A Treatise on the Predestination of the Saints,

 Chapter 1 [I.]—Introduction.

 For on consideration of your letters, I seem to see that those brethren on whose behalf you exhibit a pious care that they may not hold the poetical o

 Chapter 3 [II.]—Even the Beginning of Faith is of God’s Gift.

 Chapter 4.—Continuation of the Preceding.

 Chapter 5.—To Believe is to Think with Assent.

 Chapter 6.—Presumption and Arrogance to Be Avoided.

 Chapter 7 [III.]—Augustin Confesses that He Had Formerly Been in Error Concerning the Grace of God.

 Chapter 8 [IV.]—What Augustin Wrote to Simplicianus, the Successor of Ambrose, Bishop of Milan.

 Chapter 9 [V.]—The Purpose of the Apostle in These Words.

 Chapter 10.—It is God’s Grace Which Specially Distinguishes One Man from Another.

 Chapter 11 [VI.]—That Some Men are Elected is of God’s Mercy.

 Chapter 12 [VII.]—Why the Apostle Said that We are Justified by Faith and Not by Works.

 Chapter 13 [VIII.]—The Effect of Divine Grace.

 Chapter 14.—Why the Father Does Not Teach All that They May Come to Christ.

 Chapter 15.—It is Believers that are Taught of God.

 Chapter 16.—Why the Gift of Faith is Not Given to All.

 Chapter 17 [IX.]—His Argument in His Letter Against Porphyry, as to Why the Gospel Came So Late into the World.

 Chapter 18.—The Preceding Argument Applied to the Present Time.

 Chapter 19 [X]—In What Respects Predestination and Grace Differ.

 Chapter 20.—Did God Promise the Good Works of the Nations and Not Their Faith, to Abraham?

 Chapter 21.—It is to Be Wondered at that Men Should Rather Trust to Their Own Weakness Than to God’s Strength.

 Chapter 22.—God’s Promise is Sure.

 Chapter 23 [XII.]—Remarkable Illustrations of Grace and Predestination in Infants, and in Christ.

 Chapter 24.—That No One is Judged According to What He Would Have Done If He Had Lived Longer.

 Chapter 25 [XIII.]—Possibly the Baptized Infants Would Have Repented If They Had Lived, and the Unbaptized Not.

 Chapter 26 [XIV]—Reference to Cyprian’s Treatise “On the Mortality.”

 Chapter 27.—The Book of Wisdom Obtains in the Church the Authority of Canonical Scripture.

 Chapter 28.—Cyprian’s Treatise “On the Mortality.”

 Chapter 29.—God’s Dealing Does Not Depend Upon Any Contingent Merits of Men.

 Chapter 30 [XV.]—The Most Illustrious Instance of Predestination is Christ Jesus.

 Chapter 31.—Christ Predestinated to Be the Son of God.

 Chapter 32 [XVI.]—The Twofold Calling.

 Chapter 33.—It is in the Power of Evil Men to Sin But to Do This or That by Means of that Wickedness is in God’s Power Alone.

 Chapter 34 [XVII.]—The Special Calling of the Elect is Not Because They Have Believed, But in Order that They May Believe.

 Chapter 35 [XVIII.]—Election is for the Purpose of Holiness.

 Chapter 36.—God Chose the Righteous Not Those Whom He Foresaw as Being of Themselves, But Those Whom He Predestinated for the Purpose of Making So.

 Chapter 37.—We Were Elected and Predestinated, Not Because We Were Going to Be Holy, But in Order that We Might Be So.

 Chapter 38 [XIX.]—What is the View of the Pelagians, and What of the Semi-Pelagians, Concerning Predestination.

 Chapter 39—The Beginning of Faith is God’s Gift.

 Chapter 40 [XX.]—Apostolic Testimony to the Beginning of Faith Being God’s Gift.

 Chapter 41.—Further Apostolic Testimonies.

 Chapter 42.—Old Testament Testimonies.

 Chapter 43 [XXI.]—Conclusion.

Chapter 26 [XIV]—Reference to Cyprian’s Treatise “On the Mortality.”

Cyprian wrote a work On the Mortality,92    Cyprian, Works in The Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. v. p. 469. known with approval to many and almost all who love ecclesiastical literature, wherein he says that death is not only not disadvantageous to believers, but that it is even found to be advantageous, because it withdraws men from the risks of sinning, and establishes them in a security of not sinning. But wherein is the advantage of this, if even future sins which have not been committed are punished? Yet he argues most copiously and well that the risks of sinning are not wanting in this life, and that they do not continue after this life is done; where also he adduces that testimony from the book of Wisdom: “He was taken away, lest wickedness should alter his understanding.”93    Wisd. iv. 11. And this was also adduced by me, though you said that those brethren of yours had rejected it on the ground of its not having been brought forward from a canonical book; as if, even setting aside the attestation of this book, the thing itself were not clear which I wished to be taught therefrom. For what Christian would dare to deny that the righteous man, if he should be prematurely laid hold of by death, will be in repose? Let who will, say this, and what man of sound faith will think that he can withstand it? Moreover, if he should say that the righteous man, if he should depart from his righteousness in which he has long lived, and should die in that impiety after having lived in it, I say not a year, but one day, will go hence into the punishment due to the wicked, his righteousness having no power in the future to avail him,—will any believer contradict this evident truth? Further, if we are asked whether, if he had died then at the time that he was righteous, he would have incurred punishment or repose, shall we hesitate to answer, repose? This is the whole reason why it is said,—whoever says it,—“He was taken away lest wickedness should alter his understanding.” For it was said in reference to the risks of this life, not with reference to the foreknowledge of God, who foreknew that which was to be, not that which was not to be—that is, that He would bestow on him an untimely death in order that he might be withdrawn from the uncertainty of temptations; not that he would sin, since he was not to remain in temptation. Because, concerning this life, we read in the book of Job, “Is not the life of man upon earth a temptation?”94    Job vii. 1. But why it should be granted to some to be taken away from the perils of this life while they are righteous, while others who are righteous until they fall from righteousness are kept in the same risks in a more lengthened life,—who has known the mind of the Lord? And yet it is permitted to be understood from this, that even those righteous people who maintain good and pious characters, even to the maturity of old age and to the last day of this life, must not glory in their own merits, but in the Lord, since He who took away the righteous man from the shortness of life, lest wickedness should alter his understanding, Himself guards the righteous man in any length of life, that wickedness may not alter his understanding. But why He should have kept the righteous man here to fall, when He might have withdrawn him before,—His judgments, although absolutely righteous, are yet unsearchable.

CAPUT XIV.

26. Scripsit librum de Mortalitate Cyprianus, multis ac pene omnibus qui ecclesiasticas litteras amant, laudabiliter notum: in quo propterea dicit non solum non esse fidelibus inutilem mortem, verum etiam utilem reperiri, quoniam peccandi periculis hominem subtrahit, et in non peccandi securitate constituit. Sed quid prodest, si etiam futura, quae commissa non sunt, peccata puniuntur? Agit tamen ille copiosissime atque optime, peccandi pericula nec deesse in ista vita, nec superesse post illam. Ubi et ilud testimonium ponit de libro Sapientiae, Raptus est, ne malitia mutaret intellectum ejus. Quod a me quoque positum, fratres istos ita respuisse dixistis, tanquam non de libro canonico adhibitum: quasi et excepta hujus libri attestatione res ipsa non clara, sit, quam voluimus hinc doceri. Quis enim audeat negare christianus, justum, si morte praeoccupatus fuerit, in refrigerio futurum (Sap. IV, 11, 7)? Quilibet hoc dixerit, quis homo sanae fidei resistendum putabit? Item si dixerit, justum, si a sua justitia recesserit, in qua diu vixit, et in ea fuerit impietate defunctus, in qua, non dico unum annum, sed unum diem vixerit, in poenas iniquis debitas hinc iturum, nihil sibi sua praeterita justitia profutura (Ezech. XVIII, 24): huic perspicuae veritati quis fidelium contradicet? Porro, si quaeratur a nobis utrum si tunc esset mortuus, quando erat justus, poenas esset inventurus, an requiem; numquid requiem respondere dubitabimus? Haec est tota causa cur dictum est, a quocumque sit dictum, Raptus est, ne malitia mutaret intellectum ejus. Dictum est enim secundum pericula vitae hujus, non secundum praescientiam Dei, qui hoc praescivit quod futurum erat, non quod futurum non erat: id est, quod ei mortem immaturam fuerat largiturus, ut tentationum subtraheretur incerto; non quod peccaturus esset, qui mansurus in tentatione non esset. De hac quippe vita legitur in libro Job, Numquid non tentatio est vita humana super terram (Job VII, 1, sec. LXX)? Sed quare aliis concedatur, ut ex hujus vitae periculis dum justi sunt 0980 auferantur; alii vero justi donec a justitia cadant, in eisdem periculis vita productiore teneantur; quis cognovit sensum Domini (Rom. XI, 34)? Et tamen hinc intelligi datur, etiam illis justis qui bonos piosque mores usque ad senectutis maturitatem et diem vitae hujus ultimum servant, non in suis meritis, sed in Domino esse gloriandum: quoniam qui vitae brevitate rapuit justum, ne malitia mutaret intellectum ejus, ipse in quantacumque vitae longitudine custodit justum, ne malitia mutet intellectum ejus. Cur autem hic tenuerit casurum justum, quem priusquam caderet hinc posset auferre, justissima omnino, sed inscrutabilia sunt judicia ejus.