Exposition of the Christian Faith.

 Book I.

 Chapter I.

 Chapter II.

 Chapter III.

 Chapter IV.

 Chapter V.

 Chapter VI.

 Chapter VII.

 Chapter VIII.

 Chapter IX.

 Chapter X.

 Chapter XI.

 Chapter XII.

 Chapter XIII.

 Chapter XIV.

 Chapter XV.

 Chapter XVI.

 Chapter XVII.

 Chapter XVIII.

 Chapter XIX.

 Chapter XX.

 Book II.

 Chapter I.

 Chapter II.

 Chapter III.

 Chapter IV.

 Chapter V.

 Chapter VI.

 Chapter VII.

 Chapter VIII.

 Chapter IX.

 Chapter X.

 Chapter XI.

 Chapter XII.

 Chapter XIII.

 Chapter XIV.

 Chapter XV.

 Chapter XVI.

 Book III.

 Chapter I.

 Chapter II.

 Chapter III.

 Chapter IV.

 Chapter V.

 Chapter VI.

 Chapter VII.

 Chapter VIII.

 Chapter IX.

 Chapter X.

 Chapter XI.

 Chapter XII.

 Chapter XIII.

 Chapter XIV.

 Chapter XV.

 Chapter XVI.

 Chapter XVII.

 Book IV.

 Chapter I.

 Chapter II.

 Chapter III.

 Chapter IV.

 Chapter V.

 Chapter VI.

 Chapter VII.

 Chapter VIII.

 Chapter IX.

 Chapter X.

 Chapter XI.

 Chapter XII.

 Book V.

 Chapter I.

 Chapter II.

 Chapter III.

 Chapter IV.

 Chapter V.

 Chapter VI.

 Chapter VII.

 Chapter VIII.

 Chapter IX.

 Chapter X.

 Chapter XI.

 Chapter XII.

 Chapter XIII.

 Chapter XIV.

 Chapter XV.

 Chapter XVI.

 Chapter XVII.

 Chapter XVIII.

 Chapter XIX.

Chapter XVIII.

Wishing to give a reason for the Lord’s answer to the apostles, he assigns the one received to Christ’s tenderness. Then when another reason is supplied by others he confesses that it is true; for the Lord spoke it by reason of His human feelings. Hence he gathers that the knowledge of the Father and the Son is equal, and that the Son is not inferior to the Father. After having set beside the text, in which He is said to be inferior, another whereby He is declared to be equal, he censures the rashness of the Arians in judging about the Son, and shows that whilst they wickedly make Him to be inferior, He is rightly called a Stone by Himself.

219. We have been taught therefore that the Son of God is not ignorant of the future. If they confess this, I too—that I may now answer why He declared that neither angels, nor the Son, but only the Father knows—call to mind His wonted love for His disciples also in this passage, and His grace, which by its very frequency ought to have been known to all. For the Lord, filled with deep love for His disciples, when they asked from Him what He thought unprofitable for them to know, prefers to seem ignorant of what He knows, rather than to refuse an answer. He loves rather to provide what is useful for us, than to show His own power.

220. There are, however, some not so faint-hearted as I. For I would rather fear the deep things of God, than be wise. There are some, however, relying on the words: “And Jesus increased in age and in wisdom and in favour with God and man,”1142    S. Luke ii. 52. who boldly say, that according to His Godhead indeed He could not be ignorant of the future, but that in His assumption of our human state He said that He as Son of Man was in ignorance before His crucifixion. For when He speaks of the Son, He does not speak as it were of another; for He Himself is our Lord the Son of God and the Son of a Virgin. But by a word which embraces both, He guides our mind, so that He as Son of Man according to His adoption of our ignorance and growth of knowledge, might be believed as yet not fully to have known all things. For it is not for us to know the future. Thus He seems to be ignorant in that state in which He makes progress. For how does He progress according to His Godhead, in Whom the fulness of the Godhead dwells?1143    Col. ii. 9. Or what is there which the Son of God does not know, Who said: “Why think ye evil in your hearts?”1144    S. Matt. ix. 4. How does He not know, of Whom Scripture says: “But Jesus knew their thoughts”?1145    S. Luke vi. 8.

221. This is what others say, but I—to return to my former point, where I stated it was written of the Father: “It may be they will reverence My Son,”—I think indeed this was written in order that the Father, as He was speaking of men, might also seem to have spoken with human feelings. But still more am I inclined to think that the Son Who went about with men, and lived the life of man, and took upon Him our flesh, assumed also our feelings; so that after our ignorance He might say He knew not, though there was not anything He did not know. For though He seemed to be a man in the reality of His body, yet was He Life, and Light, and virtue came out of Him,1146    S. Luke vi. 19. to heal the wounds of the injured by the power of His Majesty.

222. Ye see then that this matter has been solved for you, since the saying of the Son is referred to the assumption of our state in its fulness, and it was thus written concerning the Father, in order that you might cease to cavil at the Son.

223. There was nothing then of which the Son of God was ignorant, for there was nothing of which the Father was ignorant. But if the Son was ignorant of nothing, as we now conclude, let them say in what respect they wish Him to seem to be inferior. If God has begotten a Son inferior to Himself, He has granted Him less. If He has granted Him less, He either wished to give less, or could only give less. But the Father is neither weak nor envious, seeing that there was neither will nor power before the Son. For wherein is He inferior, Who has all things even as the Father has them? He has received all things from the Father by right of His Generation,1147    S. John xvi. 15. and has shown forth the Father wholly by the glory of His Majesty.

224. It is written, they say: “For the Father is greater than I.”1148    S. John xiv. 28. It is also written: “He thought it not robbery to be equal with God.”1149    Phil. ii. 6. It is written again that the Jews wished to kill Him, because He said He was the Son of God, making Himself equal with God.1150    S. John v. 18. It is written: “I and My Father are one.”1151    S. John x. 30. They read “one,” they do not read “many.” Can He then be both inferior and equal in the same Nature? Nay, the one refers to His Godhead, the other to His flesh.

225. They say He is inferior: I ask who has measured it, who is of so overweening a heart, as to place the Father and the Son before his judgment seat to decide upon which is the greater? “My heart is not haughty nor are mine eyes raised unto vanity,”1152    Ps. cxxxi. 1. says David. King David feared to raise his heart in pride in human affairs, but we raise ours even in opposition to the divine secrets. Who shall decide about the Son of God? Thrones, dominions, angels, powers? But archangels give attendance and serve Him, cherubim and seraphim minister to Him and praise Him. Who then decides about the Son of God, on reading that the Father Himself knows the Son, but will not judge Him. “For no man knoweth the Son, but the Father.”1153    S. Matt. xi. 27. “Knoweth” it says, not “judgeth.” It is one thing to know, another to judge. The Father has knowledge in Himself. The Son has no power superior to Himself. And again: “No man knoweth the Father, but the Son;” and He Himself knows the Father, as the Father knows Him.

226. But thou sayest that He said He was inferior, He said also He was a Stone. Thou sayest more and yet dost impiously attack Him. I say less and with reverence add to His honour. Thou sayest He is inferior and confessest Him to be above the angels. I say He is less than the angels, yet do not take from His honour; for I do not refute His Godhead, but I do proclaim His pity

CAPUT XVIII.

Dominici ad apostolos responsi causam allaturus, primo illud indulgentiae Christi acceptum refert, mox alia quorumdam ratione proposita, germanam hanc esse profitetur, quod idem Dominus ex humano affectu locutus fuerit. Inde colligit scientiam Patris ac Filii aequalem esse; atque adeo non minorem Patre Filium. Postea ubi textui quo dicitur minor, alium quo aequalis traditur, opposuit; Arianorum de Filio judicantium temeritatem castigat, et cum illum impie minorem astruerent, ipsum pie lapidem abs se dici ostendit.

0694A

220. Edoctum est igitur non ignorasse Dei Filium quae futura sunt. Quod si fatentur, et ego, ut jam respondeam qua ratione neque angelos, neque Filium, sed Patrem scire memoravit (Marc. XIII, 32), solemnem ejus in discipulos charitatem etiam in hoc loco 0694B et gratiam recognosco, quod ex frequentia ipsa debet omnibus esse jam cognitum. Mavult enim Dominus nimio in discipulos amore propensus, petentibus his quae cognitu inutilia judicaret, videri ignorare quod noverat, quam negare; plusque amat nostram utilitatem instruere, quam suam potentiam demonstrare.

221. Sunt tamen plerique non ita timidiores, ut ego; malo enim alta timere, quam sapere: sunt tamen plerique eo freti, quod scriptum est: Et Jesus proficiebat aetate et sapientia et gratia apud Deum et homines (Luc. II, 52), qui dicant confidenter quod secundum divinitatem quidem ea quae futura sunt, ignorare non potuit, sed secundum nostrae conditionis assumptionem ignorare se quasi Filium hominis ante 0694C crucem dixit. Etenim cum Filium dicit, non quasi de alio dicit; nam ipse est et Dominus noster Dei Filius, et Filius Virginis: sed medio verbo nostrum informat affectum, ut quasi hominis filius secundum susceptionem nostrae imprudentiae, vel profectus, non 592 plene adhuc scisse omnia crederetur; non enim est nostrum scire quae futura sunt. Eadem igitur videtur ignorare conditione, qua proficit: nam quomodo secundum divinitatem proficit, in quo habitat plenitudo divinitatis (Coloss. II, 9)? Aut quid est quod nesciat Dei Filius qui dicebat: Quid cogitatis mala in cordibus vestris (Matth. IX, 4)? Quomodo nesciat, de quo dicit Scriptura: Jesus autem norat cogitationes eorum (Luc. VI, 8)?

222. Haec tamen alii dicant: ego autem ut ad superiora 0695A redeam, qui proposuerim scriptum quia Pater dixit: Fortasse reverebuntur Filium meum (Luc. XX, 13); quod utique ideo arbitror positum; ut quia de hominibus loquebatur Pater, humano locutus videatur affectu: multo magis arbitror quia Filius qui cum hominibus conversatus est, et hominem egit, et carnem suscepit, nostrum assumpsit affectum; ut nostra ignoratione nescire se diceret, non quia aliquid ipse nesciret. Nam etsi homo in veritate corporis videbatur; erat tamen vita, erat lux, et virtus exibat de eo, quae vulnera sauciorum majestatis suae auctoritate sanabat (Luc. VI, 19).

223. Advertitis ergo quaestionem vobis esse sublatam, cum et Filii dictum ad susceptionem integrae conditionis referatur humanae, et de Patre ideo 0695B scriptum sit, ut vel sic calumniari Filio desinatis.

224. Nihil ergo fuit quod ignoraverit Dei Filius; nihil enim fuit quod ignoraverit Pater. Quod si nihil et Filius ignoravit, ut jam concludamus, dicant in quo eum minorem velint videri. Si minorem generavit Deus Filium, minus contulit; si minus contulit, aut minus voluit, aut minus potuit: sed nec infirmus nec invidus Pater; quia nec voluntas ante Filium, nec potestas: in quo enim minor, qui omnia habet quae Pater habet (Joan. XVI, 15)? Nam et omnia a Patre jure generationis accepit, et totum Patrem gloria suae majestatis expressit.

225. Scriptum est, inquiunt: Quoniam Pater major me est (Joan. XIV, 28). Sed scriptum est: Non rapinam arbitratus est se esse aequalem Deo (Philip. II, 6). 0695C Scriptum est quod propterea volebant illum Judaei occidere, quia Filium se dicebat Dei, aequalem se faciens Deo (Joan. V, 18). Scriptum est: Ego et Pater unum sumus (Joan. X, 30). Unum legunt, multa non legunt. Numquid ergo et minor et aequalis per naturam eamdem potest esse? Sed aliud ad divinitatem refertur, aliud ad carnem.

226. Minorem dicunt: quaero quis mensus sit, quis tam exaltati cordis, qui velut ante tribunal suum Patrem Deum et Filium constituat; ut de praelatione dijudicet? Non est exaltatum cor meum, neque in vanum elati sunt oculi mei, David dicit (Psal. CXXX, 1). Rex David exaltare cor metuit in rebus humanis, nos exaltamus adversus divina secreta. Quis igitur judicat de Dei Filio? Throni, Dominationes, Angeli, 0695D Potestates? Sed famulantur 593 et serviunt Archangeli, sed ministrant Cherubim et Seraphim, sed laudant. Quis igitur judicat de Dei Filio, cum legerit quia ipse Pater noverit Filium, non judicet; Nemo enim novit Filium, nisi Pater (Matth. XI, 27). Novit, inquit, non judicat. Aliud est nosse, aliud judicare. Habet Pater in se scientiam, Filius supra se non habet potestatem. Et rursus: Nemo novit Patrem, nisi Filius; et ipse novit Patrem, sicut eum Pater novit.

227. Sed dicis quia minorem se dixit (Joan. XIV, 28): dixit et lapidem. Plus dicis, et impie calumniaris: 0696A minus dico, et pic astruo. Minorem dicis, et supra angelos confiteris: ego minorem angelis dico, et non derogo; quia non divinitatem arguo, sed misericordiam praedico.