On Modesty.

 I.

 Chapter II.—God Just as Well as Merciful Accordingly, Mercy Must Not Be Indiscriminate.

 Chapter III.—An Objection Anticipated Before the Discussion Above Promised is Commenced.

 Chapter IV.—Adultery and Fornication Synonymous.

 Chapter V.—Of the Prohibition of Adultery in the Decalogue.

 Chapter VI.—Examples of Such Offences Under the Old Dispensation No Pattern for the Disciples of the New.  But Even the Old Has Examples of Vengeance

 Chapter VII.—Of the Parables of the Lost Ewe and the Lost Drachma.

 Chapter VIII.—Of the Prodigal Son.

 Chapter IX.—Certain General Principles of Parabolic Interpretation.  These Applied to the Parables Now Under Consideration, Especially to that of the

 Chapter X.—Repentance More Competent to Heathens Than to Christians.

 Chapter XI.—From Parables Tertullian Comes to Consider Definite Acts of the Lord.

 Chapter XII.—Of the Verdict of the Apostles, Assembled in Council, Upon the Subject of Adultery.

 Chapter XIII.—Of St. Paul, and the Person Whom He Urges the Corinthians to Forgive.

 Chapter XIV.—The Same Subject Continued.

 Chapter XV.—The Same Subject Continued.

 Chapter XVI.—General Consistency of the Apostle.

 Chapter XVII.—Consistency of the Apostle in His Other Epistles.

 Chapter XVIII.—Answer to a Psychical Objection.

 Chapter XIX.—Objections from the Revelation and the First Epistle of St. John Refuted.

 Chapter XX.—From Apostolic Teaching Tertullian Turns to that of Companions of the Apostles, and of the Law.

 Chapter XXI.—Of the Difference Between Discipline and Power, and of the Power of the Keys.

 Chapter XXII.—Of Martyrs, and Their Intercession on Behalf of Scandalous Offenders.

Chapter VIII.—Of the Prodigal Son.

But, however, the majority of interpreters of the parables are deceived by the self-same result as is of very frequent occurrence in the case of embroidering garments with purple.  When you think that you have judiciously harmonized the proportions of the hues, and believe yourself to have succeeded in skilfully giving vividness to their mutual combination; presently, when each body (of colour) and (the various) lights are fully developed, the convicted diversity will expose all the error.  In the self-same darkness, accordingly, with regard to the parable of the two sons also, they are led by some figures (occurring in it), which harmonize in hue with the present (state of things), to wander out of the path of the true light of that comparison which the subject-matter of the parable presents.  For they set down, as represented in the two sons, two peoples—the elder the Jewish, the younger the Christian:  for they cannot in the sequel arrange for the Christian sinner, in the person of the younger son, to obtain pardon, unless in the person of the elder they first portray the Jewish.  Now, if I shall succeed in showing that the Jewish fails to suit the comparison of the elder son, the consequence of course will be, that the Christian will not be admissible (as represented) by the joint figure of the younger son.  For although the Jew withal be called “a son,” and an “elder one,” inasmuch as he had priority in adoption;88    See Ex. iv. 22; Rom. ix. 4.although, too, he envy the Christian the reconciliation of God the Father,—a point which the opposite side most eagerly catches at,—still it will be no speech of a Jew to the Father:  “Behold, in how many years do I serve Thee, and Thy precept have I never transgressed.”  For when has the Jew not been a transgressor of the law; hearing with the ear, and not hearing;89    Comp. Isa. vi. 9. holding in hatred him who reproveth in the gates,90    Comp. Isa. xxix. 21. and in scorn holy speech?91    Comp. Jer. xx. 7, 8.  So, too, it will be no speech of the Father to the Jew:  “Thou art always with Me, and all Mine are thine.”  For the Jews are pronounced “apostate sons, begotten indeed and raised on high, but who have not understood the Lord, and who have quite forsaken the Lord, and have provoked unto anger the Holy One of Israel.”92    Comp. Isa. i. 2–4.  That all things, plainly, were conceded to the Jew, we shall admit; but he has likewise had every more savoury morsel torn from his throat,93    See Ps. lxxviii. 30, 31 (in LXX. it is lxxvii. 30, 31). not to say the very land of paternal promise.  And accordingly the Jew at the present day, no less than the younger son, having squandered God’s substance, is a beggar in alien territory, serving even until now its princes, that is, the princes of this world.94    Or “age”—sæculi.  Comp. 1 Cor. ii. 6.  Seek, therefore, the Christians some other as their brother; for the Jew the parable does not admit.  Much more aptly would they have matched the Christian with the elder, and the Jew with the younger son, “according to the analogy of faith,”95    Comp. Rom. xii. 6. if the order of each people as intimated from Rebecca’s womb96    Comp. Rom. ix. 10–13; Gen. xxv. 21–24. permitted the inversion:  only that (in that case) the concluding paragraph would oppose them; for it will be fitting for the Christian to rejoice, and not to grieve, at the restoration of Israel, if it be true, (as it is), that the whole of our hope is intimately united with the remaining expectation of Israel.97    Comp. Rom. xi. 11–36.  Thus, even if some (features in the parable) are favourable, yet by others of a contrary significance the thorough carrying out of this comparison is destroyed; although (albeit all points be capable of corresponding with mirror-like accuracy) there be one cardinal danger in interpretations—the danger lest the felicity of our comparisons be tempered with a different aim from that which the subject-matter of each particular parable has bidden us (temper it).  For we remember (to have seen) actors withal, while accommodating allegorical gestures to their ditties, giving expression to such as are far different from the immediate plot, and scene, and character, and yet with the utmost congruity.  But away with extraordinary ingenuity, for it has nothing to do with our subject.  Thus heretics, too, apply the self-same parables where they list, and exclude them (in other cases)—not where they ought—with the utmost aptitude.  Why the utmost aptitude?  Because from the very beginning they have moulded together the very subject-matters of their doctrines in accordance with the opportune incidences of the parables.  Loosed as they are from the constraints of the rule of truth, they have had leisure, of course, to search into and put together those things of which the parables seem (to be symbolical).

CAPUT VIII.

0994C

Sed enim plerosque interpretes parabolarum idem exitus decipit, quem in vestibus purpura oculandis saepissime evenire est; cum putaveris recte conciliasse temperamenta colorum, et credideris comparationes eorum inter se animasse , erudito mox utroque corpore, et luminibus expressis, errorem omnem traducta diversitas evomet . Eadem itaque caligine circa filiorum quoque duorum parabolam (Luc. XV, 11 et seqq.), quibusdam ad praesens 0995A concolorantibus figuris, a vero lumine exorbitant ejus comparationis quam parabolae materia praetexit. Duos enim populos in duobus filiis collocant , Judaicum majorem, Christianum minorem. Nec enim possunt exinde Christianum peccatorem in filio minore disponere veniam consecuturum, nisi in majore judaicum expresserint. Porro, si Judaicum ostendero deficere a comparatione filii majoris, consequenter utique nec Christianus admittetur ad configurationem filii minoris. Licet enim filius audiat et Judaeus, et major, quia prior in adoptione (Rom., IX, 29); licet et Christiano reconciliationem Dei Patris invideat, quod vel maxime diversa pars carpit, sed non erit Judaei dictum ad Patrem: Ecce quot annis tibi servio, et praeceptum tuum nunquam praeterivi (Luc. 0995B XV, 29). Quando enim non transgressor legis Judaeus, aure audiens, et non audiens; odio habens traducentem in portis , et aspernamento sermonem sanctum? Sic nec patris ad Judaeum erit vox: Tu semper mecum es, et omnia mea tua sunt (Luc. XV, 31). Judaei enim apostatae filii pronuntiantur; generati quidem, et in altum elati, sed qui non computaverint Dominum, et qui dereliquerint Dominum, et in iram provocaverint Sanctum Israelis (Isa., I, 2, 4). Omnia plane Judaeo concessa dicemus, cui etiam conditio gratior quaeque de gula erepta est, nedum ipsa terra paternae promissionis. Atque adeo non minus hodie Judaeus, quam minor filius prodacta substantia Dei in aliena regione mendicat, serviens usque adhuc principibus ejus, id est saeculi hujus. Quaerant 0995C igitur alium Christiani suum fratrem; Judaeum enim 0996A parabola non recepit. Multo aptius Christianum majori, et Judaeum minori filio adaequassent, secundum fidei comparationem, si ordo utriusque populi ab utero Rebeccae designatus (Gen. XXV, 22 seqq.) permitteret demutationem, nisi quod et clausula refragaretur. Christianum enim de restitutione Judaei gaudere, et non dolere conveniet; siquidem tota spes nostra cum reliqua Israelis exspectatione conjuncta est (Rom. XI). Ita etsi quaedam faciant, sed aliis contra sapientibus interimitur exemplorum peraequatio. Quamquam et si omnia ad speculum respondere possint, unum sit praecipuum periculum interpretationum, ne aliorsum temperetur felicitas comparationum, quam quo parabolae cujusque materia mandavit. Meminimus enim et histriones cum allegoricos gestus adcommodant 0996B canticis, alia longe a praesenti et fabula et scena et persona , et tamen congruentissime exprimentes. Sed viderit ingenium extraordinarium . Nihil enim ad Andromacham. Sic et haeretici easdem parabolas quo volunt tribuunt , non quo debent aptissime excludunt . Quare aptissime? Quoniam a primordio secundum occasiones parabolarum, ipsas materias confinxerunt doctrinarum: vacavit scilicet illis solutis a regula veritatis ea conquirere atque componere, quorum parabolae videntur.