A Treatise on the soul and its origin,

 Chapter 1 [I.]—Renatus Had Done Him a Kindness by Sending Him the Books Which Had Been Addressed to Him.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—He Receives with a Kindly and Patient Feeling the Books of a Young and Inexperienced Man Who Wrote Against Him in a Tone of Arrogance.

 Chapter 3 [III]—The Eloquence of Vincentius, Its Dangers and Its Tolerableness.

 Chapter 4 [IV.]—The Errors Contained in the Books of Vincentius Victor. He Says that the Soul Comes from God, But Was Not Made Either Out of Nothing o

 Chapter 5 [V.]—Another of Victor’s Errors, that the Soul is Corporeal.

 Chapter 6 [VI.]—Another Error Out of His Second Book, to the Effect, that the Soul Deserved to Be Polluted by the Body.

 Chapter 7 [VII.]—Victor Entangles Himself in an Exceedingly Difficult Question. God’s Foreknowledge is No Cause of Sin.

 Chapter 8 [VIII.]—Victor’s Erroneous Opinion, that the Soul Deserved to Become Sinful.

 Chapter 9.—Victor Utterly Unable to Explain How the Sinless Soul Deserved to Be Made Sinful.

 Chapter 10 [IX.]—Another Error of Victor’s, that Infants Dying Unbaptized May Attain to the Kingdom of Heaven. Another, that the Sacrifice of the Body

 Chapter 11.—Martyrdom for Christ Supplies the Place of Baptism. The Faith of the Thief Who Was Crucified Along with Christ Taken as Martyrdom and Henc

 Chapter 12 [X.]—Dinocrates, Brother of the Martyr St. Perpetua, is Said to Have Been Delivered from the State of Condemnation by the Prayers of the Sa

 Chapter 13 [XI.]—The Sacrifice of the Body and Blood of Christ Will Not Avail for Unbaptized Persons, and Can Not Be Offered for the Majority of Those

 Chapter 14.—Victor’s Dilemma: He Must Either Say All Infants are Saved, or Else God Slays the Innocent.

 Chapter 15 [XII.]—God Does Not Judge Any One for What He Might Have Done If His Life Had Been Prolonged, But Simply for the Deeds He Actually Commits.

 Chapter 16 [XIII.]—Difficulty in the Opinion Which Maintains that Souls are Not by Propagation.

 Chapter 17 [XIV.]—He Shows that the Passages of Scripture Adduced by Victor Do Not Prove that Souls are Made by God in Such a Way as Not to Be Derived

 Chapter 18.—By “Breath” Is Signified Sometimes the Holy Spirit.

 Chapter 19.—The Meaning of “Breath” In Scripture.

 Chapter 20.—Other Ways of Taking the Passage.

 Chapter 21.—The Second Passage Quoted by Victor.

 Chapter 22.—Victor’s Third Quotation.

 Chapter 23.—His Fourth Quotation.

 Chapter 24 [XV.]—Whether or No the Soul is Derived by Natural Descent (Ex Traduce), His Cited Passages Fail to Show.

 Chapter 25.—Just as the Mother Knows Not Whence Comes Her Child Within Her, So We Know Not Whence Comes the Soul.

 Chapter 26 [XVI.]—The Fifth Passage of Scripture Quoted by Victor.

 Chapter 27 [XVII.]—Augustin Did Not Venture to Define Anything About the Propagation of the Soul.

 Chapter 28.—A Natural Figure of Speech Must Not Be Literally Pressed.

 Chapter 29 [XVIII.]—The Sixth Passage of Scripture Quoted by Victor.

 Chapter 30—The Danger of Arguing from Silence.

 Chapter 31.—The Argument of the Apollinarians to Prove that Christ Was Without the Human Soul of This Same Sort.

 Chapter 32 [XIX.]—The Self-Contradiction of Victor as to the Origin of the Soul.

 Chapter 33.—Augustin Has No Objection to the Opinion About the Propagation of Souls Being Refuted, and that About Their Insufflation Being Maintained.

 Chapter 34.—The Mistakes Which Must Be Avoided by Those Who Say that Men’s Souls are Not Derived from Their Parents, But are Afresh Inbreathed by God

 Chapter 35 [XX.]—Conclusion.

 Book II.

 Chapter 1 [I.]—Depraved Eloquence an Injurious Accomplishment.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—He Asks What the Great Knowledge is that Victor Imparts.

 Chapter 3.—The Difference Between the Senses of the Body and Soul.

 Chapter 4.—To Believe the Soul is a Part of God is Blasphemy.

 Chapter 5 [III.]—In What Sense Created Beings are Out of God.

 Chapter 6.—Shall God’s Nature Be Mutable, Sinful, Impious, Even Eternally Damned.

 Chapter 7.—To Think the Soul Corporeal an Error.

 [IV.] Nor shall I find fault if your humble thanks to your instructor were further earned by your having acquired from discussions with him some other

 Chapter 8.—The Thirst of the Rich Man in Hell Does Not Prove the Soul to Be Corporeal.

 Chapter 9 [V.]—How Could the Incorporeal God Breathe Out of Himself a Corporeal Substance?

 Chapter 10 [VI.]—Children May Be Found of Like or of Unlike Dispositions with Their Parents.

 Chapter 11 [VII.]—Victor Implies that the Soul Had a “State” And “Merit” Before Incarnation.

 Chapter 12 [VIII.]—How Did the Soul Deserve to Be Incarnated?

 Chapter 13 [IX.]—Victor Teaches that God Thwarts His Own Predestination.

 Chapter 14 [X.]—Victor Sends Those Infants Who Die Unbaptized to Paradise and the Heavenly Mansions, But Not to the Kingdom of Heaven.

 Chapter 15 [XI.]—Victor “Decides” That Oblations Should Be Offered Up for Those Who Die Unbaptized.

 Chapter 16 [XII.]—Victor Promises to the Unbaptized Paradise After Their Death, and the Kingdom of Heaven After Their Resurrection, Although He Admits

 Chapter 17.—Disobedient Compassion and Compassionate Disobedience Reprobated. Martyrdom in Lieu of Baptism.

 Chapter 18 [XIII.]—Victor’s Dilemma and Fall.

 Chapter 19 [XIV.]—Victor Relies on Ambiguous Scriptures.

 Chapter 20.—Victor Quotes Scriptures for Their Silence, and Neglects the Biblical Usage.

 Chapter 21 [XV.]—Victor’s Perplexity and Failure.

 Chapter 22 [XVI.]—Peter’s Responsibility in the Case of Victor.

 Chapter 23 [XVII.]—Who They are that are Not Injured by Reading Injurious Books.

 Book III.

 Chapter 1 [I.]—Augustin’s Purpose in Writing.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—Why Victor Assumed the Name of Vincentius. The Names of Evil Men Ought Never to Be Assumed by Other Persons.

 Chapter 3 [III.]—He Enumerates the Errors Which He Desires to Have Amended in the Books of Vincentius Victor. The First Error.

 Chapter 4 [IV.]—Victor’s Simile to Show that God Can Create by Breathing Without Impartation of His Substance.

 Chapter 5.—Examination of Victor’s Simile: Does Man Give Out Nothing by Breathing?

 Chapter 6.—The Simile Reformed in Accordance with Truth.

 Chapter 7 [V.]—Victor Apparently Gives the Creative Breath to Man Also.

 Chapter 8 [VI.]—Victor’s Second Error. (See Above in Book I. 26 [XVI.].)

 Chapter 9 [VII.]—His Third Error. (See Above in Book II. 11 [VII.].)

 Chapter 10.—His Fourth Error. (See Above in Book I. 6 [VI.] and Book II. 11 [VII.].)

 Chapter 11 [VIII.]—His Fifth Error. (See Above in Book I. 8 [VIII.] and Book II. 12 [VIII.].)

 Chapter 12 [IX.]—His Sixth Error. (See Above in Book I. 10-12 [IX., X.], and in Book II. 13, 14 [IX., X.].)

 Chapter 13 [X]—His Seventh Error. (See Above in Book II. 13 [IX.].)

 Chapter 14.—His Eighth Error. (See Above in Book II. 13 [IX.].)

 Chapter 15 [XI.]—His Ninth Error. (See Above in Book II. 14 [X.].)

 Chapter 16.—God Rules Everywhere: and Yet the “Kingdom of Heaven” May Not Be Everywhere.

 Chapter 17.—Where the Kingdom of God May Be Understood to Be.

 Chapter 18 [XII.]—His Tenth Error. (See Above in Book I. 13 [XI.] and Book II. 15 [XI.]).

 Chapter 19 [XIII.]—His Eleventh Error. (See Above in Book I. 15 [XII.] and Book II. 16.)

 Chapter 20 [XIV.]—Augustin Calls on Victor to Correct His Errors. (See Above in Book II. 22 [XVI.].)

 Chapter 21.—Augustin Compliments Victor’s Talents and Diligence.

 Chapter 22 [XV.]—A Summary Recapitulation of the Errors of Victor.

 Chapter 23.—Obstinacy Makes the Heretic.

 Book IV.

 Chapter 1 [I.]—The Personal Character of This Book.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—The Points Which Victor Thought Blameworthy in Augustin.

 Chapter 3.—How Much Do We Know of the Nature of the Body?

 Chapter 4 [III.]—Is the Question of Breath One that Concerns the Soul, or Body, or What?

 Chapter 5 [IV.]—God Alone Can Teach Whence Souls Come.

 Chapter 6 [V.]—Questions About the Nature of the Body are Sufficiently Mysterious, and Yet Not Higher Than Those of the Soul.

 Chapter 7 [VI.]—We Often Need More Teaching as to What is Most Intimately Ours Than as to What is Further from Us.

 Chapter 8.—We Have No Memory of Our Creation.

 Chapter 9 [VII.]—Our Ignorance of Ourselves Illustrated by the Remarkable Memory of One Simplicius.

 Chapter 10.—The Fidelity of Memory The Unsearchable Treasure of Memory The Powers of a Man’s Understanding Sufficiently Understood by None.

 Chapter 11.—The Apostle Peter Told No Lie, When He Said He Was Ready to Lay Down His Life for the Lord, But Only Was Ignorant of His Will.

 Chapter 12 [VIII.]—The Apostle Paul Could Know the Third Heaven and Paradise, But Not Whether He Was in the Body or Not.

 Chapter 13 [IX.]—In What Sense the Holy Ghost is Said to Make Intercession for Us.

 Chapter 14 [X.]—It is More Excellent to Know That the Flesh Will Rise Again and Live for Evermore, Than to Learn Whatever Scientific Men Have Been Abl

 Chapter 15 [XI.]—We Must Not Be Wise Above What is Written.

 Chapter 16.—Ignorance is Better Than Error. Predestination to Eternal Life, and Predestination to Eternal Death.

 Chapter 17 [XII.]—A Twofold Question to Be Treated Concerning the Soul Is It “Body”? and is It “Spirit”? What Body is.

 Chapter 18.—The First Question, Whether the Soul is Corporeal Breath and Wind, Nothing Else Than Air in Motion.

 Chapter 19 [XIII.]—Whether the Soul is a Spirit.

 Chapter 20 [XIV.]—The Body Does Not Receive God’s Image.

 Chapter 21 [XV.]—Recognition and Form Belong to Souls as Well as Bodies.

 Chapter 22.—Names Do Not Imply Corporeity.

 Chapter 23 [XVI.]—Figurative Speech Must Not Be Taken Literally.

 Chapter 24.—Abraham’s Bosom—What It Means.

 Chapter 25 [XVII.]—The Disembodied Soul May Think of Itself Under a Bodily Form.

 Chapter 26 [XVIII.]—St. Perpetua Seemed to Herself, in Some Dreams, to Have Been Turned into a Man, and Then Have Wrestled with a Certain Egyptian.

 Chapter 27.—Is the Soul Wounded When the Body is Wounded?

 Chapter 28.—Is the Soul Deformed by the Body’s Imperfections?

 Chapter 29 [XIX.]—Does the Soul Take the Body’s Clothes Also Away with It?

 Chapter 30.—Is Corporeity Necessary for Recognition?

 Chapter 31 [XX.]—Modes of Knowledge in the Soul Distinguished.

 Chapter 32.—Inconsistency of Giving the Soul All the Parts of Sex and Yet No Sex.

 Chapter 33.—The Phenix After Death Coming to Life Again.

 Chapter 34 [XXI.]—Prophetic Visions.

 Chapter 35.—Do Angels Appear to Men in Real Bodies?

 Chapter 36 [XXII.]—He Passes on to the Second Question About the Soul, Whether It is Called Spirit.

 Chapter 37 [XXIII.]—Wide and Narrow Sense of the Word “Spirit.”

 Chapter 38 [XXIV.]—Victor’s Chief Errors Again Pointed Out.

 Chapter 39.—Concluding Admonition.

Chapter 19.—The Meaning of “Breath” In Scripture.

The term, however, that is used in the Greek version, πνοή, is variously rendered in Latin: sometimes by flatus, breath; sometimes by spiritus, spirit; sometimes by inspiratio, inspiration. This term occurs in the Greek editions of the passage which we are now reviewing, “Who giveth breath to the people upon it,” the word for breath being πνοή. 19    The passage stands in the LXX.: Καὶ διδοὺς πνοὴν τῷ λαῷ τῷ ἐπ’ αὐτῆς. The same word is used in the narrative where man was endued with life: “And God breathed upon his face the breath of life.”20    The LXX. text of Gen. ii. 7 is, Καὶ ἐνεφύσησεν εἰς τὸ πρόσω πον αὐτοῦ πνοὴν ζωῆς. Again, in the psalm the same term occurs: “Let every thing that hath spirit praise the Lord.”21    Ps. cl. 6: Πᾶσα πνοὴ αἰνεσάτω τὸν Κύριον. It is the same word also in the Book of Job: “The inspiration of the Almighty is that which teaches.”22    According to the LXX., Πνοὴ δὲ παντοκράτορός ἐστιν ἡ διδάσκουσα. The translator refused the word flatus, breath, for adspiratio, inspiration, although he had before him the very term πνοή, which occurs in the text of the prophet which we are considering. We can hardly doubt, I think, that in this passage of Job the Holy Ghost is signified. The question discussed was concerning wisdom, whence it comes to men: “It cometh not from number of years; but the Spirit is in mortals, and the inspiration of the Almighty is that which teaches.”23    Job xxxii. 7, 8. By this repetition of terms it may be quite understood that he did not speak of man’s own spirit in the clause, “The Spirit is in mortals.” He wanted to show whence men have wisdom,—that it is not from their own selves; so by using a duplicate expression he explains his idea; “The inspiration of the Almighty is that which teaches.” Similarly, in another passage of the same book, he says, “The understanding of my lips shall meditate purity. The divine Spirit is that which formed me, and the breath of the Almighty is that which teacheth me.”24    Job xxx. 3, 4, according to the LXX., of which the text is, Σύνεσις δὲ χειλεων μου καθαρα νοήσει. Πνεῦμα θεῖον τὸ ποιῆσάν με, πνοὴ δὲ παντοκράτορός ἐστιν ἡ διδάσκουσα. Here, likewise, what he calls adspiratio, or “inspiration,” is in Greek πνοή, the same word which is translated flatus, “breath,” in the passage quoted from the prophet. Therefore, although it is rash to deny that the passage, “Who giveth breath to the people upon it, and spirit to them that walk over it,” has reference to the soul or spirit of man,—although the Holy Ghost may with greater credibility be understood as referred to in the passage: yet I ask on what ground anybody can boldly determine that the prophet meant in these words to intimate that the soul or spirit whereby our nature possesses vitality [is not given to us by God through the process of propagation?]25    The words here given in brackets are suggested by the Benedictine editor. [The Latin as it stands may be translated simply: “that the prophet meant to signify in these words the soul or spirit whereby our nature lives?” and is not this better than the conjecture?—W.] Of course if the prophet had very plainly said, “Who giveth soul to the people upon earth,” it still would remain to be asked whether God Himself gives it from an origin in the preceding generation, just as He gives the body out of such prior material, and that not only to men or cattle, but also to the seed of corn, or to any other body whatever, just as it pleases Him; or whether He bestows it by inbreathing as a new gift to each individual, as the first man received it from Him?

19. Quod autem graecus dicit πνοήν, hoc Latini varie interpretati sunt; aliquando flatum, aliquando spiritum, aliquando inspirationem. Nam hoc verbum habent codices graeci in isto prophetico testimonio, de quo nunc agimus, ubi dictum est, Qui dat flatum populo super eam: hoc est, πνοήν. Ipsum verbum est et ubi homo animatus est: Et insufflavit Deus in faciem ejus flatum vitae (Gen. II, 7). Sed ipsum verbum est et in Psalmo ubi canitur: Omnis spiritus laudet Dominum (Psal. CL, 6). Ipsum est et in libro Job, ubi scriptum est: Aspiratio autem Omnipotentis est quae docet. Noluit dicere, Flatus; sed, aspiratio; cum in graeco sit πνοή: quod etiam in illis verbis Prophetae, de quibus nunc disputamus. Et certe hoc loco, nescio utrum debeat dubitari Spiritum sanctum esse significatum. Agebatur enim de sapientia, unde sit in hominibus: Quia non ex numero annorum, sed Spiritus, inquit, est in hominibus; aspiratio autem Omnipotentis est quae docet (Job XXXII, 7, 8, sec. LXX): ut intelligeretur ista repetitione, non se de spiritu hominis dixisse, quod ait, Spiritus est in hominibus. Volebat enim ostendere unde habeant sapientiam, quia non a se ipsis; et repetendo id exposuit dicens, Aspiratio Omnipotentis est quae docet. Item alio loco in eodem libro, Intellectus, inquit, labiorum meorum pura intelligit: Spiritus divinus qui fecit me, aspiratio autem Omnipotentis, quae docet me (Id. XXXIII, 3, 4, sec. LXX). Et hic quod ait, aspiratio, vel inspiratio, in graeco est πνοήν, qui in illis prophetae verbis interpretatus est, flatus. Quamobrem cum temere negetur de anima hominis vel de spiritu hominis esse dictum, Qui dat flatum populo super eam, et spiritum calcantibus eam; quamvis ibi et Spiritus sanctus multo credibilius possit intelligi: qua tandem ratione audebit 0486 aliquis definire, animam vel spiritum, quo natura nostra vivit, loco illo voluisse significare Prophetam ? Cum profecto si apertissime diceret, Qui dat animam populo super terram, adhuc quaerendum esset, utrum eam Deus ex origine praecedentis generis ipse det, sicut ex origine praecedentis generis, ipse tamen dat corpus, non solum homini aut pecori, sed etiam semini tritici, aut alicujus caeterorum quomodo voluerit: an vero novam, sicut homo primus accepit, insufflet.