On Monogamy.

 Chapter I.—Different Views in Regard to Marriage Held by Heretics, Psychic, and Spiritualists.

 Chapter II.—The Spiritualists Vindicated from the Charge of Novelty.

 Chapter III.—The Question of Novelty Further Considered in Connection with the Words of the Lord and His Apostles.

 Chapter IV.—Waiving Allusion to the Paraclete, Tertullian Comes to the Consideration of the Ancient Scriptures, and Their Testimony on the Subject in

 Chapter V.—Connection of These Primeval Testimonies with Christ.

 Chapter VI.—The Case of Abraham, and Its Bearing on the Present Question.

 Chapter VII.—From Patriarchal, Tertullian Comes to Legal, Precedents.

 Chapter VIII.—From the Law Tertullian Comes to the Gospel.  He Begins with Examples Before Proceeding to Dogmas.

 Chapter IX.—From Examples Tertullian Passes to Direct Dogmatic Teachings.  He Begins with the Lord’s Teaching.

 Chapter X.—St. Paul’s Teaching on the Subject.

 Chapter XI.—Further Remarks Upon St. Paul’s Teaching.

 Chapter XII.—The Explanation of the Passage Offered by the Psychics Considered.

 Chapter XIII.—Further Objections from St. Paul Answered.

 Chapter XIV.—Even If the Permission Had Been Given by St. Paul in the Sense Which the Psychics Allege, It Was Merely Like the Mosaic Permission of Div

 Chapter XV.—Unfairness of Charging the Disciples of the New Prophecy with Harshness.  The Charge Rather to Be Retorted Upon the Psychics.

 Chapter XVI.—Weakness of the Pleas Urged in Defence of Second Marriage.

 They will have plainly a specious privilege to plead before Christ—the everlasting “infirmity of the flesh!”  But upon this (infirmity) will sit in ju

Chapter I.—Different Views in Regard to Marriage Held by Heretics, Psychic, and Spiritualists.

Heretics do away with marriages; Psychics accumulate them.  The former marry not even once; the latter not only once.  What dost thou, Law of the Creator?  Between alien eunuchs and thine own grooms, thou complainest as much of the over-obedience of thine own household as of the contempt of strangers.  They who abuse thee, do thee equal hurt with them who use thee not.  In fact, neither is such continence laudable because it is heretical, nor such licence defensible because it is psychical.  The former is blasphemous, the latter wanton; the former destroys the God of marriages, the latter puts Him to the blush.  Among us, however, whom the recognition of spiritual gifts entitles to be deservedly called Spiritual, continence is as religious as licence is modest; since both the one and the other are in harmony with the Creator.  Continence honours the law of marriage, licence tempers it; the former is not forced, the latter is regulated; the former recognises the power of free choice, the latter recognises a limit.  We admit one marriage, just as we do one God.  The law of marriage reaps an accession of honour where it is associated with shamefastness.  But to the Psychics, since they receive not the Spirit, the things which are the Spirit’s are not pleasing.  Thus, so long as the things which are the Spirit’s please them not, the things which are of the flesh will please, as being the contraries of the Spirit.  “The flesh,” saith (the apostle), “lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh.”1    Gal. v. 17.  But what will the flesh “lust” after, except what is more of the flesh?  For which reason withal, in the beginning, it became estranged from the Spirit.  “My Spirit,” saith (God), “shall not permanently abide in these men eternally,2    In ævum; εἰς τὸν αἱῶνα (LXX.); in æternum (Vulg.). for that they are flesh.”3    Gen. vi. 3.

CAPUT PRIMUM.

0930B

0930C Haeretici nuptias auferunt , Psychici ingerunt . Illi nec semel, isti non semel nubunt. Quid agis, lex Creatoris? Inter alienos spadones et aurigas tuos tantumdem quereris de domestico obsequio, quantum de fastidio extraneo; proinde et 0931A te laedunt qui abutuntur, quemadmodum qui non utuntur. Verum neque continentia ejusmodi laudanda, quia haeretica est; neque licentia defendenda, quia psychica est. Illa blasphemat, ista luxuriat. Illa destruit nuptiarum Deum, ista confundit. Penes nos autem, quos spirituales merito dici facit agnitio spiritalium charismatum, continentia tam religiosa est, quam licentia verecunda, quandoquidem ambae cum Creatore sunt. Continentia legem nuptiarum honorat, licentia temperat. Illa non cogitur; ista regitur. Illa arbitrium habet, haec modum. Unum matrimonium novimus, sicut unum Deum. Magis honorem refert lex nuptiarum, ubi habet et pudorem. Sed Psychicis non recipientibus spiritum, ea quae sunt spiritus non placent. Ita, dum quae sunt spiritus non placent, ea quae sunt carnis placebunt, 0931B ut contraria spiritui . Caro, inquit, adversus spiritum concupiscit, et spiritus adversus carnem (Gal., V, 17). Quid autem concupiscet caro, quam quae magis carnis sunt? Propter quod et in primordio extranea spiritus facta est: Non, inquit (Gen., VI, 3), permanebit spiritus meus in istis hominibus in aevum, eo quod caro sint.