QUINTI SEPTIMII FLORENTIS TERTULLIANI ADVERSUS VALENTINIANOS LIBER.

 CAPUT PRIMUM.

 CAPUT II .

 CAPUT III.

 CAPUT IV.

 CAPUT V.

 CAPUT VI.

 CAPUT VII.

 CAPUT VIII.

 CAPUT IX.

 CAPUT X.

 CAPUT XI.

 CAPUT XII.

 CAPUT XIII.

 CAPUT XIV.

 CAPUT XV.

 CAPUT XVI.

 CAPUT XVII.

 CAPUT XVIII.

 CAPUT XIX.

 CAPUT XX.

 CAPUT XXI.

 CAPUT XXII.

 CAPUT XXIII.

 CAPUT XXIV.

 CAPUT XXV.

 CAPUT XXVI.

 CAPUT XXVII.

 CAPUT XXVIII.

 CAPUT XXIX.

 CAPUT XXX.

 CAPUT XXXI.

 CAPUT XXXII.

 CAPUT XXXIII.

 CAPUT XXXIV.

 CAPUT XXXV.

 CAPUT XXXVI.

 CAPUT XXXVII.

 CAPUT XXXVIII.

 CAPUT XXXIX.

Chapter XXVI.—The Three Several Natures—The Material, the Animal, and the Spiritual, and Their Several Destinations.  The Strange Valentinian Opinion About the Structure of Soter’s Nature.

In like manner they assign to each of them a separate end.242    Exitum. To the material, that is to say the carnal (nature), which they also call “the left-handed,” they assign undoubted destruction; to the animal (nature), which they also call “the right-handed,” a doubtful issue, inasmuch as it oscillates between the material and the spiritual, and is sure to fall at last on the side to which it has mainly gravitated. As regards the spiritual, however, (they say) that it enters into the formation of the animal, in order that it may be educated in company with it and be disciplined by repeated intercourse with it. For the animal (nature) was in want of training even by the senses: for this purpose, accordingly, was the whole structure of the world provided; for this purpose also did Soter (the Saviour) present Himself in the world—even for the salvation of the animal (nature). By yet another arrangement they will have it that He, in some prodigious way,243    Monstruosum illum. clothed Himself with the primary portions244    Prosicias induisse. Irenæus says, “Assumed the first-fruits,” τὰς ἀπαρχάς. of those substances, the whole of which He was going to restore to salvation; in such wise that He assumed the spiritual nature from Achamoth, whilst He derived the animal (being), Christ, afterwards from the Demiurge; His corporal substance, however, which was constructed of an animal nature (only with wonderful and indescribable skill), He wore for a dispensational purpose, in order that He might, in spite of His own unwillingness,245    Ingratis. be capable of meeting persons, and of being seen and touched by them, and even of dying. But there was nothing material assumed by Him, inasmuch as that was incapable of salvation. As if He could possibly have been more required by any others than by those who were in want of salvation! And all this, in order that by severing the condition of our flesh from Christ they may also deprive it of the hope of salvation!

CAPUT XXVI.

Sic et exitum singulis dividunt. Materiali quidem, id est carnali, quem et sinistrum vocant, indubitatum interitum; animali vero, quem et dextrum appellant, dubitatum eventum, utpote inter materialem spiritalemque nutanti, et illac debito qua plurimum adnuerit. Caeterum spiritalem emitti in animalis 0579B comparationem, et erudiri cum eo et exerceri in conversationibus possit . Indiguisse enim animalem 0580A etiam sensibilium disciplinarum; in hoc et paraturam mundi prospectam; in hoc et Soterem animalem in mundo repraesentatum, in salutem scilicet animalis. Alia adhuc compositione monstruosum, volunt illum proficias earum substantiarum induisse, quarum summam saluti esset redacturus; ut spiritalem quidem susceperit ab Achamoth, animalem vero, quem mox a demiurgo induit , Christum: caeterum corporalem, ex animali substantia, sed miro et inenarrabili rationis ingenio constructum , administrationis caussa vim contulisse , quo congressui, et conspectui, et contactui , et defunctui ingratis subjaceret. Materiale autem nihil in illo fuisse, utpote salutis alienum, quasi aliis? fuerit necessarius, quam egentibus 0580B salute. Et totum hoc, ut carnis nostrae habitum alienando a Christo, a spe etiam salutis expellant .