On Monogamy.

 Chapter I.—Different Views in Regard to Marriage Held by Heretics, Psychic, and Spiritualists.

 Chapter II.—The Spiritualists Vindicated from the Charge of Novelty.

 Chapter III.—The Question of Novelty Further Considered in Connection with the Words of the Lord and His Apostles.

 Chapter IV.—Waiving Allusion to the Paraclete, Tertullian Comes to the Consideration of the Ancient Scriptures, and Their Testimony on the Subject in

 Chapter V.—Connection of These Primeval Testimonies with Christ.

 Chapter VI.—The Case of Abraham, and Its Bearing on the Present Question.

 Chapter VII.—From Patriarchal, Tertullian Comes to Legal, Precedents.

 Chapter VIII.—From the Law Tertullian Comes to the Gospel.  He Begins with Examples Before Proceeding to Dogmas.

 Chapter IX.—From Examples Tertullian Passes to Direct Dogmatic Teachings.  He Begins with the Lord’s Teaching.

 Chapter X.—St. Paul’s Teaching on the Subject.

 Chapter XI.—Further Remarks Upon St. Paul’s Teaching.

 Chapter XII.—The Explanation of the Passage Offered by the Psychics Considered.

 Chapter XIII.—Further Objections from St. Paul Answered.

 Chapter XIV.—Even If the Permission Had Been Given by St. Paul in the Sense Which the Psychics Allege, It Was Merely Like the Mosaic Permission of Div

 Chapter XV.—Unfairness of Charging the Disciples of the New Prophecy with Harshness.  The Charge Rather to Be Retorted Upon the Psychics.

 Chapter XVI.—Weakness of the Pleas Urged in Defence of Second Marriage.

 They will have plainly a specious privilege to plead before Christ—the everlasting “infirmity of the flesh!”  But upon this (infirmity) will sit in ju

Chapter VI.—The Case of Abraham, and Its Bearing on the Present Question.

But let us proceed with our inquiry into some eminent chief fathers of our origin:  for there are some to whom our monogamist parents Adam and Noah are not pleasing, nor perhaps Christ either.  To Abraham, in fine, they appeal; prohibited though they are to acknowledge any other father than God.29    See Matt. xxiii. 9.  Grant, now, that Abraham is our father; grant, too, that Paul is.  “In the Gospel,” says he, “I have begotten you.”30    1 Cor. iv. 15, where it is διὰ τοῦ εὐαγγελίου.  Show yourself a son even of Abraham.  For your origin in him, you must know, is not referable to every period of his life:  there is a definite time at which he is your father.  For if “faith” is the source whence we are reckoned to Abraham as his “sons” (as the apostle teaches, saying to the Galatians, “You know, consequently, that (they) who are of faith, these are sons of Abraham”31    Gal. iii. 7.), when did Abraham “believe God and it was accounted to him for righteousness?”  I suppose when still in monogamy, since (he was) not yet in circumcision.  But if afterwards he changed to either (opposite)—to digamy through cohabitation with his handmaid, and to circumcision through the seal of the testament—you cannot acknowledge him as your father except at that time when he “believed God,” if it is true that it is according to faith that you are his son, not according to flesh.  Else, if it be the later Abraham whom you follow as your father—that is, the digamist (Abraham)—receive him withal in his circumcision.  If you reject his circumcision, it follows that you will refuse his digamy too.  Two characters of his mutually diverse in two several ways, you will not be able to blend.  His digamy began with circumcision, his monogamy with uncircumcision.32    This is an error.  Comp. Gen. xvi. with Gen. xvii.  You receive digamy; admit circumcision too.  You retain uncircumcision; you are bound to monogamy too.  Moreover, so true is it that it is of the monogamist Abraham that you are the son, just as of the uncircumcised, that if you be circumcised you immediately cease to be his son, inasmuch as you will not be “of faith,” but of the seal of a faith which had been justified in uncircumcision.  You have the apostle:  learn (of him), together with the Galatians.33    See Gal. iii. iv. and comp. Rom. iv.  In like manner, too, if you have involved yourself in digamy, you are not the son of that Abraham whose “faith” preceded in monogamy.  For albeit it is subsequently that he is called “a father of many nations,”34    See Gen. xvii. 5. still it is of those (nations) who, as the fruit of the “faith” which precedes digamy, had to be accounted “sons of Abraham.”35    See Rom. iv. 11, 12, Gal. iii. 7; and comp. Matt. iii. 9; John viii. 39.

Thenceforward let matters see to themselves.  Figures are one thing; laws another.  Images are one thing; statutes another.  Images pass away when fulfilled:  statutes remain permanently to be fulfilled.  Images prophesy:  statutes govern.  What that digamy of Abraham portends, the same apostle fully teaches,36    See Gal. iv. 21–31. the interpreter of each testament, just as he likewise lays it down that our “seed” is called in Isaac.37    See vers. 28, 31.  If you are “of the free woman,” and belong to Isaac, he, at all events, maintained unity of marriage to the last.

These accordingly, I suppose, are they in whom my origin is counted.  All others I ignore.  And if I glance around at their examples—(examples) of some David heaping up marriages for himself even through sanguinary means, of some Solomon rich in wives as well as in other riches—you are bidden to “follow the better things;”38    See Ps. xxxvii. 27 (in LXX. xxxvi. 27); 1 Pet. iii. 11; 3 John 11. and you have withal Joseph but once wedded, and on this score I venture to say better than his father; you have Moses, the intimate eye-witness of God;39    Dei de proximo arbitrum.  See Num. xii. 6–8; Deut. xxxiv. 10. you have Aaron the chief priest.  The second Moses, also, of the second People, who led our representatives into the (possession of) the promise of God, in whom the Name (of Jesus) was first inaugurated, was no digamist.

[Caput VI.]

Sed adhuc nobis quaeramus aliquos originis principes. Non placent enim quibusdam monogami parentes, Adam et Noe, fortasse nec Christus. Ab Abraham denique provocant, prohibiti patrem alium praeter Deum agnoscere. Sit nunc pater noster Abraham, sit et Paulus. In Evangelio, inquit, ego vos generavi (I Cor., IV, 16). Etiam Abrahae te filium exhibe. Non enim passivus tibi census est in illo. Certum tempus est, quo tuus pater est. Si enim ex fide filii deputamur Abrahae, ut Apostolus docet, dicens ad Galatas: Cognoscitis nempe, quia qui ex fide, isti sunt filii Abrahae (Gal. III, 7.); quando credidit Abraham Deo, et deputatum est ei in justitiam? Opinor, adhuc 0936C in monogamia, quia in circumcisione nondum. Quod si postea in utrumque mutatus est, et in digamiam per ancillae concubinatum, et in circumcisionem per testamenti signaculum, non potes illum patrem agnoscere, nisi tunc, cum Deo credidit; siquidem secundum fidem filius ejus es, non secundum carnem. Aut si posteriorem Abraham patrem sequeris, id est digamum, recipe et circumcisum. Si rejicis circumcisum, ergo recusabis et digamum. Duas dispositiones ejus, binis inter se modis diversas, miscere non poteris. Digamus cum circumcisione esse orsus est, monogamus cum praeputiatione. Recipis digamiam? admitte et circumcisionem. Tueris praeputiationem? teneris et monogamiae. Adeo autem monogami Abrahae filius es, sicut et praeputiati; ut si circumcidaris, 0936D jam non sis filius, quia non eris ex fide, sed ex signaculo fidei in praeputiatione justificatae. Habes Apostolum, disce cum Galatis. Proinde etsi digamiam tibi intuleris, non es illius Abrahae filius, cujus fides in monogamia praecessit. Nam etsi postea pater multarum nationum nuncupatur, sed earum quae ex fide digamiam praecedente filii habebant deputari Abrahae. Exinde res viderint. Aliud sunt figurae, aliud formae. Aliud imagines, aliud definitiones. Imagines 0937A transeunt adimpletae, definitiones permanent adimplendae. Imagines prophetant, definitiones gubernant. Quid digamia illa Abrahae portendat, idem apostolus edocet, interpretator utriusque Testamenti, sicut idem semen nostrum in Isaac vocatum determinat. Si ex libera es, ad Isaac pertinens, hic certe unum matrimonium pertulit. Isti itaque sunt, ut opinor, in quibus censeor. Caeteros nescio. Quorum si exempla circumspicis, alicujus David etiam per sanguinem nuptias sibi ingerentis, alicujus Salomonis etiam uxoribus divitis; meliora sectari jussus, habes et Joseph unijugum, et hoc nomine, audeo dicere, patre meliorem; habes Moysen, Dei de proximo arbitrum; habes Aaronem, principalem sacerdotem. Secundus quoque Moyses populi secundi, qui imaginem nostram 0937B in promissionem Dei induxit, in quo primo nomen Domini dedicatum est, non fuit digamus.