Preface

 Chapters

 THE PHILOCALIA OF ORIGEN

 CHAP. II. ----That the Divine Scripture is closed up and sealed. From the Commentary on the 1st Psalm.

 CHAP. III. ---- Why the inspired books are twenty-two in number. From the same volume on the 1st Psalm.

 CHAP. IV. ----Of the solecisms and poor style of Scripture. From Volume IV. of the Commentaries on the Gospel according to John, three or four pages f

 CHAP. V. ---- What is much speaking, and what are the many books? The whole inspired Scripture is one book. From the Introduction to Volume V. of

 CHAP. VI. ----The whole Divine Scripture is one instrument of God, perfect and fitted for its work. From Volume II. of the Commentaries on the Gospel

 CHAP. VII. ----Of the special character of the persons of Divine Scripture. From the small volume on the Song of Songs, which Origen wrote in his yout

 CHAP. VIII. ----That we need not attempt to correct the solecistic phrases of Scripture, and those which are unintelligible according to the letter, s

 CHAP. IX. ---- Why it is that the Divine Scripture often uses the same term in different significations, even in the same place. From the Epistle to t

 CHAP. X. ----Of things in the Divine Scripture which seem to come near to being a stumbling-block and rock of offence. From the 39th Homily on Jeremia

 CHAP. XI. ----That we must seek the nourishment supplied by all inspired Scripture, and not turn from the passages troubled by heretics with ill-advis

 CHAP. XII. ----That a man ought not to faint in reading the Divine Scripture if he cannot comprehend the dark riddles and parables therein. From the 2

 CHAP. XIII. ---- When and to whom the lessons of philosophy may be profitable, in the explanation of the sacred Scriptures, with Scripture proof. The

 CHAP. XIV. ----They who wish to rightly understand the Divine Scriptures must of necessity be acquainted with the logical principles adapted to their

 CHAP. XV. ----A reply to the Greek philosophers who disparage the poverty of style of the Divine Scriptures, and allege that the noble truths of Chris

 CHAP. XVI. ----Concerning those who slander Christianity on account of the heresies in the Church. Book III. against Celsus.

 CHAP. XVII. ----A reply to certain philosophers who say that it makes no difference whether we call Him Who is God over All by the name Zeus, current

 CHAP. XVIII. ----A reply to those Greek philosophers who profess to know everything, and blame the simple faith of the man of Christians and complain

 CHAP. XIX. ----And again, earlier in the same book, Origen says, That our faith in our Lord has nothing in common with the irrational superstitious fa

 CHAP. XX. ----A reply to those who say that the whole world, including man, was made not for man, but for the irrational creatures for the irrational

 CHAP. XXI. ----Of Free Will, with an explanation and interpretation of those sayings of Scripture which seem to destroy it such as the following:----

 CHAP. XXII. ---- What is the dispersion on earth of rational, that is, human souls, indicated under a veil in the building of the tower, and the confu

 CHAP. XXIII. ----Of Fate, and how though God foreknows the conduct of every one, human responsibility remains the same. Further, how the stars are not

 CHAP. XXIV. ----Matter is not uncreated, or the cause of evil. From Book VII. of the Praeparatio Evangelica of Eusebius of Palestine.

 CHAP. XXV. ----That the separation which arises from foreknowledge does not do away with Free Will. From Book I. of the Commentary on the Epistle to

 CHAP. XXVI. ----Of the question of things goodand evil that they partly depend on our own efforts and partly do not and (that) according to the

 CHAP. XXVII. ----The meaning of the Lord's hardening Pharaoh's heart.

CHAP. VII. ----Of the special character of the persons of Divine Scripture. From the small volume on the Song of Songs, which Origen wrote in his youth.

1. Any one who does not understand the peculiar character 178 of the persons in Scripture, both as regards the speakers and the persons addressed, must be much perplexed by what he reads; he will ask who is speaking, who is spoken to, and when does the speaker cease to speak. For it often happens that the same person is addressed, though a third person speaks to him; or the person addressed is no longer the same, and a different person takes up what is said, while the same person speaks. And sometimes both the speaker and the person addressed are changed; or, further, though both are unchanged, it is not clear that they are. Need I seek an illustration of each of these statements, seeing that the prophetical writings abound in such changes? In fact we have here a special, though it may be unrecognised, cause of the obscurity of Scripture. It is also the way of Scripture to jump suddenly from one discourse to another.179 The prophets, above all, do this, obscuring their sense and more or less confusing the reader.

Again, from the 4th Homily 180 on the Acts, "It was needful that the Scripture should be fulfilled which the Holy Spirit spake before by the mouth of David concerning Judas."

2. In the Psalm wherein the things concerning Judas are written, one might say that it is not the Holy Spirit Who speaks, for the words are clearly the Saviour's, "Hold not thy peace, O God, at my praise: for the mouth of the wicked and the mouth of the deceitful man is opened upon me," 181 and so on, until we come to "And his office let another take." Now if it is the Saviour Who says this, what does Peter mean by telling us that "It was needful that the Scripture should be fulfilled which the Holy Ghost spake before by the mouth of David?" 182 Perhaps the lesson is something like this. The Holy Ghost employs personification in the prophets, and if He introduces the person of God, it is not God Who speaks, but the Holy Ghost speaks as God.183 And if He introduces Christ, it is not Christ Who speaks, but the Holy Ghost speaks as Christ. So, then, if He brings in the person of a prophet, or personifies this or that people, or anything whatsoever, it is the Holy Ghost Who devises all these personifications.

[1] Περὶ τοῦ ἰδιώματος τῶν προσώπων τῆς θείας γραφῆς. ἐκ τοῦ εἰς τὸ ᾆσμα μικροῦ τόμου, ὃν ἐν τῇ νεότητι ἔγραψεν. Τῷ μὴ ἐξειληφότι τὸ ἰδίωμα τῶν προσώπων τῆς γραφῆς, τῶν τε λεγόντων καὶ τῶν πρὸς ἃ ὁ λόγος, πολλὴν παρέχει σύγχυσιν τὰ λεγόμενα, ζητοῦντι τὸ λέγον πρόσωπον ὅ τί ποτέ ἐστι, καὶ τὸ πρὸς ὃ ὁ λόγος ὁποῖον, καὶ πότε τὸ λέγον ἐπαύσατο πρόσωπον: τοῦ πρὸς ὅ ἐστι πολλάκις τηρουμένου, καὶ ἑτέρου πρὸς αὐτὸ λέγοντος: ἢ τοῦ πρὸς ὃ ὁ λόγος οὐκέτι ἀκούοντος, ἑτέρου δὲ διαδεξαμένου τὰ λεγόμενα, μένοντος τοῦ λέγοντος: ἔστι δ' ὅτε μεταβάλλει ἀμφότερα, καὶ τὸ λέγον καὶ τὸ πρὸς ὃ ὁ λόγος: ἢ ἐπὶ πλεῖον μένοντα ἀμφότερα οὐ σαφῶς δηλοῦται μένοντα. τί δὲ δεῖ παράδειγμα ζητεῖν ἑνὸς ἑκάστου τούτων, πάνυ τῶν προφητικῶν πεπληρωμένων τῆς διαφορᾶς αὐτῶν; ἥτις καὶ αἰτία ἐστὶν οὐχ ἡ τυχοῦσα μὴ διακρινομένη τῆς ἀσαφείας τῶν λεγομένων. ἔστι δὲ καὶ αὕτη συνήθεια τῆς γραφῆς, τὸ ταχέως μεταπηδᾷν ἀπὸ τοῦ περί τινων λόγου εἰς τὸν περὶ ἑτέρων: καὶ τοῦτο ἀσαφῶς ποιεῖν καὶ ὑποσυγκεχυμένως μάλιστα τοὺς προφήτας.
[2] Καὶ πάλιν ὁμιλίας δʹ εἰς τὰς Πράξεις. Ἔδει πληρωθῆναι τὴν γραφὴν ἣν προεῖπε τὸ ἅγιον πνεῦμα διὰ στόματος Δαυεὶδ περὶ Ἰούδα. Ἐν ᾧ ψαλμῷ τὰ περὶ τοῦ Ἰούδα γέγραπται εἴποι τις ἂν ὅτι οὐ τὸ πνεῦμα τὸ ἅγιον λαλεῖ: σαφῶς γὰρ τοῦ σωτῆρός εἰσιν οἱ λόγοι, λέγοντος: Ὁ θεὸς τὴν αἴνεσίν μου μὴ παρασιωπήσῃς: ὅτι στόμα ἁμαρτωλοῦ καὶ στόμα δολίου ἐπ' ἐμὲ ἠνοίχθη: καὶ τὰ ἑξῆς, ἕως: Καὶ τὴν ἐπισκοπὴν αὐτοῦ λάβοι ἕτερος. πῶς οὖν, εἰ ὁ σωτήρ ἐστιν ὁ λέγων ταῦτα, φησὶν ὁ Πέτρος: Ἔδει πληρωθῆναι τὴν γραφὴν ἣν προεῖπε τὸ πνεῦμα τὸ ἅγιον διὰ στόματος Δαυείδ; μήποτε οὖν ὃ διδασκόμεθα ἐνταῦθα τοιοῦτόν ἐστι: προσωποποιεῖ τὸ πνεῦμα τὸ ἅγιον ἐν τοῖς προφήταις, καὶ ἐὰν προσωποποιήσῃ τὸν θεὸν, οὐκ ἔστιν ὁ θεὸς ὁ λαλῶν, ἀλλὰ τὸ ἅγιον πνεῦμα ἐκ προσώπου τοῦ θεοῦ λαλεῖ: καὶ ἐὰν προσωποποιήσῃ τὸν χριστὸν, οὐκ ἔστιν ὁ χριστὸς ὁ λαλῶν, ἀλλὰ τὸ ἅγιον πνεῦμα ἐκ προσώπου τοῦ χριστοῦ λαλεῖ. οὕτως οὖν κἂν προσωποποιήσῃ τὸν προφήτην ἢ τὸν λαὸν ἐκεῖνον ἢ τὸν λαὸν τοῦτον, ἢ ὅ τι δήποτε προσωποποιεῖ, τὸ ἅγιον πνεῦμά ἐστι τὸ πάντα προσωποποιοῦν.