Libellus Adversus Omnes Haereses

 I.

 II.

 III.

 IV.

 V.

 VI.

 VII.

 VIII.

Chapter III.—Carpocrates, Cerinthus, Ebion.

Carpocrates, furthermore, introduced the following sect. He affirms that there is one Virtue, the chief among the upper (regions): that out of this were produced angels and Virtues, which, being far distant from the upper Virtues, created this world43    Mundum. in the lower regions: that Christ was not born of the Virgin Mary, but was generated—a mere human being—of the seed of Joseph, superior (they admit) above all others in the practice of righteousness and in integrity of life; that He suffered among the Jews; and that His soul alone was received in heaven as having been more firm and hardy than all others: whence he would infer, retaining only the salvation of souls, that there are no resurrections of the body.

After him brake out the heretic Cerinthus, teaching similarly. For he, too, says that the world44    Mundum. was originated by those angels;45    “Ab illis” is perhaps an error for “ab angelis,” by absorption of the first syllable. So Routh has conjectured before me. and sets forth Christ as born of the seed of Joseph, contending that He was merely human, without divinity; affirming also that the Law was given by angels;46    “Ab angelis:” an erroneous notion, which professed probably to derive support from John i. 17, Acts vii. 53, Gal. iii. 19, where, however, the Greek prepositions should be carefully noted, and ought in no case to be rendered by “ab.” representing the God of the Jews as not the Lord, but an angel.

His successor was Ebion,47    Al. Hebion. not agreeing with Cerinthus in every point; in that he affirms the world48    Al. Hebion. to have been made by God, not by angels; and because it is written, “No disciple above his master, nor servant above his lord,”49    See Matt. x. 24; Luke iv. 40; John xiii. 16. sets forth likewise the law as binding,50    i.e., as Rig.’s quotation from Jerome’s Indiculus (in Oehler) shows, “because in so far as, Christ observed it.” of course for the purpose of excluding the gospel and vindicating Judaism.

III.

Praeterea Carpocratem, Cerinthum, Hebionem.

Corpocrates praeterea hanc tulit sectam. Unam esse dicit Virtutem in superioribus principalem, ex hac prolatos angelos, atque virtutes: quos distantes longe a superioribus virtutibus , mundum istum in inferioribus partibus condidisse; Christum non ex virgine Maria natum, sed ex semine Joseph, hominem tantummodo genitum, sane prae caeteris justitiae 0067A cultu, vitae integritate meliorem: hunc apud Judaeos passum: solam animam ipsius coelo receptam, eo quod et firmior et robustior caeteris fuerit: ex quo colligeret, tentata animarum sola salute, nullas corporis resurrectiones. Post hunc Cerinthus haereticus erupit, similia docens. Nam et ipse mundum institutum esse ab illis dicit: Christum ex semine Joseph natum proponit, hominem illum tantummodo sine divinitate contendens, ipsam quoque legem ab angelis datam perhibens: Judaeorum Deum non Dominum, sed angelum promens. Hujus successor Hebion fuit, Cerintho non in omni parte consentiens, quod a Deo dicat mundum, non ab angelis factum: et quia scriptum sit, Nemo discipulus 0067B super magistrum, nec servus super dominum. Legem etiam proponit, scilicet ad excludendum Evangelium, et vindicandum Judaismum.