It may indeed be undignified to give any answer at all to the statements that are foolish we seem to be pointed that way by Solomon’s wise advice, “n

 What then is the charge they bring against us? They accuse us of profanity for entertaining lofty conceptions about the Holy Spirit. All that we, in f

 What then, shall be our way of arguing? We shall answer nothing new, nothing of our own invention, though they challenge us to it we shall fall back

 We can confirm our argument by material instances. Fire naturally imparts the sense of heat to those who touch it, with all its component parts one

 If, then, the Holy Spirit is truly, and not in name only, called Divine both by Scripture and by our Fathers, what ground is left for those who oppose

 For the plea will not avail them in their self-defence, that He is delivered by our Lord to His disciples third in order, and that therefore He is est

 Since, then, it has been affirmed, and truly affirmed, that the Spirit is of the Divine Essence, and since in that one word “Divine” every idea of gre

 But if all must shrink from that, as going even beyond the most revolting blasphemy, then a devout mind must accept the nobler names and conceptions o

 If such is the doctrine concerning Him when followed out , let the same inquiry be made concerning the Son and the Father as well. Do you not confess

 If, then, they agree that the Holy Spirit is perfect absolutely, and it has been admitted in addition that true reverence requires perfection in every

 In what sort of manner, then, can you honour the Deity? How can you heighten the Highest? How can you give glory to that which is above all glory? How

 The heavens proclaim the glory of God , and yet they are counted poor heralds of His worth because His Majesty is exalted, not as far as the heavens,

 What means, then, this lowering and this expanding of their soul, on the part of these men who are enthusiastic for the Father’s honour, and grant to

 “Yes,” replies one of them, “but we have been taught by Scripture that the Father is the Creator, and in the same way that it was ‘through the Son ’ t

 What shall we answer to this? That the thoughts of their hearts are so much idle talk, when they imagine that the Spirit was not always with the Fathe

 The view which is consistent with all reverence is as follows. We are not to think of the Father as ever parted from the Son, nor to look for the Son

 If, on the contrary, this Spirit has the impulse to work, but some overwhelming control hinders His design, they must tell us the wherefore of this hi

 This is the view we take, after the unprofessional way usual with us and we reject all these elaborate sophistries of our adversaries, believing and

 But with regard to service and worship, and the other things which they so nicely calculate about, and bring into prominence, we say this that the Ho

 But if there is any of them who rejects this statement, and this idea involved in the very name of Divinity, and says that which, to the destruction o

 These destroyers of the Spirit’s glory, who relegate Him to a subject world, must tell us of what thing that unction is the symbol. It not a symbol of

 Again, let us look at it in this way. Kingship is most assuredly shown in the rule over subjects. Now what is “subject” to this Kingly Being? The Word

 For notice the amount of absurdity involved in the other alternative all things that we can think of in the actual creation have, by virtue of all ha

 Then let us look to this too. In Holy Baptism, what is it that we secure thereby? Is it not a participation in a life no longer subject to death? I th

 So that if these despisers and impugners of their very own life conceive of the gift as a little one, and decree accordingly to slight the Being who i

 If, then, every height of man’s ability falls below the grandeur of the Spirit (for that is what the Word means in the metaphor of “footstool”), what

 On the contrary the Holy Spirit is, to begin with, because of qualities that are essentially holy, that which the Father, essentially Holy, is and su

 If such, then, is the greatness of the Spirit, and whatever is beautiful, whatever is good, coming from God as it does through the Son, is completed b

 But you will say, “When I think of the Father it is the Son (alone) that I have included as well in that term.” But tell me when you have grasped the

 Do they too, then, mean this by their worship? Well, is it anything but absurdity to think that it is wrong to honour the Holy Spirit with that with w

 [Translation lacking]

If, on the contrary, this Spirit has the impulse to work, but some overwhelming control hinders His design, they must tell us the wherefore of this hindrance. Was it owing to his being grudged a share in the glory of those operations, and in order to secure that the admiration at their success should not extend to a third person as its object; or to a distrust of His help, as if His co-operation would result in present mischief? These clever men most certainly furnish the grounds for our holding one of these two hypotheses; or else, if a grudging spirit has no connection with the Deity, any more than a failure can be conceived of in any relation to an Infallible Being, what meaning of any kind is there in these narrow views of theirs, which isolate the Spirit’s power from all world-building efficiency? Their duty rather was to expel their low human way of thinking, by means of loftier ideas, and to make a calculation more worthy of the sublimity of the objects in question. For neither did the Universal God make the universe “through the Son,” as needing any help, nor does the Only-begotten God work all things “by the Holy Spirit,” as having a power that comes short of His design; but the fountain of power is the Father, and the power of the Father is the Son, and the spirit of that power is the Holy Spirit; and Creation entirely, in all its visible and spiritual extent, is the finished work of that Divine power. And seeing that no toil can be thought of in the composition of anything connected with the Divine Being (for performance being bound to the moment of willing, the Plan at once becomes a Reality), we should be justified in calling all that Nature which came into existence by creation a movement of Will, an impulse of Design, a transmission of Power, beginning from the Father, advancing through the Son, and completed in the Holy Spirit.

Εἰ δὲ τούτῳ μέν ἐστιν ἡ πρὸς τὸ ἐνεργεῖν ὁρμή, ὑπερκειμένη δέ τις ἐξουσία κωλύει τὴν πρόθεσιν, εἰπάτωσαν τὴν αἰτίαν τοῦ ταῦτα κωλύοντος. φθόνῳ τῆς ἐκ τῶν ἔργων δόξης, ὡς ἂν μὴ καὶ εἰς ἄλλον διαβαίη τῶν κατορθωμάτων τὸ θαῦμα ἢ τῷ μὴ καταπιστεύειν τῇ συνεργίᾳ, ὡς ἐπὶ λύμῃ τοῦ παντὸς ἐσομένης αὐτοῦ τῆς ἐργασίας; πάντως γὰρ τῶν τοιούτων ὑπολήψεων καὶ τὰς αἰτίας ἡμῖν οἱ σοφοὶ οὗτοι διασαφήσουσιν. εἰ δὲ οὔτε φθόνος τῆς θείας ἅπτεται φύσεως οὔτε τι σφάλμα περὶ τὴν ἄπταιστον φύσιν ἐπινοεῖται, τί βούλεται αὐτοῖς ἡ μικροπρέπεια τῶν νοημάτων ἡ τῆς δημιουργικῆς αἰτίας ἀφορίζουσα τὴν τοῦ πνεύματος δύναμιν, δέον ταῖς ὑψηλοτέραις τῶν ἐννοιῶν ἀφιέναι μὲν τὰ ταπεινὰ καὶ ἀνθρώπινα τῶν νοημάτων, λογισμὸν δὲ λαβεῖν τοῦ ὕψους τῶν ζητουμένων ἐπάξιον: ὅτι οὔτε ὁ ἐπὶ πάντων θεὸς συνεργίας τινὸς χρῄζων διὰ τοῦ υἱοῦ τὰ πάντα ἐποίησεν οὔτε ὁ μονογενὴς θεὸς ἐλάττονα τῆς προθέσεως τὴν δύναμιν ἔχων ἐν τῷ ἁγίῳ πνεύματι τὰ πάντα ἐργάζεται. ἀλλὰ πηγὴ μὲν δυνάμεώς ἐστιν ὁ πατήρ, δύναμις δὲ τοῦ πατρὸς ὁ υἱός, δυνάμεως δὲ πνεῦμα τὸ πνεῦμα τὸ ἅγιον: ἡ δὲ κτίσις πᾶσα ὅση τε αἰσθητὴ καὶ ὅση ἀσώματος τῆς θείας δυνάμεώς ἐστιν ἀποτέλεσμα. καὶ ἐπειδὴ πόνος οὐδεὶς ἐν τῇ συστάσει τῶν περὶ τὴν θείαν φύσιν ὑπονοεῖται (ὁμοῦ γὰρ τῷ προελέσθαι τὸ γενέσθαι δέον εὐθὺς οὐσία ἡ πρόθεσις γίνεται), πᾶσαν τὴν διὰ τῆς κτίσεως ὑποστᾶσαν φύσιν, θελήματος κίνησιν καὶ προθέσεως ὁρμὴν καὶ δυνάμεως διάδοσιν, εἰκότως ἄν τις προσαγορεύσειεν ἐκ πατρὸς ἀρχομένην καὶ δι' υἱοῦ προϊοῦσαν καὶ ἐν πνεύματι ἁγίῳ τελειουμένην.