollicetur. Quid ergo dicemus magiam? Quod omnes pene: fallaciam. Sed ratio fallaciae solos non fugit Christianos, qui spiritalia nequitiae, non quidem socia conscientia, sed inimica scientia novimus, nec invitatoria operatione, sed expugnatoria dominatione tractamus; multiformem luem mentis humanae, totius erroris artificem, salutis 0748A pariter animaeque vastatricem scientiam magiae, secundae scilicet idololatriae, in qua se daemones perinde mortuos fingunt, quemadmodum in illa deos. Quidni? cum et dii mortui. Itaque invocantur quidem aori et biaeothanati, sub illo fidei argumento, quod credibile videatur eas potissimum animas ad vim et injuriam facere, quas per vim et saevus et immaturus finis extorsit, quasi ad vicem offensae. Sed daemones operantur sub obtentu earum; et hi vel maxime, qui in ipsis tunc fuerunt cum adviverent, quique illas in hujusmodi impegerunt exitus. Nam, et suggessimus nullum pene hominem carere daemonio, et pluribus notum est daemoniorum quoque opera et immaturas et atroces effici mortes, quas incursibus deputant. Hanc quoque fallaciam 0748B spiritus nequam sub personis defunctorum delitescentis, nisi fallor, etiam rebus probamus, cum in exorcismis interdum aliquem se ex parentibus hominem suis affirmat, interdum gladiatorem, vel bestiarium, sicut et alibi deum; nihil magis curans, quam hoc ipsum excludere quod praedicamus, ne facile credamus animas universas ad inferos redigi, ut et judicii et resurrectionis fidem turbet. Et tamen ille daemon postquam circumstantes circumvenire tentavit, instantia divinae gratiae victus, id quod in vero est, invitus confitetur. Sic et in illa alia specie magiae, quae jam quiescentes animas evellere ab inferis creditur et conspectui exhibere, non alia fallaciae vis est operatior. Plane quia et phantasma praestatur, quia et corpus adfingitur; nec magnum 0748C illi exteriores oculos circumscribere, cui interiorem mentis aciem excaecare perfacile est. Corpora denique videbantur Pharaoni et Aegyptiis magicarum virgarum dracones, sed Moysi veritas mendacium devoravit (Exod., VII). Multa utique et adversus Apostolos Simon dedit , et Elymas magi (Act., XIII); sed plaga caecitatis de praestigiis non 0749A fuit. Quid novi aemulatio veritatis a spiritu immundo? Ecce hodie ejusdem Simonis haereticos tanta praesumptio artis extollit, ut etiam prophetarum animas ab inferis movere se spondeant. Et credo quia mendacio possunt; nec enim pythonico tunc spiritui minus licuit animam Samuelis effingere (I Reg., XXVIII), post Deum mortuos consulente Saule. Absit alioquin ut animam cujuslibet sancti, nedum prophetae (II Cor., XI), a daemonio credamus extractam, edocti quod ipse Satanas (II Thess., II) transfiguretur in angelum lucis, nedum in hominem lucis (Matth., XXIV), etiam deum se adseveraturus in fine , signaque portentosiora editurus, ad evertendos, si fieri possit, electos. Dubitavit, si forte, tunc prophetam se Dei asseverare, et utique Sauli, in quo 0749B jam ipse morabatur? Ne putes alium fuisse qui phantasma administrabat, alium qui commendabat; sed eumdem spiritum, et in pseudoprophetide, et in apostata facile mentiri, quod fecerat credi, per quem Saulis thesaurus illic erat, ubi et cor ipsius, ubi scilicet Deus non erat. Et ideo per quem visurum se credidit, vidit; quia per quem vidit, et credidit. Si et de nocturnis imaginibus opponitur, saepe non frustra mortuos visos (nam et Nasammonas propria oracula apud parentum sepulchra mansitando captare, ut Heraclides scribit, vel Nymphodorus, vel Herodotus; et Celtas apud virorum fortium busta eadem de caussa abnoctare, ut Nicander affirmat), non magis mortuos vere patimur in somnis, quam vivos, sed eadem ratione mortuos qua et vivos, et 0749C omnia quae videntur. Non enim quia videntur, vera sunt, sed quia adimplentur. Fides somniorum de effectu, non de conspectu renuntiatur. Nulli autem animae omnino inferos patere, satis Dominus in argumento illo pauperis requiescentis, et divitis ingemiscentis, ex persona Abrahae sanxit (Luc., XVI), non posse inde relegari renuntiatorem dispositionis infernae; quod vel tunc licere potuisset, ut Moysi et Prophetis crederetur. Sed etsi quasdam revocavit 0750A in corpora Dei virtus, in documenta juris sui, non idcirco communicabitur fidei, et audaciae magorum, et fallaciae somniorum, et licentiae poetarum. Atquin in resurrectionis exemplis, cum Dei virtus, sive per Prophetas, sive per Christum, sive per Apostolos in corpora animas repraesentat, solida et contrectabili, et satiata veritate, praejudicatum est hanc esse formam veritatis, ut omnem mortuorum exhibitionem incorporalem praestigias judices.