Development of Christian Doctrine

 Introduction

  Chapter 1. On the Development of Ideas

 Section 1. On the Process of Development in Ideas

 Section 2. On the Kinds of Development in Ideas

  Chapter 2. On the Antecedent Argument in behalf of Developments in Christian Doctrine

 Section 1. Developments of Doctrine to be Expected

 Section 2. An Infallible Developing Authority to be Expected

 Section 3. The Existing Developments of Doctrine the Probable Fulfilment of that Expectation

  Chapter 3. On the Historical Argument in behalf of the Existing Developments

 Section 1. Method of Proof

 Section 2. State of the Evidence

  Chapter 4. Instances in Illustration

 Section 1. Instances Cursorily Noticed

 Section 2. Our Lord's Incarnation and the Dignity of His Blessed Mother and of All Saints

 Section 3. The Papal Supremacy

  Chapter 5. Genuine Developments Contrasted with Corruptions

 Section 1. First Note of a Genuine Development—Preservation of Type

 Section 2. Second Note—Continuity of Principles

 Section 3. Third Note—Power of Assimilation

 Section 4. Fourth Note—Logical Sequence

 Section 5. Fifth Note—Anticipation of Its Future

 Section 6. Sixth Note—Conservative Action upon Its Past

 Section 7. Seventh Note—Chronic Vigour

 Chapter 6. Application of the First Note of a True Development—Preservation of Type

 Section 1. The Church of the First Centuries

 Section 2. The Church of the Fourth Century

 Section 3. The Church of the Fifth and Sixth Centuries

 Chapter 7. Application of the Second Note of a True Development

  Chapter 8. Application of the Third Note of a True Development—Assimilative Power

  Chapter 9. Application of the Fourth Note of a True Development Logical Sequence

  Chapter 10. Application of the Fifth Note of a True Development Anticipation of Its Future

  Chapter 11. Application of the Sixth Note of a True Development Conservative Action on Its Past

 Section 1. Various Instances

 Section 2. Devotion to the Blessed Virgin

  Chapter 12. Application of the Seventh Note of a True Development Chronic Vigour Note Conclusion

Section 5. Fifth Note—Anticipation of Its Future

 Since, when an idea is living, that is, influential and effective, it is sure to develope according to its own nature, and the tendencies, which are carried out on the long run, may under favourable circumstances show themselves early as well as late, and logic is the same in all ages, instances of a development which is to come, though vague and isolated, may occur from the very first, though a lapse of time be necessary to bring them to perfection. And since developments are in great measure only aspects of the idea from which they proceed, and all of them are natural consequences of it, it is often a matter of accident in what order they are carried out in individual minds; and it is in no wise strange that here and there definite specimens of advanced teaching should very early occur, which in the historical course are not found till a late day. The fact, then, of such early or recurring intimations of tendencies which afterwards are fully realized, is a sort of evidence that those later and more systematic fulfilments are only in accordance with the original idea.

 2.

 Nothing is more common, for instance, than accounts or legends of the anticipations, which great men have given in boyhood of the bent of their minds, as afterwards displayed in their history; so much so that the popular expectation has sometimes led to the invention of them. The child Cyrus mimics a despot's power, and St. Athanasius is elected Bishop by his playfellows.

 It is noticeable that in the eleventh century, when the Russians were but pirates upon the Black Sea, Constantinople was their aim; and that a prophesy was in circulation in that city that they should one day gain possession of it.

 In the reign of James the First, we have an observable anticipation of the system of influence in the management of political parties, which was developed by Sir R. Walpole a century afterwards. This attempt is traced by a living writer to the ingenuity of Lord Bacon. "He submitted to the King that there were expedients for more judiciously managing a House of Commons; ... that much might be done by forethought towards filling the House with well-affected persons, winning or blinding the lawyers ... and drawing the chief constituent bodies of the assembly, the country gentlemen, the merchants, the courtiers, to act for the King's advantage; that it would be expedient to tender voluntarily certain graces and modifications of the King's prerogative," etc. [n. 9 ] The writer adds, "This circumstance, like several others in the present reign, is curious, as it shows the rise of a systematic parliamentary influence, which was one day to become the mainspring of government."

 3.

 Arcesilas and Carneades, the founders of the later Academy, are known to have innovated on the Platonic doctrine by inculcating a universal scepticism; and they did this, as if on the authority of Socrates, who had adopted the method of ironia against the Sophists, on their professing to know everything. This, of course, was an insufficient plea. However, could it be shown that Socrates did on one or two occasions evidence deliberate doubts on the great principles of theism or morals, would any one deny that the innovation in question had grounds for being considered a true development, not a corruption?

 It is certain that, in the idea of Monachism, prevalent in ancient times, manual labour had a more prominent place than study; so much so that De Rancé, the celebrated Abbot of La Trappe, in controversy with Mabillon, maintained his ground with great plausibility against the latter's apology for the literary occupations for which the Benedictines of France are so famous. Nor can it be denied that the labours of such as Mabillon and Montfaucon are at least a development upon the simplicity of the primitive institution. And yet it is remarkable that St. Pachomius, the first author of a monastic rule, enjoined a library in each of his houses, and appointed conferences and disputations three times a week on religious subjects, interpretation of Scripture, or points of theology. St. Basil, the founder of Monachism in Pontus, one of the most learned of the Greek Fathers, wrote his theological treatises in the intervals of agricultural labour. St. Jerome, the author of the Latin versions of Scripture, lived as a poor monk in a cell at Bethlehem. These, indeed, were but exceptions in the character of early Monachism; but they suggest its capabilities and anticipate its history. Literature is certainly not inconsistent with its idea.

 4.

 In the controversies with the Gnostics, in the second century, striking anticipations occasionally occur, in the works of their Catholic opponents, of the formal dogmatic teaching developed in the Church in the course of the Nestorian and Monophysite controversies in the fifth. On the other hand, Paul of Samosata, one of the first disciples of the Syrian school of theology, taught a heresy sufficiently like Nestorianism, in which that school terminated, to be mistaken for it in later times; yet for a long while after him the characteristic of the school was Arianism, an opposite heresy.

 Lutheranism has by this time become in most places almost simple heresy or infidelity; it has terminated, if it has even yet reached its limit, in a denial both of the Canon and the Creed, nay, of many principles of morals. Accordingly the question arises, whether these conclusions are in fairness to be connected with its original teaching or are a corruption. And it is no little aid towards its resolution to find that Luther himself at one time rejected the Apocalypse, called the Epistle of St. James "straminea," condemned the word "Trinity," fell into a kind of Eutychianism in his view of the Holy Eucharist, and in a particular case sanctioned bigamy. Calvinism, again, in various distinct countries, has become Socinianism, and Calvin himself seems to have denied our Lord's Eternal Sonship and ridiculed the Nicene Creed.

 Another evidence, then, of the faithfulness of an ultimate development is its definite anticipation at an early period in the history of the idea to which it belongs.