by aurelius augustin, bishop of hippo

 Chapter 1.—Introduction: Address to Boniface.

 Chapter 2.—Why Heretical Writings Must Be Answered.

 Chapter 3.—Why He Addresses His Book to Boniface.

 Chapter 4 [II.]—The Calumny of Julian,—That the Catholics Teach that Free Will is Taken Away by Adam’s Sin.

 Chapter 5.—Free Choice Did Not Perish With Adam ’s Sin. What Freedom Did Perish.

 Chapter 6 [III.]—Grace is Not Given According to Merits.

 Chapter 7.—He Concludes that He Does Not Deprive the Wicked of Free Will.

 Chapter 8 [IV.]—The Pelagians Demolish Free Will.

 Chapter 9 [V.]—Another Calumny of Julian,—That “It is Said that Marriage is Not Appointed by God.”

 Chapter 10—The Third Calumny,—The Assertion that Conjugal Intercourse is Condemned.

 Chapter 11 [VI.]—The Purpose of the Pelagians in Praising the Innocence of Conjugal Intercourse.

 Chapter 12.—The Fourth Calumny,—That the Saints of the Old Testament are Said to Be Not Free from Sins.

 Chapter 13 [VIII.]—The Fifth Calumny,—That It is Said that Paul and the Rest of the Apostles Were Polluted by Lust.

 Chapter 14.—That the Apostle is Speaking in His Own Person and that of Others Who Are Under Grace, Not Still Under Law.

 Chapter 15 [IX.]—He Sins in Will Who is Only Deterred from Sinning by Fear.

 Chapter 16.—How Sin Died, and How It Revived.

 Chapter 17 [X.]—“The Law is Spiritual, But I Am Carnal,” To Be Understood of Paul.

 Chapter 18.—How the Apostle Said that He Did the Evil that He Would Not.

 Chapter 19.—What It is to Accomplish What is Good.

 Chapter 20.—In Me, that Is, in My Flesh.

 Chapter 21.—No Condemnation in Christ Jesus.

 Chapter 22.—Why the Passage Referred to Must Be Understood of a Man Established Under Grace.

 Chapter 23 [XI.]—What It is to Be Delivered from the Body of This Death.

 Chapter 24.—He Concludes that the Apostle Spoke in His Own Person, and that of Those Who are Under Grace.

 Chapter 25 [XII.]—The Sixth Calumny,—That Augustin Asserts that Even Christ Was Not Free from Sins.

 Chapter 26 [XIII.]—The Seventh Calumny,—That Augustin Asserts that in Baptism All Sins are Not Remitted.

 Chapter 27.—In What Sense Lust is Called Sin in the Regenerate.

 Chapter 28 [XIV.]—Many Without Crime, None Without Sin.

 Chapter 29 [XV.]—Julian Opposes the Faith of His Friends to the Opinions of Catholic Believers. First of All, of Free Will.

 Chapter 30.—Secondly, of Marriage.

 Chapter 31.—Thirdly, of Conjugal Intercourse.

 Chapter 32 [XVI.]—The Aprons Which Adam and Eve Wore.

 Chapter 33.—The Shame of Nakedness.

 Chapter 34 [XVII.]—Whether There Could Be Sensual Appetite in Paradise Before the Fall.

 Chapter 35.—Desire in Paradise Was Either None at All, or It Was Obedient to the Impulse of the Will.

 Chapter 36 [XVIII.]—Julian’s Fourth Objection, that Man is God’s Work, and is Not Constrained to Evil or Good by His Power.

 Chapter 37 [XIX.]—The Beginning of a Good Will is the Gift of Grace.

 Chapter 38 [XX.]—The Power of God’s Grace is Proved.

 Chapter 39 [XXI.]—Julian’s Fifth Objection Concerning the Saints of the Old Testament.

 Chapter 40 [XXII.]—The Sixth Objection, Concerning the Necessity of Grace for All, and Concerning the Baptism of Infants.

 Chapter 41 [XXIII.]—The Seventh Objection, of the Effect of Baptism.

 Chapter 42 [XXIV.]—He Rebuts the Conclusion of Julian’s Letter.

 Book II.

 Chapter 1.—Introduction The Pelagians Impeach Catholics as Manicheans.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—The Heresies of the Manicheans and Pelagians are Mutually Opposed, and are Alike Reprobated by the Catholic Church.

 Chapter 3.—How Far the Manicheans and Pelagians are Joined in Error How Far They are Separated.

 Chapter 4.—The Two Contrary Errors.

 Chapter 5 [III.]—The Calumny of the Pelagians Against the Clergy of the Roman Church.

 Chapter 6 [IV.]—What Was Done in the Case of Cœlestius and Zosimus.

 Chapter 7.—He Suggests a Dilemma to Cœlestius.

 Chapter 8.—The Catholic Faith Concerning Infants.

 Chapter 9 [V.]—He Replies to the Calumnies of the Pelagians.

 Chapter 10.—Why the Pelagians Falsely Accuse Catholics of Maintaining Fate Under the Name of Grace.

 Chapter 11 [VI.]—The Accusation of Fate is Thrown Back Upon the Adversaries.

 Chapter 12.—What is Meant Under the Name of Fate.

 Chapter 13 [VII.]—He Repels the Calumny Concerning the Acceptance of Persons.

 Chapter 14.—He Illustrates His Argument by an Example.

 Chapter 15.—The Apostle Meets the Question by Leaving It Unsolved.

 Chapter 16.—The Pelagians are Refuted by the Case of the Twin Infants Dying, the One After, and the Other Without, the Grace of Baptism.

 Chapter 17 [VIII.]—Even the Desire of an Imperfect Good is a Gift of Grace, Otherwise Grace Would Be Given According to Merits.

 Chapter 18.—The Desire of Good is God’s Gift.

 Chapter 19 [IX.]—He Interprets the Scriptures Which the Pelagians Make Ill Use of.

 Chapter 20.—God’s Agency is Needful Even in Man’s Doings.

 Chapter 21.—Man Does No Good Thing Which God Does Not Cause Him to Do.

 Chapter 22 [X.]—According to Whose Purpose the Elect are Called.

 Chapter 23.—Nothing is Commanded to Man Which is Not Given by God.

 Book III.

 Chapter 1 [I.]—Statement.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—The Misrepresentation of the Pelagians Concerning the Use of the Old Law.

 Chapter 3.—Scriptural Confirmation of the Catholic Doctrine.

 Chapter 4 [III.]—Misrepresentation Concerning the Effect of Baptism.

 Chapter 5.—Baptism Puts Away All Sins, But It Does Not at Once Heal All Infirmities.

 Chapter 6 [IV.]—The Calumny Concerning the Old Testament and the Righteous Men of Old.

 Chapter 7.—The New Testament is More Ancient Than the Old But It Was Subsequently Revealed.

 Chapter 8.—All Righteous Men Before and After Abraham are Children of the Promise and of Grace.

 Chapter 9.—Who are the Children of the Old Covenant.

 Chapter 10.—The Old Law Also Given by God.

 Chapter 11.—Distinction Between the Children of the Old and of the New Testaments.

 Chapter 12.—The Old Testament is Properly One Thing—The Old Instrument Another.

 Chapter 13.—Why One of the Covenants is Called Old, the Other New.

 Chapter 14 [V.]—Calumny Concerning the Righteousness of the Prophets and Apostles.

 Chapter 15.—The Perfection of Apostles and Prophets.

 Chapter 16 [VI.]—Misrepresentation Concerning Sin in Christ.

 Chapter 17 [VII.]—Their Calumny About the Fulfilment of Precepts in the Life to Come.

 Chapter 18.—Perfection of Righteousness and Full Security Was Not Even in Paul in This Life.

 Chapter 19.—In What Sense the Righteousness of Man in This Life is Said to Be Perfect.

 Chapter 20.—Why the Righteousness Which is of the Law is Valued Slightly by Paul.

 Chapter 21.—That Righteousness is Never Perfected in This Life.

 Chapter 22.—Nature of Human Righteousness and Perfection.

 Chapter 23.—There is No True Righteousness Without the Faith of the Grace of Christ.

 Chapter 24 [VIII.]—There are Three Principal Heads in the Pelagian Heresy.

 Chapter 25 [IX.]—He Shows that the Opinion of the Catholics is the Mean Between that of the Manicheans and Pelagians, and Refutes Both.

 Chapter 26 [X.]—The Pelagians Still Strive After a Hiding-Place, by Introducing the Needless Question of the Origin of the Soul.

 Book IV.

 Chapter 1 [I.]—The Subterfuges of the Pelagians are Five.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—The Praise of the Creature.

 Chapter 3 [III.]—The Catholics Praise Nature, Marriage, Law, Free Will, and the Saints, in Such Wise as to Condemn as Well Pelagians as Manicheans.

 Chapter 4 [IV.]—Pelagians and Manicheans on the Praise of the Creature.

 Chapter 5.—What is the Special Advantage in the Pelagian Opinions?

 Chapter 6.—Not Death Alone, But Sin Also Has Passed into Us by Means of Adam.

 Chapter 7.—What is the Meaning of “In Whom All Have Sinned”?

 Chapter 8.—Death Passed Upon All by Sin.

 Chapter 9 [V.]—Of the Praise of Marriage.

 Chapter 10.—Of the Praise of the Law.

 Chapter 11.—The Pelagians Understand that the Law Itself is God’s Grace.

 Chapter 12 [VI.]—Of the Praise of Free Will.

 Chapter 13.—God’s Purposes are Effects of Grace.

 Chapter 14.—The Testimonies of Scripture in Favour of Grace.

 Chapter 15.—From Such Scriptures Grace is Proved to Be Gratuitous and Effectual.

 Chapter 16.—Why God Makes of Some Sheep, Others Not.

 Chapter 17 [VII.]—Of the Praise of the Saints.

 Chapter 18.—The Opinion of the Saints Themselves About Themselves.

 Chapter 19.—The Craft of the Pelagians.

 Chapter 20 [VIII.]—The Testimonies of the Ancients Against the Pelagians.

 Chapter 21.—Pelagius, in Imitation of Cyprian, Wrote a Book of Testimonies.

 Chapter 22.—Further References to Cyprian.

 Chapter 23.—Further References to Cyprian.

 Chapter 24.—The Dilemma Proposed to the Pelagians.

 Chapter 25 [IX.]—Cyprian’s Testimonies Concerning God’s Grace.

 Chapter 26.—Further Appeals to Cyprian’s Teaching.

 Chapter 27 [X.]—Cyprian’s Testimonies Concerning the Imperfection of Our Own Righteousness.

 Chapter 28.—Cyprian’s Orthodoxy Undoubted.

 Chapter 29 [XI.]—The Testimonies of Ambrose Against the Pelagians and First of All Concerning Original Sin.

 Chapter 30.—The Testimonies of Ambrose Concerning God’s Grace.

 Chapter 31.—The Testimonies of Ambrose on the Imperfection of Present Righteousness.

 Chapter 32 [XII.]—The Pelagian’s Heresy Arose Long After Ambrose.

 Chapter 33.—Opposition of the Manichean and Catholic Dogmas.

 Chapter 34.—The Calling Together of a Synod Not Always Necessary to the Condemnation of Heresies.

Chapter 14.—He Illustrates His Argument by an Example.

But that what I am saying may be made clear by the exhibition of an example, let us suppose certain twins, born of a certain harlot, and exposed that they might be taken up by others. One of them has expired without baptism; the other is baptized. What can we say was in this case the “fate” or the “fortune,” which are here absolutely nothing? What “acceptance of persons,” when with God there is none, even if there could be any such thing in these cases, seeing that they certainly had nothing for which the one could be preferred to the other, and no merits of their own,—whether good, for which the one might deserve to be baptized; or evil, for which the other might deserve to die without baptism? Were there any merits in their parents, when the father was a fornicator, the mother a harlot? But of whatever kind those merits were, there were certainly not any that were different in those who died in such different conditions, but all were common to both. If, then, neither fate, since no stars made them to differ; nor fortune, since no fortuitous accidents produce these things; nor the diversity of persons nor of merits have done this; what remains, so far as it refers to the baptized child, save the grace of God, which is given freely to vessels made unto honour; but, as it refers to the unbaptized child, the wrath of God, which is repaid to the vessels made for dishonour in respect of the deservings of the lump itself? But in that one which is baptized we constrain you to confess the grace of God, and convince you that no merit of its own preceded; but as to that one which died without baptism, why that sacrament should have been wanting to it, which even you confess to be needful for all ages, and what in that manner may have been punished in him, it is for you to see who will not have it that there is any original sin.

14. Sed ut id quod dicimus alicujus exempli manifestatione 0581 clarescat, constituamus aliquos ab aliqua meretrice geminos editos, atque ut ab aliis colligerentur expositos: horum sine Baptismo exspiravit unus, alius baptizatus. Quod hic fatum fortunamve fuisse dicamus, quae omnino nulla sunt? Quam personarum acceptionem, cum apud Deum nulla esset etiam si in istis ulla esse potuisset: qui utique nihil habebant, unde alter alteri praeferretur, meritaque nulla propria, sive bona, quibus mereretur alius baptizari; sive mala, quibus alius sine Baptismate mori? An aliqua parentum fuerunt, ubi fornicator pater, meretrix mater? Sed qualiacumque illa fuerint, non utique istis tam diversa conditione morientibus ulla diversa, sed utrique communia. Si ergo nec fatum, quia nullae stellae ista decernunt; nec fortuna, quia non fortuiti casus haec agunt; nec personarum, nec meritorum diversitas hoc fecerunt: quid restat, quantum ad baptizatum adtinet, nisi gratia Dei quae vasis factis in honorem gratis datur; quantum autem ad non baptizatum, ira Dei, quae vasis factis in contumeliam pro ipsius massae meritis redditur? Sed in illo qui baptizatus est, gratiam Dei vos confiteri cogimus, et meritum ejus nullum praecessisse convincimus: de illo autem sine Baptismate mortuo, cur ei defuerit Sacramentum, quod et vos fatemini omnibus aetatibus necessarium, et quid isto modo in eo fuerit vindicatum, vos videritis qui non vultis esse originale delictum.