by aurelius augustin, bishop of hippo

 Chapter 1.—Introduction: Address to Boniface.

 Chapter 2.—Why Heretical Writings Must Be Answered.

 Chapter 3.—Why He Addresses His Book to Boniface.

 Chapter 4 [II.]—The Calumny of Julian,—That the Catholics Teach that Free Will is Taken Away by Adam’s Sin.

 Chapter 5.—Free Choice Did Not Perish With Adam ’s Sin. What Freedom Did Perish.

 Chapter 6 [III.]—Grace is Not Given According to Merits.

 Chapter 7.—He Concludes that He Does Not Deprive the Wicked of Free Will.

 Chapter 8 [IV.]—The Pelagians Demolish Free Will.

 Chapter 9 [V.]—Another Calumny of Julian,—That “It is Said that Marriage is Not Appointed by God.”

 Chapter 10—The Third Calumny,—The Assertion that Conjugal Intercourse is Condemned.

 Chapter 11 [VI.]—The Purpose of the Pelagians in Praising the Innocence of Conjugal Intercourse.

 Chapter 12.—The Fourth Calumny,—That the Saints of the Old Testament are Said to Be Not Free from Sins.

 Chapter 13 [VIII.]—The Fifth Calumny,—That It is Said that Paul and the Rest of the Apostles Were Polluted by Lust.

 Chapter 14.—That the Apostle is Speaking in His Own Person and that of Others Who Are Under Grace, Not Still Under Law.

 Chapter 15 [IX.]—He Sins in Will Who is Only Deterred from Sinning by Fear.

 Chapter 16.—How Sin Died, and How It Revived.

 Chapter 17 [X.]—“The Law is Spiritual, But I Am Carnal,” To Be Understood of Paul.

 Chapter 18.—How the Apostle Said that He Did the Evil that He Would Not.

 Chapter 19.—What It is to Accomplish What is Good.

 Chapter 20.—In Me, that Is, in My Flesh.

 Chapter 21.—No Condemnation in Christ Jesus.

 Chapter 22.—Why the Passage Referred to Must Be Understood of a Man Established Under Grace.

 Chapter 23 [XI.]—What It is to Be Delivered from the Body of This Death.

 Chapter 24.—He Concludes that the Apostle Spoke in His Own Person, and that of Those Who are Under Grace.

 Chapter 25 [XII.]—The Sixth Calumny,—That Augustin Asserts that Even Christ Was Not Free from Sins.

 Chapter 26 [XIII.]—The Seventh Calumny,—That Augustin Asserts that in Baptism All Sins are Not Remitted.

 Chapter 27.—In What Sense Lust is Called Sin in the Regenerate.

 Chapter 28 [XIV.]—Many Without Crime, None Without Sin.

 Chapter 29 [XV.]—Julian Opposes the Faith of His Friends to the Opinions of Catholic Believers. First of All, of Free Will.

 Chapter 30.—Secondly, of Marriage.

 Chapter 31.—Thirdly, of Conjugal Intercourse.

 Chapter 32 [XVI.]—The Aprons Which Adam and Eve Wore.

 Chapter 33.—The Shame of Nakedness.

 Chapter 34 [XVII.]—Whether There Could Be Sensual Appetite in Paradise Before the Fall.

 Chapter 35.—Desire in Paradise Was Either None at All, or It Was Obedient to the Impulse of the Will.

 Chapter 36 [XVIII.]—Julian’s Fourth Objection, that Man is God’s Work, and is Not Constrained to Evil or Good by His Power.

 Chapter 37 [XIX.]—The Beginning of a Good Will is the Gift of Grace.

 Chapter 38 [XX.]—The Power of God’s Grace is Proved.

 Chapter 39 [XXI.]—Julian’s Fifth Objection Concerning the Saints of the Old Testament.

 Chapter 40 [XXII.]—The Sixth Objection, Concerning the Necessity of Grace for All, and Concerning the Baptism of Infants.

 Chapter 41 [XXIII.]—The Seventh Objection, of the Effect of Baptism.

 Chapter 42 [XXIV.]—He Rebuts the Conclusion of Julian’s Letter.

 Book II.

 Chapter 1.—Introduction The Pelagians Impeach Catholics as Manicheans.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—The Heresies of the Manicheans and Pelagians are Mutually Opposed, and are Alike Reprobated by the Catholic Church.

 Chapter 3.—How Far the Manicheans and Pelagians are Joined in Error How Far They are Separated.

 Chapter 4.—The Two Contrary Errors.

 Chapter 5 [III.]—The Calumny of the Pelagians Against the Clergy of the Roman Church.

 Chapter 6 [IV.]—What Was Done in the Case of Cœlestius and Zosimus.

 Chapter 7.—He Suggests a Dilemma to Cœlestius.

 Chapter 8.—The Catholic Faith Concerning Infants.

 Chapter 9 [V.]—He Replies to the Calumnies of the Pelagians.

 Chapter 10.—Why the Pelagians Falsely Accuse Catholics of Maintaining Fate Under the Name of Grace.

 Chapter 11 [VI.]—The Accusation of Fate is Thrown Back Upon the Adversaries.

 Chapter 12.—What is Meant Under the Name of Fate.

 Chapter 13 [VII.]—He Repels the Calumny Concerning the Acceptance of Persons.

 Chapter 14.—He Illustrates His Argument by an Example.

 Chapter 15.—The Apostle Meets the Question by Leaving It Unsolved.

 Chapter 16.—The Pelagians are Refuted by the Case of the Twin Infants Dying, the One After, and the Other Without, the Grace of Baptism.

 Chapter 17 [VIII.]—Even the Desire of an Imperfect Good is a Gift of Grace, Otherwise Grace Would Be Given According to Merits.

 Chapter 18.—The Desire of Good is God’s Gift.

 Chapter 19 [IX.]—He Interprets the Scriptures Which the Pelagians Make Ill Use of.

 Chapter 20.—God’s Agency is Needful Even in Man’s Doings.

 Chapter 21.—Man Does No Good Thing Which God Does Not Cause Him to Do.

 Chapter 22 [X.]—According to Whose Purpose the Elect are Called.

 Chapter 23.—Nothing is Commanded to Man Which is Not Given by God.

 Book III.

 Chapter 1 [I.]—Statement.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—The Misrepresentation of the Pelagians Concerning the Use of the Old Law.

 Chapter 3.—Scriptural Confirmation of the Catholic Doctrine.

 Chapter 4 [III.]—Misrepresentation Concerning the Effect of Baptism.

 Chapter 5.—Baptism Puts Away All Sins, But It Does Not at Once Heal All Infirmities.

 Chapter 6 [IV.]—The Calumny Concerning the Old Testament and the Righteous Men of Old.

 Chapter 7.—The New Testament is More Ancient Than the Old But It Was Subsequently Revealed.

 Chapter 8.—All Righteous Men Before and After Abraham are Children of the Promise and of Grace.

 Chapter 9.—Who are the Children of the Old Covenant.

 Chapter 10.—The Old Law Also Given by God.

 Chapter 11.—Distinction Between the Children of the Old and of the New Testaments.

 Chapter 12.—The Old Testament is Properly One Thing—The Old Instrument Another.

 Chapter 13.—Why One of the Covenants is Called Old, the Other New.

 Chapter 14 [V.]—Calumny Concerning the Righteousness of the Prophets and Apostles.

 Chapter 15.—The Perfection of Apostles and Prophets.

 Chapter 16 [VI.]—Misrepresentation Concerning Sin in Christ.

 Chapter 17 [VII.]—Their Calumny About the Fulfilment of Precepts in the Life to Come.

 Chapter 18.—Perfection of Righteousness and Full Security Was Not Even in Paul in This Life.

 Chapter 19.—In What Sense the Righteousness of Man in This Life is Said to Be Perfect.

 Chapter 20.—Why the Righteousness Which is of the Law is Valued Slightly by Paul.

 Chapter 21.—That Righteousness is Never Perfected in This Life.

 Chapter 22.—Nature of Human Righteousness and Perfection.

 Chapter 23.—There is No True Righteousness Without the Faith of the Grace of Christ.

 Chapter 24 [VIII.]—There are Three Principal Heads in the Pelagian Heresy.

 Chapter 25 [IX.]—He Shows that the Opinion of the Catholics is the Mean Between that of the Manicheans and Pelagians, and Refutes Both.

 Chapter 26 [X.]—The Pelagians Still Strive After a Hiding-Place, by Introducing the Needless Question of the Origin of the Soul.

 Book IV.

 Chapter 1 [I.]—The Subterfuges of the Pelagians are Five.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—The Praise of the Creature.

 Chapter 3 [III.]—The Catholics Praise Nature, Marriage, Law, Free Will, and the Saints, in Such Wise as to Condemn as Well Pelagians as Manicheans.

 Chapter 4 [IV.]—Pelagians and Manicheans on the Praise of the Creature.

 Chapter 5.—What is the Special Advantage in the Pelagian Opinions?

 Chapter 6.—Not Death Alone, But Sin Also Has Passed into Us by Means of Adam.

 Chapter 7.—What is the Meaning of “In Whom All Have Sinned”?

 Chapter 8.—Death Passed Upon All by Sin.

 Chapter 9 [V.]—Of the Praise of Marriage.

 Chapter 10.—Of the Praise of the Law.

 Chapter 11.—The Pelagians Understand that the Law Itself is God’s Grace.

 Chapter 12 [VI.]—Of the Praise of Free Will.

 Chapter 13.—God’s Purposes are Effects of Grace.

 Chapter 14.—The Testimonies of Scripture in Favour of Grace.

 Chapter 15.—From Such Scriptures Grace is Proved to Be Gratuitous and Effectual.

 Chapter 16.—Why God Makes of Some Sheep, Others Not.

 Chapter 17 [VII.]—Of the Praise of the Saints.

 Chapter 18.—The Opinion of the Saints Themselves About Themselves.

 Chapter 19.—The Craft of the Pelagians.

 Chapter 20 [VIII.]—The Testimonies of the Ancients Against the Pelagians.

 Chapter 21.—Pelagius, in Imitation of Cyprian, Wrote a Book of Testimonies.

 Chapter 22.—Further References to Cyprian.

 Chapter 23.—Further References to Cyprian.

 Chapter 24.—The Dilemma Proposed to the Pelagians.

 Chapter 25 [IX.]—Cyprian’s Testimonies Concerning God’s Grace.

 Chapter 26.—Further Appeals to Cyprian’s Teaching.

 Chapter 27 [X.]—Cyprian’s Testimonies Concerning the Imperfection of Our Own Righteousness.

 Chapter 28.—Cyprian’s Orthodoxy Undoubted.

 Chapter 29 [XI.]—The Testimonies of Ambrose Against the Pelagians and First of All Concerning Original Sin.

 Chapter 30.—The Testimonies of Ambrose Concerning God’s Grace.

 Chapter 31.—The Testimonies of Ambrose on the Imperfection of Present Righteousness.

 Chapter 32 [XII.]—The Pelagian’s Heresy Arose Long After Ambrose.

 Chapter 33.—Opposition of the Manichean and Catholic Dogmas.

 Chapter 34.—The Calling Together of a Synod Not Always Necessary to the Condemnation of Heresies.

Chapter 2 [II.]—The Praise of the Creature.

They accomplish the praise of the creature, inasmuch as it pertains to the human race of which the question now is, in these statements: “That God is the Maker of all those that are born, and that the sons of men are God’s work; and that all sin descends not from nature, but from the will.” With this praise of the creature they connect, “that they say that baptism is necessary for every age, so that,” namely, “the creature itself may be adopted among the children of God; not because it derives anything from its parents which must be purified in the laver of regeneration.” To this praise they add also, “that they say that Christ the Lord was sprinkled with no stain of sin as far as pertains to His infancy;” because they assert that His flesh was most pure from all contagion of sin, not by His own excellence and singular grace, but by His fellowship with the nature which is shared by all infants. It also belongs to this that they introduce the question “of the origin of the soul,” thus endeavouring to make all the souls of infants equal to the soul of Christ, maintaining that they likewise are sprinkled with no stain of sin. On this account, also, they say, “that nothing of evil passed from Adam upon the rest of humanity except death, which,” they say, “is not always an evil, since to the martyrs, for instance, it is for the sake of rewards; and it is not the dissolution of the bodies, which in every kind of men shall be raised up, that can make death to be called either good or evil, but the diversity of merits which arises from human liberty.” These things they write in this letter concerning the praise of the creature.

They praise marriage truly according to the Scriptures, “because the Lord saith in the gospel, He who made men from the beginning made them male and female, and said, Increase and multiply, and replenish the earth.” Although this is not written in that passage of the gospel, yet it is written in the law. They add, moreover, “What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.”250    Rom. iv. 15.    Matt. xix. 4. And these we acknowledge to be gospel words.

In the praise of the law they say, “that the old law was, according to the apostle, holy and just and good; that on those who keep its commandments, and live righteously by faith, such as the prophets and patriarchs, and all the saints, life eternal could be conferred.”

In the praise of free will they say, “that free will has not perished, since the Lord says by the prophets, ‘If ye be willing and will hear me, ye shall eat the good things of the land: if ye are unwilling, and will not hear, the sword shall devour you.’251    Gal. iii. 19.    Isa. i. 19. And thus, also, it is that grace assists the good purpose of any person, but yet does not infuse a desire of virtue into the reluctant heart, because there is no acceptance of persons with God.”

In the praise of the saints they conceal themselves, saying “that baptism perfectly renews men, inasmuch as the apostle is a witness who testifies that, by the washing of water, the Church is made out of the heathen holy and spotless;252    Gal. iii. 21, 23.    Eph. v. 26. that the Holy Spirit also assisted pious souls in ancient times, even as the prophet says to God, ‘Thy good Spirit shall lead me into the right way;’253    Gal. iv. 24, 31.    Ps. cxliii. 10. that all the prophets, moreover, and apostles or saints, as well of the New as of the Old Testament, to whom God gives witness, were righteous, not in comparison with the wicked, but by the rule of virtue; and that in future time there is a reward as well of good works as of evil. But that no one can then perform the commandment which here he may have contemned, because the apostle said, ‘We must be manifested before the judgment-seat of Christ, that every one may receive the things belonging to the body, according to what he has done, whether good or evil.’”254    2 Cor. v. 10.

In all these points, whatever they say of the praise of the creature and of marriage, they endeavour to bring us back to this,—that there is no original sin; whatever of the praise of law and of free will, to this, that grace does not assist without merit, and that thus grace is no more grace; whatever of the praise of the saints, to this, that mortal life in the saints appears not to have sin, and that it is not necessary for them to pray God for the remitting of their debts.

CAPUT II.

2. Laus creaturae; laus nuptiarum; laus legis; laus liberi arbitrii; laus sanctorum. Laudem creaturae, quod ad genus humanum attinet, unde nunc quaestio est, his sententiis exsequuntur: «Quod nascentium conditor Deus sit, filiique hominum opus sint Dei; et peccatum omne non de natura, sed de voluntate descendat.» Huic laudi creaturae applicant, «Quod omnibus aetatibus dicunt esse Baptismum necessarium, ut» scilicet «illa creatura in Dei filios adoptetur, non quod aliquid ex parentibus trahat, quod sit lavacro regenerationis expiandum.» Huic laudi adjungunt, et «quod Christum Dominum nulla dicunt macula peccati fuisse respersum, quantum attinet ad ejus infantiam: «quia ejus carnem ab omni peccati contagione purissimam, non excellentia propria et gratia singulari, sed communione naturae, quae omnibus inest infantibus asseverant. Eo pertinet etiam, quod «de animae origine» inserunt quaestionem: sic animae Christi coaequare molientes omnes animas parvulorum, quas volunt esse similiter nulla peccati macula aspersas. 0610 Propter hoc etiam dicunt, «Ex Adam nihil mali transisse per caeteros, nisi mortem: quae non semper est malum,» inquiunt, «cum et martyribus sit causa praemiorum, et vel bonam vel malam dici faciat, non resolutio corporum, quae excitabuntur in omni genere hominum, sed meritorum diversitas, quae de humana libertate contingit.» Haec scribunt in hac Epistola de laude creaturae.

Nuptias vero secundum Scripturas laudant, «quia Dominus in Evangelio loquitur, Qui fecit ab initio, masculum et feminam fecit eos (Matth. XIX, 4), et dixit, Crescite, et multiplicamini, et replete terram» (Gen. I, 28). Quamvis hoc non in eo loco Evangelii, sed tamen in lege sit scriptum. Addunt etiam, «Quod ergo Deus conjunxit, homo non separet» (Matth. XIX, 6). Quae verba evangelica agnoscimus.

In laude legis dicunt, «Veterem legem secundum Apostolum justam et sanctam et bonam (Rom. VII, 12), custodientibus mandata sua, ac per fidem juste viventibus, sicut Prophetis et Patriarchis omnibusque sanctis, vitam potuisse conferre perpetuam.»

In laude liberi arbitrii dicunt, «Liberum arbitrium non periisse, cum loquatur Dominus per prophetam: Si volueritis et audieritis me, quae bona sunt terrae edetis: si nolueritis et non audieritis, gladius vos comedet (Isai. I, 19, 20). Ac per hoc et gratiam uniuscujusque bonum propositum adjuvare, non tamen reluctandi studium virtutis immittere, quia personarum acceptio non est apud Deum» (Rom. II, 11).

Laude sanctorum sese contegunt, dicentes, «Baptisma perfecte homines innovare: siquidem Apostolus testis sit, qui per lavacrum aquae Ecclesiam de Gentibus sanctam fieri immaculatamque testatur (Ephes. V, 26). Sanctum quoque Spiritum mentes bonas in antiquis adjuvisse temporibus, dicente propheta ad Deum, Spiritus tuus bonus deducet me in viam rectam (Psal. CXLII, 10). Omnes quoque Prophetas et Apostolos vel sanctos, tam novi quam veteris Testamenti, quibus Deus testimonium perhibet, non in comparatione sceleratorum, sed regula virtutum justos fuisse: in futuro autem tempore mercedem esse tam bonorum operum, quam malorum. Caeterum neminem posse, quae hic contempserit, illic mandata perficere; quia dixerit Apostolus, Oportet nos manifestari ante tribunal Christi, ut reportet unusquisque 0611propria corporis, secundum quod gessit, sive bonum, sive malum» (II Cor. V, 10).

In his omnibus quidquid dicunt de laude creaturae atque nuptiarum, ad hoc referre conantur, ut non sit originale peccatum: quidquid de laude legis et liberi arbitrii, ad hoc, ut gratia non adjuvet nisi meritum, ac sic gratia jam non sit gratia: quidquid de laude sanctorum, ad hoc, ut vita mortalis in sanctis videatur non habere peccatum, nec sit eis necessarium pro dimittendis debitis suis precari Deum.