The Well and the Shallows

 INTRODUCTION

 AN APOLOGY FOR BUFFOONS

 MY SIX CONVERSIONS I. THE RELIGION OF FOSSILS II. WHEN THE WORLD TURNED BACK III. THE SURRENDER UPON SEX IV. THE PRAYER-BOOK PROBLEM V. THE COLLAPSE O

 THE RETURN TO RELIGION

 THE REACTION OF THE INTELLECTUALS LEVITYOR LEVITATION

 THE CASE FOR HERMITS

 KILLING THE NERVE

 THE CASE OF CLAUDEL THE HIGHER NlHILISM

 THE ASCETIC AT LARGE

 THE BACKWARD BOLSHIE

 THE LAST TURN

 THE NEW LUTHER BABIES AND DlSTRIBUTISM

 THREE FOES OF THE FAMILY

 THE DON AND THE CAVALIER

 THE CHURCH AND AGORAPHOBIA

 BACK IN THE FOG

 THE HISTORIC MOMENT

 MARY AND THE CONVERT

 A CENTURY OF EMANCIPATION

 TRADE TERMS

 FROZEN FREE THOUGHT

 SHOCKING THE MODERNISTS

 A GRAMMAR OF KNIGHTHOOD

 REFLECTIONS ON A ROTTEN APPLE

 SEX AND PROPERTY ST. THOMAS MORE

 THE RETURN OF CAESAR

 AUSTRIA

 THE SCRIPTURE READER

 AN EXPLANATION

 WHY PROTESTANTS PROHIBIT

 WHERE IS THE PARADOX?

 INTRODUCTORY NOTE

 AN APOLOGY FOR BUFFOONS

 MY SIX CONVERSIONS

 MY SIX CONVERSIONS

 MY SIX CONVERSIONS

 MY SIX CONVERSIONS

 MY SIX CONVERSIONS

 MY SIX CONVERSIONS

 MY SIX CONVERSIONS

 THE RETURN TO RELIGION

 THE REACTION OF THE INTELLECTUALS

 THE CASE FOR HERMITS

 KILLING THE NERVE

 THE CASE OF CLAUDEL

 THE HIGHER NIHILISM

 THE ASCETIC AT LARGE

 THE BACKWARD BOLSHIE

 THE LAST TURN

 THE NEW LUTHER

 BABIES AND DISTRIBUTISM

 THREE FOES OF THE FAMILY

 THE DON AND THE CAVALIER

 THE CHURCH AND AGORAPHOBIA

 BACK IN THE FOG

 MARY AND THE CONVERT

 A CENTURY OF EMANCIPATION

 TRADE TERMS

 FROZEN FREE THOUGHT

 SHOCKING THE MODERNISTS

 A GRAMMAR OF KNIGHTHOOD

 REFLECTIONS ON A ROTTEN APPLE

 SEX AND PROPERTY

 THE RETURN OF CAESAR

 AUSTRIA

 THE SCRIPTURE READER

 AN EXPLANATION

 WHERE IS THE PARADOX?

THE CHURCH AND AGORAPHOBIA

THE erection of a great cathedral in a great city, and especially in a great port, that is a city that is also a wide gate of the world, recalls certain truths that are curiously forgotten, or sometimes still more astonishingly contradicted or reversed. Before we come to count the million mistakes and misunderstandings which separate men from the Catholic Church, there is one enormous and elementary mistake, which has to do with this question of scale and position in the world. To put it shortly; the man who fears to enter the Church commonly fancies that what he feels is a sort of claustrophobia. As a fact, what he really feels, is rather a sort of agoraphobia. Some silly little historical accidents, almost entirely peculiar to the particular way in which Catholicism survived in England, have given many Englishmen an extraordinary notion that it is a sort of hole and corner affair. These honest Protestants, like the imaginary nuns in the impossible romances, walk about in perpetual fear of being "walled up." For them the typical Catholic act is not going into a great thing like a church, but into a small thing like a confessional box. And to their nightmare fancy a confessional box is a sort of man-trap; and presents in its very appearance some combination of a coffin and a cage. The same notion is reinforced by the use of the word "cells," which in a Protestant community means prison-cells, and not monastic cells. The same is suggested by the word "crypt," about which there must obviously be something cryptic. These and many other tags of tradition have preserved in this country the custom of talking as if the danger of being a Catholic was the danger of being buried in a deep dark hole. And yet even the tradition was, not only a legend, but very nearly a pretence. Even the man who said these things knew in his heart, or at least had a vague knowledge at the back of his mind, that his fear was really a fear of something larger than himself and his tribal traditions; that he was really, as it was sometimes stated from both points of view, leaving a national for an international church. As I have said, it was not claustrophobia, the fear of the crypt or the cell; it was agoraphobia, or the fear of the forum, of the market-place, of the open spaces and the colossal public buildings. To the really insular and individualistic type of sectarian, even the fear of the Church was also partly a fear of the world. It can be seen in the terror which some of the English Tories, in the old times, felt towards the cosmopolitan culture of the Jesuits; who honestly seemed to them a sort of universal anarchists. It can be seen in the exaggerated revulsion from the very varied experiments, failures and successes of the Baroque. Of nearly all the non-Catholic types of our time we can truly say, that any such type must broaden his mind to become a Catholic. He must grow more used than he is at present to the long avenues and the large spaces. This is really what is meant by the Puritans who say that the Church is Pagan; that it does open a very long avenue, which is the only avenue left connecting us with Pagan antiquity. That is largely what is meant by insisting that the Church covers all sorts of dubious or disreputable people; all the motley mobs of tramps and pedlars and beggars, who do make up the life of an open market-place. Quicquid agunt homines; which even Matthew Arnold wisely saw was the true motto of the practical life of the Roman Catholic Church.

Now a great deal has been said by Protestants, naturally enough, and not a little even by Catholics, about the danger of displaying before the world a pomp and triumph that may easily be called worldly. Undoubtedly some harm was done, and some misunderstandings did arise, when the Popes of the Renaissance filled Rome with trophies that might have marked the triumphs of the Caesars, and permitted the slander that the father of Christian man had usurped the title of King of Kings and forgotten his own actual title of Servant of Servants. But, taking human nature as a whole, the method is justified; because it is some sort of proclamation of the profound truth mentioned above; that the Faith belongs to the heights and the open spaces, and the circle of the whole world, and is not the one thing which its enemies go on desperately calling it; a conspiracy. There could not be a better way of suggesting the very reverse of that suggestion, than by the continual use in public buildings of what is large in design and hospitable in gesture. Art, and especially architecture, can here express actualities that are at once too large and too elusive to be expressed in words. St. Mark's Cathedral at Venice is in some ways a very curious building, and to some northern eyes does not look like a cathedral at all; but it does look like a thing coloured with the sunrise and the sunset, in touch with the very ends of the earth; open like a harbour and full of popular poetry like a fairy-palace. That is, it does express the first essential fact that Catholicism is not a narrow thing; that it knows more than the world knows about the potentialities and creative possibilities of the world, and that it will outlast all the worldly and temporary expressions of the same culture. Christianity has gone northward and established richer ports in colder seas; it has been changed and chilled for a time by colder heresies; but the same principle still stands for its expansion and exaltation; that which is expressed in the expansion and exaltation of great buildings; in the breadth of great gates declaring the brotherhood of men or the lifting of great domes pointing the way of their destiny. To-day another such building is being reared in what Mr. Belloc's fantasy once called a Harbour in the North; and its scope and scale would indeed be idle things, if they did not remind us of the two essential truths: first, that even within the world the boundaries of the Faith are being enlarged; and second, and much more important, that the Faith itself enlarges the world; which would be a small thing without it.

-/-